Hearing LossNCT05337748
Clinical Validation of the Lexie Lumen Hearing Aid
A study testing Lexie Self Test and Fit Group and Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group in people with Hearing Loss, run by hearX Group at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
More than half a billion people globally have hearing loss. Most hearing loss is sensorineural, meaning that the hearing loss is irreversible and requires rehabilitation. The majority of people with hearing loss have mild to moderate degrees, for which the most effective treatment options are hearing aids. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hearing Loss
- What is being tested?
- Lexie Self Test and Fit Group and Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- 11 Apr 2022to 1 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged between the ages of 18 to 99 years, living in South Africa.
- Good English proficiency (measured using an online English proficiency test as well as self-report of English speaking competence)
- Must have a self-perceived hearing loss
- Mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss (thresholds <= 80 dB HL across frequencies bilaterally)
- Possession of a smartphone compatible with the Lexie app (iOS or Android)
- Access to mobile data to operate the Lexie app.
- Willingness and availability to participate in the study over a period of 45 days
Who cannot join
- Normal hearing or profound hearing loss
- Active outer or middle ear disease
- Poor English proficiency
- Diagnosed cognitive impairment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Validation of the Lexie Lumen Over the Counter Hearing Aid
More than half a billion people globally have hearing loss. Most hearing loss is sensorineural, meaning that the hearing loss is irreversible and requires rehabilitation. The majority of people with hearing loss have mild to moderate degrees, for which the most effective treatment options are hearing aids. Over the past few years, there have been many developments in hearing technology and the service delivery models in which they are supplied. Traditional hearing care models include several visits to a qualified hearing professional who must both perform diagnostics and prescribe hearing aids, which in the past has been the only way to obtain hearing aids. However, newer developments include forms of self-fitting hearing aids that enable a user to perform threshold measurements to determine the degree of hearing loss and automatically program and fine-tune hearing aids. These devices are now becoming available as direct-to-consumer (DTC) or over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. Furthermore, alternative care models have been suggested to bolster access and uptake of assistive technology for hearing loss. Regulations on DTC and OTC hearing aids are starting to come into effect. In 2017, the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2016 directed the FDA to create a category for OTC hearing aids for adults with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss. In October 2021, the FDA formally proposed a rule to establish the OTC hearing aid category as part of this process. These changes in regulations would mean that soon, many of these self-fitting devices will become available. In response to these changes in service delivery models, the hearX group recently developed the Lexie Lumen hearing aids that can perform in-situ hearing threshold estimations and automatically prescribe hearing aid gain settings that closely approximate the gold-standard NAL-NL2 fitting prescription. This study aims to evaluate whether the performance of the novel Lexie self-test and self-fitting hearing aid is equivalent to the same hearing aid programmed professionally by an audiologist using a professionally obtained audiogram.
Read the detailed description
Objective: To examine the difference in outcomes (satisfaction and objective benefit) of the Lexie self-test and self-fitting (Lexie- STF) hearing aid versus a Lexie hearing aid fitted professionally with a clinically obtained audiogram (Lexie-PTF) (n = 60).
Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that the Lexie-STF (experimental group) will be non-inferior to the Lexie-PFT (control group) in terms of perceived satisfaction, speech perception in noise and real-ear measurements.
Design: A randomized control trial (RCT) will be conducted cross-sectionally (45 days) to evaluate the efficacy of Lexie-STF compared to Lexie-PTF.
Setting: This study will involve clinical, audiometric testing as well as a user field-trial of the fitted hearing aids.
Participants: Eligible participants will include 60 adults (18 to 99 years) with a self-perceived level of hearing loss, free from symptoms of ear disease or excessive cerumen and who own a smartphone (Android or iOS). Participants will be recruited for each group and will randomly be assigned using a computer-generated randomization by an independent research assistant, after being stratified for sex and degree of hearing loss.
