DementiaWADADNCT05321680
Withdrawal of Antidementia Drugs in Advanced Dementia (WADAD)
A study testing Treatment withdrawal in people with Dementia, run by Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E. at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
Dementia is a chronic progressive mental disorder that adversely affects higher cortical functions, including cognition and behavior leading up to disability and dependence in daily life activities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia
- What is being tested?
- Treatment withdrawal
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 20 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of dementia syndrome defined by clinical criteria (Alzheimer's dementia according to NIA-AA 2011 criteria, vascular dementia or mixed dementia)
- MMSE≤15
- Medicated with oral/transdermal patch anti-dementia (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine or memantine), alone or in combination, for a minimum period of 3 months;
- Availability of a designated caregiver who monitors the patient's clinical situation and can collaborate in the assessment of outcomes and the provision of informed consent (ideally 8/h at least 3x/week)
- Shared perception between the attending neurologist and family members that the drug may no longer have a therapeutic effect, has been ineffective after a therapeutic trial, or the presence of side effects possibly attributed to the drugs.
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy presumably less than the follow-up period (6 months);
- Unstable medical or surgical condition that can significantly interfere with the patient's overall health status;
- Another pathology interfering with cognitive functioning (HIV, brain tumor, encephalitis, demyelinating disease);
- Introduction of an antipsychotic drug in the last month.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Withdrawal of Antidementia Drugs in Advanced Dementia (WADAD): a Randomized Clinical Trial and Cost-utility Analysis
Dementia is a chronic progressive mental disorder that adversely affects higher cortical functions, including cognition and behavior leading up to disability and dependence in daily life activities. It has become a major public health concern because of its increasing prevalence, chronicity, burden for caregivers, and the high personal and financial costs needed for care. Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia, occurring in 5% to 7% of individuals older than 60. In Portugal, Santana et al study estimated that 160 287 people above 60 years had a diagnosis of dementia in 2013 (prevalence of 5,9%).The increasing national and international prevalence of dementia and its associated burden then imparts a high priority on delivering safe and effective treatment options.
Currently approved treatments available for the symptomatic management of mild to moderate AD include cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine) and a N-methyl- D-aspartate receptor antagonist (memantine). These drugs are also given off-label for other types of dementia (vascular and mixed dementias), with treatment continuing through advanced disease stages. Given that ChEIs have demonstrated short-term modest stabilization on measures of cognition and global functioning in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), several practice guidelines have proposed ChEIs for the treatment of all stages of AD, with some advocating ChEI discontinuation if tolerability issues arise, or if there is no longer a noticeable clinical benefit. Further studies in this setting are important as patients with severe dementia are more functionally impaired, present with comorbid illnesses, posing a higher risk of polypharmacy. In addition, ChEIs have a potential risk of adverse events including nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, vomiting, muscle cramping, fatigue, and weight loss. Less commonly, ChEI might be associated with rhabdomyolysis, convulsions, falls, syncope, pneumonia and death. Because cognitive and behavioral impairments change during the progressive disease course, the effects of medications may be unpredictable, especially over long durations of treatment. It might be challenging to weigh minimally beneficial effects against predicted harms of continued treatment, considering both patient and caregiver-centered care goals besides less clinically relevant cognitive outcomes.
Only a small number of discontinuation RCTs were conducted to date but involved relatively few participants with heterogeneous designs, disease severities and outcomes. As so, clinicians take individualized discontinuation decisions and the only consensual domains are a lack of response and a loss of effectiveness. The present pragmatic clinical trial will compare the efficacy of maintaining pharmacological treatment versus treatment cessation on cognition, behavior, functional disability and quality of life of patients and caregivers, among patients with severe dementia due to AD, with or without small vessel subcortical vascular disease. The investigators will consider other important endpoints besides cognitive functioning including mood, apathy, energy and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Moreover, this trial will try to look for outcomes that engage patients and families in treatment decisions.
Read the detailed description
Specific aim 1. Explore the effects of discontinuing ChEI and/or memantine on global impression, disease severity, function, behavior and cognitive outcomes;
Hypothesis:
- Progression to disability (defined as a loss of 2 of 4 basic functions, or 6 of 11 instrumental functions, according to the BADLS), at 6 months, is significantly higher in patients discontinuing therapy;
- Patients with severe dementia who discontinue ChEI and/or memantine show a significantly higher decline on ratings of cognitive function, behavior and activities of daily living over 6 months than those continuing these drugs;
- Patients with severe dementia who discontinue ChEI and/or memantine experience increased adverse events including healthcare visits and other several medical intercurrences.
