Coronary DiseaseVICTORYNCT05346068
The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial
A study testing OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon and Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter in people with Coronary Disease and Coronary Artery Disease, run by Luzerner Kantonsspital at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has become the dominant treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
- What is being tested?
- OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon and Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 22 Nov 2022to 30 May 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Patient experienced an acute STEMI or cardiogenic shock related to an acute MI within 2 days prior to index procedure;
- Any comorbidity or condition which may reduce compliance with this protocol, including follow-up calls/ visits (e.g. advanced dementia);
- Any medical, geographic, and/or social factor making study participation impractical or precluding required follow-up.
- Patient is pregnant or nursing (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrollment);
- Unable to take a P2Y12 inhibitor (i.e. clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months;
- Patient has an allergy to imaging contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated;
Show all 20Show fewer
- Renal failure with an eGFR <30ml/min1.73m2;
- History of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 7 days, or any prior intracranial hemorrhage;
- Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 6 months;
- Untreated pre-procedural hemoglobin <10g/dL or intention to refuse blood transfusions if one should become necessary;
- Patient has an allergy or intolerance to cobalt-chromium and/ or everolimus.
- Life expectancy of less than 1 year.
- Angiographic exclusion criteria:
- Anatomy where the device or OCT catheter are unlikely to be delivered due to tortuosity or other characteristics;
- Target lesion is in a coronary artery bypass graft;
- Target lesion is an in-stent restenosis (ISR);
- Flow limiting target vessel thrombus (evident on angiography or OCT);
- Definite or possible thrombus (by angiography or intravascular imaging) in the target vessel;
- Evidence of aneurysm in target vessel within 10 mm of the target lesion.
- Of note, only qualified physicians who are investigators or a sub-investigators for the trial will assess each individual´s eligibility criteria and take the final decision to include the subject in the trial (ICH GCP 4.3.1). This decision will be documented prior to the subject receiving the first intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Luzerner Heart Centre
Lucerne, 6000
Florim Cuculi, MD, +41412052134, florim.cuculi@luks.ch
About this study
Official title: The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial - A Randomized, Multicenter, Non-inferiority Comparison of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) and the OPN Non-compliant Balloon for Treatment of Calcified and Refractory Coronary Lesions
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has become the dominant treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization. Nonetheless, PCI with stent implantation has some limitations and especially patients with severely calcified coronary lesions (approximately 10-20% of all patients with CAD) have an elevated risk for adverse outcomes, including target lesion failure (TLF) and stent thrombosis (ST).
Several dedicated PCI devices have been developed for treatment of severely calcified lesions. Whereas especially two of them have shown promising results in smaller, prospective studies. First, the super high-pressure NC PCI balloon (OPN™ NC, SIS Medical AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) has been shown to represent an effective and safe device for lesion preparation. Second, the lately introduced Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)™ balloon catheter (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA) appears to be a safe and efficient alternative device for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. However, it remains unknown, if the OPN™ NC balloon is non-inferior to to IVL regarding lesion preparation and completeness of stent expansion in severely calcified lesions.
Read the detailed description
To evaluate final stent expansion following a strategy of lesion preparation with either the Shockwave C2 IVL™ Catheter (Shockwave Medical Inc. Santa Clara, CA, United States) or a super high-Pressure NC PTCA Balloon (OPN™ NC; SIS Medical Distribution AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions undergoing coronary stent implantation.
To assess the safety of a strategy of using super high-pressure NC balloons compared to shockwave IVL™ for treatment of heavily calcified lesions, which are treated with a contemporary drug eluting stent.
Patients presenting with chronic or acute coronary artery disease and requiring PCI to a very calcified coronary artery lesion will either be randomized to preparation of that corresponding lesion using the control device (Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter) or the study device (the super high-pressure NC PCI Balloon (OPN™ NC)).
The treatment of the calcified coronary lesion will be guided by use of intravascular imaging (optical coherence tomography, OCT).
Enrolled patients will undergo follow-up at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Stent Restenosis, Coronary Artery Calcification
- Being tested
- OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon, Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI BalloonDevice
In order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions.
As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria.
Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion.
Shockwave™ C2 IVL CatheterDevice
In order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions.
As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria.
Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Device | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon |
| Control Device | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Final stent expansion (in percentage, %) assessed by OCT
Measured: At index Procedure
Secondary outcomes (4)
Acceptable stent expansion (>80%) assessed by OCT
Measured: At index Procedure
Optimal stent expansion (>90%) assessed by OCT
Measured: At index Procedure
Procedural success
defined as the achievement of angiographic success (residual stenosis of <30%, no flow-limiting dissection and/or no no-reflow) without any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which is defined as cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction, TIA/ stroke and repeat revascularization (PCI or CABG) up to 30 days
Measured: At index Procedure
Strategy success
defined as procedural success using the assigned study device and stent, without requirement for lesion preparation with further devices (i.e. cross-over to the non-assigned study devices or cutting/ scoring balloons).
