Epidural AnalgesiaPhase 4NCT05323214
Comparative Study Between Two Adjuvant Drugs to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries
A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl Analgesic regimen and Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimen in people with Epidural Analgesia, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Epidural analgesia is associated with early postoperative mobilization and rehabilitation with minimally associated pain and discomfort. Analgesic effect of local anesthetics is augmented by addition of adjuvants in epidural anesthesia ensuring satisfactory postoperative period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Epidural Analgesia
- What is being tested?
- Fentanyl Analgesic regimen and Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimen
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 30 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA I or ASA II patients.
- Age group: 21-70 years old.
- BMI ≤40
- Duration of procedure ≤ 180 minutes.
Who cannot join
- Patients with known neurologic and psychiatric illness will be excluded from the study.
- Contraindications for epidural anesthesia as patient refusal, bleeding or coagulation test abnormalities, local skin infection at spinal lumbar region, raised intracranial pressure and hypovolemia
- Spine abnormalities.
- Systemic disorders like hematological, respiratory, cardiac, renal or hepatic insufficiency.
- Allergy to any of the drugs used in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ain Shams University Hospitals
Cairo
Ibrahim A Ibrahim, MD
Mohamed A Saleh, MD
About this study
Official title: Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries
Epidural analgesia is associated with early postoperative mobilization and rehabilitation with minimally associated pain and discomfort. Analgesic effect of local anesthetics is augmented by addition of adjuvants in epidural anesthesia ensuring satisfactory postoperative period. This study evaluates the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as additives to bupivacaine for epidural analgesia.
Read the detailed description
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidin and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia in abdominal surgeries regarding block characteristics, post-operative analgesia, hemodynamic changes and any anticipated side effects.
- Type of Study: Prospective randomized comparative clinical study.
- Study Setting: The operating theatres of Ain Shams University Hospitals
- Study Period: One year
- Sampling Method: Random sampling Patients randomly allocated by computer generated randomization and using opaque sealed envelopes to one of the three study groups according to the adjuvant drug used in postoperative analgesia.
- Sample Size: Total 75 cases divided into 25 cases in each group. Kiran et al. (2018) reported a rather large effect size comparing onset to sensory block and time to maximum motor block. In a one-way ANOVA study, sample sizes of 25 cases per group in three groups whose means are to be compared. The total sample of 75 subjects achieves 80% power to detect differences among the means versus the alternative of equal means using an F test with a 0.0500 significance level. The size of the variation in the means is represented by the effect size = 0.4
- Conditions
- Epidural Analgesia
- Being tested
- Control Analgesic regimen, Fentanyl Analgesic regimen, Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimen
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Control Analgesic regimenDrug
Also called Epidural Bupivacaine
testing the efficiency of bupivacaine without adjuvant drugs in epidural analgesia
Fentanyl Analgesic regimenDrug
Also called Epidural Fentanyl Bupivacaine
testing the efficiency of Fentanyl as an adjuvant drug to bupivacaine in epidural analgesia
Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimenDrug
Also called Epidural Dexmedetomidine Bupivacaine
testing the efficiency of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant drug to bupivacaine in epidural analgesia
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Other | Normal saline 2 ml will be mixed with 48 ml bupivacaine 0.125% in an elastomeric pump. The rate of epidural infusion will be 5ml/hr for the postoperative 24 hours. Receives: Drug: Control Analgesic regimen |
| Fentanyl group | Other | Fentanyl 2 ml (100 μg) will be mixed with 48 ml bupivacaine 0.125% in an elastomeric pump. The rate of epidural infusion will be 5ml/hr for the postoperative 24 hours. Receives: Drug: Fentanyl Analgesic regimen |
| Dexmedetomidine group | Other | Dexmedetomidine 1 ml (100 μg) plus 1 ml normal saline will be mixed with 48 ml bupivacaine 0.125% in an elastomeric pump. The rate of epidural infusion will be 5ml/hr for the postoperative 24 hours. Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Onset of sensory analgesia
will be assessed by pin prick and cold application from the start of epidural infusion till scoring 1 at the 3 point scale. Assessment will be done every 5 minutes until the onset of sensory block using a 3-point scale: 0=normal sensation, 1=loss of sensation of pin prick (analgesia), and 2=loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
Measured: 24 hours
Duration of analgesia
time from starting epidural infusion to the time of the first request for additional pain medication
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
Postoperative pain score
for 24 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 - no pain, 10 - worst pain ever) at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs after starting epidural infusion.
Measured: 24 hours
Analgesic consumption
during the 24 hours following epidural infusion.
Measured: 24 hours
The motor block
will be assessed if occurred by Bromage three point score (0-3) for the lower extremity during the 24 hours following epidural infusion where 0: no motor impairment (able to move the hip, knee, and ankle joints);
- unable to raise either extended leg (able to move joints of knee and ankle);
- unable to raise extended leg and flex knee (able to move joint of ankle); 3; unable to move knee and foot.
