AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerSSL follow-upNCT05355363

Risk of Metachronous Findings After Detection of Serrated Lesions and High-grade Dysplasia With Surveillance Delay

A study testing Standard Colonoscopy in people with Colorectal Cancer and Colon Adenoma, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of this study is to determine the rate of total metachronous advanced neoplasia (TMAN) detection after index detection of serrated lesions (SL) [sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs)], and metachronous high-risk adenoma (HRA) after index detection of high-grade dysplasia… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer, Colon Adenoma
What is being tested?
Standard Colonoscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
727 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
27 Feb 2023to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 45-80 who underwent colonoscopy from 2009 to 2022 at the Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) with 1+ SL or HGD detected at index colonoscopy and lacking follow-up within or beyond the surveillance interval recommended by 2020 USMSTF guidelines.

Who cannot join

  • 1) Patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease;
  • 2) Hereditary CRC syndromes;
  • 3) CRC at index colonoscopy;
  • 4) Serrated polyposis syndrome;
  • 5) Life expectancy too short to benefit from colonoscopy;
  • 6) Follow-up colonoscopy not yet due according to USMSTF guidelines. Patients with concomitant HRA and SL at index will be invited to participate if the index (or last) colonoscopy was performed more than 1 year ago. This is based on the high rates of HRA we identified in our retrospective study posing increased risks for these patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

    Montreal, Quebec

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The primary aim of this study is to determine the rate of total metachronous advanced neoplasia (TMAN) detection after index detection of serrated lesions (SL) [sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs)], and metachronous high-risk adenoma (HRA) after index detection of high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

We will use the database of patients diagnosed with SL or HGD at index colonoscopy with a delay in surveillance and determine the risk of advanced lesions (especially high-risk lesion and CRC detection) of these delayed colonoscopies. The aim is to determine the effects of breach of continuity of care in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks second among worldwide cancer related deaths and third in terms of cancer incidence. Colonoscopy-based screening programs have been established to reduce CRC morbidity and mortality. Multiple guidelines have established surveillance recommendations for repeat colonoscopies based on findings at index colonoscopy. Serrated lesions (SLs), including sessile serrated polyps/adenomas (SSP) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) have become of increased interest for their role as precursors of CRC. The optimal timing of follow-up colonoscopies after detection of SLs has been controversial as studies looking into optimal surveillance timing are lacking. The US Multi Society Task Force (USMSTF) 2020 guidelines recommend 5-10y surveillance intervals for detection of 1-2 SSPs, 3-5y for 3-4 SSPs, 3y for >4 SSPs or TSA. In contrast, the 2020 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guidelines state that 1-10mm SLs do not require follow-up. It is unclear what the appropriate surveillance intervals is for patients with SLs which is evidenced by diverging recommendations from USMSTF/ESGE. High-grade dysplasia (HGD) is an exceedingly rare finding in colorectal polyps. The current literature on the yield of colonoscopy after index HGD is sparse, with conflicting data on risk of metachronous HRA due to low numbers of included HGD leading to high variability in reported outcomes.

Patient with SL or HGD diagnosed from 2010-2022 will be gathered from the pathology department to determine which patients lack follow-up during these years. Patients with lack of follow-up will be contacted by phone, then invited to undergo follow-up colonoscopy as part of our routine clinical follow-up of these patients' files.

In addition to the primary and secondary endpoints, data collected will include patient age; sex; ASA class; past medical history; family history of CRC; procedure date; name of endoscopist; colonoscopy indication; BBPS score; withdrawal time; adenoma and polyp detection rate at index and follow-up colonoscopy; completeness of polypectomy; polyp location, size, surface, morphology (Paris classification), histopathology; complications, immediate and late (14 days).

Being tested
Standard Colonoscopy
Keywords
sessile serrated polyps, traditional serrated adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, high-risk adenoma, cancer prevention, Colonoscopy
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard ColonoscopyDiagnostic test

    Standard colonoscopy: All optically diagnosed polyps will be removed and sent to the CHUM pathology laboratory for histopathological evaluation according to institutional standards.

Study groups in NCT05355363
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ColonoscopyExperimentalStandard colonoscopy: All optically diagnosed polyps will be removed and sent to the CHUM pathology laboratory for histopathological evaluation according to institutional standards.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Standard Colonoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of TMAN detection after index detection of serrated lesions

    the rate of total metachronous advanced neoplasia (TMAN) detection after index detection of serrated lesions [sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs)]

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Rate of metachronous high-risk adenoma (HRA) after index detection of high-grade dysplasia (HGD)

    the rate of metachronous high-risk adenoma (HRA) after index detection of high-grade dysplasia (HGD)

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Rate of T-MAN detection for concomitant index SSP+low-risk adenoma (LRA); index SSP+ high-risk adenoma (HRA); index SSP alone

    The rate of T-MAN detection for concomitant index SSP+low-risk adenoma (LRA); index SSP+ high-risk adenoma (HRA); index SSP alone

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Rate of T-MAN detection according to number, size, location, and dysplasia status of index SSPs

    The rate of T-MAN detection according to number, size, location, and dysplasia status of index SSPs

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Rate of metachronous HRA detection for index HGD alone

    The rate of metachronous HRA detection for index HGD alone

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Rate of metachronous HRA detection for index HGD according to number, size, location, of index HGD

    The rate of metachronous HRA detection for index HGD according to number, size, location, of index HGD

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Rate of metachronous high-risk serrated lesion (SL) for concomitant index SSP+LRA; index SSP+HRA; index SSP alone; index SSP all synchronous findings included; index TSA a ll synchronous findings included

    The rate of metachronous high-risk serrated lesion (SL) for concomitant index SSP+LRA; index SSP+HRA; index SSP alone; index SSP all synchronous findings included; index TSA all synchronous findings included

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Rate of metachronous high-risk SL detection according to number, size, location, and dysplasia status of index SSPs

    The rate of metachronous high-risk SL detection according to number, size, location, and dysplasia status of index SSPs

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Rate of metachronous HRA for concomitant index SSP+LRA; index SSP+HRA; index SSP alone; index SSP all synchronous findings included; index TSA all synchronous findings included

    The rate of metachronous HRA for concomitant index SSP+LRA; index SSP+HRA; index SSP alone; index SSP all synchronous findings included; index TSA all synchronous findings included

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Rate of metachronous HRA detection according to number, size, location, and dysplasia status of index SSPs

    The rate of metachronous HRA detection according to number, size, location, and dysplasia status of index SSPs

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Rate of T-MAN and metachronous HRA detection for the serrated lesion (SL) and HGD groups

    The rate of T-MAN and metachronous HRA detection for the serrated lesion (SL) and HGD groups stratified by number of years of surveillance delay

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Rate of metachronous advanced SL and metachronous HRA detection for the serrated lesion (SL) group

    The rate of metachronous advanced SL and metachronous HRA detection for the serrated lesion (SL) group stratified by number of years of delay at time of endoscopy from surveillance intervals recommended by guidelines

    Measured: 1 year

  11. Adenoma detection rates (ADR) and advanced adenoma detection rates at follow-up

    Adenoma detection rates (ADR) and advanced adenoma detection rates at follow-up stratified by number of years of delay at time of endoscopy from surveillance intervals recommended by guidelines

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2022
  2. Study start27 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
prospective, multi-endoscopist, single center, single group assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
727 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05355363
Sponsor's protocol ID
22.179
Acronym
SSL follow-up
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
4 Apr 2022
Last updated
18 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard Colonoscopy in people with Colorectal Cancer and Colon Adenoma, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of TMAN detection after index detection of serrated lesions (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in