Acute Coronary SyndromeMACROS2NCT05322395
Pragmatic Randomised Trial of the ESC 0/1 Versus 0/3 Hour Troponin Pathway
A study testing ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Troponin, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and impact of implementing the ESC 0-1 hour high sensitive troponin pathway in clinical practice and with specific reference to the 0-3 hour pathway currently in use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Troponin, Chest Pain
- What is being tested?
- ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,536 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2021to 10 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chest pain with moderate or high suspicion chest pain (see chest pain evaluation chart at end) or any patient the clinician deems suspicious for myocardial ischaemia thus requesting a troponin sample (between daytime hours 0800hrs to 1800hrs)
- Presentation <12 hours since onset of chest pain (or unknown duration)
- Age >18 years of age
Who cannot join
- ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) infarct on the presenting electrocardiogram (ECG)
- Symptoms considered definitely non-cardiac
- Trauma
- Pregnancy
- Comorbid conditions requiring hospital admission
- Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) <1 month
- coexistent clinical conditions likely to preclude follow-up.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
liverpool university Hospital nhs foundation trust
Liverpool, GB, L186JR
Aleem Khand, +441512918126, aleem.khand@liverpoolft.nhs.uk
Ahmed Dakshi, +441515294738, ahmed.dakshi@nhs.net
About this study
Official title: Safety and Feasibility of Triage and Rapid Discharge of Patients With Chest Pain From Accident and Emergency: a Pragmatic, Randomised, Multicentre, Non-inferiority Control Trial of the Accelerated European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0-1 Hour Pathway vs. Conventional 0-3 Hour Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and impact of implementing the ESC 0-1 hour high sensitive troponin pathway in clinical practice and with specific reference to the 0-3 hour pathway currently in use.
The principal outcome measure will be the safety of the 0-1 hour protocol (which is less established and has limited data on safety when implemented in clinical practice)
Read the detailed description
- the investigators propose to compare 2 'gold standard' NICE recommended/ESC guideline-backed pathways; the accelerated 0-1 hour troponin clinical pathway versus the conventional 0-3-hour pathway, in a randomised multicentre controlled study.
- The primary outcome is to compare percentage safe (with the emphasis and sample size calculation on safety) discharge by 4 hours from presentation by means of the 0-3 hours versus the 0-1-hour (with the 0 hour in both pathways incorporating discharge using the limit of detection).
- the investigators propose to use high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) (ROCHE, Elecsys assay as this is currently in routine clinical use at the site) for this purpose and also perform comparative analyses using a high sensitivity troponin I (hs cTnI) assay (ABBOTT, Architect).
- Redundant blood sample will also be used to evaluate point of care testing (POCT), with additional blood sample taken for POC. These samples will be undertaken as part of routine clinical care and will not require additional venepuncture (and will only be analysed if consent is gained for tissue use in research) population. A co-primary endpoint will be single sample rule-out by point of care troponin (POCT) (with a value of <4ng/l in those with chest pain onset >3 hours from presentation) as assessed in the recent APACE study of triage true POC.11 A comparison of this rule-out in terms of effectiveness (percentage discharge) and safety (sensitivity) will be made with ROCHE lod (<5ng/l)12 and the optimised rule-out of Abbott architect (HSTNI<5ng/l)13
2.2 Secondary objectives
- The relative performance of the Abbott Architect high sensitivity troponin I (hs TnI) , Quidel's TriageTrue and Siemens Attellica troponin I assay will also be assessed in terms of the primary and secondary endpoints by reference to high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) with cut-points for Abbott hs-cTn I from the BACC study used for the 0-1-hour pathway.14
- The performance of the novel machine learning algorithm, the Myocardial Ischemic Injury Index (MI3, Abbott) will also be assessed retrospectively with regard to safety and efficacy. This sub study using fully anonymized data will be performed in association with coinvestigators from Abbott Diagnostics (appendix 1).
- To understand if low levels of Growth Differentiation Factor (GDF-15), could expand safe discharge beyond the LOD. This will be tested for retrospectively in stored plasma samples.
- To assess if point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples) mirror gold standard high sensitive troponin analysis with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction.
- Hypothesis That an accelerated 0-1-hour troponin protocol, when implemented into clinical practice as a pragmatic RCT, will effect safe discharge with greater numbers discharged, by 4 hours from presentation, compared to the use of the more conventional 0-3 hour troponin protocol.
