Neuropathic PainNCT05338554
Optimize the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain
A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Neuropathic Pain and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Neuropathic pain (NP) is one type of refractory chronic pain condition,medical treatments for NP is limited because of its poorly response.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce neuroplastic changes which has been used to manage chronic pain conditions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuropathic Pain, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- What is being tested?
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2022to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- （1）woman or man over 18 years and under 85 years; （2）Clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain (3) pain for at least 3 months, at least moderate intensity (≥ 4/10 assessed by VAS) ; (4) stable pharmacological treatment for pain at least 2 weeks before inclusion; (5) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.
Who cannot join
- (1)Any clinically significant or unstable ongoing medical or psychiatric disorder including major depression; (2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); (3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); (5) other type of pain more severe than neuropathic pain; (6) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems); (7) impossibility to be followed during the time course of the study;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The second affliated hospital of zhejiang university
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
About this study
Neuropathic pain (NP) is one type of refractory chronic pain condition,medical treatments for NP is limited because of its poorly response.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce neuroplastic changes which has been used to manage chronic pain conditions. Indeed, high-frequency (≥ 5 Hz) rTMS over the primary motor cortex (M1) is suggested to be able to reduce neuropathic pain in randomized controlled studies. Overall, the clinical application of rTMS in chronic pain is still limited by the response rate, whereby it is close to moderate and far from being excellent at its best. Therefore this project designed a series of clinical trials to optimize the analgesic efficacy of rTMS. According to the research results of investigators previous project, patients with neuropathic pain were divided into responders and non-responders after 5 consecutive days of 10HZ rTMS or pcTBS intervention (see project ID:2021-0751)according to the change of pain intensity, and then different trials will be applied to responders and non-responders to optimize the analgesic effect of rTMS.
Read the detailed description
For non-responders (whose visuo-analogic scale (VAS) decreased less than 20 mm or T1-T0/T0×100%<30%), a feasible method is to switch stimulation targets. So the investigator will change the stimulation target from M1 to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and then delivered another 5 days consecutive interventions to assess the efficacy.
For responders (whose VAS decreased an average of 20 mm or more or T1-T0/T0×100%≥30%), the investigator further investigate the long-lasting effect of rTMS. the patients will participate a continuous trials (2 sessions weekly for 2 weeks) and 4 weeks follow up.
- Being tested
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice
Magnetic stimulation was performed using a figure-eight coil connected to a Magstim Rapid2 system, All patients seat in a comfortable reclining chair and delivered pcTBS protocol using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation . The stimulation intensity was set to 80% of the resting motor threshold, which is measured as the minimal intensity of stimulation evoking an electromyographic response ≥50µV on the first dorsal interosseus muscle of the hand contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere in at least 5 out of 10 trials. For this measurement, a figure-of-eight coil is positioned over the hand motor hotspot and oriented perpendicular to the central sulcus (parallel to the hemispheric midline).
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice
Magnetic stimulation was performed using a figure-eight coil connected to a Magstim Rapid2 system, All patients seat in a comfortable reclining chair and delivered 10HZ protocol using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation . The stimulation intensity was set to 80% of the resting motor threshold, which is measured as the minimal intensity of stimulation evoking an electromyographic response ≥50µV on the first dorsal interosseus muscle of the hand contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere in at least 5 out of 10 trials. For this measurement, a figure-of-eight coil is positioned over the hand motor hotspot and oriented perpendicular to the central sulcus (45° away from the hemispheric midline).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| pcTBS | Experimental | The protocol is same as the previous study: pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation device . A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline. Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation |
| 10HZ rTMS | Experimental | The protocol is same as the previous study: 10HZ rTMS included 15 trains of 10-second stimulation given at 10 Hz to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation device , with the inter-train interval being set to 50 seconds (1500 pulses) Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pain intensity measured with the visuo-analogic scale (VAS)
For non-responders:the primary outcome measure is the mean change from baseline over the course of 5 (group by time interaction) in average pain intensity measured with the visuo-analogic scale (VAS) ( 0= no pain and 10= maximal pain). Pain intensity is further assessed immediately before each rTMS session at days 2, 3, 4, 5, and then at weeks 2, 3, 4 after the intervention.
For responders: pain intensity is assessed after two sessions of rTMS session and then at weeks 2, 3, 4 after the intervention.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Motor-evoked potential (MEP)
Corticospinal excitability was measured with MEP at rest of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward).
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Cortical silent period (CSP)
Corticospinal excitability was measured with CSP during a sustained voluntary FDI muscle contraction, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward).
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
The sensory dimension of pain
The sensory dimension of pain (rated on 33) measured with Short form of the McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) .
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
The affective dimension of pain
The affective dimension of pain measured with Short form of the McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) .
