Postmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT05338086
A Study to Compare Efficacy, PK, PD, Safety and IMM of MB09 to Prolia® [EU-sourced] in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
A Phase 3 study testing MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia and Elemental Calcium in people with Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis, run by mAbxience Research S.L. at 64 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia and Elemental Calcium
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 558 participants
- Where
- 64 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2022to 22 May 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Postmenopausal women, diagnosed with osteoporosis.
- Aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 80 years at screening.
- Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 99.9 kg, and a body mass index of ≤30 kg/m2 at screening.
- Absolute bone mineral density consistent with T-score ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip as measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).
- At least two intact, nonfractured vertebrae in the L1-L4 region and at least one hip joint evaluable by DXA.
- Adequate organ function.
Who cannot join
- Previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®, or denosumab biosimilar) or other monoclonal antibody.
- History and/or presence of one severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures or hip fracture.
- Recent long bone fracture (within 6 months).
- History and/or presence of bone metastases, bone disease or other metabolic disease.
- Intravenous bisphosphonate administered within 5 years of screening.
- Oral bisphosphonates ≥12 months cumulative use prior to screening. If used <12 months cumulatively and the last dose was ≥12 months before screening, the subject could be enrolled.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Ongoing use of any osteoporosis treatment or use of prohibited treatment.
- Other bone active drugs.
- History and/or current hypoparathyroidism or hyperparathyroidism, hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia.
- Other Inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
64 sites in 8 countries.
64 sites in 8 countries
Poland17 sites
Bialystok - ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Spólka Jawna
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship
NZOZ Osteo Medic SC Artur Racewicz Jerzy Supronik
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship
Szpital Uniwersytecki Nr 2 im. Dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy
Bydgoszcz
Centrum Medyczne Czestochowa - PRATIA - PPDS
Częstochowa, Silesian Voivodeship
Centrum Medyczne Katowice - PRATIA - PPDS
Katowice
Globe Badania Kliniczne Spólka z o.o.
Kłodzko, Lower Silesian Voivodeship
Centrum Medyczne Linden
Krakow
Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne
Krakow
MCM Krakow - PRATIA - PPDS
Krakow
AES - DRS - Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Poznaniu
Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne (Lotników Polskich)
Świdnik, Lublin Voivodeship
Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
Świdnik, Lublin Voivodeship
AES - DRS - Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Warszawie
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship
Centrum Medyczne AMED
Warsaw
Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park NZOZ
Warsaw
Rheuma Medicus Specjalistyczne Centrum Reumatologii i Osteoporozy
Warsaw
AES - DRS - Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial we Wroclawiu
Wroclaw
Bulgaria12 sites
Medical Center Medconsult Pleven OOD
Pleven
Medical Center Artmed OOD
Plovdiv
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Plovdiv
Plovdiv
Outpatient Clinic for Specialized Medical Help - Medical Center Kuchuk Paris "OOD"
Plovdiv
AES - DRS - Medical Center Synexus Sofia EOOD
Sofia, Sofia-Grad
Diagnostic and Consulting Center Aleksandrovska EOOD
Sofia
Diagnostic- Consultative Center Convex EOOD
Sofia
Medical Center Excelsior OOD - PPDS
Sofia
Medical Center Hera EOOD
Sofia
Specialized outpatient medical facility - Rheumatology Centre St. Irina EOOD
Sofia
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich AD
Stara Zagora
New Medical Center EOOD
Vratsa
Hungary11 sites
Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz
Békéscsaba, Bekes County
AES - DRS - Synexus Budapest - Magyarország Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft
Budapest
QUALICLINIC Kft
Budapest
Óbudai Egészségügyi Centrum Kft
Budapest
AES - DRS - Synexus Debrecen Magyarország Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft
Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar
AES - DRS - Synexus Gyula - Magyarország Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft
Gyula, Bekes County
Pest Megyei Flór Ferenc Kórház
Kistarcsa, Pest County
Csongrad Megyei Dr. Bugyi Istvan Korhaz
Szentes, Csongrád megye
MÁV Kórház és Rendelointézet Szolnok