Means to test hypothesis: A two-arm parallel group, two-centre randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer).
The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
- Outcomes: 4.1 Primary endpoint
- the investigators will compare safe discharge by each strategy (ie the ESC 0-1 hour pathway versus 0-3 pathway) and the proportion actually discharged by each pathway at 4 hours. The exact definition of safety will be percentage (of cohort randomised to each pathway) safely discharged by 4 hours of presentation to accident and emergency (Safety will be judged by type 1 myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death by 4 weeks with sensitivity >98% - the study will be powered on safety to establish whether 0-1-hour performance is equivalent to 0-3-hour sampling by means of a non-inferiority analysis- see statistics). (Type 1 myocardial infarction is due to acute coronary atherothrombotic myocardial injury with either plaque rupture or erosion and, often, associated thrombosis. A separate analysis will also be undertaken with inclusion of type 2 MI as well as type 1 MI as an endpoint
4.2 Co-primary endpoint: There will be a comparison of the real time performance of point of care troponin (POCT) assay to that of a sample sent for analysis in the laboratory (the current gold standard of central laboratory analysis using HS cTn).The primary interest will be in presentation sample POC rule-out (triage true (quidel) POC <4ng/l with CP onset >3 hours compared to LOD or optimised rule-out of ROCHE (elecsys) assay, siemens attelica and Abbott architect. There will be a similar comparison made with siemens VTLI troponin I POC assay using FDA approved cut-points for MI rule-out
4.3 Secondary Endpoints:
- Type 1 myocardial infarction (adjudicated with the use of Abbott hs cTnI) and cardiovascular death* at 4 weeks (target for safety negative predictive value (NPV) >99.5% and sensitivity >98%). (co-primary endpoint). This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
- All cause death, type 1 myocardial infarction and urgent or emergency revascularisation. This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
- Proportion with rule-out or rule-in MI in the 0-1 hour and 0-3 hour
- Prediction of MI with myocardial ischemic injury index (MI3) algorithm9
- HEART ≤3 and a modified HEART score for rule-out MI at 30 days15
- Proportion with repeat presentations to accident and emergency within 30 days
- Proportion undergoing coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation in 0-1 versus 0-3 hour pathway
- Performance of point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples to 0 hour) with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 myocardial infarction
- Rule out of MI with GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15)
- Cardiovascular deaths include deaths that result from an myocardial infarctions (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure (HF), death due to stroke, death due to cardiovascular procedures, death due to cardiovascular haemorrhage, and death due to other cardiovascular causes and deaths that do not have a clear non- cardiovascular cause.
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Troponin, Chest Pain, Point-of-care Systems
- Being tested
- ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway
- Keywords
- acs, POC troponin, high sensitivity troponin
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Chest Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathwayDiagnostic test
Also called esc 0/3 hour troponin pathway
randomisation to 0/1 versus 0/3 hour pathway
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ESC 0/1 pathway | Experimental | A two-arm parallel group, two-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer).
The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect). Receives: Diagnostic Test: ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway |
| ESC 0/3 hour pathway | Active comparator | A two-arm parallel group, two-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer).
The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect). Receives: Diagnostic Test: ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
percentage safe discharge by 4 hours. safety defined as type 1 MI and CV deah
We will compare safe discharge by each strategy (ie the ESC 0-1 hour pathway versus 0-3 pathway) and the proportion actually discharged by each pathway at 4 hours. The exact definition of safety will be percentage (of cohort randomised to each pathway) safely discharged by 4 hours of presentation to accident and emergency (Safety will be judged by type 1 myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death by 4 weeks with sensitivity >98% - the study will be powered on safety to establish whether 0-1-hour performance is equivalent to 0-3-hour sampling by means of a non-inferiority analysis- see statistics).