Specific aim 2. Explore the effects of discontinuation strategies in patients and caregiver's health related quality of life.
Hypothesis:
- Patients with severe dementia and their caregivers experience lower levels of health-related quality of life after treatment discontinuation.
Specific aim 3. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of a discontinuation strategy.
- Treatment with antidementia drugs is the most cost-effective treatment strategy in advanced stages of dementia, delaying progression to disability and reducing formal and informal costs and healthcare utilization;
- Treatment with antidementia drugs is the strategy associated with better quality of life and lower cost-utility ratio.
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Being tested
- Treatment withdrawal
- Keywords
- antidementia drug, dementia, quality of life, cost-utility analysis
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment withdrawalOther
Tapering or suspension of antidementia drugs
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment withdrawal | Experimental | discontinuation of treatment (anti-cholinesterase inhibitors including donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine; and/or memantine) Receives: Other: Treatment withdrawal |
| Treatment continuation | No intervention | treatment continuation (anti-cholinesterase inhibitors including donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine; and/or memantine) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
BADLS (Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale)
Progression to disability (defined as a loss of 2 of 4 basic functions, or 6 of 11 instrumental functions); total score varies from 0 (totally independent) to 60 (totally dependent)
Measured: 6 months
Quality of life of patients and caregivers
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D); score varies from 0 to 100 using a Visual analogue scale
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI)
NPI (0-144), higher scores indicating worse behavior
Measured: 6 months
General Health Questionnaire 12 (caregivers)
score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating increased psychological symptoms
Measured: 6 months
Clinical Global Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CGIC-Plus)
The score ranges from 1 (much better) to 7 (much worse), with 4 indicating no change
Measured: 6 months
Serious adverse events
Inpatient admission, emergency visits, antibiotic prescription, seizures, falls
Measured: 6 months
Mortality
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion1 Dec 2021
- Study completion20 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A clinical, pragmatic, unicentric, open trial with blinded assessors. We will use a parallel randomized design (1:1) that will evaluate the effect of maintaining pharmacological treatment versus treatment withdrawal.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Veronica Raquel Alheia Cabreira, Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.
- Investigators
- Verónica R Cabreira, MD, Principal investigator, Centro Hospitalar São João (Neurology Department)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05321680
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 68-21
- Acronym
- WADAD
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Upon request Supplementary data may be published along with study results.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Withdrawal of Antidementia Drugs in Advanced Dementia (WADAD): a Randomized Clinical Trial and Cost-utility Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05321680
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WADAD / 68-21
- Conditions
- Dementia
- Keywords
- antidementia drug, dementia, quality of life, cost-utility analysis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dementia is a chronic progressive mental disorder that adversely affects higher cortical functions, including cognition and behavior leading up to disability and dependence in daily life activities. It has become a major public health concern because of its increasing prevalence, chronicity, burden for caregivers, and the high personal and financial costs needed for care. Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia, occurring in 5% to 7% of individuals older than 60. In Portugal, Santana et al study estimated that 160 287 people above 60 years had a diagnosis of dementia in 2013 (prevalence of 5,9%).The increasing national and international prevalence of dementia and its associated burden then imparts a high priority on delivering safe and effective treatment options.
Currently approved treatments available for the symptomatic management of mild to moderate AD include cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) (donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine) and a N-methyl- D-aspartate receptor antagonist (memantine). These drugs are also given off-label for other types of dementia (vascular and mixed dementias), with treatment continuing through advanced disease stages. Given that ChEIs have demonstrated short-term modest stabilization on measures of cognition and global functioning in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), several practice guidelines have proposed ChEIs for the treatment of all stages of AD, with some advocating ChEI discontinuation if tolerability issues arise, or if there is no longer a noticeable clinical benefit. Further studies in this setting are important as patients with severe dementia are more functionally impaired, present with comorbid illnesses, posing a higher risk of polypharmacy. In addition, ChEIs have a potential risk of adverse events including nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, vomiting, muscle cramping, fatigue, and weight loss. Less commonly, ChEI might be associated with rhabdomyolysis, convulsions, falls, syncope, pneumonia and death. Because cognitive and behavioral impairments change during the progressive disease course, the effects of medications may be unpredictable, especially over long durations of treatment. It might be challenging to weigh minimally beneficial effects against predicted harms of continued treatment, considering both patient and caregiver-centered care goals besides less clinically relevant cognitive outcomes.
