AzTrials
AzTrials

Unilateral Cerebral PalsyNCT05355883

Remote Ischemic Conditioning, Bimanual Skill Learning, and Corticospinal Excitability

A study testing Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC), Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT) and Bimanual Cup Stacking Training in people with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy and Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is a leading cause of childhood disability. An early brain injury impairs the upper extremity function, bimanual coordination, and impacts the child's independence. The existing therapeutic interventions have higher training doses and modest effect sizes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 16 years
What is being tested?
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC), Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT) and Bimanual Cup Stacking Training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
51 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Dec 2021to 30 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy, ages 6-16 years
  • Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III
  • Ability to complete a stack of 3 cups in 2 minutes
  • Mainstream in school and has sufficient cognition to follow the experiment instructions

Who cannot join

  • Children with other developmental disabilities such as autism, developmental coordination disorders, etc.
  • Children with absent active motor threshold
  • Children with cognitive deficits or communication problem
  • Children with known cardiorespiratory and vascular dysfunctions
  • Children with metabolic disorders, neoplasm, hydrocephalus
  • Children who are receiving other adjunct therapies such as rTMS and tDCS
  • Children with seizures and on anti-seizure medications
  • Children with metal implants and incompatible medical devices for MRI scans

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Dept. of Physical Therapy, East Carolina University

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bimanual Skill Learning, Bimanual Coordination, and Corticospinal Excitability in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is a leading cause of childhood disability. An early brain injury impairs the upper extremity function, bimanual coordination, and impacts the child's independence. The existing therapeutic interventions have higher training doses and modest effect sizes. Thus, there is a critical need to find an effective priming agent to enhance bimanual skill learning in children with UCP. This study aims to determine the effects of a novel priming agent, remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), when paired with intensive bimanual skill training to enhance bimanual skill learning and to augment skill dependent plasticity in children with UCP.

Read the detailed description

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a phenomenon of protecting the target organ from ischemia by directly exposing it to brief episodes of sublethal ischemia. RIC is a clinically feasible way of performing IC where episodes of ischemia and reperfusion are delivered with cyclic inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm or leg. Pre-clinical and preliminary clinical trials in humans show neuroprotective effects of RIC. Investigators prior work has shown that when paired with motor training, RIC enhances motor learning in healthy individuals. Based on these diversified benefits of RIC, the central hypothesis is that the multifactorial mechanisms of RIC can be harnessed as a priming agent to enhance motor learning and augment neuroplasticity in children with UCP. The Specific Aims are: 1) to determine the effects of RIC + training on bimanual skill performance, and 2) to determine the effects of RIC + training on corticospinal excitability in children with UCP. In this triple blind, randomized controlled trial, 30 children with UCP, ages 6-16 years will first undergo bimanual speed stack performance, functional upper extremity, and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation assessments. Children will then undergo RIC/Sham conditioning plus training. Investigators will deliver RIC/sham conditioning via cyclic inflation and deflation of a pressure cuff on the paretic arm using a standard protocol. Training will involve 5 days (15 trials/day) of bimanual speed stack training and intensive bimanual training using hand arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) with a standard dose of 6 hours/day for 5 days. The children will perform the same baseline assessments post-intervention. Investigators hypothesize that compared to sham conditioning + training, RIC + training will significantly enhance: 1) bimanual skill performance (decrease in movement time (sec) to complete bimanual speed stack task), 2) bimanual function (increase in the Assisting Hand Assessment scores), 3) cortical excitability in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) (larger amplitude of motor evoked potentials and lower resting or active motor thresholds), and 4) reduce motor cortex inhibition (reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and increase in intracortical facilitation in ipsilesional M1). The long-term goal is to develop effective interventions to improve function of children with UCP. Outcomes of this project will provide critical ingredients for designing Phase II trials that will determine the effects of RIC combined with different dose of intensive behavioral interventions to improve functional outcomes in children with UCP.

Being tested
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC), Sham conditioning, Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT), Bimanual Cup Stacking Training, Balance training
Keywords
Cerebral palsy, Bimanual coordination, Corticospinal excitability
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)Behavioural

    Also called Remote limb ischemic conditioning

    See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. RIC is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the pre-training assessment visit, visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits, visit 7 is a post-training assessment visit.

  • Sham conditioningBehavioural

    Also called Sham

    See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the pre-training assessment visit, visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits, visit 7 is a post-training assessment visit.

  • Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT)Behavioural

    Also called Bimanual skill training

    HABIT is a child-friendly, intensive intervention directed at improving bimanual coordination and function of the affected arm. The intervention employed in this study includes various age-appropriate fine and gross motor bimanual activities that will be delivered in a play context. Children practice bimanual activities for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week, for 1 week.