Szolnok, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok
Vital Medical Center
Veszprém
AES - DRS - Synexus Zalaegerszeg Magyarország Egészségügyi Kft
Zalaegerszeg, Zala County
Estonia7 sites
KLV Arstikabinet
Pärnu, Pärnu Maakon
Center For Clinical And Basic Research
Tallinn, Harju
East Tallinn Central Hospital
Tallinn, Harju
North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation
Tallinn, Harju
Clinical Research Centre Ltd
Tartu, Tartu
MediTrials OÜ
Tartu, Tartu
Tartu University Hospital
Tartu, Tartu
Latvia5 sites
Private Practice of Laila Atike
Liepāja, Liepājas Rajon
Outpatient Clinic Veselibas Centrs 4
Riga, Riga Rajon
Outpatient Clinic Adoria
Riga, Rigas Rajons
RSU Ambulance
Riga
Sigulda Hospital, Outpatient Clinic
Sigulda, Siguldas Pilsēta
Mexico5 sites
Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica Y Clinica SC
Guadalajara, Jalisco
Hospital Angeles Lindavista (Consultorio de Reumatologia)
Mexico City, Mexico City
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio González
Monterrey, Nuevo León
Centro Integral Medico SJR S.C
Querétaro
Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto
San Luis Potosí City
Serbia4 sites
Institute of Rheumatology Belgrade - PPDS
Belgrade
Military Medical Academy
Belgrade
University Clinical Center of Serbia - PPDS
Belgrade
Clinical Centre of Vojvodina
Novi Sad
Georgia3 sites
National Institute of Endocrinology
Tbilisi
Tbilisi Heart and Vascular Clinic Ltd
Tbilisi
Tbilisi Heart Center Ltd.
Tbilisi
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel, Multinational Study to Compare the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB09 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) vs. Prolia® (EU-sourced) in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
Read the detailed description
The study was planning to randomise approximately 528 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged ≥55 and ≤80 years old with a Bone Mineral Density (BMD) consistent with T-score of ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4 at the lumbar spine or total hip as measured by DXA during the Screening Period. Screening evaluations were to be completed within 28 days prior to randomisation.
On Day 1, 528 eligible postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were to be randomised in a 2:1:1 ratio to receive MB09-MB09 (Arm 1), Prolia-MB09 (Arm 2), or Prolia-Prolia (Arm 3) using an Interactive Response Sys-tem (IRT).
During the Main Treatment Period, subjects received one subcutaneous injection (60 mg/mL) of study drug on Day 1 and at Month 6. At Month 12, after all efficacy and safety assessments have been performed, the subject were to be enter the Transition/Safety Follow Up Period and were to receive the third dose of study drug. Subjects assigned to the MB09 MB09 arm (Arm 1) received MB09 on Day 1, at Month 6 and at Month 12. Subjects assigned to the Prolia MB09 arm (Arm 2) received EU-Prolia on Day 1 and at Month 6, and MB09 at Month 12. Subjects assigned to the Prolia-Prolia arm (Arm 3) received EU-Prolia on Day 1, at Month 6, and at Month 12. All subjects were to be followed up to Transition Period Month 6.
All subjects received daily supplementation of calcium and vitamin D.
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia, Elemental Calcium, Vitamin D
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MB09 (denosumab biosimilar)Drug
Pre-filled syringe (PFS) 60 mg/mL solution, administered as subcutaneous injection
EU-ProliaDrug
PFS 60 mg/mL solution, administered as subcutaneous injection
Elemental CalciumDietary supplement
at least 1000 mg daily
Vitamin DDietary supplement
at least 400 IU daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MB09-MB09 | Experimental | Subjects randomised into MB09-MB09 group were administered MB09 (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months. Receives: Drug: MB09 (denosumab biosimilar); Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
| Prolia-MB09 | Active comparator | Subjects randomised into Prolia- MB09 group were administered Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months. Receives: Drug: MB09 (denosumab biosimilar); Drug: EU-Prolia; Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
| Prolia-Prolia | Active comparator | Subjects randomised into Prolia-Prolia group were administered Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months. Receives: Drug: EU-Prolia; Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at 52 Weeks - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy of MB09 to EU Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of lumbar spine BMD at Week 52 (Month 12). The main analysis method was on the mFAS using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) fitted to the composite %CfB lumbar spine BMD at Month 6 and Month 12, without any imputation of missing data. Bone mineral density was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessments of the lumbar spine (L1 to L4) were performed at a central imaging vendor.
