Lower Limb; Sprain (Strain)NCT05347875
Implementation of an App-based Walking Aid Skills Training Program
A study testing Walking aid skills app and Breathing skills app in people with Lower Limb; Sprain (Strain) and Lower Limb Fracture, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Walking aids (WA), such as crutches, canes, and walkers allow individuals to move independently after lower body impairment. Improper WA use may lead to upper body discomfort, pain, or injury. Improper WA use has been associated with increased risk of falls, which may result in traumatic brain injury or even death. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Limb; Sprain (Strain), Lower Limb Fracture, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Walking aid skills app and Breathing skills app
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2024to 1 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patient at a study site currently using walking aids >75% of their ambulatory time
- age 18-99
Who cannot join
- currently using a wheelchair >25% of their ambulatory time
- cannot comfortably communicate in English or French
- history of significant cognitive or visual impairment that would affect their ability to use the app interventions
- unable to give voluntary informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada2 sites, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta
Ranita Manocha, MD, MSc, 403-944-4224, bettermobilitylab@ucalgary.ca
- Completed
CIRRIS
Québec, Quebec
About this study
Official title: Exploring the Influence of a Novel Application for Training and Evaluating Walking Implementation of an App-based Walking Aid Skills Training Program Aid Skills in Walking Aid Users: A Protocol for a Pragmatic Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Walking aids (WA), such as crutches, canes, and walkers allow individuals to move independently after lower body impairment. Improper WA use may lead to upper body discomfort, pain, or injury. Improper WA use has been associated with increased risk of falls, which may result in traumatic brain injury or even death. WA-related accidents and injuries may not only affect an individual patient's quality of life; they may also increase healthcare system resource use and caregiver burden. WA-related injuries may be preventable if WA are properly fit and sufficient training is provided to the WA user.
Smartphone applications (apps) are widely used technologies that have been used to improve health outcomes in populations of healthy and chronically ill individuals. We have developed an app that can be used to teach WA users how to properly fit and use their devices. This app is called Improving Canadians' Walking Aid skills, Learning, and Knowledge (ICanWALK©).
Read more
The development of the Walking Aids Skills Test© (WAST©) allows for the objective measurement of how well an individual uses their walking aid. It is important to develop such a measurement in order to see whether interventions such as mobile applications change a walking aid user's ability to walk with their device. This 12-item objective evaluation measures the ability of an individual to use their walking aid in different settings, while picking up an object off the ground, navigating stairs, or encountering terrains such as gravel or grass.
Three hypotheses will be explored through this clinical trial. Hypothesis 1: Patients who use the ICanWALK© app will have improved balance confidence compared to the control group.
Hypothesis 2: Patients who use the ICanWALK© app will have improved balance, improved mobility, less pain, and fewer falls compared to the control group.
Hypothesis 3: The WAST© will have an inter-rater reliability of 70% (k=0.85).
Read the detailed description
This study is a single-masked 2-centre randomized control trial. In order to evaluate the usability and feasibility of the app, we will evaluate 52 (26 female) patients and their physical therapists. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group, both of which will use apps available from Move Improve®. Through the Move Improve® platform, both groups will be shown instructional videos of different movement skills, and then will be able to record secure videos of themselves performing the skills. The control group will watch videos related to breathing skills and the treatment group will watch videos related to walking aids. Patients must be aged 18-80 years and require the regular (>75% of ambulatory time) use of a WA. Patients will be recruited from the South Health Campus Neuromuscular and Orthopedic Clinics, Foothills Medical Centre Orthopedic Surgery and Physiatry Clinics, Foothills Medical Centre Orthopedic Inpatients Units, Foothills Medical Centre Day Surgery Units, University of Calgary Sports Medicine Centre, Momentum Health Physiotherapy Clinics (all in Calgary, Alberta), and Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS, in Québec City, Québec) where they will be informed of the project during clinical sessions with their practitioners. Potential patient participants will be screened in-person by a Research Assistant to determine their eligibility.
The primary outcome of the study is the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale assessed at baseline and 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the following at baseline and 4 weeks: Timed Up and Go (TUG), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Berg Balance Score (BBS), Walking Aid Skills Test© (WAST©), number of falls, and a description of upper limb location and pain. Additionally, we will consider both the patient and clinician participant's perspectives about the perceived usefulness, ease of use of, and satisfaction with the app and will ask them about perceived treatment effect and additional time required during therapy sessions. Participant's time spent on and score of each component will also be recorded.
