AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeMACROS2NCT05322395

Pragmatic Randomised Trial of the ESC 0/1 Versus 0/3 Hour Troponin Pathway

A study testing ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Troponin, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and impact of implementing the ESC 0-1 hour high sensitive troponin pathway in clinical practice and with specific reference to the 0-3 hour pathway currently in use. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Troponin, Chest Pain
What is being tested?
ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,536 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
10 Dec 2021to 10 Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chest pain with moderate or high suspicion chest pain (see chest pain evaluation chart at end) or any patient the clinician deems suspicious for myocardial ischaemia thus requesting a troponin sample (between daytime hours 0800hrs to 1800hrs)
  • Presentation <12 hours since onset of chest pain (or unknown duration)
  • Age >18 years of age

Who cannot join

  • ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) infarct on the presenting electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Symptoms considered definitely non-cardiac
  • Trauma
  • Pregnancy
  • Comorbid conditions requiring hospital admission
  • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) <1 month
  • coexistent clinical conditions likely to preclude follow-up.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • liverpool university Hospital nhs foundation trust

    Liverpool, GB, L186JR

    Aleem Khand, +441512918126, aleem.khand@liverpoolft.nhs.uk

    Ahmed Dakshi, +441515294738, ahmed.dakshi@nhs.net

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Safety and Feasibility of Triage and Rapid Discharge of Patients With Chest Pain From Accident and Emergency: a Pragmatic, Randomised, Multicentre, Non-inferiority Control Trial of the Accelerated European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0-1 Hour Pathway vs. Conventional 0-3 Hour Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and impact of implementing the ESC 0-1 hour high sensitive troponin pathway in clinical practice and with specific reference to the 0-3 hour pathway currently in use.

The principal outcome measure will be the safety of the 0-1 hour protocol (which is less established and has limited data on safety when implemented in clinical practice)

Read the detailed description
  1. the investigators propose to compare 2 'gold standard' NICE recommended/ESC guideline-backed pathways; the accelerated 0-1 hour troponin clinical pathway versus the conventional 0-3-hour pathway, in a randomised multicentre controlled study.
  2. The primary outcome is to compare percentage safe (with the emphasis and sample size calculation on safety) discharge by 4 hours from presentation by means of the 0-3 hours versus the 0-1-hour (with the 0 hour in both pathways incorporating discharge using the limit of detection).
  3. the investigators propose to use high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) (ROCHE, Elecsys assay as this is currently in routine clinical use at the site) for this purpose and also perform comparative analyses using a high sensitivity troponin I (hs cTnI) assay (ABBOTT, Architect).
  4. Redundant blood sample will also be used to evaluate point of care testing (POCT), with additional blood sample taken for POC. These samples will be undertaken as part of routine clinical care and will not require additional venepuncture (and will only be analysed if consent is gained for tissue use in research) population. A co-primary endpoint will be single sample rule-out by point of care troponin (POCT) (with a value of <4ng/l in those with chest pain onset >3 hours from presentation) as assessed in the recent APACE study of triage true POC.11 A comparison of this rule-out in terms of effectiveness (percentage discharge) and safety (sensitivity) will be made with ROCHE lod (<5ng/l)12 and the optimised rule-out of Abbott architect (HSTNI<5ng/l)13

2.2 Secondary objectives

  1. The relative performance of the Abbott Architect high sensitivity troponin I (hs TnI) , Quidel's TriageTrue and Siemens Attellica troponin I assay will also be assessed in terms of the primary and secondary endpoints by reference to high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) with cut-points for Abbott hs-cTn I from the BACC study used for the 0-1-hour pathway.14
  2. The performance of the novel machine learning algorithm, the Myocardial Ischemic Injury Index (MI3, Abbott) will also be assessed retrospectively with regard to safety and efficacy. This sub study using fully anonymized data will be performed in association with coinvestigators from Abbott Diagnostics (appendix 1).
  3. To understand if low levels of Growth Differentiation Factor (GDF-15), could expand safe discharge beyond the LOD. This will be tested for retrospectively in stored plasma samples.
  4. To assess if point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples) mirror gold standard high sensitive troponin analysis with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction.
  5. Hypothesis That an accelerated 0-1-hour troponin protocol, when implemented into clinical practice as a pragmatic RCT, will effect safe discharge with greater numbers discharged, by 4 hours from presentation, compared to the use of the more conventional 0-3 hour troponin protocol.

