AzTrials
AzTrials

Postmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT05338086

A Study to Compare Efficacy, PK, PD, Safety and IMM of MB09 to Prolia® [EU-sourced] in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

A Phase 3 study testing MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia and Elemental Calcium in people with Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis, run by mAbxience Research S.L. at 64 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 80 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
What is being tested?
MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia and Elemental Calcium
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
558 participants
Where
64 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
16 Mar 2022to 22 May 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Postmenopausal women, diagnosed with osteoporosis.
  • Aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 80 years at screening.
  • Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 99.9 kg, and a body mass index of ≤30 kg/m2 at screening.
  • Absolute bone mineral density consistent with T-score ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip as measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA).
  • At least two intact, nonfractured vertebrae in the L1-L4 region and at least one hip joint evaluable by DXA.
  • Adequate organ function.

Who cannot join

  • Previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®, or denosumab biosimilar) or other monoclonal antibody.
  • History and/or presence of one severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures or hip fracture.
  • Recent long bone fracture (within 6 months).
  • History and/or presence of bone metastases, bone disease or other metabolic disease.
  • Intravenous bisphosphonate administered within 5 years of screening.
  • Oral bisphosphonates ≥12 months cumulative use prior to screening. If used <12 months cumulatively and the last dose was ≥12 months before screening, the subject could be enrolled.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Ongoing use of any osteoporosis treatment or use of prohibited treatment.
  • Other bone active drugs.
  • History and/or current hypoparathyroidism or hyperparathyroidism, hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia.
  • Other Inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

64 sites in 8 countries.

64 sites in 8 countries

Poland17 sites
  • Bialystok - ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Spólka Jawna

    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship

  • NZOZ Osteo Medic SC Artur Racewicz Jerzy Supronik

    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship

  • Szpital Uniwersytecki Nr 2 im. Dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy

    Bydgoszcz

  • Centrum Medyczne Czestochowa - PRATIA - PPDS

    Częstochowa, Silesian Voivodeship

  • Centrum Medyczne Katowice - PRATIA - PPDS

    Katowice

  • Globe Badania Kliniczne Spólka z o.o.

    Kłodzko, Lower Silesian Voivodeship

  • Centrum Medyczne Linden

    Krakow

  • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne

    Krakow

  • MCM Krakow - PRATIA - PPDS

    Krakow

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Poznaniu

    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship

  • Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne (Lotników Polskich)

    Świdnik, Lublin Voivodeship

  • Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne

    Świdnik, Lublin Voivodeship

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Warszawie

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship

  • Centrum Medyczne AMED

    Warsaw

  • Centrum Medyczne Reuma Park NZOZ

    Warsaw

  • Rheuma Medicus Specjalistyczne Centrum Reumatologii i Osteoporozy

    Warsaw

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial we Wroclawiu

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Bulgaria12 sites
  • Medical Center Medconsult Pleven OOD

    Pleven

  • Medical Center Artmed OOD

    Plovdiv

  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Plovdiv

    Plovdiv

  • Outpatient Clinic for Specialized Medical Help - Medical Center Kuchuk Paris "OOD"

    Plovdiv

  • AES - DRS - Medical Center Synexus Sofia EOOD

    Sofia, Sofia-Grad

  • Diagnostic and Consulting Center Aleksandrovska EOOD

    Sofia

  • Diagnostic- Consultative Center Convex EOOD

    Sofia

  • Medical Center Excelsior OOD - PPDS

    Sofia

  • Medical Center Hera EOOD

    Sofia

  • Specialized outpatient medical facility - Rheumatology Centre St. Irina EOOD

    Sofia

  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich AD

    Stara Zagora

  • New Medical Center EOOD

    Vratsa

Other trials in Bulgaria

Hungary11 sites
  • Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz

    Békéscsaba, Bekes County

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Budapest - Magyarország Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft

    Budapest

  • QUALICLINIC Kft

    Budapest

  • Óbudai Egészségügyi Centrum Kft

    Budapest

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Debrecen Magyarország Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft

    Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Gyula - Magyarország Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Kft

    Gyula, Bekes County

  • Pest Megyei Flór Ferenc Kórház

    Kistarcsa, Pest County

  • Csongrad Megyei Dr. Bugyi Istvan Korhaz

    Szentes, Csongrád megye

  • MÁV Kórház és Rendelointézet Szolnok

    Szolnok, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok

  • Vital Medical Center

    Veszprém

  • AES - DRS - Synexus Zalaegerszeg Magyarország Egészségügyi Kft

    Zalaegerszeg, Zala County

Other trials in Hungary

Estonia7 sites
  • KLV Arstikabinet

    Pärnu, Pärnu Maakon

  • Center For Clinical And Basic Research

    Tallinn, Harju

  • East Tallinn Central Hospital

    Tallinn, Harju

  • North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation

    Tallinn, Harju

  • Clinical Research Centre Ltd

    Tartu, Tartu

  • MediTrials OÜ

    Tartu, Tartu

  • Tartu University Hospital

    Tartu, Tartu

Other trials in Estonia

Latvia5 sites
  • Private Practice of Laila Atike

    Liepāja, Liepājas Rajon

  • Outpatient Clinic Veselibas Centrs 4

    Riga, Riga Rajon

  • Outpatient Clinic Adoria

    Riga, Rigas Rajons

  • RSU Ambulance

    Riga

  • Sigulda Hospital, Outpatient Clinic

    Sigulda, Siguldas Pilsēta

Other trials in Latvia

Mexico5 sites
  • Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica Y Clinica SC

    Guadalajara, Jalisco

  • Hospital Angeles Lindavista (Consultorio de Reumatologia)

    Mexico City, Mexico City

  • Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio González

    Monterrey, Nuevo León

  • Centro Integral Medico SJR S.C

    Querétaro

  • Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto

    San Luis Potosí City

Other trials in Mexico

Serbia4 sites
  • Institute of Rheumatology Belgrade - PPDS

    Belgrade

  • Military Medical Academy

    Belgrade

  • University Clinical Center of Serbia - PPDS

    Belgrade

  • Clinical Centre of Vojvodina

    Novi Sad

Other trials in Serbia

Georgia3 sites
  • National Institute of Endocrinology

    Tbilisi

  • Tbilisi Heart and Vascular Clinic Ltd

    Tbilisi

  • Tbilisi Heart Center Ltd.

    Tbilisi

Other trials in Georgia

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel, Multinational Study to Compare the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB09 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) vs. Prolia® (EU-sourced) in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Read the detailed description

The study was planning to randomise approximately 528 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged ≥55 and ≤80 years old with a Bone Mineral Density (BMD) consistent with T-score of ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4 at the lumbar spine or total hip as measured by DXA during the Screening Period. Screening evaluations were to be completed within 28 days prior to randomisation.

On Day 1, 528 eligible postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were to be randomised in a 2:1:1 ratio to receive MB09-MB09 (Arm 1), Prolia-MB09 (Arm 2), or Prolia-Prolia (Arm 3) using an Interactive Response Sys-tem (IRT).

During the Main Treatment Period, subjects received one subcutaneous injection (60 mg/mL) of study drug on Day 1 and at Month 6. At Month 12, after all efficacy and safety assessments have been performed, the subject were to be enter the Transition/Safety Follow Up Period and were to receive the third dose of study drug. Subjects assigned to the MB09 MB09 arm (Arm 1) received MB09 on Day 1, at Month 6 and at Month 12. Subjects assigned to the Prolia MB09 arm (Arm 2) received EU-Prolia on Day 1 and at Month 6, and MB09 at Month 12. Subjects assigned to the Prolia-Prolia arm (Arm 3) received EU-Prolia on Day 1, at Month 6, and at Month 12. All subjects were to be followed up to Transition Period Month 6.

