AzTrials
AzTrials

Tobacco UseNCT05320887

Cigarette and E-cigarette Nicotine Content in an Electronic Tobacco Marketplace (ETM)

A study testing Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquids, Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids and Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquids in people with Tobacco Use, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is proposing a four condition Electronic Tobacco Marketplace (ETM) study to determine if banning normal nicotine content (NNC) is sufficient for encouraging smokers to switch to potentially less harmful products or if the availability of higher nicotine and/or flavored alternative products (specifically… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tobacco Use
What is being tested?
Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquids, Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids and Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquids
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Jul 2022to 6 Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 21+ years of age
  • Self-report smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day for the past year
  • Breathe carbon monoxide (CO) level > 8 ppm or positive urine NicCheck
  • Willingness to use other tobacco products during the study
  • Speak, comprehend, and read English sufficiently to complete study procedures
  • Have home access to a computer, smart phone, or tablet with a web camera and internet access
  • Tried a vaping device at least once in their lifetime

Who cannot join

  • Currently seeking treatment to quit smoking
  • Self-reported serious medical or psychiatric condition(s) including cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases
  • Body temperature > 100.4 F
  • Cold, flu or COVID-19 symptoms including fever, cough, and runny nose in the past 30 days
  • Currently pregnant, breastfeeding or intending to become pregnant for the duration of the study or unwilling to agree to use adequate protection to avoid pregnancy
  • CO reading > 80 ppm

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Cigarette Nicotine Content, E-Cigarette Nicotine Content and E-Cigarette Flavoring on Smoking Behavior in an Electronic Tobacco Marketplace

This study is proposing a four condition Electronic Tobacco Marketplace (ETM) study to determine if banning normal nicotine content (NNC) is sufficient for encouraging smokers to switch to potentially less harmful products or if the availability of higher nicotine and/or flavored alternative products (specifically e-cigarettes) are needed to achieve maximal reductions in smoking.

Read the detailed description

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) passed in 2009 provides the FDA with the authority to regulate tobacco products. One provision in this legislative act empowers the FDA to set limits on constituents in tobacco products, including nicotine. Such a measure has the potential to reduce the chance of individuals experimenting with smoking from becoming dependent and enable current smokers to quit when they are motivated to do so. Although the proposal to reduce nicotine in cigarettes has been met with skepticism by some because of concerns over compensatory smoking behavior and the potential emergence of a black market, this policy measure was considered to be technically feasible by the American Medical Association and the British Medical, by tobacco control researchers, policymakers and governmental officials who were convened in a meeting on nicotine regulation8, and by the World Health Organization Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. Most importantly, in July 2017, FDA Commissioner Gottlieb announced he was "directing our Center for Tobacco Products to develop a comprehensive nicotine regulatory plan premised on the need to confront and alter cigarette addiction." This announcement was followed on March 16, 2018 by the release of the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled "Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Combusted Cigarettes" (ID: FDA-2017-N-6189-0001) "to obtain information for consideration in developing a tobacco product standard to set the maximum nicotine level for cigarettes."

This study proposes to conduct a within-subjects, multi-session virtual lab study and validation field assessment to determine how the availability of flavored e-liquids affects product purchasing among cigarette smokers. Adult daily cigarette smokers (N=64) will be recruited for this study. After initial eligibility is assessed, participants will complete six virtual sessions (1 baseline, 4 experimental, and 1 follow-up) and one field assessment to evaluate their tobacco use.

Conditions
Tobacco Use
Being tested
Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquids, Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids, Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquids, Low nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids
Keywords
Cigarette smoking
Medical subject headings
Tobacco Use, Cigarette Smoking

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquidsOther

    Participants are randomly assigned to the order of each marketplace Group

  • Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquidsOther

    Participants are randomly assigned to the order of each marketplace Group

  • Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquidsOther

    Participants are randomly assigned to the order of each marketplace Group

  • Low nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquidsOther

    Participants are randomly assigned to the order of each marketplace Group

Study groups in NCT05320887
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquidsExperimentalNormal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquids
Receives: Other: Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquids
Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquidsExperimentalNormal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids
Receives: Other: Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids
Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquidsExperimentalLow nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquids
Receives: Other: Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquids
Low nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquidsExperimentalLow nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids
Receives: Other: Low nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Cigarettes Purchased

    Average number of cigarettes purchased (analyzed as raw data and using derived behavioral economic measures)

    Measured: Visit 6 approximately 4 weeks after baseline

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of E-liquid Milliliters Purchased

    Average number of e-liquid milliliters purchased (analyzed as raw data and using derived behavioral economic measures)

    Measured: Visit 6 approximately 4 weeks after baseline

  2. Proportion of Participants Completing Flavor and Nicotine Content Discrete Choice Projections

    The proportion of participants projected to choose a cigarette over an e-cigarette under different potential regulatory scenarios, as determined by regression analysis.