Measured: 24 hours
Post operative Mean arterial Blood pressure
Mean arterial pressure in mmHg will be monitored continuously and recorded just before the initiation of epidural infusion and thereafter at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs. postoperatively during the 24 hours following epidural infusion
Measured: 24 hours
Post operative Heart rate
Heart rate (HR) in beats per minute (bpm) will be monitored continuously and recorded just before the initiation of epidural infusion and thereafter at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs. postoperatively during the 24 hours following epidural infusion
Measured: 24 hours
Post operative Peripheral oxygen saturation
Peripheral oxygen saturation in blood (SpO2) will be monitored continuously and recorded just before the initiation of epidural infusion and thereafter at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hrs. postoperatively during the 24 hours following epidural infusion
Measured: 24 hours
Anticipated adverse events
like postoperative nausea and vomiting during the 24 hours from the start of epidural analgesia
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Epidural AnalgesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bahaa Eldin E Hassan, Professor, Study chair, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.Hadeel M Abd Elhamid, Professor, Study director, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.Mohamed A Saleh, MD, Study director, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.Ibrahim A Ibrahim, MD, Study director, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05323214
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FMASU MD 121/2021
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 15 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Grewal A. Dexmedetomidine: New avenues. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;27(3):297-302. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.83670. No abstract available.
PubMed 21897496Hetta DF, Fares KM, Abedalmohsen AM, Abdel-Wahab AH, Elfadl GMA, Ali WN. Epidural dexmedetomidine infusion for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery: randomized trial. J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 30;11:2675-2685. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S163975. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30464585Kiran S, Jinjil K, Tandon U, Kar S. Evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as additives to ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan-Mar;34(1):41-45. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_205_16.
PubMed 29643621Mohamad MF, Mohammad MA, Hetta DF, Ahmed EH, Obiedallah AA, Elzohry AAM. Thoracic epidural analgesia reduces myocardial injury in ischemic patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. J Pain Res. 2017 Apr 12;10:887-895. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S122918. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28442930Yousef AA, Salem HA, Moustafa MZ. Effect of mini-dose epidural dexmedetomidine in elective cesarean section using combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a randomized double-blinded controlled study. J Anesth. 2015 Oct;29(5):708-14. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2027-7. Epub 2015 May 26.
PubMed 26006222Zhao Y, Xin Y, Liu Y, Yi X, Liu Y. Effect of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Combined With Ropivacaine in Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study. Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):319-324. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000411.
PubMed 27513640Soliman, Rabie & Eltaweel, Moataz. (2016). Comparative study of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief in adult patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomized study. Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Science. 5. 1. 10.7243/2049-9752-5-1.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05323214
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FMASU MD 121/2021
- Conditions
- Epidural Analgesia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Epidural analgesia is associated with early postoperative mobilization and rehabilitation with minimally associated pain and discomfort. Analgesic effect of local anesthetics is augmented by addition of adjuvants in epidural anesthesia ensuring satisfactory postoperative period. This study evaluates the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as additives to bupivacaine for epidural analgesia.
Detailed description
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidin and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia in abdominal surgeries regarding block characteristics, post-operative analgesia, hemodynamic changes and any anticipated side effects.
- Type of Study: Prospective randomized comparative clinical study.
- Study Setting: The operating theatres of Ain Shams University Hospitals
- Study Period: One year
- Sampling Method: Random sampling Patients randomly allocated by computer generated randomization and using opaque sealed envelopes to one of the three study groups according to the adjuvant drug used in postoperative analgesia.
- Sample Size: Total 75 cases divided into 25 cases in each group. Kiran et al. (2018) reported a rather large effect size comparing onset to sensory block and time to maximum motor block. In a one-way ANOVA study, sample sizes of 25 cases per group in three groups whose means are to be compared. The total sample of 75 subjects achieves 80% power to detect differences among the means versus the alternative of equal means using an F test with a 0.0500 significance level. The size of the variation in the means is represented by the effect size = 0.4
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Other | Drug: Control Analgesic regimenNormal saline 2 ml will be mixed with 48 ml bupivacaine 0.125% in an elastomeric pump. The rate of epidural infusion will be 5ml/hr for the postoperative 24 hours. |
| Fentanyl group | Other | Drug: Fentanyl Analgesic regimenFentanyl 2 ml (100 μg) will be mixed with 48 ml bupivacaine 0.125% in an elastomeric pump. The rate of epidural infusion will be 5ml/hr for the postoperative 24 hours. |
| Dexmedetomidine group | Other | Drug: Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimenDexmedetomidine 1 ml (100 μg) plus 1 ml normal saline will be mixed with 48 ml bupivacaine 0.125% in an elastomeric pump. The rate of epidural infusion will be 5ml/hr for the postoperative 24 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ASA I or ASA II patients.