All subjects received daily supplementation of calcium and vitamin D.

Being tested
MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia, Elemental Calcium, Vitamin D

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MB09 (denosumab biosimilar)Drug

    Pre-filled syringe (PFS) 60 mg/mL solution, administered as subcutaneous injection

  • EU-ProliaDrug

    PFS 60 mg/mL solution, administered as subcutaneous injection

  • Elemental CalciumDietary supplement

    at least 1000 mg daily

  • Vitamin DDietary supplement

    at least 400 IU daily

Study groups in NCT05338086
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MB09-MB09ExperimentalSubjects randomised into MB09-MB09 group were administered MB09 (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months.
Receives: Drug: MB09 (denosumab biosimilar); Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D
Prolia-MB09Active comparatorSubjects randomised into Prolia- MB09 group were administered Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months.
Receives: Drug: MB09 (denosumab biosimilar); Drug: EU-Prolia; Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D
Prolia-ProliaActive comparatorSubjects randomised into Prolia-Prolia group were administered Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) SC injection every 6 months.
Receives: Drug: EU-Prolia; Dietary Supplement: Elemental Calcium; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at 52 Weeks - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)

    To demonstrate equivalent efficacy of MB09 to EU Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of lumbar spine BMD at Week 52 (Month 12). The main analysis method was on the mFAS using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) fitted to the composite %CfB lumbar spine BMD at Month 6 and Month 12, without any imputation of missing data. Bone mineral density was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessments of the lumbar spine (L1 to L4) were performed at a central imaging vendor.

    Measured: Baseline (Screening), up to Week 52

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Efficacy: Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 52 - Full Analysis Set (FAS)

    Difference in means (MB09-Prolia) in the %CfB in lumbar spine BMD after 12 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with SC denosumab injections every 6 months. This included all subjects and data records irrespective of failed eligibility criteria, receipt of prohibited medications, discontinued treatment for any reason, had errors or deviations in dosing, or receipt of both doses. Estimation was via Multiple Imputation (MI) and ANCOVA on the FAS. Since the retrieved dropout rate was low, a treatment-failure (TF) penalty was applied to the imputed values at Month 12 for those subjects who received only one dose of the study treatment to centre the distribution of each subject's %CfB values around their baseline level. Bone density measurements were performed by DXA. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (screening), up to Week 52

  2. Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and Month12 - MMRM on mFAS

    To assess the efficacy of MB09 to EU-Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of Lumbar Spine at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and Month12. The difference in means in %CfB in lumbar spine BMD between MB09 and Prolia at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck at Month 6 and Month 12 from an MMRM presented for the mFAS. Bone density measurements were performed by DXA. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (screening), Month 6 and Month 12.

  3. Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and 12 - ANCOVA on FAS

    To assess the efficacy of MB09 to EU-Prolia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in terms of the difference in means (MB09-Prolia) in the %CfB in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6 and Total Hip and Femur Neck BMD at Month 6 and 12 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with SC denosumab injections every 6 months. This included all subjects and data records irrespective of failed eligibility criteria, receipt of prohibited medications, discontinued treatment for any reason, had errors or deviations in dosing, or receipt of both doses. Bone density measurement were performed by DXA. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline (screening), Month 6, Month 12.

  4. Pharmacodynamics: Serum Carboxy-terminal Cross-linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (sCTX) Area Under the Effect Curve From Zero to 6 Months (AUEC0-6 Months) After First Dose - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS)

    Geometric meant (geometric CV%) sCTX Area under the effect curve from zero to 6 months (AUEC0-6 months) after first dose in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with SC denosumab injections every 6 months assuming all women received their first denosumab dose without any errors in dosing and without receipt of any prohibited therapies or other osteoporosis medications up to 6 months after first dose.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.

