AzTrials
AzTrials

Idiopathic ScoliosisNCT05347056

The Effect of Vertebral Body Tethering on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Cross-Section Area in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

An observational study of Idiopathic Scoliosis, run by Istanbul University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We aimed to compare the paraspinal muscle cross-section area and functional results of anterior vertebral tethering and selective thoracic fusion surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 19 years
Conditions the study is for
Idiopathic Scoliosis
What is being tested?
Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance, Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension trunk muscle strength and endurance test and Lomber Region Range of motion assessment
How many people
16 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
9 May 2022to 6 Jun 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 19 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: At least 6 months have passed since the surgical procedure, Patients followed in Istanbul Medical Faculty Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Group 1: VBT applied Group 2: only selective thoracic fusion was applied

Who may be able to join

  • Males or females age 12 to 19 years old Diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis At least 6 months have passed since surgical intervention Spina bifida occulta is permitted

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy Prior spinal or chest surgery MRI abnormalities (including syrinx greater than 4mm, Chiari malformation, or tethered cord) Neuromuscular, thoracogenic, cardiogenic scoliosis, or any other non-idiopathic scoliosis Associated syndrome, including Marfan syndrome or neurofibromatosis

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Esin Nur Taşdemir, MD contact

905353661124

esin.tasdemir@istanbul.edu.tr

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Vertebral Body Tethering on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Cross-Section Area, Lumbar Range of Motion and Trunk Muscle Strength in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

We aimed to compare the paraspinal muscle cross-section area and functional results of anterior vertebral tethering and selective thoracic fusion surgery.

Read the detailed description

Idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine. It is defined as the curvature of the spine of 10° or more detected radiologically in the coronal plane. In scoliosis, changes in axial rotation in the transverse plane and physiological curvatures in the sagittal plane (decrease or increase in kyphosis, lordosis) occur.

The incidence of scoliosis is 2-3%, but up to 10% of patients need surgical treatment. Knowing the long-term effects of posterior spinal fusion is currently the gold standard treatment because it gives good results in deformity improvement. However, fusion surgery has disadvantages such as loss of motion in the spine and long-term development of adjacent segment disease and disc degeneration. It has also been suggested that spinal fusion causes iatrogenic damage to the paraspinal muscles (especially the multifidus), which is of great importance in the alignment and movement of the spine due to the posterior approach during surgery.

As a result of damage to the lumbar multifidus muscles and the development of fatty degeneration, problems such as spinal sagittal alignment disorders and chronic low back pain can be seen. In addition, fatty degeneration and atrophy of the paraspinal muscles may lead to the development of adjacent segment disease in the segments under fusion in the long term.

In selective thoracic fusion, by protecting the mobile segments in the lumbar region, the range of motion is preserved and iatrogenic damage of the lumbar paraspinal muscles is prevented. After selective thoracic fusion (STF), some improvement occurs in the deformity in the lumbar region. However, the risk of insufficient improvement and progression of the curve in the unfused lumbar segments, especially in immature patients, should be considered.

Anterior vertebra body tethering is a surgical technique that has been used more frequently in recent years, which is thought to prevent functional complications caused by spinal fusion.With this method, which allows the growth of the spine to continue, there is no need for fusion when treating progressive curvature. Short-term radiological results of this surgical technique have been reported frequently in recent years, but the literature on functional results (spine flexibility, trunk endurance, etc.) is very limited.

In our study, we plan to evaluate the effects of AVT applied to the lumbar region on paraspinal muscle quality, trunk muscle strength and endurance, and trunk joint range of motion by evaluating patients who underwent selective thoracic fusion surgery and patients who underwent thoracic fusion + AVT to the lumbar region.

Being tested
Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance, Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension trunk muscle strength and endurance test, Lomber Region Range of motion assessment, Radiograph, SRS 22
Keywords
Scoliosis, Vertebral body tethering, Motion preservation, Multifidus, Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical subject headings
Scoliosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lumbar Spine Magnetic ResonanceDiagnostic test

    Metal artifact reduction sequence (mars), axial t2 sequence

  • Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension trunk muscle strength and endurance testDiagnostic test

    Also called Cybex

    To evaluate for trunk muscle strength and endurance angular velocity of 60 and 120°/s

  • Lomber Region Range of motion assessmentDiagnostic test

    To evaluate for lomber region ROM with digital inclinometer

  • RadiographDiagnostic test

    spinal radiograph AP/Lateral

  • SRS 22Behavioural

    SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire

Study groups in NCT05347056
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vertebral Body Tethering GroupVertebral Body Tethering applied to the lumbar region, with or without fusion to the thoracic region
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance; Diagnostic Test: Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension trunk muscle strength and endurance test; Diagnostic Test: Lomber Region Range of motion assessment; Diagnostic Test: Radiograph; Behavioral: SRS 22
Selective Thoracic Fusion Groupselective thoracic fusion was applied, no intervention was applied to the lumbar region
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance; Diagnostic Test: Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension trunk muscle strength and endurance test; Diagnostic Test: Lomber Region Range of motion assessment; Diagnostic Test: Radiograph; Behavioral: SRS 22

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of VBT and STF group paraspinal muscles cross-section area

    The bilateral cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES) and psoas (P) muscles at all disc levels were measured by outlining the fascial boundary of the muscle

    Measured: 6 months to 3 years after surgery

  2. Comparison of pre-op and post-op paraspinal muscles cross-section area

    The bilateral cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES) and psoas (P)

    Measured: 6 months to 3 years after surgery

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Investigation of Quality of Life in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

    Quality of life Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months to 3 years after surgery

  2. Comparison of VBT and STF group trunk muscle strenght and endurance

    Cybex Norm

    Measured: 6 months to 3 years after surgery

  3. Comparison VBT and STF group lomber range of motion

    Dual inclinometer

    Measured: 6 months to 3 years after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Apr 2022
  2. Study start9 May 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion27 May 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion6 Jun 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
16 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05347056
Sponsor's protocol ID
ENTASDEMIR
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
21 Apr 2022
Last updated
26 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available.

Publications

  • Green DW, Lawhorne TW 3rd, Widmann RF, Kepler CK, Ahern C, Mintz DN, Rawlins BA, Burke SW, Boachie-Adjei O. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23):1948-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff1ea9.

    PubMed 21289549
  • Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y, Akturk UD, Korkmaz E, Yildirim E, Sarioglu E, Ofluoglu E, Aydogan M. Comparison of clinical and functional outcomes of vertebral body tethering to posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of quality of life: preliminary results. Spine Deform. 2021 Jul;9(4):1175-1182. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00323-5. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

    PubMed 33683642
  • Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG, Suk SI, Suh SW, Nam Y, Kim SI, Song KS. Long-Term Influence of Paraspinal Muscle Quantity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Following Deformity Correction by Posterior Approach. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):4790. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204790.

    PubMed 34682913
  • Baroncini A, Trobisch PD, Berrer A, Kobbe P, Tingart M, Eschweiler J, Da Paz S, Migliorini F. Return to sport and daily life activities after vertebral body tethering for AIS: analysis of the sport activity questionnaire. Eur Spine J. 2021 Jul;30(7):1998-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06768-6. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

    PubMed 33638722

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Idiopathic Scoliosis, run by Istanbul University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Esin Nur Taşdemir, MD (905353661124, esin.tasdemir@istanbul.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of VBT and STF group paraspinal muscles cross-section area (time frame: 6 months to 3 years after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05347056, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in