AzTrials
AzTrials

Postpartum HemorrhageNCT05340777

Ghana: The Barriers and Facilitators of Scaling up the Ellavi UBT for Postpartum Hemorrhage

An observational study of Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by PATH at 3 sites in Ghana.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this implementation science study is to generate evidence that informs the successful uptake and adoption of the Ellavi UBT within Ghana's PPH management programs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Postpartum Hemorrhage
What is being tested?
Training Obstetric staff on Ellavi UBT
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
200 participants
Where
3 sitesGhana
Study dates
18 Nov 2020to 28 Feb 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Obstetrical care providers who recently participated in a PPH/Ellavi UBT training and/or obstetrical care providers who recently managed a refractory PPH event. The study participant must work in 1 of 3 participating facilities. The number of interviewees per site will vary depending on the size of the facility and number of refractory PPH events. Participants will be selected based on their participation in training sessions, or their management of a PPH event and will include obstetrical staff currently practicing at Tema General Hospital, Kasoa Polyclinic, or Ridge Hospital. Participants may be re-sampled with each use of the UBT.

Who may be able to join

  • Labor ward obstetric staff
  • Employed at 1 of the 3 hospitals participating in this study.

Who cannot join

  • Non-obstetric staff
  • Obstetric staff not employed at the 3 study hospitals

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Ghana3 sites
  • Ridge Hospital

    Accra

  • Tema General Hospital

    Accra

  • Kasoa Polyclinic

    Kasoa, Central Region

Other trials in Ghana

About this study

Official title: GHANA: An Implementation Study on the Barriers and Facilitators of Scaling up the Innovative, Low-cost Ellavi Uterine Balloon Tamponade for Postpartum Hemorrhage

The purpose of this implementation science study is to generate evidence that informs the successful uptake and adoption of the Ellavi UBT within Ghana's PPH management programs. The investigators aim to improve the likelihood that the Ellavi UBT will be integrated into the health care system by obtaining critical feedback from stakeholders and health care providers on the barriers and facilitators towards its successful adoption and roll out. The research will be done in three purposively selected facilities near Accra Ghana: Tema General Hospital, Ridge Hospital, and Kasoa Polyclinic.

This study uses a nonexperimental design to collect data on implementation (e.g. # staff trained, usability, user confidence, acceptability, feasibility). The study team will train all obstetric healthcare staff (i.e. obstetricians, midwives, medical officers, clinical officers) involved in PPH management at the 3 participating healthcare facilities on the Ellavi UBT. The investigators will gather feedback from the obstetric healthcare workers (post-training and post-PPH) to understand the barriers to and facilitators of use in order to evaluate acceptability and feasibility among facilities providing different levels of care (level 4, level 5 (county), level 6 (tertiary)). This process will help to generate training and facility level recommendations for improved uptake and integration into the local maternal care package. Case report forms and semi-quantitative surveys will be completed by obstetrical care providers to evaluate the primary outcomes of acceptability and feasibility by measuring: context of use, accuracy of use, perceptions of the device, user confidence, acceptability, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness. The secondary outcomes will include financial data to determine the cost of introducing the Ellavi UBT into the Kenyan PPH management protocols and the health system. The study will not involve the storage of biological samples. There is not a direct benefit of the study to the individual participants. All study participants will sign consent forms.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this implementation research study is to generate evidence that informs the successful uptake and adoption of the Ellavi UBT within Ghanaian PPH management programs for both public and private sector programs. The investigators aim to generate evidence for Ghanaian stakeholders to use in their decision-making around the use of Ellavi UBT in PPH management programs.

Specific objectives:

To determine the adoption, penetration, sustainability and fidelity of implementing the Ellavi UBT device into PPH care in three health care facilities. The investigators will explore the number of health workers and facilities that receive the PPH and Ellavi UBT training, and percent of health workers and facilities that adopt the Ellavi UBT device over the 10-month period. The investigators will also assess factors that influence the adoption, penetration, sustainability, and fidelity through an operations research survey, and the Ellavi UBT questionnaire.

To determine the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of using the Ellavi UBT in participating health facilities at various levels of care near Accra, the investigators will explore user comprehension of the Ellavi UBT usage steps, accuracy of use, perceptions of the device, attitudes towards the device, user confidence, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness.

