AzTrials
AzTrials

Rectal CancerNCT05336643

Radioisotope and Fluorescence Guidance in Rectal Cancer

A study testing Radiofluorescence in people with Rectal Cancer and Lymph Node Metastasis, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study to investigate if pelvic side wall lymph nodes that remain after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be identified intraoperatively using dual radioisotope and fluorescence guidance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Rectal Cancer, Lymph Node Metastasis
What is being tested?
Radiofluorescence
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jan 2023to Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Primary diagnosis of biopsy-proven rectal cancer
  • Scheduled for curative robotic surgery of primary tumour
  • Have signed an approved informed consent form for the study
  • Be willing and able to comply with the study protocol

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy or history of adverse reaction to Technetium-99m nanocolloid or indocyanine green
  • Pregnant or lactating subjects
  • Subjects who, in the Investigator's and/or designee's opinion, have any medical condition that makes the subject a poor candidate for the investigational procedure, or interferes with the interpretation of study results

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tom Pampiglione, BMBS contact

02034479928

uclh.randd@nhs.net

United Kingdom1 site
  • University College London Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Pelvic Side Wall Lymph Node Detection in Rectal Cancer Using Dual Radioisotope and Fluorescence Guidance

A study to investigate if pelvic side wall lymph nodes that remain after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be identified intraoperatively using dual radioisotope and fluorescence guidance.

Read the detailed description

Background Total mesorectal excision (TME) revolutionised the management of rectal cancer by improving outcomes and standardising surgical technique. When excising mesorectal lymph nodes, most involved nodes are removed. However, a proportion of lower rectal lymphatic drainage is through the pelvic sidewall (PSW) system, all PSW nodes are left behind in TME. Up to 15% patients with rectal cancer have PSW involvement at presentation, this is associated with increased local recurrence.

Problem There are two main approaches in the management of PSW nodes. In the Western hemisphere, patients are typically staged with pre-operative MRI. Those with nodes undergo neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to downstage the tumour, followed by surgical resection, PSW lymph nodes are left in place. In the East patients undergo PSW lymph node dissection at the time of rectal resection. There is evidence that lymphadenectomy at initial surgery or after chemoradiotherapy improves oncological outcome, though this is at the cost of increased morbidity, worsening urinary and sexual function.

Objective The aim is to make PSW lymph node dissection safer and more targeted. This initial feasibility study, is investigating if PSW lymph nodes can be individually identified using dual modalities, fluorescence, and a radioisotope tracer. The fluorophore indocyanine green (ICG) has been used successfully for lymph node mapping in rectal cancer. ICG and Technetium-99m nanocolloid (Tc99m), a radioisotope, have been used as dual tracers for lymph nodes in gynaecological, esophagogastric and oral surgery, but never in rectal surgery.

Method The investigators have designed an open label, single-centre, feasibility study to investigate if PSW lymph nodes can be identified intra-operatively using a radioisotope and fluorescence. Ten post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy rectal cancer patients will be scheduled for resection. Pre-operatively patients will receive an injection of Tc99m and ICG to the submucosa around the tumour. Patients will undergo single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanning to identify lymphatic drainage. Intra-operatively, after bowel resection, the surgical team will examine the PSW for lymph nodes using a minimally invasive gamma probe (SENSEI, Lightpoint Medical) to detect Tc99m, and a near infrared camera system (Firefly, Intuitive) to visualise ICG. The primary outcome is intraoperative detection of PSW lymph nodes.

Significance The aim from this feasibility study is to demonstrate that individual PSW nodes can be detected intra-operatively. By proving this technique, the investigators will design a larger study to investigate the oncological outcome of excising individual involved nodes, with the aim of reducing PSW recurrence and surgical morbidity.

Being tested
Radiofluorescence
Medical subject headings
Rectal Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RadiofluorescenceDevice

    Assessment of pelvic sidewall with Firefly and Sensei

Study groups in NCT05336643
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radioisotope and fluorescence guidanceExperimentalPatients undergoing curative resection for rectal cancer will receive a peritumoural, submucosal administration of indocyanine green and technetium-99m nanocolloid. Intraoperatively the SENSEI gamma probe and Da Vinci Firefly will be used to identify pelvic side wall lymph nodes.
Receives: Device: Radiofluorescence

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lymph node detection with indocyanine green and near-infrared light source

    Intraoperative identification of pelvic side wall lymph nodes using fluorescence. After resection of the rectal specimen the near infrared light source will be switched on and the pelvic side wall will be assessed for lymph nodes seen on SPECTCT. Primary outcome will be recorded as "yes" or "no".

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Lymph node detection with technetium 99m colloid and SENSEI gamma probe

    Intraoperative identification of pelvic side wall lymph nodes using radioisotope. After resection of the rectal specimen the gamma probe will be switched on and the pelvic side wall will be assessed for lymph nodes seen on SPECTCT. Primary outcome will be recorded as "yes" or "no".

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Radioactive count of identified lymph nodes (MBq)

    Usability of drop in gamma probe - effectiveness 1

    Intraoperative identification of pelvic side wall lymph nodes using radioisotope. After resection of the rectal specimen the gamma probe will be switched on and the pelvic side wall will be assessed for lymph nodes seen on SPECTCT.

    Secondary outcome is the gamma radiation count of identified nodes recorded in megabecquerel (MBq)

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Background radioactive count (MBq)

    Usability of drop in gamma probe - effectiveness 2

    Intraoperative identification of pelvic side wall lymph nodes using radioisotope. After resection of the rectal specimen the gamma probe will be switched on and the pelvic side wall will be assessed for lymph nodes seen on SPECTCT.

    Secondary outcome is the gamma radiation count of background radiation, measured underneath camera port, pointing up towards port, recorded in megabecquerel (MBq)

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Time to lymph node identification (seconds)

    Usability of drop in gamma probe - effectiveness 3

    Intraoperative identification of pelvic side wall lymph nodes using radioisotope. After resection of the rectal specimen the gamma probe will be switched on and the pelvic side wall will be assessed for lymph nodes seen on SPECTCT.

    Secondary outcome is time taken for lymph node identification, recorded in seconds

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Usability of drop in probe (System usability scale)

    Usability of drop in gamma probe - satisfaction

    Intraoperative identification of pelvic side wall lymph nodes using radioisotope. After resection of the rectal specimen the gamma probe will be switched on and the pelvic side wall will be assessed for lymph nodes seen on SPECTCT.

    Secondary outcome is the usability of the SENSEI gamma probe using the System Usability Scale (Score 0-100)

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Lymph nodes identified on SPECTCT

    In the morning patients receive a peritumoral submucosal injection of technetium 99m nano colloid. After a 4 hour interval they undergo SPECTCT.

    Number of lymph nodes identified on SPECTCT.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Concordance of nodes seen on PET MRI/CT and SPECTCT

    In the lead up to surgery (>24 hours prior) patients will undergo PET MRI/CT. In the morning patients receive a peritumoral submucosal injection of technetium 99m nano colloid. After a 4 hour interval they undergo SPECTCT.

    Percentage of nodes seen on PET MRI/CT seen on SPECTCT (%)

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2022
  2. Study startJan 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Open label, single arm, feasibility study for a medical device
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05336643
Sponsor's protocol ID
147974
Other IDs
307317
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
30 Mar 2022
Last updated
1 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: As this is a small pilot study there is no plan to publish IPD. However, if requested by researchers then it can be shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiofluorescence in people with Rectal Cancer and Lymph Node Metastasis, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tom Pampiglione, BMBS (02034479928, uclh.randd@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lymph node detection with indocyanine green and near-infrared light source (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in