Type 2 DiabetesPrimarycareNCT05336019
The Effect of a Diabetes Self-management Coaching Program for Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the Ethiopian PC.
A study testing Diabetes self-management Coaching in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Queen's University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Background: Diabetes mellitus is the third most prevalent chronic disease globally. It is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose because of impaired insulin production, reduced insulin effectiveness, or both. It is a major contributor for physical disability and impaired quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Diabetes self-management Coaching
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2022to 30 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Attend diabetes care for at least 1 year
- Taking anti-diabetic medications
- Age between 18 -65 years
- HbA1c level >7% or Repeated FBS>130
Who cannot join
- Attend behavioral therapy program in the last 1 year
- Clinically confirmed mentally ill clients
- Pregnant
- Physically impaired (unable to see, hear, and walk)
- Clinically confirmed co-morbidity (Heart failure, cancer, stroke) which may interfere with their participation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of the Diabetes Self-management Coaching Program on the Clinical and Behavioral Parameters for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes in the Ethiopian PC Setting: Mixed-methods Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Diabetes mellitus is the third most prevalent chronic disease globally. It is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose because of impaired insulin production, reduced insulin effectiveness, or both. It is a major contributor for physical disability and impaired quality of life. Diabetic Self-Management programs help to control blood glucose, reduce hospitalization, and increase compliance; however, the program is underutilized in the Primary Care settings globally; due to cognitive, financial, behavioral, and emotional factors. Health coaching is a client-centered self-management approach informed by behavioral change theories to empower individuals to identify their strengths and resources and achieve their health and wellness goals.
Purpose: The study's overarching goal is to determine whether implementing the Diabetes Self-Management (DSM) Coaching program can be effective and feasible for individuals with type diabetes in the Ethiopian primary care context.
Read more
Method: The study will employ a single-blinded feasibility randomized controlled trial followed by a concurrent mixed-method design. A block randomization technique with block size of 4 will be used to allocate eligible participants for the quantitative part. Structured outcome measures will be used to collect data on self-efficacy, self-care practice, and glycated hemoglobin A1c. Qualitative description approach with an in-depth interview method of data collection will be used to explore perspectives of participants, barriers and facilitators, and acceptability of the program. Mean, median and frequencies will be computed. Depending on the normality of the distribution and the number of participants, t-tests, x2 tests, sign tests, and ANOVA will be considered to analyze the data. Inductive qualitative content analysis approach will be followed to analyze qualitative data. Qualitative and quantitative data will be merged at result level for further interpretation and presented in discussion section.
Significance: The study will be used to determine the feasibility of the Diabetic Self-Management Coaching program in the Ethiopian primary care settings. Study participants will be benefited from the coaching program and will improve their self-efficacy, diabetes self-care practice, and blood glucose level. Furthermore, the study will have a paramount advantage to establish a foundation for future definitive trial that can prove effectiveness of the program.
Read the detailed description
Primary Aim Objective 2. To determine the acceptability of implementing a DSM Coaching program in the Ethiopian PC setting.
The specific objectives are:
1.1. To assess the recruitment ability, adherence, retention ability, and satisfaction of the study participants.
1.2. To determine the fidelity of implementing the DSM Coaching program. Secondary Aim Objective 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the DSM Coaching program on self-efficacy, self-care practice, and HbA1c among individuals with type 2 diabetes attending PC in Gondar town.
The specific objectives include- 2.1. To evaluate the effect of the DSM Coaching program on the self-efficacy of individuals with type 2 diabetes 2.2. To examine the effect of the DSM Coaching program on the self-care practice of individuals with type 2 diabetes.