Eligible participants will sign consent forms to participate. During their usual physical therapy session, the patient will use the app on 2 occasions (up to 15 minutes). After the session, the patient will each be asked to complete online questionnaires via Qualtrics (Utah, USA) on the iPad. The questionnaires will include confidence using walking aid, comfort using walking aid, Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, app ease of use, app usability, and app satisfaction. The Research Assistant will be available during the session in case problems arise.
A physical assessment will occur at baseline, 2-weeks, and 4-weeks after initial assessment. The physical assessment contains the BBS, 6MWT, and WAST©. This evaluation will be conducted by the Research Assistant.
The WAST© will be video recorded by the Research Assistant. We will ask physical therapists to rate the videos of the participants to determine the reliability and validity of the walking aid skills test.
There have been no published studies on the minimal clinically important difference of the ABC. A previous study on 376 knee osteoarthritis patients resulted in an increase in ABC scores by a mean of 9.15 at 1-year post-total knee arthroplasty. Using a repeated-measures Cohen's d, the effect size in that study was 0.585. As such, a sample size of 18 would be sufficient to explore two-tailed differences within a single individual over time on the ABC as they were recovering from their injury (1-β=0.8, α=0.05; G*Power, Germany). However, we would like to explore the differences between two groups (app exposures) as a primary outcome. We also wish to explore sex-based differences and want to incorporate a conservative estimate 10% dropout rate. As such, it is likely that 26 participants in each cohort will be sufficient to find significant differences for the primary outcome variable being investigated.
Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control groups using 1:1 allocation ratio to increase the power to detect statistically significant differences between groups. To support balance between groups, a computerized randomization process, stratified by site (4 sites) and sex with block sizes of 2, 4, and 6, designed by a biostatician using SPSS3 (IBM, Armonk, USA) will be used.
Information on the baseline covariates will be presented for the two groups. Rates of non-participation will be reported. All primary and exploratory secondary mobility outcome measures will be assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test in SPSS (IBM, Armonk, USA). ABC scores will be analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with Greenhouse-Geisser correction with time and app group as factors. For the remaining variables, between-group differences will be investigated using either independent group t-tests or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests in SPSS. α = 0.05 will be used for all testing, with correction for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach.
Primary outcome variables will be analyzed in SPSS. Reliability will be analyzed in Microsoft Excel and will be investigated using independent and dependent group t-tests in Excel, with a p-value set at <0.05. Validity will be analyzed in Microsoft Excel and compared to predicted ability to walk, and the Walking Aid Skills Test scores compared to the Timed-Up and Go, Balance Scale and 2-minute Walk. Reliability will be analyzed in Microsoft Excel and compared scores of the same reviewer over time and between reviewers.
- Being tested
- Walking aid skills app, Breathing skills app
- Keywords
- Gait aid, Walking aid, Cane, Crutch, Walker
- Medical subject headings
- Sprains and Strains, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Walking aid skills appOther
Also called ICanWALK
The interventional app teaches users how to fit, walk with, and navigate stairs and chairs with a walking aid. It contains instructional videos with key "components" of these skills highlighted. The user can use their phone's video to record themselves performing the taught skills to enable them to review their usage of the walking aids.
Breathing skills appOther
This app has the same interface as the ICanWALK app. Instead, it teaches deep breathing for stress relief and breathing to improve lung function.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Breathing Skills App Receives: Other: Breathing skills app |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | ICanWALK© App Receives: Other: Walking aid skills app |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
16-item self-report measure that asks individuals to rate their balance confidence in performing a range of activities from 0% to 100%.
Measured: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
2-minute walk test
Measuring the distance walked in 2 minutes. The greater distance covered the more proficient participant is at using walking aid. Minimum: 0 metres. Maximum: unlimited.
Measured: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Berg Balance Scale
Scale ranges from 0 to 56. Higher score indicates better balance.
Measured: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Timed Up and Go
Patient will walk to a line that is 3m away from them, at the line they will turn around, walk 3m, and sit in a chair. The time stops when their buttocks touch the chair. A time of greater than or equal to 15 seconds indicates an increased fall risk.
Measured: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Walking Aid Skills Test©
Scale from 0-100 with higher value indicating greater proficiency using walking aid.
Measured: baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Jun 2024
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lower Limb; Sprain (Strain)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alberta Health services, Laval University, Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ranita Manocha, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Ranita Manocha, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05347875
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB21-1165
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Anonymized IPD will be shared if requested on a case-by-case basis.
Publications
Si HB, Zeng Y, Zhong J, Zhou ZK, Lu YR, Cheng JQ, Ning N, Shen B. The effect of primary total knee arthroplasty on the incidence of falls and balance-related functions in patients with osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 29;7(1):16583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16867-4.