- Age group: 21-70 years old.
- BMI ≤40
- Duration of procedure ≤ 180 minutes.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with known neurologic and psychiatric illness will be excluded from the study.
- Contraindications for epidural anesthesia as patient refusal, bleeding or coagulation test abnormalities, local skin infection at spinal lumbar region, raised intracranial pressure and hypovolemia
- Spine abnormalities.
- Systemic disorders like hematological, respiratory, cardiac, renal or hepatic insufficiency.
- Allergy to any of the drugs used in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Control Analgesic regimenAlso: Epidural Bupivacainetesting the efficiency of bupivacaine without adjuvant drugs in epidural analgesia | Drug | Control group |
| Fentanyl Analgesic regimenAlso: Epidural Fentanyl Bupivacainetesting the efficiency of Fentanyl as an adjuvant drug to bupivacaine in epidural analgesia | Drug | Fentanyl group |
| Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimenAlso: Epidural Dexmedetomidine Bupivacainetesting the efficiency of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant drug to bupivacaine in epidural analgesia | Drug | Dexmedetomidine group |
Primary outcome
Onset of sensory analgesia
Time frame: 24 hours
will be assessed by pin prick and cold application from the start of epidural infusion till scoring 1 at the 3 point scale. Assessment will be done every 5 minutes until the onset of sensory block using a 3-point scale: 0=normal sensation, 1=loss of sensation of pin prick (analgesia), and 2=loss of sensation of touch (anesthesia).
Duration of analgesia
Time frame: 24 hours
time from starting epidural infusion to the time of the first request for additional pain medication
7 secondary outcomes
Postoperative pain score
Time frame: 24 hours
Analgesic consumption
Time frame: 24 hours
The motor block
Time frame: 24 hours
Post operative Mean arterial Blood pressure
Time frame: 24 hours
Post operative Heart rate
Time frame: 24 hours
Post operative Peripheral oxygen saturation
Time frame: 24 hours
Anticipated adverse events
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 21897496Grewal A. Dexmedetomidine: New avenues. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;27(3):297-302. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.83670. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30464585Hetta DF, Fares KM, Abedalmohsen AM, Abdel-Wahab AH, Elfadl GMA, Ali WN. Epidural dexmedetomidine infusion for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery: randomized trial. J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 30;11:2675-2685. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S163975. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 29643621Kiran S, Jinjil K, Tandon U, Kar S. Evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as additives to ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jan-Mar;34(1):41-45. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_205_16.
- Background: PubMed 28442930Mohamad MF, Mohammad MA, Hetta DF, Ahmed EH, Obiedallah AA, Elzohry AAM. Thoracic epidural analgesia reduces myocardial injury in ischemic patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. J Pain Res. 2017 Apr 12;10:887-895. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S122918. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 26006222Yousef AA, Salem HA, Moustafa MZ. Effect of mini-dose epidural dexmedetomidine in elective cesarean section using combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a randomized double-blinded controlled study. J Anesth. 2015 Oct;29(5):708-14. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2027-7. Epub 2015 May 26.
- Background: PubMed 27513640Zhao Y, Xin Y, Liu Y, Yi X, Liu Y. Effect of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Combined With Ropivacaine in Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study. Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):319-324. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000411.
- BackgroundSoliman, Rabie & Eltaweel, Moataz. (2016). Comparative study of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief in adult patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomized study. Journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Science. 5. 1. 10.7243/2049-9752-5-1.
- National institute for health and clinical excellenceLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Epidural Analgesia
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Not yet recruiting
Dural Puncture Epidural With 27G vs 26G Needles Versus Standard Epidural for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, Obstetrical
RecruitingObservational study
Anesthetic Technique and Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Delivery
Ceserean Section, Obstetric Quality of Recovery
Not yet recruiting
The 90% Effective Initial Volume for Labor Analgesia Under Double Dural Puncture Epidural Technique
Labor Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Voiding Position (Standing in the Shower vs. Sitting) on Post- Void Residual Urine Volume (PVR) After Removal of Urinary Catheter in Women Following Vaginal Delivery With Epidural Analgesia: A Double- Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Postpartum Urinary Retention
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bahaa Eldin E Hassan, Professor study chair
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.
Hadeel M Abd Elhamid, Professor study director
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.
Mohamed A Saleh, MD study director
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive care and pain management, Ain Shams University.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl Analgesic regimen and Dexmedetomidine Analgesic regimen in people with Epidural Analgesia, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ibrahim A Ibrahim, MD (+201208208230, Drhema2010n@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Onset of sensory analgesia (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05323214, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2022.