(Type 1 myocardial infarction is due to acute coronary atherothrombotic myocardial injury with either plaque rupture or erosion and, often, associated thrombosis. A separate analysis will also be undertaken with inclusion of type 2 MI as well as type 1 MI as an endpoint
Measured: 4 hours
point of care troponin performance compared to laboratory performance
largely rule-out of Quidel triage true and siemens VTLI
Measured: 4 hours
Secondary outcomes (9)
Type 1 myocardial infarction
Measured: 30 days
All cause death, type 1 myocardial infarction and urgent or emergency revascularisation. This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
Measured: 30 days
Proportion with rule-out or rule-in MI in the 0-1 hour and 0-3 hour
Measured: 30 days
Prediction of MI with myocardial ischemic injury index (MI3) algorithm
Measured: 30 days
HEART ≤3 and a modified HEART score for rule-out MI at 30 days
Measured: 30 days
Proportion with repeat presentations to accident and emergency within 30 days
Measured: 30 days
Proportion undergoing coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation in 0-1 versus 0-3 hour pathway
Measured: 1 year
Performance of point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples to 0 hour) with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 myocardial infarction
Measured: 30 days
Rule out of MI with GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15)
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2022
- Study start10 Dec 2021
- Primary completion1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Nov 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Coronary SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A two-arm parallel group, two-centre randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,536 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- northwest coast academic science network, Quidel Corporation, Siemens Corporation, Corporate Technology, Abbott Diagnostics Division
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Heather Rodgers, Study director, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05322395
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPO635
- Acronym
- MACROS2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hatherley J, Dakshi A, Collinson P, Miller G, Bailey L, Davies S, Fearon H, Meah N, Frost F, Raj R, Ensor E, Fisher M, Goulden C, Noori Z, Salmon T, Rawat A, Hornby R, Lambert A, Sekulska K, Ingram T, Fitzgerald G, Shaw M, Khand A. Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in Practice: A Randomized Trial of 0/1-Hour vs 0/3-Hour Troponin Testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 May 20:S0735-1097(26)05979-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5135. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42159533Dakshi A, Hatherley J, Collinson P, Phillips S, Bailey L, Miller G, Shaw M, Khand A. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a high-sensitivity troponin I point-of-care assay in the Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule Out Study (MACROS-2). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Sep 2;63(2):422-432. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0138. Print 2025 Jan 29.
PubMed 39239902Khand A, Hatherley J, Dakshi A, Miller G, Bailey L, Fisher M, Goulden C, Noori Z, Rawat A, Hornby R, Fearon H, Meah N, Davies S, Sekulska K, Hassan A, Lambert A, Phillips S, Raj R, Wiles T, Collinson P. Safety and feasibility of triage and rapid discharge of patients with chest pain from emergency room: A pragmatic, randomized noninferiority control trial of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0 to 1 hour pathway vs conventional 0 to 3 hour accelerated diagnostic protocol. Am Heart J. 2024 Dec;278:235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
PubMed 39151715
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Feasibility of Triage and Rapid Discharge of Patients With Chest Pain From Accident and Emergency: a Pragmatic, Randomised, Multicentre, Non-inferiority Control Trial of the Accelerated European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0-1 Hour Pathway vs. Conventional 0-3 Hour Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05322395
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MACROS2 / SPO635
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome, Troponin, Chest Pain, Point-of-care Systems
- Keywords
- acs, POC troponin, high sensitivity troponin
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 3,536 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOther government
- Collaborators
- northwest coast academic science network, Quidel Corporation, Siemens Corporation, Corporate Technology, Abbott Diagnostics Division
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and impact of implementing the ESC 0-1 hour high sensitive troponin pathway in clinical practice and with specific reference to the 0-3 hour pathway currently in use.
The principal outcome measure will be the safety of the 0-1 hour protocol (which is less established and has limited data on safety when implemented in clinical practice)
Detailed description
- the investigators propose to compare 2 'gold standard' NICE recommended/ESC guideline-backed pathways; the accelerated 0-1 hour troponin clinical pathway versus the conventional 0-3-hour pathway, in a randomised multicentre controlled study.
- The primary outcome is to compare percentage safe (with the emphasis and sample size calculation on safety) discharge by 4 hours from presentation by means of the 0-3 hours versus the 0-1-hour (with the 0 hour in both pathways incorporating discharge using the limit of detection).
- the investigators propose to use high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) (ROCHE, Elecsys assay as this is currently in routine clinical use at the site) for this purpose and also perform comparative analyses using a high sensitivity troponin I (hs cTnI) assay (ABBOTT, Architect).