2..3. To determine the effect of the DSM Coaching program on the HbA1C of individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Study participants assigned to intervention group will attend 12 weeks DSM Coaching program. This program has two components, four group based sessions and 4 individual home-based coaching. The control group will take the routine diabetes care for the same duration. The outcome will be assessed at baseline, after completing the intervention and after a two months follow-up.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Diabetes self-management Coaching, Usual care
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, self-management, Type 2 Diabetes, Coaching, Empowerment
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Empowerment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diabetes self-management CoachingBehavioural
Also called Diabetes Health Coaching
A 12-week Diabetes self-management coaching program
Usual careOther
Also called routine service
Assigned to 12 weeks of usual care which includes a physical examination, history taking,, medication refill, lab investigation, and health education
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| "Diabetes self-management Coaching" | Experimental | A 12-week Diabetes self-management Coaching program and the usual care Receives: Behavioral: Diabetes self-management Coaching |
| "Usual Care" | Active comparator | The control group will be assigned to 12 weeks usual care or routine diabetes service Receives: Other: Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of the DSM Coaching program
Acceptability measures the reaction of individual recipients-both study subjects and interventionists to the intervention(Bowen et al., 2009). It will be measured using a validated scale (B. J. Weiner et al., 2017). Mean scores will be used to categorize responses into acceptable and non-acceptable.
Measured: up to 1 year
Recruitment rate
It is the proportion of eligible individuals willing to give consent and randomized to the study.
Measured: up to 1 year
Ahernece rate
An intervention adherence is the participant's compliance with attending all group sessions, and all home-based coaching sessions.
Measured: 1 year
Retention rate
The ability of the program to retain participants in the study. The proportion of study participants who completed the study and evaluated at the end of the intervention T2 and end of follow-up T3.
Measured: 1year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Diabetes self-efficacy
Diabetes self-efficacy will be measured using Stanford Self-Management Resource Center (SMRC) diabetes self-efficacy scale (SMRC, 2021). Mean scores will be computed to decide changes in values.
Measured: up to 1 year
Diabetes self-care practice
The diabetes self-care practice will be measured using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activity (SDSCA)(Toobert et al., 2000). Mean scores will be computed to decide changes in values.
Measured: up to 1 year
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
HbA1c will be analyzed from a sample of whole blood using a chemistry machine at the University of Gondar hospital laboratory department. HbA1c < 7.0% is considered as the good glycemic control and HbA1c ≥ 7.0% will be considered as poorly controlled glucose level(Abera et al., 2022).
Measured: up to 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Apr 2023
- Study completion30 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (45)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A single-blinded, parallel-group feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial design.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen's University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fikadu Yehualashet, Queen's University
- Investigators
- Fikadu A Yehualashet, Masters, Principal investigator, Queen's University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05336019
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20224207
- Acronym
- Primarycare
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 26 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: For the sake of confidentiality, participant data will not be shared. However, data will be disseminated in the form of publications, conference presentations, and local media. In addition, data may be shared on request.
Publications
Alaofe H, Asaolu I, Ehiri J, Moretz H, Asuzu C, Balogun M, Abosede O, Ehiri J. Community Health Workers in Diabetes Prevention and Management in Developing Countries. Ann Glob Health. 2017 May-Aug;83(3-4):661-675. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
PubMed 29221543Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. No abstract available.
PubMed 847061Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Aug 20;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
PubMed 23961782Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.
PubMed 12365965Campos BM, Kieffer EC, Sinco B, Palmisano G, Spencer MS, Piatt GA. Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Led Diabetes Intervention among Older and Younger Latino Participants: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Sep;3(3):47. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3030047. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
PubMed 30345345Chapman A, Browning CJ, Enticott JC, Yang H, Liu S, Zhang T, Thomas SA. Effect of a Health Coach Intervention for the Management of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 19;6:252. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00252. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30283767Chen RY, Huang LC, Su CT, Chang YT, Chu CL, Chang CL, Lin CL. Effectiveness of Short-Term Health Coaching on Diabetes Control and Self-Management Efficacy: A Quasi-Experimental Trial. Front Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;7:314. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00314. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31737593Coleman CM, Bossick AS, Zhou Y, Hopkins-Johnson L, Otto MG, Nair AS, Willens DE, Wegienka GR. Introduction of a community health worker diabetes coach improved glycemic control in an urban primary care clinic. Prev Med Rep. 2020 Nov 27;21:101267. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101267. eCollection 2021 Mar.
