AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiorespiratory Fitness TestNCT05356871

Validity and Reliability of a Clinical Method for Assessment of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Using Seismocardiography

An observational study of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Test, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness (here VO2max) is considered a valuable tool for improving the risk prediction of cardiovascular disease and overall patient management. However, the gold standard method for determining VO2max requires both maximal exercise until exhaustion and expensive equipment, why it is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cardiorespiratory Fitness Test
What is being tested?
VO2max validity and reliability assesment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
29 Jun 2020to 2 Nov 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A representative selection of the healthy adult population

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy participants

Who cannot join

  • A history of previous or current cardiovascular disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Conditions that prevent maximal cycling exercise

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Xlab, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen

    Copenhagen, 2200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness (here VO2max) is considered a valuable tool for improving the risk prediction of cardiovascular disease and overall patient management. However, the gold standard method for determining VO2max requires both maximal exercise until exhaustion and expensive equipment, why it is not always feasible. A new method for estimating VO2max using a non-exercise prediction model with seismocardiography (SCG) information has been proposed. SCG is recording and interpretations of vibrations originating from the beating heart measured on the chest wall with an accelerometer. SCG has previously been shown to correlate to physiologic events in the cardiac cycle and thus a measure of cardiac performance. VO2max is generally believed to be limited by the rate of oxygen delivery to the muscles, where maximal cardiac output and oxygen carrying capacity of the blood are considered the main limiting factors. The theoretical basis for incorporating SCG to a VO2max prediction model is therefore evident. The previous studies assessed the prediction model in a cross-sectional study design to compare validity of the method. A requirement of further validation of the prediction model with reliability assessment is therefore needed.

Biological age is a concept trying to relate the age to the health status rather than the date of birth. Biological age assesses the heterogeneity in functional metabolic status and vulnerability to disease. A Biological age model has previously been designed for health promotion interventions. However, reliability assessment of the model is needed.

Read more

The purpose of the current study was therefore to:

  1. investigate the validity and reliability of a new clinical method for estimation of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) using seismocardiography.
  2. investigate the reliability of the biological age model.
Read the detailed description

20 healthy participants were recruited for the study. The study included three identical visit to the laboratory within 14 days.

The participants received both written and oral information about the study and the possible risks associated hereof, before volunteering and signing a written informed consent form.

The participants arrived at the laboratory after an overnight fast from latest 10pm the day before (water excepted). Furthermore, the participants were asked to avoid strenuous exercise 48 hours prior to the test day and eat a habitual diet, which had to be replicated before the second and third visit.

Testing at each visit to the laboratory included:

Completion of a short version of the International Physical Activity Questionaire, about leisure time physical activities.

Measurements of height, weight and waist and hip circumference.

Measurement of body composition using a Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan on day 1.

Measurement of body composition using a bioelectrical impedance analysis scale on day 1, 2 and 3.

Measurement of blood pressure in the supine position. 3 measures with 2 minute resting in between.

Measurement of VO2max using a non-exercise testing method based on seismocardiography.

Collection of a 15 ml resting venous blood sample for measurements of resting levels of hormones, metabolites and lipids in the blood plasma.

Measurement of lung function in terms of FEV1 and FVC (Vyntus SPIRO spirometer, Vyaire Medical).

Determination of VO2max applying a graded exercise test on a bicycle ergometry until voluntary exhaustion with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements.

Procedure and analysis:

Bioelectrical impedance analysis scale (Tanita MC-780MA, Tanita Corporation of America Inc): The participants was analysed on the scale after voiding and wearing minimal clothing.

DXA scanning (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare): The participants was placed in the supine position in the DXA scanner after voiding and while wearing minimal clothing.

Blood samples: The blood samples was collected from the vein cubiti medialis in the forearm. The blood was sampled in iced BD vacutainers (5 mL Aprotinin, 4 mL EDTA and 2 mL Lithium Heparin) and immediately centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 minutes at 4⁰C (Rotina 380R, Hettich). The plasma was collected and stored at -80⁰C for later analyzes of resting levels of metabolites, lipids and hormones.

The concentrations of hemoglobin, hematocrit, glucose and lactate was immediately analyzed though sampling of 2 mL blood in a specialized syringe (safePICO Aspirator, Radiometer) and using an automatic analyzer (ABL800 Flex, Radiometer).