Only a small number of discontinuation RCTs were conducted to date but involved relatively few participants with heterogeneous designs, disease severities and outcomes. As so, clinicians take individualized discontinuation decisions and the only consensual domains are a lack of response and a loss of effectiveness. The present pragmatic clinical trial will compare the efficacy of maintaining pharmacological treatment versus treatment cessation on cognition, behavior, functional disability and quality of life of patients and caregivers, among patients with severe dementia due to AD, with or without small vessel subcortical vascular disease. The investigators will consider other important endpoints besides cognitive functioning including mood, apathy, energy and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Moreover, this trial will try to look for outcomes that engage patients and families in treatment decisions.
Detailed description
Specific aim 1. Explore the effects of discontinuing ChEI and/or memantine on global impression, disease severity, function, behavior and cognitive outcomes;
Hypothesis:
- Progression to disability (defined as a loss of 2 of 4 basic functions, or 6 of 11 instrumental functions, according to the BADLS), at 6 months, is significantly higher in patients discontinuing therapy;
- Patients with severe dementia who discontinue ChEI and/or memantine show a significantly higher decline on ratings of cognitive function, behavior and activities of daily living over 6 months than those continuing these drugs;
- Patients with severe dementia who discontinue ChEI and/or memantine experience increased adverse events including healthcare visits and other several medical intercurrences.
Specific aim 2. Explore the effects of discontinuation strategies in patients and caregiver's health related quality of life.
Hypothesis:
- Patients with severe dementia and their caregivers experience lower levels of health-related quality of life after treatment discontinuation.
Specific aim 3. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of a discontinuation strategy.
- Treatment with antidementia drugs is the most cost-effective treatment strategy in advanced stages of dementia, delaying progression to disability and reducing formal and informal costs and healthcare utilization;
- Treatment with antidementia drugs is the strategy associated with better quality of life and lower cost-utility ratio.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A clinical, pragmatic, unicentric, open trial with blinded assessors. We will use a parallel randomized design (1:1) that will evaluate the effect of maintaining pharmacological treatment versus treatment withdrawal.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment withdrawal | Experimental | Other: Treatment withdrawaldiscontinuation of treatment (anti-cholinesterase inhibitors including donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine; and/or memantine) |
| Treatment continuation | No intervention | –treatment continuation (anti-cholinesterase inhibitors including donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine; and/or memantine) |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of dementia syndrome defined by clinical criteria (Alzheimer's dementia according to NIA-AA 2011 criteria, vascular dementia or mixed dementia)
- MMSE≤15
- Medicated with oral/transdermal patch anti-dementia (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine or memantine), alone or in combination, for a minimum period of 3 months;
- Availability of a designated caregiver who monitors the patient's clinical situation and can collaborate in the assessment of outcomes and the provision of informed consent (ideally 8/h at least 3x/week)
- Shared perception between the attending neurologist and family members that the drug may no longer have a therapeutic effect, has been ineffective after a therapeutic trial, or the presence of side effects possibly attributed to the drugs.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Life expectancy presumably less than the follow-up period (6 months);
- Unstable medical or surgical condition that can significantly interfere with the patient's overall health status;
- Another pathology interfering with cognitive functioning (HIV, brain tumor, encephalitis, demyelinating disease);
- Introduction of an antipsychotic drug in the last month.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment withdrawalTapering or suspension of antidementia drugs | Other | Treatment withdrawal |
Primary outcome
BADLS (Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale)
Time frame: 6 months
Progression to disability (defined as a loss of 2 of 4 basic functions, or 6 of 11 instrumental functions); total score varies from 0 (totally independent) to 60 (totally dependent)
Quality of life of patients and caregivers
Time frame: 6 months
EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D); score varies from 0 to 100 using a Visual analogue scale
5 secondary outcomes
Neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI)
Time frame: 6 months
General Health Questionnaire 12 (caregivers)
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical Global Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CGIC-Plus)
Time frame: 6 months
Serious adverse events
Time frame: 6 months
Mortality
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Upon request Supplementary data may be published along with study results.
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Verónica R Cabreira, MD principal investigator
Centro Hospitalar São João (Neurology Department)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment withdrawal in people with Dementia, run by Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E. at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
BADLS (Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale) (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2022.