- Redundant blood sample will also be used to evaluate point of care testing (POCT), with additional blood sample taken for POC. These samples will be undertaken as part of routine clinical care and will not require additional venepuncture (and will only be analysed if consent is gained for tissue use in research) population. A co-primary endpoint will be single sample rule-out by point of care troponin (POCT) (with a value of <4ng/l in those with chest pain onset >3 hours from presentation) as assessed in the recent APACE study of triage true POC.11 A comparison of this rule-out in terms of effectiveness (percentage discharge) and safety (sensitivity) will be made with ROCHE lod (<5ng/l)12 and the optimised rule-out of Abbott architect (HSTNI<5ng/l)13
2.2 Secondary objectives
- The relative performance of the Abbott Architect high sensitivity troponin I (hs TnI) , Quidel's TriageTrue and Siemens Attellica troponin I assay will also be assessed in terms of the primary and secondary endpoints by reference to high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) with cut-points for Abbott hs-cTn I from the BACC study used for the 0-1-hour pathway.14
- The performance of the novel machine learning algorithm, the Myocardial Ischemic Injury Index (MI3, Abbott) will also be assessed retrospectively with regard to safety and efficacy. This sub study using fully anonymized data will be performed in association with coinvestigators from Abbott Diagnostics (appendix 1).
- To understand if low levels of Growth Differentiation Factor (GDF-15), could expand safe discharge beyond the LOD. This will be tested for retrospectively in stored plasma samples.
- To assess if point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples) mirror gold standard high sensitive troponin analysis with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction.
- Hypothesis That an accelerated 0-1-hour troponin protocol, when implemented into clinical practice as a pragmatic RCT, will effect safe discharge with greater numbers discharged, by 4 hours from presentation, compared to the use of the more conventional 0-3 hour troponin protocol.
Means to test hypothesis: A two-arm parallel group, two-centre randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer).
The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
- Outcomes: 4.1 Primary endpoint
- the investigators will compare safe discharge by each strategy (ie the ESC 0-1 hour pathway versus 0-3 pathway) and the proportion actually discharged by each pathway at 4 hours. The exact definition of safety will be percentage (of cohort randomised to each pathway) safely discharged by 4 hours of presentation to accident and emergency (Safety will be judged by type 1 myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death by 4 weeks with sensitivity >98% - the study will be powered on safety to establish whether 0-1-hour performance is equivalent to 0-3-hour sampling by means of a non-inferiority analysis- see statistics). (Type 1 myocardial infarction is due to acute coronary atherothrombotic myocardial injury with either plaque rupture or erosion and, often, associated thrombosis. A separate analysis will also be undertaken with inclusion of type 2 MI as well as type 1 MI as an endpoint
4.2 Co-primary endpoint: There will be a comparison of the real time performance of point of care troponin (POCT) assay to that of a sample sent for analysis in the laboratory (the current gold standard of central laboratory analysis using HS cTn).The primary interest will be in presentation sample POC rule-out (triage true (quidel) POC <4ng/l with CP onset >3 hours compared to LOD or optimised rule-out of ROCHE (elecsys) assay, siemens attelica and Abbott architect. There will be a similar comparison made with siemens VTLI troponin I POC assay using FDA approved cut-points for MI rule-out
4.3 Secondary Endpoints:
- Type 1 myocardial infarction (adjudicated with the use of Abbott hs cTnI) and cardiovascular death* at 4 weeks (target for safety negative predictive value (NPV) >99.5% and sensitivity >98%). (co-primary endpoint). This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
- All cause death, type 1 myocardial infarction and urgent or emergency revascularisation. This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
- Proportion with rule-out or rule-in MI in the 0-1 hour and 0-3 hour
- Prediction of MI with myocardial ischemic injury index (MI3) algorithm9
- HEART ≤3 and a modified HEART score for rule-out MI at 30 days15
- Proportion with repeat presentations to accident and emergency within 30 days
- Proportion undergoing coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation in 0-1 versus 0-3 hour pathway
- Performance of point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples to 0 hour) with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 myocardial infarction
- Rule out of MI with GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15)
- Cardiovascular deaths include deaths that result from an myocardial infarctions (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure (HF), death due to stroke, death due to cardiovascular procedures, death due to cardiovascular haemorrhage, and death due to other cardiovascular causes and deaths that do not have a clear non- cardiovascular cause.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A two-arm parallel group, two-centre randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ESC 0/1 pathway | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathwayA two-arm parallel group, two-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect). |