Means to test hypothesis: A two-arm parallel group, two-centre randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer).

The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).

  1. Outcomes: 4.1 Primary endpoint
  2. the investigators will compare safe discharge by each strategy (ie the ESC 0-1 hour pathway versus 0-3 pathway) and the proportion actually discharged by each pathway at 4 hours. The exact definition of safety will be percentage (of cohort randomised to each pathway) safely discharged by 4 hours of presentation to accident and emergency (Safety will be judged by type 1 myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death by 4 weeks with sensitivity >98% - the study will be powered on safety to establish whether 0-1-hour performance is equivalent to 0-3-hour sampling by means of a non-inferiority analysis- see statistics). (Type 1 myocardial infarction is due to acute coronary atherothrombotic myocardial injury with either plaque rupture or erosion and, often, associated thrombosis. A separate analysis will also be undertaken with inclusion of type 2 MI as well as type 1 MI as an endpoint

4.2 Co-primary endpoint: There will be a comparison of the real time performance of point of care troponin (POCT) assay to that of a sample sent for analysis in the laboratory (the current gold standard of central laboratory analysis using HS cTn).The primary interest will be in presentation sample POC rule-out (triage true (quidel) POC <4ng/l with CP onset >3 hours compared to LOD or optimised rule-out of ROCHE (elecsys) assay, siemens attelica and Abbott architect. There will be a similar comparison made with siemens VTLI troponin I POC assay using FDA approved cut-points for MI rule-out

4.3 Secondary Endpoints:

  1. Type 1 myocardial infarction (adjudicated with the use of Abbott hs cTnI) and cardiovascular death* at 4 weeks (target for safety negative predictive value (NPV) >99.5% and sensitivity >98%). (co-primary endpoint). This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
  2. All cause death, type 1 myocardial infarction and urgent or emergency revascularisation. This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)
  3. Proportion with rule-out or rule-in MI in the 0-1 hour and 0-3 hour
  4. Prediction of MI with myocardial ischemic injury index (MI3) algorithm9
  5. HEART ≤3 and a modified HEART score for rule-out MI at 30 days15
  6. Proportion with repeat presentations to accident and emergency within 30 days
  7. Proportion undergoing coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation in 0-1 versus 0-3 hour pathway
  8. Performance of point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples to 0 hour) with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 myocardial infarction
  9. Rule out of MI with GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15)
  • Cardiovascular deaths include deaths that result from an myocardial infarctions (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure (HF), death due to stroke, death due to cardiovascular procedures, death due to cardiovascular haemorrhage, and death due to other cardiovascular causes and deaths that do not have a clear non- cardiovascular cause.
Being tested
ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway
Keywords
acs, POC troponin, high sensitivity troponin
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Chest Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathwayDiagnostic test

    Also called esc 0/3 hour troponin pathway

    randomisation to 0/1 versus 0/3 hour pathway

Study groups in NCT05322395
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESC 0/1 pathwayExperimentalA two-arm parallel group, two-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway
ESC 0/3 hour pathwayActive comparatorA two-arm parallel group, two-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. percentage safe discharge by 4 hours. safety defined as type 1 MI and CV deah

    We will compare safe discharge by each strategy (ie the ESC 0-1 hour pathway versus 0-3 pathway) and the proportion actually discharged by each pathway at 4 hours. The exact definition of safety will be percentage (of cohort randomised to each pathway) safely discharged by 4 hours of presentation to accident and emergency (Safety will be judged by type 1 myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death by 4 weeks with sensitivity >98% - the study will be powered on safety to establish whether 0-1-hour performance is equivalent to 0-3-hour sampling by means of a non-inferiority analysis- see statistics).

