AzTrials
AzTrials

Risk ReductionNCT05333679

Urine Tenofovir Point-of-care Test to Identify Patients in Need of ART Adherence Support (UTRA Study)

A study testing UTRA and UTRA feedback in people with Risk Reduction, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

ART is given to people living with HIV in order to suppress the virus, resulting in improved health for the individual and decreased transmission of the virus to others. Success of ART is dependent on adherence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Risk Reduction
What is being tested?
UTRA and UTRA feedback
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
2 Mar 2022to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years old
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • HIV-infected, receiving or (re-)starting a tenofovir-based ART regimen
  • Current ART regimen includes at least one drug with a high genetic barrier to resistance e.g. dolutegravir, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir.
  • Any previous raised viral load >50 copies/ml (after ART initiation).
  • Willing and able to comply with laboratory tests and other study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Not willing or able to provide informed consent in any of the languages provided
  • Not receiving a tenofovir-based ART regimen
  • Any other clinical condition that in the opinion of an investigator puts the patient at increased risk if participating in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, University of Cape Town

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

ART is given to people living with HIV in order to suppress the virus, resulting in improved health for the individual and decreased transmission of the virus to others. Success of ART is dependent on adherence. Currently, adherence is assessed by asking patients directly and then confirming with a viral load test, which is expensive and is often only done when the viral load is already raised. Therefore there is a need to find a method to detect problems with adherence early before the viral load rises.

A urine-based test was recently developed, called UTRA (urine tenofovir rapid assay). This test can give clinic staff immediate results about a person's adherence to the antiretroviral medication Tenofovir (TDF). The study will compare the results of this urine test to drug levels found in blood, self-reported adherence and pharmacy collection records to see if this test can be used as part of routine care in ART clinics. If the test is effective it would allow clinic staff to identify people with adherence difficulties early and give them the necessary support before their viral load rises.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomised study, recruiting 200 people taking TDF-based ART. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to intervention versus standard enhanced adherence counselling. Intervention participants will receive an adherence support package informed by feedback from the urine-based test. The investigators will assess the impact of the adherence test on VL suppression rates in each arm (without necessitating a regimen switch) at 12 months after enrolment. Enrolling participants with adherence challenges increases efficiency and mirrors the population requiring adherence support in our setting.

The UTRA device used for this study has received a FDA Non-Significant Risk (NSR) designation and is IDE exempt.

FEASIBILITY:

The investigators will track retention in the study among participants in each arm, missed visits, and the number of urine assessments performed in the intervention arm.

ACCEPTABILITY:

All participants enrolled will also complete a standardised questionnaire about the acceptability of the adherence support they received. This measure of acceptability will be assessed as a secondary outcome by arm, along with socio-demographics profiles associated with low/high acceptability described within arm.

QUALITATIVE PROCEDURES:

  1. Participant in-depth interviews: Qualitative data will include in-depth interviews of participants (n~20; ~3-4 interviews with each participant over 6-9 months of their treatment) using semi-structured guides conducted by experienced socio-behavioural scientists. The semi-structured interview guide will elicit feelings about the urine adherence metric and counseling messages, concerns regarding privacy, advantages/disadvantages of receiving such results, and the likely impact of this monitoring test on sustained adherence to ART or just on short-term adherence. Interviews will be conducted in participants' preferred language.
  2. Health care worker interviews: The investigators will additionally assess the feasibility of the intervention by interviewing health care providers, who will be administering the UTRA test at the clinical point of care in the future. The study will examine provider perceptions of the assay at the end of the study using in-depth interviews (n~10), assessing perceived usefulness, complexity to use, stigma/social harm, and benefits. These interviews will also elicit barriers and facilitators to delivery of the urine assay-informed counseling messages.
Conditions
Risk Reduction
Being tested
UTRA, UTRA feedback
Keywords
UTRA, Point-of-care, Real-time, PLHIV, Adherence monitoring, ART
Medical subject headings
Risk Reduction Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • UTRADevice

    Collect urine on intervention participants and screen for presence of TFV.

  • UTRA feedbackBehavioural

    Feedback will be provided to the participant based on the UTRA results on their adherence with provision of standard adherence counseling.