| ESC 0/3 hour pathway | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathwayA two-arm parallel group, two-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Chest pain with moderate or high suspicion chest pain (see chest pain evaluation chart at end) or any patient the clinician deems suspicious for myocardial ischaemia thus requesting a troponin sample (between daytime hours 0800hrs to 1800hrs)
- Presentation <12 hours since onset of chest pain (or unknown duration)
- Age >18 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) infarct on the presenting electrocardiogram (ECG)
- Symptoms considered definitely non-cardiac
- Trauma
- Pregnancy
- Comorbid conditions requiring hospital admission
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathwayAlso: esc 0/3 hour troponin pathwayrandomisation to 0/1 versus 0/3 hour pathway | Diagnostic test | ESC 0/1 pathway, ESC 0/3 hour pathway |
Primary outcome
percentage safe discharge by 4 hours. safety defined as type 1 MI and CV deah
Time frame: 4 hours
We will compare safe discharge by each strategy (ie the ESC 0-1 hour pathway versus 0-3 pathway) and the proportion actually discharged by each pathway at 4 hours. The exact definition of safety will be percentage (of cohort randomised to each pathway) safely discharged by 4 hours of presentation to accident and emergency (Safety will be judged by type 1 myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death by 4 weeks with sensitivity >98% - the study will be powered on safety to establish whether 0-1-hour performance is equivalent to 0-3-hour sampling by means of a non-inferiority analysis- see statistics). (Type 1 myocardial infarction is due to acute coronary atherothrombotic myocardial injury with either plaque rupture or erosion and, often, associated thrombosis. A separate analysis will also be undertaken with inclusion of type 2 MI as well as type 1 MI as an endpoint
point of care troponin performance compared to laboratory performance
Time frame: 4 hours
largely rule-out of Quidel triage true and siemens VTLI
9 secondary outcomes
Type 1 myocardial infarction
Time frame: 30 days
All cause death, type 1 myocardial infarction and urgent or emergency revascularisation. This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
Time frame: 30 days
Proportion with rule-out or rule-in MI in the 0-1 hour and 0-3 hour
Time frame: 30 days
Prediction of MI with myocardial ischemic injury index (MI3) algorithm
Time frame: 30 days
HEART ≤3 and a modified HEART score for rule-out MI at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Proportion with repeat presentations to accident and emergency within 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Proportion undergoing coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation in 0-1 versus 0-3 hour pathway
Time frame: 1 year
Performance of point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples to 0 hour) with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 myocardial infarction
Time frame: 30 days
Rule out of MI with GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15)
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42159533Hatherley J, Dakshi A, Collinson P, Miller G, Bailey L, Davies S, Fearon H, Meah N, Frost F, Raj R, Ensor E, Fisher M, Goulden C, Noori Z, Salmon T, Rawat A, Hornby R, Lambert A, Sekulska K, Ingram T, Fitzgerald G, Shaw M, Khand A. Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in Practice: A Randomized Trial of 0/1-Hour vs 0/3-Hour Troponin Testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 May 20:S0735-1097(26)05979-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5135. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39239902Dakshi A, Hatherley J, Collinson P, Phillips S, Bailey L, Miller G, Shaw M, Khand A. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a high-sensitivity troponin I point-of-care assay in the Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule Out Study (MACROS-2). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Sep 2;63(2):422-432. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0138. Print 2025 Jan 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39151715Khand A, Hatherley J, Dakshi A, Miller G, Bailey L, Fisher M, Goulden C, Noori Z, Rawat A, Hornby R, Fearon H, Meah N, Davies S, Sekulska K, Hassan A, Lambert A, Phillips S, Raj R, Wiles T, Collinson P. Safety and feasibility of triage and rapid discharge of patients with chest pain from emergency room: A pragmatic, randomized noninferiority control trial of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0 to 1 hour pathway vs conventional 0 to 3 hour accelerated diagnostic protocol. Am Heart J. 2024 Dec;278:235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
AI-Assisted Interpretation of Cardiac CT in the Emergency Department
Chest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heather Rodgers study director
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Troponin, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aleem Khand (+441515292720, aleem.khand@liverpoolft.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
percentage safe discharge by 4 hours. safety defined as type 1 MI and CV deah (time frame: 4 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05322395, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2024.