    (Type 1 myocardial infarction is due to acute coronary atherothrombotic myocardial injury with either plaque rupture or erosion and, often, associated thrombosis. A separate analysis will also be undertaken with inclusion of type 2 MI as well as type 1 MI as an endpoint

    Measured: 4 hours

  2. point of care troponin performance compared to laboratory performance

    largely rule-out of Quidel triage true and siemens VTLI

    Measured: 4 hours

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Type 1 myocardial infarction

    Measured: 30 days

  2. All cause death, type 1 myocardial infarction and urgent or emergency revascularisation. This analysis will be repeated incorporating both type 1 and 2 MI definition. (prespecified secondary analysis)

    Measured: 30 days

  3. Proportion with rule-out or rule-in MI in the 0-1 hour and 0-3 hour

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Prediction of MI with myocardial ischemic injury index (MI3) algorithm

    Measured: 30 days

  5. HEART ≤3 and a modified HEART score for rule-out MI at 30 days

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Proportion with repeat presentations to accident and emergency within 30 days

    Measured: 30 days

  7. Proportion undergoing coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation in 0-1 versus 0-3 hour pathway

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Performance of point of care troponin samples at time points at 1 to 3 hours (additional samples to 0 hour) with respect to diagnosis of acute or chronic myocardial injury and/or type 1 myocardial infarction

    Measured: 30 days

  9. Rule out of MI with GDF-15 (Growth Differentiation Factor 15)

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2022
  2. Study start10 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Nov 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A two-arm parallel group, two-centre randomised controlled trial of 0-1-hour high sensitivity troponin T (hs cTnT) compared to a 0-3-hour pathway as rules for rapid discharge of suspected ACS. (both incorporating single presentation sample limit of detection (LOD) high sensitive troponin as a rule for discharge, or cut-off selected by manufacturer). The power of the study is on safety rather than percent discharge achieved by 4 hours as this is the primary focus for clinicians and health care institutions. (By virtue of the earlier sampling the 0-1 hour troponin sampling is likely to allow greater discharges by 4 hours and the sample size for safety easily accommodates this aspect).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,536 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05322395
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPO635
Acronym
MACROS2
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
4 Jan 2022
Last updated
5 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Hatherley J, Dakshi A, Collinson P, Miller G, Bailey L, Davies S, Fearon H, Meah N, Frost F, Raj R, Ensor E, Fisher M, Goulden C, Noori Z, Salmon T, Rawat A, Hornby R, Lambert A, Sekulska K, Ingram T, Fitzgerald G, Shaw M, Khand A. Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in Practice: A Randomized Trial of 0/1-Hour vs 0/3-Hour Troponin Testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 May 20:S0735-1097(26)05979-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5135. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42159533
  • Dakshi A, Hatherley J, Collinson P, Phillips S, Bailey L, Miller G, Shaw M, Khand A. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a high-sensitivity troponin I point-of-care assay in the Mersey Acute Coronary Syndrome Rule Out Study (MACROS-2). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Sep 2;63(2):422-432. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0138. Print 2025 Jan 29.

    PubMed 39239902
  • Khand A, Hatherley J, Dakshi A, Miller G, Bailey L, Fisher M, Goulden C, Noori Z, Rawat A, Hornby R, Fearon H, Meah N, Davies S, Sekulska K, Hassan A, Lambert A, Phillips S, Raj R, Wiles T, Collinson P. Safety and feasibility of triage and rapid discharge of patients with chest pain from emergency room: A pragmatic, randomized noninferiority control trial of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0 to 1 hour pathway vs conventional 0 to 3 hour accelerated diagnostic protocol. Am Heart J. 2024 Dec;278:235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

    PubMed 39151715

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ESC 0/1 hour troponin pathway in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Troponin, run by Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Aleem Khand (+441515292720, aleem.khand@liverpoolft.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

percentage safe discharge by 4 hours. safety defined as type 1 MI and CV deah (time frame: 4 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05322395, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in