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Pain interference scale
7 items rated from 0= does not interfere to 10= complete interference, total score 70 from the Brief Pain Inventory.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Patients global impression of change
the 7 items Patients global impression of change (PGIC) (from very much worse to very much improved)
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
The depression score
ranging from 0 to 13 with higher scores indicating more severe depression from the 13 items Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Measured: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2022
- Primary completion1 Dec 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- After 5 consecutive days of 10HZ rTMS or pcTBS intervention of previous study, patients were divided into responders and non-responders according to the change of pain intensity measured with VAS and both of them will receive different trial of interventions.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- min yan, prof, Study chair, The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05338554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-0752
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: investigators do not plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimize the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05338554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-0752
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neuropathic pain (NP) is one type of refractory chronic pain condition,medical treatments for NP is limited because of its poorly response.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce neuroplastic changes which has been used to manage chronic pain conditions. Indeed, high-frequency (≥ 5 Hz) rTMS over the primary motor cortex (M1) is suggested to be able to reduce neuropathic pain in randomized controlled studies. Overall, the clinical application of rTMS in chronic pain is still limited by the response rate, whereby it is close to moderate and far from being excellent at its best. Therefore this project designed a series of clinical trials to optimize the analgesic efficacy of rTMS. According to the research results of investigators previous project, patients with neuropathic pain were divided into responders and non-responders after 5 consecutive days of 10HZ rTMS or pcTBS intervention (see project ID:2021-0751)according to the change of pain intensity, and then different trials will be applied to responders and non-responders to optimize the analgesic effect of rTMS.
Detailed description
For non-responders (whose visuo-analogic scale (VAS) decreased less than 20 mm or T1-T0/T0×100%<30%), a feasible method is to switch stimulation targets. So the investigator will change the stimulation target from M1 to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and then delivered another 5 days consecutive interventions to assess the efficacy.
For responders (whose VAS decreased an average of 20 mm or more or T1-T0/T0×100%≥30%), the investigator further investigate the long-lasting effect of rTMS. the patients will participate a continuous trials (2 sessions weekly for 2 weeks) and 4 weeks follow up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- After 5 consecutive days of 10HZ rTMS or pcTBS intervention of previous study, patients were divided into responders and non-responders according to the change of pain intensity measured with VAS and both of them will receive different trial of interventions.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| pcTBS | Experimental | Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationThe protocol is same as the previous study: pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation device . A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline. |
| 10HZ rTMS | Experimental | Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationThe protocol is same as the previous study: 10HZ rTMS included 15 trains of 10-second stimulation given at 10 Hz to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation device , with the inter-train interval being set to 50 seconds (1500 pulses) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- （1）woman or man over 18 years and under 85 years; （2）Clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain (3) pain for at least 3 months, at least moderate intensity (≥ 4/10 assessed by VAS) ; (4) stable pharmacological treatment for pain at least 2 weeks before inclusion; (5) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- (1)Any clinically significant or unstable ongoing medical or psychiatric disorder including major depression; (2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); (3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); (5) other type of pain more severe than neuropathic pain; (6) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems); (7) impossibility to be followed during the time course of the study;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationMagnetic stimulation was performed using a figure-eight coil connected to a Magstim Rapid2 system, All patients seat in a comfortable reclining chair and delivered pcTBS protocol using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation . The stimulation intensity was set to 80% of the resting motor threshold, which is measured as the minimal intensity of stimulation evoking an electromyographic response ≥50µV on the first dorsal interosseus muscle of the hand contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere in at least 5 out of 10 trials. For this measurement, a figure-of-eight coil is positioned over the hand motor hotspot and oriented perpendicular to the central sulcus (parallel to the hemispheric midline). | Device | pcTBS |
| Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationMagnetic stimulation was performed using a figure-eight coil connected to a Magstim Rapid2 system, All patients seat in a comfortable reclining chair and delivered 10HZ protocol using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation . The stimulation intensity was set to 80% of the resting motor threshold, which is measured as the minimal intensity of stimulation evoking an electromyographic response ≥50µV on the first dorsal interosseus muscle of the hand contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere in at least 5 out of 10 trials. For this measurement, a figure-of-eight coil is positioned over the hand motor hotspot and oriented perpendicular to the central sulcus (45° away from the hemispheric midline). | Device | 10HZ rTMS |
Primary outcome
pain intensity measured with the visuo-analogic scale (VAS)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
For non-responders:the primary outcome measure is the mean change from baseline over the course of 5 (group by time interaction) in average pain intensity measured with the visuo-analogic scale (VAS) ( 0= no pain and 10= maximal pain). Pain intensity is further assessed immediately before each rTMS session at days 2, 3, 4, 5, and then at weeks 2, 3, 4 after the intervention. For responders: pain intensity is assessed after two sessions of rTMS session and then at weeks 2, 3, 4 after the intervention.
7 secondary outcomes
Motor-evoked potential (MEP)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Cortical silent period (CSP)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
The sensory dimension of pain
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
The affective dimension of pain
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Pain interference scale
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Patients global impression of change
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
The depression score
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. investigators do not plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Related trials for Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
min yan, prof study chair
The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Neuropathic Pain and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pain intensity measured with the visuo-analogic scale (VAS) (time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2023.