PubMed 29185496Nindorera F, Manocha RHK, Miller WC, Routhier F, Best KL. Exploring the Influence of a Novel App for Training and Evaluating Walking Aid Skills in Walking Aid Users: Protocol for a Pragmatic Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Dec 24;14:e71060. doi: 10.2196/71060.
PubMed 41442703
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploring the Influence of a Novel Application for Training and Evaluating Walking Implementation of an App-based Walking Aid Skills Training Program Aid Skills in Walking Aid Users: A Protocol for a Pragmatic Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05347875
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB21-1165
- Keywords
- Gait aid, Walking aid, Cane, Crutch, Walker
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alberta Health services, Laval University, Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Walking aids (WA), such as crutches, canes, and walkers allow individuals to move independently after lower body impairment. Improper WA use may lead to upper body discomfort, pain, or injury. Improper WA use has been associated with increased risk of falls, which may result in traumatic brain injury or even death. WA-related accidents and injuries may not only affect an individual patient's quality of life; they may also increase healthcare system resource use and caregiver burden. WA-related injuries may be preventable if WA are properly fit and sufficient training is provided to the WA user.
Smartphone applications (apps) are widely used technologies that have been used to improve health outcomes in populations of healthy and chronically ill individuals. We have developed an app that can be used to teach WA users how to properly fit and use their devices. This app is called Improving Canadians' Walking Aid skills, Learning, and Knowledge (ICanWALK©).
The development of the Walking Aids Skills Test© (WAST©) allows for the objective measurement of how well an individual uses their walking aid. It is important to develop such a measurement in order to see whether interventions such as mobile applications change a walking aid user's ability to walk with their device. This 12-item objective evaluation measures the ability of an individual to use their walking aid in different settings, while picking up an object off the ground, navigating stairs, or encountering terrains such as gravel or grass.
Three hypotheses will be explored through this clinical trial. Hypothesis 1: Patients who use the ICanWALK© app will have improved balance confidence compared to the control group.
Hypothesis 2: Patients who use the ICanWALK© app will have improved balance, improved mobility, less pain, and fewer falls compared to the control group.
Hypothesis 3: The WAST© will have an inter-rater reliability of 70% (k=0.85).
Detailed description
This study is a single-masked 2-centre randomized control trial. In order to evaluate the usability and feasibility of the app, we will evaluate 52 (26 female) patients and their physical therapists. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group, both of which will use apps available from Move Improve®. Through the Move Improve® platform, both groups will be shown instructional videos of different movement skills, and then will be able to record secure videos of themselves performing the skills. The control group will watch videos related to breathing skills and the treatment group will watch videos related to walking aids. Patients must be aged 18-80 years and require the regular (>75% of ambulatory time) use of a WA. Patients will be recruited from the South Health Campus Neuromuscular and Orthopedic Clinics, Foothills Medical Centre Orthopedic Surgery and Physiatry Clinics, Foothills Medical Centre Orthopedic Inpatients Units, Foothills Medical Centre Day Surgery Units, University of Calgary Sports Medicine Centre, Momentum Health Physiotherapy Clinics (all in Calgary, Alberta), and Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS, in Québec City, Québec) where they will be informed of the project during clinical sessions with their practitioners. Potential patient participants will be screened in-person by a Research Assistant to determine their eligibility.
The primary outcome of the study is the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale assessed at baseline and 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the following at baseline and 4 weeks: Timed Up and Go (TUG), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Berg Balance Score (BBS), Walking Aid Skills Test© (WAST©), number of falls, and a description of upper limb location and pain. Additionally, we will consider both the patient and clinician participant's perspectives about the perceived usefulness, ease of use of, and satisfaction with the app and will ask them about perceived treatment effect and additional time required during therapy sessions. Participant's time spent on and score of each component will also be recorded.
Eligible participants will sign consent forms to participate. During their usual physical therapy session, the patient will use the app on 2 occasions (up to 15 minutes). After the session, the patient will each be asked to complete online questionnaires via Qualtrics (Utah, USA) on the iPad. The questionnaires will include confidence using walking aid, comfort using walking aid, Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, app ease of use, app usability, and app satisfaction. The Research Assistant will be available during the session in case problems arise.
A physical assessment will occur at baseline, 2-weeks, and 4-weeks after initial assessment. The physical assessment contains the BBS, 6MWT, and WAST©. This evaluation will be conducted by the Research Assistant.
The WAST© will be video recorded by the Research Assistant. We will ask physical therapists to rate the videos of the participants to determine the reliability and validity of the walking aid skills test.
