AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT05338918

Effect of Mental Imagery on Lower Limb Functions in Stroke

A study testing Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality Training and Virtual Reality Training in people with Stroke, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the effects of mental imagery and virtual reality training with virtual reality alone on lower limb functional status of stroke patients. The study will be a randomized controlled trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality Training and Virtual Reality Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
27 Apr 2022to 5 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with sub-acute/ chronic stroke (>3 months)
  • Modified Ashworth Ranking Scale 1-3
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment scoring >24-30

Who cannot join

  • Any active pathological condition
  • Visual or hearing impairment
  • Neurological conditions like Epilepsy, Parkinson, Alzheimer's, Impaired cognition
  • Orthopedic issues hindering Mobility Substantially (Fractures, Severe Degenerative Joint Diseases etc.)
  • Psychological issues

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Railway General Hospital

    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46060

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Mental Imagery With Virtual Reality Training on Lower Limb Functions in Stroke

This study aims to compare the effects of mental imagery and virtual reality training with virtual reality alone on lower limb functional status of stroke patients. The study will be a randomized controlled trial. After the initial evaluation randomization will be done on participants lying under the eligibility criteria. Randomized participants will be allocated to Control \& Experimental groups. Mental imagery (Audiotape recordings of some specific tasks for lower limb functions) with Virtual reality training given to experimental group while Virtual reality training alone to Control group. Task oriented training for balance \& gait as baseline treatment will be given to each group.

Read the detailed description

Stroke causes inability to perform activities with affected limbs among which difficulty in walking and doing house chores are the most common dysfunctions. Stroke highly affects the productivity of people in family as well as in community. It also adds financial burden on families of patients. There are number of different restorative techniques and therapeutic approaches for the rehabilitation of stroke patients. For example, bobath approach, constrained induced movement therapy, mirror therapy, electrical stimulations, Circuit training, resistance training, Motor relearning program, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, body weight supported treadmill for walking, Frenkel's exercises, repetitive task specific training, electromyography biofeedback and many others. All these approaches mainly focused on the repetition of tasks to perform a specific function, as the neuroplasticity requires repetition to occur. But there is a lack of interest, motivation and attention of stroke patients to perform similar tasks repeatedly. The lack of active participation directly or indirectly affects the neural stimulation and neural plasticity. One of the most emerging techniques in these days is Mental Imagery. Mental imagery(MI) is "a training method where imagination of movements, without actually moving, is used with the intention of improving motor performance" Currently Mental imagery has been used for neuro rehabilitation as it activates the same brain areas required for planning and execution of movements more or less in the same way require for actual performance of that movement. In this study the combination for Mental imagery and virtual reality is used for participation of patients in rehabilitation program which in turn increases the neural stimulation and causes neural plasticity to improve the motor performance. By increasing the functional activity, their ADL's can be improved to help them in becoming the active member of the society.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality Training, Virtual Reality Training
Keywords
Lower limb, Impairment, Mental practice, Virtual Reality training
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality TrainingOther

    Mental Imagery TASK Practice with Virtual Reality Training: 30-40 minutes treatment sessions will be performed three times a week for six weeks, Part 1: 2-3 minutes of relaxation Part 2: Visual Imagery (external motor imagery training) for 5-8 minutes Part 3: Actual Task Practice for 10 minutes Part 4: Virtual Reality based training (including games for lower limb functions) for 10 minutes Part 5:Task Oriented training for 10 minutes Tasks for both (mental imagery + actual task practice) will be: Sit-stand task, Static stance (30 seconds), Indoor walk on a leveled surface, Walk indoor towards target, Forward / Side Stepping, Walking outdoors

  • Virtual Reality TrainingOther

    Virtual Reality Training: 30-40 minutes treatment sessions will be performed three times a week for six weeks. Games will include River rush, 20000 water leaks, reflex ridge along with task oriented training. Tasks will be: Sit-stand task, Static stance (30 seconds), Indoor walk on a leveled surface, Walk indoor towards target, Forward / Side Stepping, Walking outdoors

Study groups in NCT05338918
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality GroupExperimentalMental Imagery with Virtual Reality
Receives: Other: Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality Training
Virtual Reality Alone GroupActive comparatorVirtual Reality Alone
Receives: Other: Virtual Reality Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale - Lower Extremity

    This scale is recognized as a golden standard for assessment of motor function of stroke patients worldwide. It focuses on reflex activity, voluntary movements within and outside of synergies, ability to perform isolated movement, and coordination. Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully. The total possible scale score is 226 Motor score: ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to 100 points (normal motor performance). Divided into 66 points for upper extremity and 34 points for the lower extremity. Sensation: ranges from 0 to 24 points. Balance: ranges from 0 to 14 points. Joint range of motion: ranges from 0 to 44 points. Joint pain: ranges from 0 to 44 points.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Berg Balance Scale

    changes from the baseline, Berg balance scale is used for assessment of balance and fall risk, Higher scores on the berg balance scale indicate greater independence and better ability to balance. In contrast, lower scores indicate a greater fall risk Items DESCRIPTION SCORE (0-4) Sitting to standing, Standing unsupported, Sitting unsupported, Standing to sitting, Transfers , Standing with eyes closed , Standing with feet together, Reaching forward with outstretched arm, Retrieving object from floor, Turning to look behind, Turning 360 degrees, Placing alternate foot on stool, Standing with one foot in front, Standing on one foot, TOTAL __/56

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. Timed Up and Go test

    changes from the baseline, Timed up and go test is used for the assessment of falls risk among the elderly population. The Timed "Up and Go" (TUG) Test measures, in seconds, the time is taken by an individual to stand up from a standard armchair (approximate seat height of 46 cm, arm height 65 cm), walk a distance of 3 meters (approximately 10 feet), turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Normal healthy elderly usually complete the task in 10 seconds or less. Very frail or weak elderly with poor mobility may take 2 minutes or more. Clinical guide: <10 seconds = normal <20 seconds = good mobility, can go out alone, mobile without a gait aid <30 seconds = problems, cannot go outside alone, requires a gait aid A score of more than or equal to 14 seconds has been shown to indicate a high risk of falls.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  4. 10-meter walk test

    In this test, the participant walks through a 10-m walkway without any break. At the 4-m of walkway, time is recorded in order to obtain a rhythmic phase of walking speed. Then the time required over 3 trials was converted to the walking speed. The reliability of 10-m walk test is 0.83 and literature also shows the construct validity of 10-meter walk test.

    Measured: 6 weeks

  5. Wisconsin Gait Scale

    This scale is used to assess gait cycle. It consists of 14 items, the higher the score, greater will be the disability. These scale focuses on the components of stance phase, guardedness of affected leg, toe off, swing phase and heel strike. The reliability of Wisconsin Gait Scale was 0.91 and 0.96 and Cronbach scores were 0.91 and 0.94 respectively. Minimum score is 13.35 \& maximum score is 42. The higher the score the more seriously affected the gait.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2022
  2. Study start27 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion5 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion5 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05338918
Sponsor's protocol ID
01261/Tasmiyah Asghar
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
15 Apr 2022
Last updated
21 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mental Imagery with Virtual Reality Training and Virtual Reality Training in people with Stroke, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale - Lower Extremity (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in