PubMed 33364150Denneson, L. M., Ono, S. S., Trevino, A. Y., Kenyon, E., & Dobscha, S. K. (2020). The applicability of self-determination theory to health coaching: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 13(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/17521882.2019.1673457
Dineen-Griffin S, Garcia-Cardenas V, Williams K, Benrimoj SI. Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31369582Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15-20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
PubMed 21318011Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
PubMed 27777223Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
PubMed 18352969Engelhard C, Lonneman W, Warner D, Brown B. The implementation and evaluation of health professions students as health coaches within a diabetes self-management education program. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Dec;10(12):1600-1608. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
PubMed 30527826Feleke BE, Feleke TE, Kassahun MB, Adane WG, Fentahun N, Girma A, Alebachew A, Misgan E, Desyibelew HD, Bayih MT, Seid O. Glycemic Control of Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Referral Hospitals of Amhara Region, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 16;2021:6691819. doi: 10.1155/2021/6691819. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33532494
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of the Diabetes Self-management Coaching Program on the Clinical and Behavioral Parameters for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes in the Ethiopian PC Setting: Mixed-methods Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05336019
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Primarycare / 20224207
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, self-management, Type 2 Diabetes, Coaching, Empowerment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen's UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Diabetes mellitus is the third most prevalent chronic disease globally. It is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose because of impaired insulin production, reduced insulin effectiveness, or both. It is a major contributor for physical disability and impaired quality of life. Diabetic Self-Management programs help to control blood glucose, reduce hospitalization, and increase compliance; however, the program is underutilized in the Primary Care settings globally; due to cognitive, financial, behavioral, and emotional factors. Health coaching is a client-centered self-management approach informed by behavioral change theories to empower individuals to identify their strengths and resources and achieve their health and wellness goals.
Purpose: The study's overarching goal is to determine whether implementing the Diabetes Self-Management (DSM) Coaching program can be effective and feasible for individuals with type diabetes in the Ethiopian primary care context.
Method: The study will employ a single-blinded feasibility randomized controlled trial followed by a concurrent mixed-method design. A block randomization technique with block size of 4 will be used to allocate eligible participants for the quantitative part. Structured outcome measures will be used to collect data on self-efficacy, self-care practice, and glycated hemoglobin A1c. Qualitative description approach with an in-depth interview method of data collection will be used to explore perspectives of participants, barriers and facilitators, and acceptability of the program. Mean, median and frequencies will be computed. Depending on the normality of the distribution and the number of participants, t-tests, x2 tests, sign tests, and ANOVA will be considered to analyze the data. Inductive qualitative content analysis approach will be followed to analyze qualitative data. Qualitative and quantitative data will be merged at result level for further interpretation and presented in discussion section.
Significance: The study will be used to determine the feasibility of the Diabetic Self-Management Coaching program in the Ethiopian primary care settings. Study participants will be benefited from the coaching program and will improve their self-efficacy, diabetes self-care practice, and blood glucose level. Furthermore, the study will have a paramount advantage to establish a foundation for future definitive trial that can prove effectiveness of the program.
Detailed description
Primary Aim Objective 2. To determine the acceptability of implementing a DSM Coaching program in the Ethiopian PC setting.
The specific objectives are:
1.1. To assess the recruitment ability, adherence, retention ability, and satisfaction of the study participants.
1.2. To determine the fidelity of implementing the DSM Coaching program. Secondary Aim Objective 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the DSM Coaching program on self-efficacy, self-care practice, and HbA1c among individuals with type 2 diabetes attending PC in Gondar town.
The specific objectives include- 2.1. To evaluate the effect of the DSM Coaching program on the self-efficacy of individuals with type 2 diabetes 2.2. To examine the effect of the DSM Coaching program on the self-care practice of individuals with type 2 diabetes.