Measured: Baseline (Screening), up to Week 52
Secondary outcomes (10)
Efficacy: Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 52 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)
Difference in means (MB09-Prolia) in the %CfB in lumbar spine BMD after 12 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with SC denosumab injections every 6 months. This included all subjects and data records irrespective of failed eligibility criteria, receipt of prohibited medications, discontinued treatment for any reason, had errors or deviations in dosing, or receipt of both doses. Estimation was via Multiple Imputation (MI) and ANCOVA on the FAS. Since the retrieved dropout rate was low, a treatment-failure (TF) penalty was applied to the imputed values at Month 12 for those subjects who received only one dose of the study treatment to centre the distribution of each subject's %CfB values around their baseline level. Bone density measurements were performed by DXA. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis.
Measured: Baseline (screening), up to Week 52
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and Month12 - MMRM on mFAS
To assess the efficacy of MB09 to EU-Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of Lumbar Spine at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and Month12. The difference in means in %CfB in lumbar spine BMD between MB09 and Prolia at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck at Month 6 and Month 12 from an MMRM presented for the mFAS. Bone density measurements were performed by DXA. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis.
Measured: Baseline (screening), Month 6 and Month 12.
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and 12 - ANCOVA on FAS
To assess the efficacy of MB09 to EU-Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of the difference in means (MB09-Prolia) in the %CfB in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and 12 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with SC denosumab injections every 6 months. This included all subjects and data records irrespective of failed eligibility criteria, receipt of prohibited medications, discontinued treatment for any reason, had errors or deviations in dosing, or receipt of both doses. Bone density measurement were performed by DXA. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis.
Measured: Baseline (screening), Month 6, Month 12.
Pharmacodynamics: Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (sCTX) Area Under the Effect Curve From Zero to 6 Months (AUEC0-6 Months) After First Dose - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)
Geometric meant (geometric CV%) sCTX Area under the effect curve from zero to 6 months (AUEC0-6 months) after first dose in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with SC denosumab injections every 6 months assuming all women received their first denosumab dose without any errors in dosing and without receipt of any prohibited therapies or other osteoporosis medications up to 6 months after first dose.
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.
Pharmacodynamics: %CfB Area Under the Percent Inhibition Curve From Time Zero to 6 Months (AUIC0-6 Months) in sCTX - on mFAS
AUIC0-6 months = Area under the inhibition curve for % change from baseline sCTX concentrations from time zero to 6 months
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Denosumab After First Dose Study Treatment (Pharmacokinetic Parameter Analysis Set)
To assess the PK profile of MB09 compared with EU-Prolia following the first dose, maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Denosumab After First Dose study treatment (Pharmacokinetic Parameter Analysis Set).
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6
Pharmacokinetics: To Assess the PK Profile of MB09 Compared With EU Prolia (AUC0-6 Months) Following the First Dose
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 6 months analysed on the log scale by ANCOVA. The model will include treatment and stratification variables (baseline BMD T-score at the lumbar spine (≤ -3.0 and > -3.0 SD), body mass index (< 25 and ≥ 25 kg/m2), age at study entry (≥ 55 to < 68 years versus ≥ 68 to ≤ 80 years) and prior bisphosphonate medication use at study entry (prior use of bisphosphonates versus no prior bisphosphonate use as fixed effects. The estimated mean difference with 95% CI will be back-transformed to give the ratio of geometric means (MB09/EU-Prolia) with 95% CI following the first dose in the Main Treatment Period.
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.
Safety: Overall Summary of Adverse Events - Main Treatment Period - Safety Analysis Set (SAF) and Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period (SAF-TP)
For Main Treatment Period, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 12 and no more than 6 months after the last dose in case of early treatment discontinuation unless the TEAE was considered as related to the study treatment by investigator. For Transition Period, TEAE was an event observed after the third dose of study treatment at Month 12 until Month 18. Throughout the study, TEAE was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 18.