Intervention: The experimental group (Lexie-STF) will be provided with Lexie Lumen hearing aids and accompanying smartphone application, that will be automatically fitted according to the participants in-situ audiogram. Participants will then be able to self-adjust their hearing aid settings (prescriptive gain) after a period of two weeks. The control group (Lexie PTF) will be professionally fitted by a certified audiologist with the Lexie Lumen hearing aids, according to gold-standard NAL-NL2 prescriptive gain targets using a standard clinically obtained audiogram.
Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). Secondary outcome measures will be the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), the QuickSIN speech-in-noise test and real-ear-measurements (REMs).
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Being tested
- Lexie Self Test and Fit Group, Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group
- Keywords
- hearing loss, hearing aid, hearing rehabilitation, self-fitting hearing aid
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lexie Self Test and Fit GroupDevice
Also called Lexie STF)
The intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with a slimtube and dome. The hearing aids will be accompanied and operated using the Lexie smartphone application. Participants will self-perform an in-situ hearing check (pure tones presented via the hearing aids). The prescriptive gain of the hearing aids will be programmed and applied automatically using the obtained in-situ hearing thresholds. Participants will be fitted according to the customized, Lexie optimal fit prescribed gain setting. The optimal settings include the original gain and compression requirements that NAL-NL2 suggests for various audiograms. No additional band equalizer or compression adjustments are added. After a specified period of time, participants will be able to self-adjust the hearing aids using the smartphone application.
Lexie Professional Test and Fit GroupDevice
Also called Lexie PFT
The intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with slimtube and dome. Hearing aids will be fitted by a certified audiologist according to a gold-standard prescriptive formula (NAL-NL2) using a clinically obtained diagnostic pure tone audiogram. Participants will have access to the smartphone application, but the settings will be limited with only options to change the volume of the hearing aids.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental : Lexie Self Test and Fit Group (Lexie STF) | Experimental | The intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with a slimtube and dome. The hearing aids will be accompanied and operated using the Lexie smartphone application. Participants will self-perform an in-situ hearing check (pure tones presented via the hearing aids). The prescriptive gain of the hearing aids will be programmed and applied automatically using the obtained in-situ hearing thresholds. Participants will be fitted according to the customized, Lexie optimal fit prescribed gain setting. The optimal settings include the original gain and compression requirements that NAL-NL2 suggests for various audiograms. No additional band equalizer or compression adjustments are added. After a specified period of time, participants will be able to self-adjust the hearing aids using the smartphone application. Receives: Device: Lexie Self Test and Fit Group |
| Control: Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group (Lexie PTF) | Active comparator | The intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with slimtube and dome. Hearing aids will be fitted by a certified audiologist according to a gold-standard prescriptive formula (NAL-NL2) using a clinically obtained diagnostic pure tone audiogram. Participants will have access to the smartphone application, but the settings will be limited with only options to change the volume of the hearing aids. Receives: Device: Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) is a 24 item self-assessment inventory in which patients report the amount of trouble they experience hearing and communicating in noise in different everyday listening environments. Benefit is calculated by comparing the patient's reported difficulty in the unaided condition with their amount of difficulty when using amplification. The APHAB produces scores for 4 subscales: Ease of Communication (EC), Reverberation (RV), Background Noise (BN), and Aversiveness (AV).The final score is determined by subtracting the aided average from the unaided average, keeping in mind that the score indicates how frequently the individual experiences communication difficulty. Therefore a higher score indicates a poorer outcome. (Minimum score 1% to a maximum score of 99%).
Measured: Change from baseline assessment to final assessment after 30 day field trial use.
Secondary outcomes (4)
International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)
IOI HA is a seven item questionnaire designed to evaluate effectiveness of hearing aid treatment. The responses of the items are assigned a value of 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a more favorable outcome. The total score is calculated as the sum of all the subscales. Minimum score for the total score is 7 and maximum score 35.