  5. Pharmacodynamics: %CfB Area Under the Percent Inhibition Curve From Time Zero to 6 Months (AUIC0-6 Months) in sCTX - on mFAS

    AUIC0-6 months = Area under the inhibition curve for % change from baseline sCTX concentrations from time zero to 6 months

    Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.

  6. Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Denosumab After First Dose Study Treatment (Pharmacokinetic Parameter Analysis Set)

    To assess the PK profile of MB09 compared with EU-Prolia following the first dose, maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Denosumab After First Dose study treatment (Pharmacokinetic Parameter Analysis Set).

    Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6

  7. Pharmacokinetics: To Assess the PK Profile of MB09 Compared With EU Prolia (AUC0-6 Months) Following the First Dose

    Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 6 months analysed on the log scale by ANCOVA. The model will include treatment and stratification variables (baseline BMD T-score at the lumbar spine (≤ -3.0 and > -3.0 SD), body mass index (< 25 and ≥ 25 kg/m2), age at study entry (≥ 55 to < 68 years versus ≥ 68 to ≤ 80 years) and prior bisphosphonate medication use at study entry (prior use of bisphosphonates versus no prior bisphosphonate use as fixed effects. The estimated mean difference with 95% CI will be back-transformed to give the ratio of geometric means (MB09/EU-Prolia) with 95% CI following the first dose in the Main Treatment Period.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Month 6.

  8. Safety: Overall Summary of Adverse Events - Main Treatment Period - Safety Analysis Set (SAF) and Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period (SAF-TP)

    For Main Treatment Period, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 12 and no more than 6 months after the last dose in case of early treatment discontinuation unless the TEAE was considered as related to the study treatment by investigator. For Transition Period, TEAE was an event observed after the third dose of study treatment at Month 12 until Month 18. Throughout the study, TEAE was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 18.

    Measured: From first administration of study treatment on Day 1 until Month 18

  9. Safety: New Clinical Bone Fractures - TEAEs (Throughout the Study - From Day 1 Untill Month 18)

    For the Main Treatment Period, TEAE was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 12 and no more than 6 months after the last dose in case of early treatment discontinuation unless the TEAE was considered as related to the study treatment by investigator. For Transition Period, TEAE was an event observed after the third dose of study treatment at Month 12 until Month 18. Throughout the study, TEAE was an event observed after first dose on Day 1 until Month 18.

    Measured: All participants in the Main Treatment Period and Transition Period (From Day 1 untill Month 18)

  10. Overall Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) - Safety Analysis Set (SAF) and Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period (SAF-TP)

    Number of subjects experiencing treatment-induced immunogenicity: Binding and neutralising serum denosumab antibodies from baseline up to and including Month 18. Analysis of immunogenicity data will be based on ADA evaluable subjects defined as all SAF or SAF-TP subjects with baseline and at least one post-baseline immunogenicity assessment within the Main Treatment Period or the Transition Period. The formation of ADAs against MB09 or EU-Prolia was assessed in blood samples.

    Measured: From baseline (pre-dose) up to and including Month 18.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2022
  2. Study start16 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion14 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion22 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
558 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05338086
Sponsor's protocol ID
MB09-C-01-19
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
8 Apr 2022
Last updated
21 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Supronik J, Giorgadze E, Blicharski T, Sanchez-Vidaurre S, Perez-Diaz L, Paravisini A, Millan S. Phase III Study to Confirm Clinical Similarity of MB09, a Denosumab Biosimilar, and Prolia(R) in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (SIMBA Study). Pharmaceutics. 2026 Feb 27;18(3):291. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18030291.

    PubMed 41900779

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing MB09 (denosumab biosimilar), EU-Prolia and Elemental Calcium in people with Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis, run by mAbxience Research S.L. at 64 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 64 sites in Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Estonia, Latvia and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy: Percentage Change From Baseline (%CfB) in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at 52 Weeks - Modified Full Analysis Set (mFAS) (time frame: Baseline (Screening), up to Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05338086, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in