2..3. To determine the effect of the DSM Coaching program on the HbA1C of individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Study participants assigned to intervention group will attend 12 weeks DSM Coaching program. This program has two components, four group based sessions and 4 individual home-based coaching. The control group will take the routine diabetes care for the same duration. The outcome will be assessed at baseline, after completing the intervention and after a two months follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A single-blinded, parallel-group feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| "Diabetes self-management Coaching" | Experimental | Behavioral: Diabetes self-management CoachingA 12-week Diabetes self-management Coaching program and the usual care |
| "Usual Care" | Active comparator | Other: Usual careThe control group will be assigned to 12 weeks usual care or routine diabetes service |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Attend diabetes care for at least 1 year
- Taking anti-diabetic medications
- Age between 18 -65 years
- HbA1c level >7% or Repeated FBS>130
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Attend behavioral therapy program in the last 1 year
- Clinically confirmed mentally ill clients
- Pregnant
- Physically impaired (unable to see, hear, and walk)
- Clinically confirmed co-morbidity (Heart failure, cancer, stroke) which may interfere with their participation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes self-management CoachingAlso: Diabetes Health CoachingA 12-week Diabetes self-management coaching program | Behavioural | "Diabetes self-management Coaching" |
| Usual careAlso: routine serviceAssigned to 12 weeks of usual care which includes a physical examination, history taking,, medication refill, lab investigation, and health education | Other | "Usual Care" |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of the DSM Coaching program
Time frame: up to 1 year
Acceptability measures the reaction of individual recipients-both study subjects and interventionists to the intervention(Bowen et al., 2009). It will be measured using a validated scale (B. J. Weiner et al., 2017). Mean scores will be used to categorize responses into acceptable and non-acceptable.
Recruitment rate
Time frame: up to 1 year
It is the proportion of eligible individuals willing to give consent and randomized to the study.
Ahernece rate
Time frame: 1 year
An intervention adherence is the participant's compliance with attending all group sessions, and all home-based coaching sessions.
Retention rate
Time frame: 1year
The ability of the program to retain participants in the study. The proportion of study participants who completed the study and evaluated at the end of the intervention T2 and end of follow-up T3.
3 secondary outcomes
Diabetes self-efficacy
Time frame: up to 1 year
Diabetes self-care practice
Time frame: up to 1 year
Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Time frame: up to 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Dec 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 29221543Alaofe H, Asaolu I, Ehiri J, Moretz H, Asuzu C, Balogun M, Abosede O, Ehiri J. Community Health Workers in Diabetes Prevention and Management in Developing Countries. Ann Glob Health. 2017 May-Aug;83(3-4):661-675. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 847061Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 23961782Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Aug 20;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
- Results publication: PubMed 12365965Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.
- Results publication: PubMed 30345345Campos BM, Kieffer EC, Sinco B, Palmisano G, Spencer MS, Piatt GA. Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Led Diabetes Intervention among Older and Younger Latino Participants: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Sep;3(3):47. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3030047. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 30283767Chapman A, Browning CJ, Enticott JC, Yang H, Liu S, Zhang T, Thomas SA. Effect of a Health Coach Intervention for the Management of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 19;6:252. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00252. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 31737593Chen RY, Huang LC, Su CT, Chang YT, Chu CL, Chang CL, Lin CL. Effectiveness of Short-Term Health Coaching on Diabetes Control and Self-Management Efficacy: A Quasi-Experimental Trial. Front Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;7:314. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00314. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 33364150Coleman CM, Bossick AS, Zhou Y, Hopkins-Johnson L, Otto MG, Nair AS, Willens DE, Wegienka GR. Introduction of a community health worker diabetes coach improved glycemic control in an urban primary care clinic. Prev Med Rep. 2020 Nov 27;21:101267. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101267. eCollection 2021 Mar.
- Results publicationDenneson, L. M., Ono, S. S., Trevino, A. Y., Kenyon, E., & Dobscha, S. K. (2020). The applicability of self-determination theory to health coaching: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 13(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/17521882.2019.1673457
- Results publication: PubMed 31369582Dineen-Griffin S, Garcia-Cardenas V, Williams K, Benrimoj SI. Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 21318011Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15-20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 27777223Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. For the sake of confidentiality, participant data will not be shared. However, data will be disseminated in the form of publications, conference presentations, and local media. In addition, data may be shared on request.
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study on the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Guominkang in the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Culturally Tailored Program for Food-Insecure Adults: SPICE-D
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D)
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Implementing a Screening Strategy for the Diagnosis of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Health Care in a Brazilian Municipality
Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2), Prediabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A First-In-Human Study of ARO-INHBE in Adults With Obesity With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Obesity
Not yet recruiting
Role of Endothelial Dysfunction on Exercise Pressor Reflex in Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), Endothelial Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fikadu A Yehualashet, Masters principal investigator
Queen's University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diabetes self-management Coaching in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Queen's University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of the DSM Coaching program (time frame: up to 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05336019, which also lists 45 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2023.