Measured: Final assessment after 30 day field use
QuickSIN Speech in Noise Test
The QuickSIN measures a persons ability to accurately hear speech in noise by determining a signal-to-noise ratio loss. A list of six sentences with five key words per sentence is presented in four-talker babble noise. The sentences are presented at pre-recorded signal-to-noise ratios which decrease in 5-dB steps from 25 (very easy) to 0 (extremely difficult). To score, the number of correctly repeated words from each of the six sentences are counted. The SNR loss is calculated by subtracting the total number of correct words from 25.5. Three lists are averaged to obtain an average SNR score. The SNRs used are: 25, 20, 15, 10, 5 and 0, encompassing normal to severely impaired performance in noise. Benefit scores are calculated as unaided (without hearing aids) -aided (with hearing aids) score. Benefit scores at 30 days are presented in the data table.
Measured: Baseline and benefit at the end of 30 day field use
Digits-in-noise Test (DIN)
The DIN measure primarily the auditory, or bottom-up, speech recognition abilities in noise. The test determines a speech reception threshold by presenting spoken digit triplets (e.g., 3-4-7) in speech weighted background masking noise. Twenty three digits are presented adaptively at different signal to noise ratios, based on correct or incorrect recognition of the digits. The speech reception threshold is determined by averaging the signal to noise ratios of the last 19 digit triplets. Benefit scores are calculated as unaided baseline- aided at 30 days after field trial use. Benefit scores are presented in the data table.
Measured: Baseline unaided test and aided fitting final assessment after 30 day field use
Live Speech Mapping Using Real Ear Measurements (REM)
Real Ear Measurements (REM) involves placing a fine probe microphone into the ear canal to measure the sound at the eardrum. The hearing aid will be inserted in the ear alongside the probe microphone to measure the amplification effect within the patients ear taking into account the patient ear acoustics. Adjustments to the hearing aid can be made and measurement to best match the prescription target. The specific REM measure used will be Live Speech Mapping, which assesses the hearing aid output using realistic speech presented via a loudspeaker with the hearing aid in its normal mode of operation. The outcome measure of Live Speech Mapping is the decibel sound pressure level (dB SPL) across a range of frequencies (250Hz to 4000Hz), calculated as the difference from the NAL-NL2 target (i.e. NAL-NL2 target- measured dB SPL).
Measured: Final assessment after 30 day field use
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2022
- Study start11 Apr 2022
- Primary completion1 Oct 2022
- Study completion1 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hearing LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The experimental group will undergo the self-test and fitting (Lexie STF) intervention and the experimental group will undergo the professional test and fit (Lexie PTF) intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- hearX Group
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Pretoria
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, De Wet Swanepoel, hearX Group
- Investigators
- De Wet Swanepoel, PhD, Principal investigator, hearX Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05337748
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LexieLumen
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chadha S, Kamenov K, Cieza A. The world report on hearing, 2021. Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Apr 1;99(4):242-242A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.285643. No abstract available.
PubMed 33953438Keidser G, Convery E. Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions. Trends Hear. 2016 Apr 12;20:2331216516643284. doi: 10.1177/2331216516643284.