Study groups in NCT05333679
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalPOC adherence testing by a urine TFV assay with feedback
Receives: Device: UTRA; Behavioral: UTRA feedback
Standard of CareNo interventionStandard enhanced adherence counselling, SA Department of Health, March 2020

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Participants in Each Arm Achieving Viral Suppression to <50 Copies/ml

    Assess suppression rates (VL< 50 copies/mL) in both study arms using an intention-to-treat analysis. Plasma will be stored an enrolment, month 6 and month 12 for viral load assay completion after the study. Samples are assayed either with the Alinity m HIV-1 assay (Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Park, Illinois, U.S.A.); lower limit of detection (LLD) 10 copies/mL or the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 Test, v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland); LLD 20 copies/mL. Whole blood will be centrifuged and plasma then tested on the automated analyzer according to national standard operating procedures

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of Participants Retained in Care

    Follow up visits will occur in 12-week increments post-enrolment: at month 3, month 6, month 9 and month 12; and will be synchronized wherever possible with routine clinic visits. Visit windows will be continuous, with each window extending to 6 weeks before and 6 weeks after the visit target date. A visit will be considered missed if the participant does not attend during the 12-week visit window

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Viral Suppression (<50 Copies/mL)

    Assess suppression rates (VL< 50 copies/mL) in both study arms using an intention-to-treat analysis. Samples are assayed either with the Alinity m HIV-1 assay (Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Park, Illinois, U.S.A.); lower limit of detection (LLD) 10 copies/mL or the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 Test, v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland); LLD 20 copies/mL. Whole blood will be centrifuged and plasma then tested on the automated analyzer according to national standard operating procedures

    Measured: 6 months

  3. The Proportion of Participants Indicating "Strongly Agree" or "Agree" Averaged Across 10 Items, Each Using a Five-point Likert Scale to Measure Aspects of the Adherence Support Intervention (i.e., by Arm: UTRA-informed or Standard of Care)

    The proportion of participants indicating "strongly agree" or "agree" averaged across 10 items, each item using a five-point Likert scale to measure aspects of acceptability of the adherence support intervention (i.e., by arm: UTRA-informed or standard of care), at month 12. Responses to the Likert scale range from "Strongly agree" to "Strongly disagree". Aspects of acceptability include domains on: support from health workers, time given by health workers to discuss the patients' treatment, patient perceptions of feeling informed about their adherence, feelings of surveillance (-vely scored), and self-satisfactions with adherence.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Apr 2022
  2. Study start2 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05333679
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI152119
Other IDs
5R01AI152119
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
11 Apr 2022
Last updated
28 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: We will share de-identified data in publicly accessible databases once study is complete and study findings disseminated.

Publications

  • Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, Hakim JG, Kumwenda J, Grinsztejn B, Pilotto JH, Godbole SV, Chariyalertsak S, Santos BR, Mayer KH, Hoffman IF, Eshleman SH, Piwowar-Manning E, Cottle L, Zhang XC, Makhema J, Mills LA, Panchia R, Faesen S, Eron J, Gallant J, Havlir D, Swindells S, Elharrar V, Burns D, Taha TE, Nielsen-Saines K, Celentano DD, Essex M, Hudelson SE, Redd AD, Fleming TR; HPTN 052 Study Team. Antiretroviral Therapy for the Prevention of HIV-1 Transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 1;375(9):830-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600693. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

    PubMed 27424812
  • Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, Hakim JG, Kumwenda J, Grinsztejn B, Pilotto JH, Godbole SV, Mehendale S, Chariyalertsak S, Santos BR, Mayer KH, Hoffman IF, Eshleman SH, Piwowar-Manning E, Wang L, Makhema J, Mills LA, de Bruyn G, Sanne I, Eron J, Gallant J, Havlir D, Swindells S, Ribaudo H, Elharrar V, Burns D, Taha TE, Nielsen-Saines K, Celentano D, Essex M, Fleming TR; HPTN 052 Study Team. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):493-505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105243. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

    PubMed 21767103
  • Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, Degen O, Corbelli GM, Estrada V, Geretti AM, Beloukas A, Raben D, Coll P, Antinori A, Nwokolo N, Rieger A, Prins JM, Blaxhult A, Weber R, Van Eeden A, Brockmeyer NH, Clarke A, Del Romero Guerrero J, Raffi F, Bogner JR, Wandeler G, Gerstoft J, Gutierrez F, Brinkman K, Kitchen M, Ostergaard L, Leon A, Ristola M, Jessen H, Stellbrink HJ, Phillips AN, Lundgren J; PARTNER Study Group. Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2428-2438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30418-0. Epub 2019 May 2.

    PubMed 31056293
  • Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, van Lunzen J, Corbelli GM, Estrada V, Geretti AM, Beloukas A, Asboe D, Viciana P, Gutierrez F, Clotet B, Pradier C, Gerstoft J, Weber R, Westling K, Wandeler G, Prins JM, Rieger A, Stoeckle M, Kummerle T, Bini T, Ammassari A, Gilson R, Krznaric I, Ristola M, Zangerle R, Handberg P, Antela A, Allan S, Phillips AN, Lundgren J; PARTNER Study Group. Sexual Activity Without Condoms and Risk of HIV Transmission in Serodifferent Couples When the HIV-Positive Partner Is Using Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy. JAMA. 2016 Jul 12;316(2):171-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5148.