There have been no published studies on the minimal clinically important difference of the ABC. A previous study on 376 knee osteoarthritis patients resulted in an increase in ABC scores by a mean of 9.15 at 1-year post-total knee arthroplasty. Using a repeated-measures Cohen's d, the effect size in that study was 0.585. As such, a sample size of 18 would be sufficient to explore two-tailed differences within a single individual over time on the ABC as they were recovering from their injury (1-β=0.8, α=0.05; G*Power, Germany). However, we would like to explore the differences between two groups (app exposures) as a primary outcome. We also wish to explore sex-based differences and want to incorporate a conservative estimate 10% dropout rate. As such, it is likely that 26 participants in each cohort will be sufficient to find significant differences for the primary outcome variable being investigated.
Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control groups using 1:1 allocation ratio to increase the power to detect statistically significant differences between groups. To support balance between groups, a computerized randomization process, stratified by site (4 sites) and sex with block sizes of 2, 4, and 6, designed by a biostatician using SPSS3 (IBM, Armonk, USA) will be used.
Information on the baseline covariates will be presented for the two groups. Rates of non-participation will be reported. All primary and exploratory secondary mobility outcome measures will be assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test in SPSS (IBM, Armonk, USA). ABC scores will be analyzed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with Greenhouse-Geisser correction with time and app group as factors. For the remaining variables, between-group differences will be investigated using either independent group t-tests or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests in SPSS. α = 0.05 will be used for all testing, with correction for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach.
Primary outcome variables will be analyzed in SPSS. Reliability will be analyzed in Microsoft Excel and will be investigated using independent and dependent group t-tests in Excel, with a p-value set at <0.05. Validity will be analyzed in Microsoft Excel and compared to predicted ability to walk, and the Walking Aid Skills Test scores compared to the Timed-Up and Go, Balance Scale and 2-minute Walk. Reliability will be analyzed in Microsoft Excel and compared scores of the same reviewer over time and between reviewers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Breathing skills appBreathing Skills App |
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Other: Walking aid skills appICanWALK© App |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patient at a study site currently using walking aids >75% of their ambulatory time
- age 18-99
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- currently using a wheelchair >25% of their ambulatory time
- cannot comfortably communicate in English or French
- history of significant cognitive or visual impairment that would affect their ability to use the app interventions
- unable to give voluntary informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Walking aid skills appAlso: ICanWALKThe interventional app teaches users how to fit, walk with, and navigate stairs and chairs with a walking aid. It contains instructional videos with key "components" of these skills highlighted. The user can use their phone's video to record themselves performing the taught skills to enable them to review their usage of the walking aids. | Other | Experimental Group |
| Breathing skills appThis app has the same interface as the ICanWALK app. Instead, it teaches deep breathing for stress relief and breathing to improve lung function. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
16-item self-report measure that asks individuals to rate their balance confidence in performing a range of activities from 0% to 100%.
4 secondary outcomes
2-minute walk test
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Berg Balance Scale
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Timed Up and Go
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Walking Aid Skills Test©
Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29185496Si HB, Zeng Y, Zhong J, Zhou ZK, Lu YR, Cheng JQ, Ning N, Shen B. The effect of primary total knee arthroplasty on the incidence of falls and balance-related functions in patients with osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 29;7(1):16583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16867-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41442703Nindorera F, Manocha RHK, Miller WC, Routhier F, Best KL. Exploring the Influence of a Novel App for Training and Evaluating Walking Aid Skills in Walking Aid Users: Protocol for a Pragmatic Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Dec 24;14:e71060. doi: 10.2196/71060.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Anonymized IPD will be shared if requested on a case-by-case basis.
Related trials for Lower Limb; Sprain (Strain)
Recruiting
The Effects of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Exercises Added to Postural Stabilization Training in Amateur Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability
Ankle Sprain, Ankle Sprain Strain
Recruiting
The Effects of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Exercises Added to Postural Stabilization Training in Chronic Ankle Instability
Ankle Sprains, Ankle Sprain Strain
Not yet recruiting
Correlation Between Soft Tissue Displacement and Functional Performance in Orthopedic Patients
Hamstring Muscle Strain, Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity
Recruiting
Effects Of Criteria Versus Time-Based Rehabilitation On Return To Play In Football Players
Hamstring Muscle Strain
RecruitingPhase 3
Topical Diclofenac vs.Oral Ibuprofen for MSK Pain in Children
Musculoskeletal Injury, Pediatrics
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ranita Manocha, MD, MSc principal investigator
University of Calgary
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Walking aid skills app and Breathing skills app in people with Lower Limb; Sprain (Strain) and Lower Limb Fracture, run by University of Calgary at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ranita Manocha, MD, MSc (403-944-4224, ranita.manocha@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) (time frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05347875, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2026.