PubMed 27072929De Sousa KC, Manchaiah V, Moore DR, Graham MA, Swanepoel W. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
PubMed 37052929
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Validation of the Lexie Lumen Over the Counter Hearing Aid
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05337748
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LexieLumen
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Keywords
- hearing loss, hearing aid, hearing rehabilitation, self-fitting hearing aid
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- hearX GroupIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Pretoria
- Study start
- 11 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
More than half a billion people globally have hearing loss. Most hearing loss is sensorineural, meaning that the hearing loss is irreversible and requires rehabilitation. The majority of people with hearing loss have mild to moderate degrees, for which the most effective treatment options are hearing aids. Over the past few years, there have been many developments in hearing technology and the service delivery models in which they are supplied. Traditional hearing care models include several visits to a qualified hearing professional who must both perform diagnostics and prescribe hearing aids, which in the past has been the only way to obtain hearing aids. However, newer developments include forms of self-fitting hearing aids that enable a user to perform threshold measurements to determine the degree of hearing loss and automatically program and fine-tune hearing aids. These devices are now becoming available as direct-to-consumer (DTC) or over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. Furthermore, alternative care models have been suggested to bolster access and uptake of assistive technology for hearing loss. Regulations on DTC and OTC hearing aids are starting to come into effect. In 2017, the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2016 directed the FDA to create a category for OTC hearing aids for adults with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss. In October 2021, the FDA formally proposed a rule to establish the OTC hearing aid category as part of this process. These changes in regulations would mean that soon, many of these self-fitting devices will become available. In response to these changes in service delivery models, the hearX group recently developed the Lexie Lumen hearing aids that can perform in-situ hearing threshold estimations and automatically prescribe hearing aid gain settings that closely approximate the gold-standard NAL-NL2 fitting prescription. This study aims to evaluate whether the performance of the novel Lexie self-test and self-fitting hearing aid is equivalent to the same hearing aid programmed professionally by an audiologist using a professionally obtained audiogram.
Detailed description
Objective: To examine the difference in outcomes (satisfaction and objective benefit) of the Lexie self-test and self-fitting (Lexie- STF) hearing aid versus a Lexie hearing aid fitted professionally with a clinically obtained audiogram (Lexie-PTF) (n = 60).
Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that the Lexie-STF (experimental group) will be non-inferior to the Lexie-PFT (control group) in terms of perceived satisfaction, speech perception in noise and real-ear measurements.
Design: A randomized control trial (RCT) will be conducted cross-sectionally (45 days) to evaluate the efficacy of Lexie-STF compared to Lexie-PTF.
Setting: This study will involve clinical, audiometric testing as well as a user field-trial of the fitted hearing aids.
Participants: Eligible participants will include 60 adults (18 to 99 years) with a self-perceived level of hearing loss, free from symptoms of ear disease or excessive cerumen and who own a smartphone (Android or iOS). Participants will be recruited for each group and will randomly be assigned using a computer-generated randomization by an independent research assistant, after being stratified for sex and degree of hearing loss.
Intervention: The experimental group (Lexie-STF) will be provided with Lexie Lumen hearing aids and accompanying smartphone application, that will be automatically fitted according to the participants in-situ audiogram. Participants will then be able to self-adjust their hearing aid settings (prescriptive gain) after a period of two weeks. The control group (Lexie PTF) will be professionally fitted by a certified audiologist with the Lexie Lumen hearing aids, according to gold-standard NAL-NL2 prescriptive gain targets using a standard clinically obtained audiogram.
Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). Secondary outcome measures will be the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), the QuickSIN speech-in-noise test and real-ear-measurements (REMs).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The experimental group will undergo the self-test and fitting (Lexie STF) intervention and the experimental group will undergo the professional test and fit (Lexie PTF) intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental : Lexie Self Test and Fit Group (Lexie STF) | Experimental | Device: Lexie Self Test and Fit GroupThe intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with a slimtube and dome. The hearing aids will be accompanied and operated using the Lexie smartphone application. Participants will self-perform an in-situ hearing check (pure tones presented via the hearing aids). The prescriptive gain of the hearing aids will be programmed and applied automatically using the obtained in-situ hearing thresholds. Participants will be fitted according to the customized, Lexie optimal fit prescribed gain setting. The optimal settings include the original gain and compression requirements that NAL-NL2 suggests for various audiograms. No additional band equalizer or compression adjustments are added. After a specified period of time, participants will be able to self-adjust the hearing aids using the smartphone application. |
| Control: Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group (Lexie PTF) | Active comparator | Device: Lexie Professional Test and Fit GroupThe intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with slimtube and dome. Hearing aids will be fitted by a certified audiologist according to a gold-standard prescriptive formula (NAL-NL2) using a clinically obtained diagnostic pure tone audiogram. Participants will have access to the smartphone application, but the settings will be limited with only options to change the volume of the hearing aids. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adults aged between the ages of 18 to 99 years, living in South Africa.