Measured: At index Procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2022
- Study start22 Nov 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Luzerner Kantonsspital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hôpital Fribourgeois, Hamilton General Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthias Bossard, Luzerner Kantonsspital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05346068
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VICTORY Trial
- Acronym
- VICTORY
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Seiler T, Attinger-Toller A, Cioffi GM, Madanchi M, Teufer M, Wolfrum M, Moccetti F, Toggweiler S, Kobza R, Bossard M, Cuculi F. Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Using a Dedicated Super High-Pressure Balloon. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jan;46:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
PubMed 36085285Pinilla-Echeverri N, Bossard M, Hillani A, Chavarria JA, Cioffi GM, Dutra G, Guerrero F, Madanchi M, Attinger A, Kossmann E, Sibbald M, Cuculi F, Sheth T. Treatment of Calcified Lesions Using a Dedicated Super-High Pressure Balloon: Multicenter Optical Coherence Tomography Registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jul;52:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
PubMed 36907698Cuculi F, Bossard M, Zasada W, Moccetti F, Voskuil M, Wolfrum M, Malinowski KP, Toggweiler S, Kobza R. Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography. Open Heart. 2020 Jan 23;7(1):e001204. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001204. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32076567
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial - A Randomized, Multicenter, Non-inferiority Comparison of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) and the OPN Non-compliant Balloon for Treatment of Calcified and Refractory Coronary Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05346068
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VICTORY / VICTORY Trial
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Stent Restenosis, Coronary Artery Calcification
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Luzerner KantonsspitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hôpital Fribourgeois, Hamilton General Hospital
- Study start
- 22 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has become the dominant treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization. Nonetheless, PCI with stent implantation has some limitations and especially patients with severely calcified coronary lesions (approximately 10-20% of all patients with CAD) have an elevated risk for adverse outcomes, including target lesion failure (TLF) and stent thrombosis (ST).
Several dedicated PCI devices have been developed for treatment of severely calcified lesions. Whereas especially two of them have shown promising results in smaller, prospective studies. First, the super high-pressure NC PCI balloon (OPN™ NC, SIS Medical AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) has been shown to represent an effective and safe device for lesion preparation. Second, the lately introduced Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)™ balloon catheter (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA) appears to be a safe and efficient alternative device for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. However, it remains unknown, if the OPN™ NC balloon is non-inferior to to IVL regarding lesion preparation and completeness of stent expansion in severely calcified lesions.
Detailed description
To evaluate final stent expansion following a strategy of lesion preparation with either the Shockwave C2 IVL™ Catheter (Shockwave Medical Inc. Santa Clara, CA, United States) or a super high-Pressure NC PTCA Balloon (OPN™ NC; SIS Medical Distribution AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) in patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions undergoing coronary stent implantation.
To assess the safety of a strategy of using super high-pressure NC balloons compared to shockwave IVL™ for treatment of heavily calcified lesions, which are treated with a contemporary drug eluting stent.
Patients presenting with chronic or acute coronary artery disease and requiring PCI to a very calcified coronary artery lesion will either be randomized to preparation of that corresponding lesion using the control device (Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter) or the study device (the super high-pressure NC PCI Balloon (OPN™ NC)).
The treatment of the calcified coronary lesion will be guided by use of intravascular imaging (optical coherence tomography, OCT).
Enrolled patients will undergo follow-up at 30 days, 1 year and 2 years
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study Device | Experimental | Device: OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon |
| Control Device | Active comparator | Device: Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Patient experienced an acute STEMI or cardiogenic shock related to an acute MI within 2 days prior to index procedure;
- Any comorbidity or condition which may reduce compliance with this protocol, including follow-up calls/ visits (e.g. advanced dementia);
- Any medical, geographic, and/or social factor making study participation impractical or precluding required follow-up.
- Patient is pregnant or nursing (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrollment);
- Unable to take a P2Y12 inhibitor (i.e. clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI BalloonIn order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions. As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria. Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion. | Device | Study Device |
| Shockwave™ C2 IVL CatheterIn order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions. As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria. Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion. | Device | Control Device |
Primary outcome
Final stent expansion (in percentage, %) assessed by OCT
Time frame: At index Procedure
4 secondary outcomes
Acceptable stent expansion (>80%) assessed by OCT
Time frame: At index Procedure
Optimal stent expansion (>90%) assessed by OCT
Time frame: At index Procedure
Procedural success
Time frame: At index Procedure
Strategy success
Time frame: At index Procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 36085285Seiler T, Attinger-Toller A, Cioffi GM, Madanchi M, Teufer M, Wolfrum M, Moccetti F, Toggweiler S, Kobza R, Bossard M, Cuculi F. Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Using a Dedicated Super High-Pressure Balloon. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jan;46:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 36907698Pinilla-Echeverri N, Bossard M, Hillani A, Chavarria JA, Cioffi GM, Dutra G, Guerrero F, Madanchi M, Attinger A, Kossmann E, Sibbald M, Cuculi F, Sheth T. Treatment of Calcified Lesions Using a Dedicated Super-High Pressure Balloon: Multicenter Optical Coherence Tomography Registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jul;52:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 32076567Cuculi F, Bossard M, Zasada W, Moccetti F, Voskuil M, Wolfrum M, Malinowski KP, Toggweiler S, Kobza R. Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography. Open Heart. 2020 Jan 23;7(1):e001204. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001204. eCollection 2020.
Related trials for Coronary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon and Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter in people with Coronary Disease and Coronary Artery Disease, run by Luzerner Kantonsspital at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Florim Cuculi, MD (+41412052134, florim.cuculi@luks.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Final stent expansion (in percentage, %) assessed by OCT (time frame: At index Procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05346068, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2024.