    Measured: Month 1 after baseline

  3. Lung Cancer Perceived Risk Scores for VLNC Cigarettes

    The response options rely on a 10-point Likert-like scale: 1 = very low risk of disease; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 = very high risk of disease. Minimum possible response 1. Maximum possible response 10. The higher the score, the greater perceived risk of VLNC cigarettes for lung cancer.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Product Evaluation Scale Scores

    Product evaluation scale scores for VLNC cigarettes among participants who received VLNC cigarettes will be determined by a product evaluation questionnaire. The questionnaire measures the strength of self-reported positive subjective effects (e.g., reward, satisfaction) following product use. The response options rely on a 7-point Likert-like scale: 1=not at all; 2= very little; 3= a little; 4= moderately; 5= a lot; 6= quite a lot; 7= extremely. The summed score adds responses to 13 separate items. Minimum possible response: 13. Maximum possible response: 91. Higher scores denote more favorable product effects. Note: This was only administered (at Virtual Visit 6) to participants who received each product type in the field (dependent on their baseline ETM shopping trip purchases).

    Measured: Visit 6 approximately 4 weeks after baseline

  5. Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale Scores

    Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale measures the severity of nicotine withdrawal symptoms. The response options rely on a 5-point Likert-like scale; 0=None; 1= Slight; 2=Mild; 3=Moderate; 4=Severe. There are 7 items total, that are summed. Minimum possible response: 0. Maximum possible response: 28. Higher scores denote greater severity of withdrawal symptoms.

    Measured: Visit 6 approximately 4 weeks after baseline

  6. Questionnaire on Smoking Urges Score

    Questionnaire on Smoking Urges measures the strength of urges to smoke. The response options rely on a 7-point Likert-like scale: 1=Strongly Disagree; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7= Strongly Agree. The questionnaire has 10 total items; scores sum responses to each item. Minimum possible response: 10. Maximum possible response: 70. Higher scores denote greater urges to smoke.

    Measured: Visit 6 approximately 4 weeks after baseline

  7. Tobacco Product Interest Scores

    Tobacco Product Interest of different products; Slider scale ranging from 0=No Interest to 100=Very Interested

    Measured: 1 month after baseline

  8. Tobacco Policy Questionnaire Scores

    Tobacco Policy Questionnaire scored from Support, Oppose, and Don't know for personal opinions on Making Cigarettes Less Addictive

    Measured: 1 month after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2022
  2. Study start27 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion6 Aug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Model description
Participants are randomly assigned to either low nicotine or normal nicotine content vaping devices with tobacco flavors only available
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05320887
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00080010
Other IDs
5U54DA031659-09
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
23 Mar 2022
Last updated
9 Oct 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jarvis MJ, Bates C. Eliminating nicotine in cigarettes. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):106-7; author reply 107-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10465828
  • Kozlowski LT. Prospects for a nicotine-reduction strategy in the cigarette endgame: Alternative tobacco harm reduction scenarios. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Jun;26(6):543-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

    PubMed 25795345
  • Kozlowski LT. Cigarette prohibition and the need for more prior testing of the WHO TobReg's global nicotine-reduction strategy. Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e31-e34. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052995. Epub 2016 Jun 29. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27357937
  • Kozlowski LT. Let actual markets help assess the worth of optional very-low-nicotine cigarettes before deciding on mandatory regulations. Addiction. 2017 Jan;112(1):3-5. doi: 10.1111/add.13515. Epub 2016 Aug 23. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27554993
  • Shatenstein S. Eliminating nicotine in cigarettes. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):106; author reply 107-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10465827
  • Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Slade J, Houston TP, Davis RM, Deitchman SD. Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Tob Control. 1998 Autumn;7(3):281-93. doi: 10.1136/tc.7.3.281.

    PubMed 9825424
  • Hatsukami DK, Perkins KA, Lesage MG, Ashley DL, Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Backinger CL, Zeller M. Nicotine reduction revisited: science and future directions. Tob Control. 2010 Oct;19(5):e1-10. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.035584.

    PubMed 20876072
  • World Health Organization. WHO STUDY GROUP ON TOBACCO PRODUCT REGULATION. Report on the Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulations: Fifth Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2015;(989):1-234, back cover.

    PubMed 26353746

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Normal Nicotine Content Vape with all flavor e-liquids, Normal nicotine content vape with tobacco e-liquids and Low nicotine content vape with all flavor e-liquids in people with Tobacco Use, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Cigarettes Purchased (time frame: Visit 6 approximately 4 weeks after baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05320887, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in