    PubMed 27404185
  • Herzer M, Ramey C, Rohan J, Cortina S. Incorporating electronic monitoring feedback into clinical care: a novel and promising adherence promotion approach. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;17(4):505-18. doi: 10.1177/1359104511421103. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

    PubMed 21949048
  • de Necker M, de Beer JC, Stander MP, Connell CD, Mwai D. Economic and public health impact of decentralized HIV viral load testing: A modelling study in Kenya. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212972. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30811510
  • van Zyl GU, van Mens TE, McIlleron H, Zeier M, Nachega JB, Decloedt E, Malavazzi C, Smith P, Huang Y, van der Merwe L, Gandhi M, Maartens G. Low lopinavir plasma or hair concentrations explain second-line protease inhibitor failures in a resource-limited setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Apr;56(4):333-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31820dc0cc.

    PubMed 21239995
  • Prasitsuebsai W, Kerr SJ, Truong KH, Ananworanich J, Do VC, Nguyen LV, Kurniati N, Kosalaraksa P, Sudjaritruk T, Chokephaibulkit K, Thammajaruk N, Singtoroj T, Teeraananchai S, Horng H, Bacchetti P, Gandhi M, Sohn AH. Using Lopinavir Concentrations in Hair Samples to Assess Treatment Outcomes on Second-Line Regimens Among Asian Children. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015 Oct;31(10):1009-14. doi: 10.1089/AID.2015.0111. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

    PubMed 26200586
  • Murnane PM, Bacchetti P, Currier JS, Brummel S, Okochi H, Phung N, Louie A, Kuncze K, Hoffman RM, Nematadzira T, Soko DK, Owor M, Saidi F, Flynn PM, Fowler MG, Gandhi M. Tenofovir concentrations in hair strongly predict virologic suppression in breastfeeding women. AIDS. 2019 Aug 1;33(10):1657-1662. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002237.

    PubMed 31021852
  • Gandhi M, Bacchetti P, Ofokotun I, Jin C, Ribaudo HJ, Haas DW, Sheth AN, Horng H, Phung N, Kuncze K, Okochi H, Landovitz RJ, Lennox J, Currier JS; AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5257 Study Team. Antiretroviral Concentrations in Hair Strongly Predict Virologic Response in a Large Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment-naive Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 5;68(6):1044-1047. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy764.

    PubMed 30184104
  • Gandhi M, Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Gange SJ, Anastos K, Levine A, Hyman CL, Cohen M, Young M, Huang Y, Greenblatt RM; Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). Protease inhibitor levels in hair strongly predict virologic response to treatment. AIDS. 2009 Feb 20;23(4):471-8. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328325a4a9.

    PubMed 19165084
  • Gandhi M, Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Anastos K, Gange SJ, Minkoff H, Young M, Milam J, Cohen MH, Sharp GB, Huang Y, Greenblatt RM. Atazanavir concentration in hair is the strongest predictor of outcomes on antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(10):1267-75. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir131.

    PubMed 21507924
  • Cohan D, Natureeba P, Koss CA, Plenty A, Luwedde F, Mwesigwa J, Ades V, Charlebois ED, Gandhi M, Clark TD, Nzarubara B, Achan J, Ruel T, Kamya MR, Havlir DV. Efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected pregnant Ugandan women. AIDS. 2015 Jan 14;29(2):183-91. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000531.

    PubMed 25426808
  • Koss CA, Natureeba P, Mwesigwa J, Cohan D, Nzarubara B, Bacchetti P, Horng H, Clark TD, Plenty A, Ruel TD, Achan J, Charlebois ED, Kamya MR, Havlir DV, Gandhi M. Hair concentrations of antiretrovirals predict viral suppression in HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding Ugandan women. AIDS. 2015 Apr 24;29(7):825-30. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000619.

    PubMed 25985404
  • Chawana TD, Gandhi M, Nathoo K, Ngara B, Louie A, Horng H, Katzenstein D, Metcalfe J, Nhachi CFB; Adolescent Treatment Failure (ATF) study team. Defining a Cutoff for Atazanavir in Hair Samples Associated With Virological Failure Among Adolescents Failing Second-Line Antiretroviral Treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Sep 1;76(1):55-59. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001452.

    PubMed 28520618

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing UTRA and UTRA feedback in people with Risk Reduction, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Participants in Each Arm Achieving Viral Suppression to <50 Copies/ml (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05333679, which also lists 57 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in