SCG VO2max prediction:

The SCG VO2max prediction was performed as previously described with the same type of equipment. Brief, the SCG recording was performed using an iWorx IX-228/s (IWORX, Dover, New Hampshire) connected to a PC. LabScribe was used as recording software (version 3. Dover, New Hampshire). The accelerometer (Silicon Design 1521-002) had a resolution of ± 2 g, a low noise at 7 μg / √ Hz and a frequency 70 response of 0-300 Hz and was placed on sternum 2 cm proximal of processus xiphoideus. The recording lasted 5 minutes and was performed in the supine position. VentriJect Aps later performed the signal processing and VO2max estimation. VentriJect Aps was informed of the age, height and weight of the participants for inclusion in the prediction model, but was blinded of the measured VO2max.

Hereafter a new devolved wireless device (Seismofit, VentriJect Aps) was used to determine SCG VO2max. The Seismofit contains a 3v battery and a three-axis digital output accelerometer (LIS3DHH, ST Microelectronics). The Seismofit device is connected to a phone application where the participants demographic data (age, height and weight) was entered before performing the recording. For the recording, the participants was lying in the supine position and the Seismofit device was placed on sternum 2 cm proximal of processus Xiphoideus with double adhesive tape. The predicted SCG VO2max value appeared on the phone screen within 5 minutes.

The Seismofit VO2max prediction was performed twice with 5 minutes rest in between. This was done to assess the test-retest reliability of the device.

The iWorx VO2max was done to compare the previous equipment with the new wireless equipment with automatic signal processing.

The gold standard VO2max determination:

A graded exercise test (GET) until voluntary exhaustion on a bicycle ergometer was performed. The protocol consisted of a five-minute warm-up at 80 W for women and 100 W for men and increased hereafter with 20 W for women and 25 W for men every minute until exhaustion.

Participants was wearing a chest strapped heart rate monitor (Polar Vantage XL, Polar) with continuous heart rate measures during the test. Furthermore the participants, was asked about perceived exhaustion on the 6-20 Borg scale directly following exhaustion.

Statistical analysis:

All data was checked for normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test) and equal variance (Brown- Forsythe test). The significant level is p<0.05.

A Mixed-effect model, Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement, Pearson correlations and Mean Absolute Percentage Error was used for assessment of validity between the Seismofit VO2max and GET VO2max, Seismofit VO2max measure 1 and 2 and between Seismofit VO2max and iWorx VO2max.

Coefficient of Variation (CV), Standard Error of Estimate (SEE) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to assess reliability of VO2max measurements.

The project was approved by the Science Ethical commitee of the greater region of Copenhagen (H-19081375) the 3rd of February 2020. The protocol of the study adhered to the principles of the Helsinki declaration.

Being tested
VO2max validity and reliability assesment
Keywords
Validity, Reliability, VO2max testing, Biological age

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VO2max validity and reliability assesmentOther

    Reliability assessment of VO2max determination with three repeated measures for two methods.

Study groups in NCT05356871
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthy participantsHealthy men and women within the age of 18 and 75 yrs.
Receives: Other: VO2max validity and reliability assesment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Validity and reliability of the SCG VO2max prediction model

    For assessment of validity and reliability of the SCG VO2max prediction model, three repeated measures of SCG VO2max and the gold standard determination of VO2max will be conducted on three different test days within 14 days.

    The validity assessment will be based on differences and agreement between the two methods.

    The reliability assessment will be based on intra-method variations between test days.

    Measured: From June until December

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Reliability of the biological age model

    Three repeated measures of biological age within 14 days will be conducted.

    The reliability assessment will be based on intra-method variation between test days

    Measured: From June until December

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2022
  2. Study start29 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion2 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion2 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05356871
Sponsor's protocol ID
VentriJect Validation Study
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
26 Apr 2022
Last updated
15 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sorensen K, Schmidt SE, Jensen AS, Sogaard P, Struijk JJ. Definition of Fiducial Points in the Normal Seismocardiogram. Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 18;8(1):15455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33675-6.

    PubMed 30337579
  • Sorensen K, Poulsen MK, Karbing DS, Sogaard P, Struijk JJ, Schmidt SE. A Clinical Method for Estimation of VO2max Using Seismocardiography. Int J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;41(10):661-668. doi: 10.1055/a-1144-3369. Epub 2020 May 26.

    PubMed 32455456
  • Hansen MT, Grønfeldt BM, Rømer T, Fogelstrøm M, Sørensen K, Schmidt SE, et al. Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest. In: Computing in Cardiology 2021. IEEE. 2021;48(1):48-51 DOI: 10.22489/CinC.2021.165

  • Husted KLS, Fogelstrom M, Hulst P, Brink-Kjaer A, Henneberg KA, Sorensen HBD, Dela F, Helge JW. A Biological Age Model Designed for Health Promotion Interventions: Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Study for Model Development. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 26;9(10):e19209. doi: 10.2196/19209.

    PubMed 33104001

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Test, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Validity and reliability of the SCG VO2max prediction model (time frame: From June until December). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05356871, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in