- Good English proficiency (measured using an online English proficiency test as well as self-report of English speaking competence)
- Must have a self-perceived hearing loss
- Mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss (thresholds <= 80 dB HL across frequencies bilaterally)
- Possession of a smartphone compatible with the Lexie app (iOS or Android)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Normal hearing or profound hearing loss
- Active outer or middle ear disease
- Poor English proficiency
- Diagnosed cognitive impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lexie Self Test and Fit GroupAlso: Lexie STF)The intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with a slimtube and dome. The hearing aids will be accompanied and operated using the Lexie smartphone application. Participants will self-perform an in-situ hearing check (pure tones presented via the hearing aids). The prescriptive gain of the hearing aids will be programmed and applied automatically using the obtained in-situ hearing thresholds. Participants will be fitted according to the customized, Lexie optimal fit prescribed gain setting. The optimal settings include the original gain and compression requirements that NAL-NL2 suggests for various audiograms. No additional band equalizer or compression adjustments are added. After a specified period of time, participants will be able to self-adjust the hearing aids using the smartphone application. | Device | Experimental : Lexie Self Test and Fit Group (Lexie STF) |
| Lexie Professional Test and Fit GroupAlso: Lexie PFTThe intervention offered is a hearing aid fitting with Lexie Lumen hearing aids coupled with slimtube and dome. Hearing aids will be fitted by a certified audiologist according to a gold-standard prescriptive formula (NAL-NL2) using a clinically obtained diagnostic pure tone audiogram. Participants will have access to the smartphone application, but the settings will be limited with only options to change the volume of the hearing aids. | Device | Control: Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group (Lexie PTF) |
Primary outcome
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
Time frame: Change from baseline assessment to final assessment after 30 day field trial use.
The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) is a 24 item self-assessment inventory in which patients report the amount of trouble they experience hearing and communicating in noise in different everyday listening environments. Benefit is calculated by comparing the patient's reported difficulty in the unaided condition with their amount of difficulty when using amplification. The APHAB produces scores for 4 subscales: Ease of Communication (EC), Reverberation (RV), Background Noise (BN), and Aversiveness (AV).The final score is determined by subtracting the aided average from the unaided average, keeping in mind that the score indicates how frequently the individual experiences communication difficulty. Therefore a higher score indicates a poorer outcome. (Minimum score 1% to a maximum score of 99%).
4 secondary outcomes
International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)
Time frame: Final assessment after 30 day field use
QuickSIN Speech in Noise Test
Time frame: Baseline and benefit at the end of 30 day field use
Digits-in-noise Test (DIN)
Time frame: Baseline unaided test and aided fitting final assessment after 30 day field use
Live Speech Mapping Using Real Ear Measurements (REM)
Time frame: Final assessment after 30 day field use
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 33953438Chadha S, Kamenov K, Cieza A. The world report on hearing, 2021. Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Apr 1;99(4):242-242A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.285643. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27072929Keidser G, Convery E. Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions. Trends Hear. 2016 Apr 12;20:2331216516643284. doi: 10.1177/2331216516643284.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37052929De Sousa KC, Manchaiah V, Moore DR, Graham MA, Swanepoel W. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hearing Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Vestibular Function on Deaf Infants' Activities of Daily Living
Vestibular Dysfunction, Hearing Loss
Recruiting
HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
Not yet recruiting
Hearing Intervention Effects on Brain and Language Development in Children With Bilateral Mild Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss, Bilateral
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Autosomal Dominant Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Retrospective Analysis of Speech Performance Using the HiRes Ultra and HiRes Ultra 3D Cochlear Implant
Cochlear Hearing Loss
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
De Wet Swanepoel, PhD principal investigator
hearX Group
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lexie Self Test and Fit Group and Lexie Professional Test and Fit Group in people with Hearing Loss, run by hearX Group at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) (time frame: Change from baseline assessment to final assessment after 30 day field trial use.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05337748, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.