Measured: From first administration of study treatment on Day 1 until Month 18
Safety: New Clinical Bone Fractures - TEAEs (Throughout the Study - From Day 1 Untill Month 18)
For the Main Treatment Period, TEAE was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 12 and no more than 6 months after the last dose in case of early treatment discontinuation unless the TEAE was considered as related to the study treatment by investigator. For Transition Period, TEAE was an event observed after the third dose of study treatment at Month 12 until Month 18. Throughout the study, TEAE was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 18.
Measured: All participants in the Main Treatment Period and Transition Period (From Day 1 untill Month 18)
Overall Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) - Safety Analysis Set (SAF) and Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period (SAF-TP)
Number of subjects experiencing treatment-induced immunogenicity: Binding and neutralising serum denosumab antibodies from baseline up to and including Month 18. Analysis of immunogenicity data will be based on ADA evaluable subjects defined as all SAF or SAF-TP subjects with baseline and at least one post-baseline immunogenicity assessment within the Main Treatment Period or the Transition Period. The formation of ADAs against MB09 or EU-Prolia was assessed in blood samples.
Measured: From baseline (pre-dose) up to and including Month 18.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2022
- Study start16 Mar 2022
- Primary completion14 Dec 2023
- Study completion22 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 558 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- mAbxience Research S.L.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05338086
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MB09-C-01-19
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Supronik J, Giorgadze E, Blicharski T, Sanchez-Vidaurre S, Perez-Diaz L, Paravisini A, Millan S. Phase III Study to Confirm Clinical Similarity of MB09, a Denosumab Biosimilar, and Prolia(R) in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (SIMBA Study). Pharmaceutics. 2026 Feb 27;18(3):291. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18030291.
PubMed 41900779
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel, Multinational Study to Compare the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB09 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) vs. Prolia® (EU-sourced) in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05338086
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MB09-C-01-19
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 558 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- mAbxience Research S.L.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
Detailed description
The study was planning to randomise approximately 528 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged ≥55 and ≤80 years old with a Bone Mineral Density (BMD) consistent with T-score of ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4 at the lumbar spine or total hip as measured by DXA during the Screening Period. Screening evaluations were to be completed within 28 days prior to randomisation.
On Day 1, 528 eligible postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were to be randomised in a 2:1:1 ratio to receive MB09-MB09 (Arm 1), Prolia-MB09 (Arm 2), or Prolia-Prolia (Arm 3) using an Interactive Response Sys-tem (IRT).
During the Main Treatment Period, subjects received one subcutaneous injection (60 mg/mL) of study drug on Day 1 and at Month 6. At Month 12, after all efficacy and safety assessments have been performed, the subject were to be enter the Transition/Safety Follow Up Period and were to receive the third dose of study drug. Subjects assigned to the MB09 MB09 arm (Arm 1) received MB09 on Day 1, at Month 6 and at Month 12. Subjects assigned to the Prolia MB09 arm (Arm 2) received EU-Prolia on Day 1 and at Month 6, and MB09 at Month 12. Subjects assigned to the Prolia-Prolia arm (Arm 3) received EU-Prolia on Day 1, at Month 6, and at Month 12. All subjects were to be followed up to Transition Period Month 6.
All subjects received daily supplementation of calcium and vitamin D.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MB09-MB09 | Experimental | Drug: MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium, Dietary Supplement: Vitamin DSubjects randomised into MB09-MB09 group were administered MB09 (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months. |
| Prolia-MB09 | Active comparator | Drug: MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), Drug: EU-Prolia, Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium, Dietary Supplement: Vitamin DSubjects randomised into Prolia- MB09 group were administered Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months. |
| Prolia-Prolia | Active comparator | Drug: EU-Prolia, Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium, Dietary Supplement: Vitamin DSubjects randomised into Prolia-Prolia group were administered Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Postmenopausal women, diagnosed with osteoporosis.
- Aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 80 years at screening.
- Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 99.9 kg, and a body mass index of ≤30 kg/m2 at screening.
- Absolute bone mineral density consistent with T-score ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip as measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).
- At least two intact, nonfractured vertebrae in the L1-L4 region and at least one hip joint evaluable by DXA.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®, or denosumab biosimilar) or other monoclonal antibody.
- History and/or presence of one severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures or hip fracture.
- Recent long bone fracture (within 6 months).
- History and/or presence of bone metastases, bone disease or other metabolic disease.
- Intravenous bisphosphonate administered within 5 years of screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MB09 (denosumab biosimilar)Pre-filled syringe (PFS) 60 mg/mL solution, administered as subcutaneous injection | Drug | MB09-MB09, Prolia-MB09 |
| EU-ProliaPFS 60 mg/mL solution, administered as subcutaneous injection | Drug | Prolia-MB09, Prolia-Prolia |
| Elemental Calciumat least 1000 mg daily | Dietary supplement | MB09-MB09, Prolia-MB09, Prolia-Prolia |
| Vitamin Dat least 400 IU daily | Dietary supplement | MB09-MB09, Prolia-MB09, Prolia-Prolia |
Primary outcome
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at 52 Weeks - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)
Time frame: Baseline (Screening), up to Week 52
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy of MB09 to EU Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of lumbar spine BMD at Week 52 (Month 12). The main analysis method was on the mFAS using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) fitted to the composite %CfB lumbar spine BMD at Month 6 and Month 12, without any imputation of missing data. Bone mineral density was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessments of the lumbar spine (L1 to L4) were performed at a central imaging vendor.
10 secondary outcomes
Efficacy: Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 52 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)
Time frame: Baseline (screening), up to Week 52
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and Month12 - MMRM on mFAS
Time frame: Baseline (screening), Month 6 and Month 12.
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and 12 - ANCOVA on FAS
Time frame: Baseline (screening), Month 6, Month 12.
Pharmacodynamics: Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (sCTX) Area Under the Effect Curve From Zero to 6 Months (AUEC0-6 Months) After First Dose - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.
Pharmacodynamics: %CfB Area Under the Percent Inhibition Curve From Time Zero to 6 Months (AUIC0-6 Months) in sCTX - on mFAS
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.
Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Denosumab After First Dose Study Treatment (Pharmacokinetic Parameter Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6
Pharmacokinetics: To Assess the PK Profile of MB09 Compared With EU Prolia (AUC0-6 Months) Following the First Dose
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.
Safety: Overall Summary of Adverse Events - Main Treatment Period - Safety Analysis Set (SAF) and Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period (SAF-TP)
Time frame: From first administration of study treatment on Day 1 until Month 18
Safety: New Clinical Bone Fractures - TEAEs (Throughout the Study - From Day 1 Untill Month 18)
Time frame: All participants in the Main Treatment Period and Transition Period (From Day 1 untill Month 18)
Overall Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) - Safety Analysis Set (SAF) and Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period (SAF-TP)
Time frame: From baseline (pre-dose) up to and including Month 18.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41900779Supronik J, Giorgadze E, Blicharski T, Sanchez-Vidaurre S, Perez-Diaz L, Paravisini A, Millan S. Phase III Study to Confirm Clinical Similarity of MB09, a Denosumab Biosimilar, and Prolia(R) in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (SIMBA Study). Pharmaceutics. 2026 Feb 27;18(3):291. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18030291.
Related trials for Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Sensorimotor Balance Training vs Digitally Augmented Core Stabilization in Women With Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of TST002 Injection in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis or Low Bone Mass
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, Low Bone Mass
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Sequential Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by Denosumab vs. Zoledronic Acid for Gains in HIP BMD
Osteoporosis in Post-menopausal Women
Not yet recruiting
High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Physiotherapy for Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Trial
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Osteopenia
RecruitingObservational study
Sequential Therapies After Osteoanabolic Treatment
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
64 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia and Elemental Calcium in people with Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis, run by mAbxience Research S.L. at 64 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 64 sites in Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at 52 Weeks - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS) (time frame: Baseline (Screening), up to Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05338086, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2025.