AzTrials
AzTrials

Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationNCT05342857

Maximum Treatment Interval With Aflibercept T&E

An observational study of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the duration of effectiveness of anti-VEGF (Aflibercept) by analyzing the percentage of patients whose maximum treatment interval is extended to 16 weeks and beyond in 24 months and their long-term remission. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
Aflibercept Injection [Eylea]
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Treatment-naïve nAMD and PCV patients

Who may be able to join

  • -Treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal CNV secondary to wet AMD and PCV, with visual impairment being exclusively due to an symptomatic neovascular AMD.
  • - -Clinical status meet the national reimbursement criteria

Who cannot join

  • - Any contraindications as listed in the local intravitreal aflibercept package insert
  • - Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation at baseline
  • - Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure [IOP] ≥30 mm Hg on medication) at baseline
  • - Neovascularisation of the iris or neovascular glaucoma at baseline
  • - Visually significant cataract, severe vitreous haemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, proliferative diabetic retinopathy or CNV of any cause other than wet AMD at baseline
  • - Structural damage to the center of the macula in either eye that is likely to preclude improvement in VA following the resolution of macular edema or any other condition expected to permanently limit VA outcomes over the course of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shin Kong Memorial Wu Ho-Su Hospital

    Taipei

    Sam Lin, MD, 886-2-2833-2211 ext. 2074, samlin.skhctc@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Investigation of the Maximal Treatment Interval and Long-term Remission and the Associated Factors of Neovascular AMD Treated With Anti-VEGF Using Treat and Extend Strategy

To evaluate the duration of effectiveness of anti-VEGF (Aflibercept) by analyzing the percentage of patients whose maximum treatment interval is extended to 16 weeks and beyond in 24 months and their long-term remission.

Read the detailed description

This is an Observational, prospective, single arm study. The distribution of maximum treatment interval extended within 2 year among nAMD patients with Aflibercept Treat-and-Extend(T\&E) regimen will be analyzed. And Clinical indicators for fast extension of treatment interval and emering disease activity will be captured.

To maximize Vision acuity (VA) outcome and reduce treatment burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients, the T\&E regimen has become popular in recent years. Sufficient drug durability is the key element to support T\&E regimen. Clinical trials with aflibercept suggest a longer duration of VEGF suppression than with bevacizumab or ranibizumab, which is also supported by pharmacokinetic models, and mean duration of vitreous VEGF suppression by aflibercept injection was demonstrated as > 71 ± 18 days. With these attributes, while managed by intravitreal injection aflibercept (IVI-ALF) T\&E regimen, it has been shown in ALTAIR study that around 40% and 60% of patients had treatment interval extended to 12 week and 16 weeks at week 96 respectively.

Nevertheless, it was observed that the distribution of treatment interval is polarized, a group of patients would eventually reach a stable disease status with only few treatments needed per year, while another group of patients may still need more intensive treatment even shorter than 8 week interval. To maximize benefit of patients with practical and personalized IVT-AFL T\&E regimens, it is important to provided further evidence to support maximizing treatment interval as well as clinical indicators to take precise action to active disease. Therefore, this study is designed to understand the potential durability of Aflibercept by analyzing maximum treatment interval with IVT-AFL in 2 years, and explore clinical indicators to guide optimal T\&E regimen for each patient.

Patients are treated with Aflibercept 2.0 mg following the T\&E criteria in Taiwan local consensus (listed as below). Once the treatment interval is extended to 16 weeks, and the patient has two consecutive 16-week treatment interval, treatment strategy will be changed to pro re nata (PRN) with monthly follow-up. IVI-AFL will immediately be applied once there is any disease activity detected.

During the study, patients will be monitored with BCVA, fundus photograph, structural OCT, OCT Angiography.

T\&E criteria in Taiwan local consensus:

  • Extension: No BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters (or 1 line of Snellen chart) AND dry retina§,†, #
  • Maintain: No BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters (or 1 line of Snellen chart) AND non-increased fluid§
  • Shortening: Any increased fluid with BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters (or 1 line of Snellen chart)‡, # OR new macular hemorrhage OR new neovascularization

"§"Absence of macular hemorrhage and neovascularization is required.

"†"Non-increased fluid after 3 more consecutive monthly injections following initial treatment could be considered as persistent fluid, and the injection interval could be extended if VA is stable.

"‡" Either increased fluid or BCVA loss ≥ 5 ETDRS letters alone could be maintained at current treatment interval.

"#" Extension or shortening can be by 2 or 4 weeks

Being tested
Aflibercept Injection [Eylea]

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aflibercept Injection [Eylea]Drug

    Aflibercept 2.0 mg with the T\&E criteria in Taiwan local consensus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The percentage of patients whose maximum treatment interval is extended to 24 months

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Find the prediction factors associated with extension to 16 weeks and beyond by univariate and multivariate analysis

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Find the prediction factors associated with occurrence of disease activity by univariate and multivariate analysis

    Measured: 2 years

  3. The percentage of patients whose maximum treatment interval is extended to 16 weeks and beyond in 24 months in PCV and wAMD subgroup

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Mean change in BCVA from baseline to month 24

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Mean change in central subfield thickness from baseline to month 24

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Proportion of patients who gain ≧15 ETDRS letters from baseline to month 24

    Measured: 2 years

  7. Mean number of injections in each group from baseline to month 24

    Measured: 2 years

  8. Mean treatment interval from baseline to month 24

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completionAug 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05342857
Sponsor's protocol ID
20211006R
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
5 Apr 2022
Last updated
25 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cheng-Kuo Cheng, MD (886-2833-2211 ext. 2074, ckcheng.md@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The percentage of patients whose maximum treatment interval is extended to 24 months (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in