  • Sensitize senior management at each of the three participating facilities, separately.
  • Conduct two half-day trainings on PPH and Ellavi UBT use at each of the three participating health facilities separated by: 1) obstetricians, medical and clinical officers, and 2) midwives.
  • Collect individual initial (post-training) data to assess comprehension of Ellavi UBT usage steps, perceptions of the device, attitudes towards the device, user confidence, usability, and insights into training effectiveness.
  • Case Management Form (CMF): Obstetrical care provider will complete a CMF within 24hrs (<24hrs) of managing each PPH event. This will inform the study team of how decision-making algorithms were applied and accuracy of use.
  • Ellavi UBT Questionnaire: PATH-Ghana study team member will collect individual post (post-usage) Ellavi UBT use data (<72hrs) from each study participant (obstetrical care worker) to assess comprehension of Ellavi UBT usage steps, perceptions of the device, attitudes towards the device, user confidence, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness.
  • PATH-Ghana study staff will record secondary data from hospital registry books over a 9 month duration of this study (January-Sept 2021) in comparison to the same period in 2020 to examine changes in use of condom catheters, and Ellavi UBTs.
  • Use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify constructs with the potential to influence the introduction and use of Ellavi UBT. These constructs will be mapped to questions in the questionnaire, and will be analyzed to identify their influence on Ellavi UBT use. Constructs that have influence on the implementation of UBTs (both positively and negatively) will be disseminated for use in future introduction and scale up of Ellavi UBTs.

To disseminate the information in national, regional, and international forums to support information sharing, increased awareness of the role of UBT for refractory PPH, and adoption of its use.

  • Summarize how the Ellavi UBT can be integrated into curriculums, guidelines, and hospital systems (e.g. patient-provider friendly materials) by analyzing the key facilitators and barriers.
  • Host a national level meeting with Kenyan MOH stakeholders and participating facilities
  • Publish and disseminate findings in a peer-reviewed journal h. Present at international conferences and forums, as funding permits. Show the use of Ellavi UBT using poster presentations and demonstration sessions at international obstetrics meetings: FIGO, WHO UBT group, Women Deliver as funding permits.
Being tested
Training Obstetric staff on Ellavi UBT
Medical subject headings
Postpartum Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Training Obstetric staff on Ellavi UBTDevice

    The study team will train all obstetric healthcare staff (i.e. obstetricians, midwives, medical officers, clinical officers) involved in PPH management at the participating healthcare facilities on use of the Ellavi UBT. This will be done to ensure staff are trained on the newly registered and provided medical device. We will gather feedback on how to improve the training curriculum from participants. We will also gather information from the healthcare workers immediately post-use of an Ellavi UBT device following their management of a refractory PPH case. These surveys will help us to understand the barriers to and facilitators of use in order to evaluate acceptability and feasibility among facilities providing different levels of PPH care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Semi-quantitative post-training survey on the appropriateness and acceptability of using the Ellavi UBT device

    • Appropriateness will be measured by capturing # deliveries and # postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) cases typically managed per month by the obstetric staff surveyed.
    • Acceptability will be measured by surveying obstetric staff on their perception of Ellavi UBT effectiveness in comparison to other PPH treatments, attitudes towards the device post training, device usability measures, and user-confidence operating the device.

    Measured: 10 months

  2. Facility survey (quantitative) to determine adoption, penetration, and sustainability

    • Adoption will be measured by the # of facilities (of 3 total) who ever used the Ellavi UBT over the 10 month period.
    • Penetration/Reach will be measured by determining the % of total staff (employed at the 3 hospitals) who were participated in our Ellavi UBT/PPH training courses.
    • Sustainability is measured by the # facilities (of 3 total) who ever used the Ellavi UBT 4 months after the training (at least 1 time), and the # of facilities that used the Ellavi UBT every month for 6 months after the training.

    Measured: 10 months

  3. Semi-quantitative post-UBT-use survey on fidelity to training skills, and feasibility of using the Ellavi UBT device

    • Feasibility will be measured by capturing the # of Ellavi UBT devices used to manage the PPH events, and barriers/enablers to use of the device.
    • Fidelity will be measured by questions asked on accuracy of use (fidelity to the training)

    Measured: 10 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2022
  2. Study start18 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05340777
Sponsor's protocol ID
1514537
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
14 Sep 2021
Last updated
22 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The de-identified data will be shared with the funder in the form of a study report. If data are held on a public database (due to publication requirements), they will not be linked to the study participant and their identity would not be revealed.

Publications

  • Parker ME, Qureshi Z, Deganus S, Soki J, Cofie P, Dapaah P, Owusu R, Gwako G, Osoti A, Ogutu O, Opira J, Sunkwa-Mills G, Boamah M, Srofenyoh E, Aboagye P, Fofie C, Kaliti S, Morozoff C, Secor A, Metzler M, Abu-Haydar E. Introduction of the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package for improved postpartum haemorrhage management: an implementation research study. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e066907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066907.

    PubMed 36737079

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Postpartum Hemorrhage, run by PATH at 3 sites in Ghana.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Ghana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Semi-quantitative post-training survey on the appropriateness and acceptability of using the Ellavi UBT device (time frame: 10 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05340777, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in