  • Bimanual Cup Stacking TrainingBehavioural

    Also called Cup stacking task

    Children practices bimanual cup stacking, 15 trials/day for 5 consecutive day.

  • Balance trainingBehavioural

    All children undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg and using various bilateral upper extremity strategies. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 2-6.

Study groups in NCT05355883
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)ExperimentalRIC is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to at least 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure to 250 mmHg on the more involved arm. RIC involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. RIC is performed on visits 2-6. Intervention * Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT) * Bimanual cup stacking training * Balance training
Receives: Behavioral: Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC); Behavioral: Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT); Behavioral: Bimanual Cup Stacking Training; Behavioral: Balance training
Sham ConditioningSham comparatorSham conditioning is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 25 mmHg on the more involved arm. RIC involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. RIC is performed on visits 2-6. Intervention * Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT) * Bimanual cup stacking training * Balance training
Receives: Behavioral: Sham conditioning; Behavioral: Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT); Behavioral: Bimanual Cup Stacking Training; Behavioral: Balance training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Assisting Hand Assessment

    Assisting Hand Assessment assesses bimanual coordination and affected hand function. A 5-point change from pre- to post-intervention is considered a clinically meaningful improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  2. Change in Bimanual Task Performance

    The time (seconds) to complete each trial of cup stack, which will be averaged across three trials. This will be measured at visit 1 (pre-) and visit 7 (post-intervention). Smaller time to complete the task indicates better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  3. Change in Resting and Active Motor Thresholds

    The minimum intensity of the stimulator output required to produce an MEP of > 50 μV will be determined using maximum-likelihood parameter estimation by a sequential testing (ML-PEST) algorithm from the lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Greater reduction in resting and active motor threshold from pre- to post-intervention indicates greater corticospinal excitability.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  4. Change in Stimulus-response curves

    Suprathreshold intensities of 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, and 150% of resting motor threshold will be administered randomly on the lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Greater motor evoked potential response at each of these intensities indicate greater corticospinal excitability.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in Box and Blocks Test (BBT)

    BBT is a standard test to assess manual speed. Greater number of blocks transferred indicates greater manual speed.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  2. Change in Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    NHPT is a standard test to assess manual speed and dexterity. Smaller time to complete NHPT indicates greater speed and dexterity.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  3. Change in Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT)

    JHFT assesses fine and gross hand and arm movements. Smaller time to complete JHFT indicates better hand function.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  4. Change in Balance performance

    The average amount of time in seconds that a participant maintains the stability platform within ±5° of horizontal position during 15 trials of 30 seconds each. The total score will range between 0-30 seconds. Higher balance score indicates better balance performance. Greater average balance time indicates better balance performance.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  5. Change in Hand grip and pinch strength

    Hand grip and pinch strength assesses hand muscle strength. Greater hand and pinch strength indicates greater strength of hand muscles.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  6. Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI)

    For SICI, a subthreshold (80% RMT) conditioning pulse to the motor hotspot will be applied followed by a suprathreshold (120% RMT) test pulse 3 milliseconds later. Reduction in SICI indicates intracortical facilitation.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  7. Change in Intracortical Facilitation (ICF)

    For ICF, the interstimulus interval will increase to 12 milliseconds. Greater ICF indicates greater intracortical facilitation.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

  8. Change in accelerometry derived variables

    Number of movements, use ratio, magnitude ratio, bilateral magnitude, and acceleration variability will be quantified using wrist worn accelerometers. Greater values indicate better bimanual performance.

    Measured: Baseline and 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2022
  2. Study start18 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion30 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double blinded, randomized controlled trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
51 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05355883
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-001913
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
15 Jan 2022
Last updated
16 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be shared on NIH figshare network and will be made available on request.

Publications

  • Surkar SM, Hoffman RM, Willett S, Flegle J, Harbourne R, Kurz MJ. Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Improves Prefrontal Cortex Activation in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018 Apr;30(2):93-100. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000486.

    PubMed 29578992
  • Dirnagl U, Becker K, Meisel A. Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):398-412. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70054-7.

    PubMed 19296922
  • Gidday JM. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):437-48. doi: 10.1038/nrn1927.

    PubMed 16715053
  • Stetler RA, Leak RK, Gan Y, Li P, Zhang F, Hu X, Jing Z, Chen J, Zigmond MJ, Gao Y. Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: paradigms and clinical significance. Prog Neurobiol. 2014 Mar;114:58-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.005. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

    PubMed 24389580
  • Kharbanda RK, Nielsen TT, Redington AN. Translation of remote ischaemic preconditioning into clinical practice. Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1557-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61421-5.

    PubMed 19880021

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC), Hand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT) and Bimanual Cup Stacking Training in people with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy and Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Assisting Hand Assessment (time frame: Baseline and 1 week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05355883, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in