AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastrointestinal CancersNCT05359042

Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers

A study testing Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes platform and Health Related Quality of Life Surveys in people with Gastrointestinal Cancers and Gastrointestinal Cancer Metastatic, run by University of California, San Francisco.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized trial of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers treated at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) who are starting a new line of systemic therapy to evaluate the feasibility of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) platform. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes platform and Health Related Quality of Life Surveys
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Jun 2024to 30 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers: esophageal, gastric, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic, neuroendocrine, small intestine, colorectal and anal cancers.
  • Patients can have early stage or advanced cancer and will be starting treatment with new, standard of care infusion therapy regimen at UCSF.
  • Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.
  • No limit on prior lines of therapy.
  • Access to smartphone, tablet, or computer with capability to use symptom tracking web site (must have mobile phone number or email address).
  • Willing and able to provide written, signed informed consent in English.
  • Ability of individual or legal guardian/representative to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have already started therapy prior to study enrollment.
  • Patients who are receiving their treatment outside of UCSF.
  • Participation in another clinical trial (therapeutic or non-therapeutic).
  • Patients who are on therapy with oral oncolytics or combination therapy of oral oncolytics and infusional agents.
  • Patients who are non-English speakers.

About this study

Official title: Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers at Risk for Unplanned ED Visits and Hospitalizations

This is a randomized trial of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers treated at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) who are starting a new line of systemic therapy to evaluate the feasibility of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) platform.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To evaluate the feasibility of the ePRO platform by describing the proportion of participants who engage with the ePRO tool via virtual care chat at least once after enrollment.

II. To investigate the potential differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by comparing the change in overall score of EuroQol five-dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D) index.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To evaluate the degree of engagement with virtual care chat as defined by the proportion of chat modules completed.

II. To measure the potential differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

III. To describe the symptom experience of participants in the intervention arm.

IV. To evaluate the performance of clinical escalation rules and impact on clinic workflow and efficiency.

  1. To prospectively validate a risk model predicting emergency department (ED) visits and admissions due to cancer treatment side effects.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To compare unplanned ED visits and hospitalizations between intervention arm and control arm.

II. To compare referral patterns to Symptom Management Clinic. III. To compare concordance between participant self-reported and provider assigned Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status.

Being tested
Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes platform, Health Related Quality of Life Surveys
Keywords
Patient Reported Outcomes, Hospitalizations, Emergency Department Visits
Medical subject headings
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes platformOther

    Also called ePRO platform

    The ePRO tool is developed by a third-party vendor, Conversa, and engages the patient in a chat-based interaction to assess patient symptoms and provide educational material.

  • Health Related Quality of Life SurveysOther

    Also called HRQoL

    Surveys will be administered to participants

Study groups in NCT05359042
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ePRO Assessment ToolExperimentalParticipants will receive either a text message or an email inviting them to engage in the health chat. Participant assessments including HRQOL and user experience will be administered via the platform. Participants will also be able to participate in short, interactive patient education modules related to the infusion and side effect management.
Receives: Other: Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes platform; Other: Health Related Quality of Life Surveys
Standard of CareNo interventionParticipants in the standard of care arm will report symptoms via standard of care messaging through UCSF MyChart or telephone calls throughout the study period, and complete standard of care HRQoL surveys.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients who engaged with the ePRO tool

    The point estimation of proportion of patients who engaged with the ePRO tool via virtual care chat at least once after enrollment and its 95% binomial confidence interval (CI) will be obtained.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  2. Change in overall score of EQ-5D

    The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension by selecting one of the following responses: no problems (0), slight problems (1), mild problems (2), moderate problems (3), or severe problems (4) with a particular dimension. Lower scores indicate less issues/problems with that particular health dimension. Change in overall score of EQ-5D index between the intervention and usual of care arms between baseline and 6 months will be reported

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Proportion of chat modules completed

    To evaluate the degree of engagement with virtual care chat as defined by the proportion of chat modules completed per patient. Point estimation and 95% binomial CI will be obtained assuming normality assumption holds.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  2. Proportion of chats in which PRO-CTCAE was offered were completed.

    To evaluate the degree of engagement with virtual care chat as defined by the proportion of chats in which PRO-CTCAE was offered were completed. Point estimation and 95% binomial CI will be obtained assuming normality assumption holds

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  3. Change in EQ-5D scores over time

    The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension by selecting one of the following responses: no problems (0), slight problems (1), mild problems (2), moderate problems (3), or severe problems (4) with a particular dimension. Lower scores indicate less issues/problems with that particular health dimension. Change in overall score of EQ-5D index between the intervention and usual of care arms between baseline, every 3 months, and at the completion of the study will be examined using a linear mixed model.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  4. Number of patient-reported symptoms

    Number of patient-reported symptoms over the 6-month study period will be reported by frequency of symptom.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  5. Number of patient-reported symptoms that were severe and were escalated

    Number of patient-reported symptoms that were categorized as severe and escalated will be reported by frequency of symptom.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  6. Mean change in pain score over time.

    The pain score will be obtained using a standard pain index with values ranging from 0= No Pain to 10= Worst pain as reported by patients. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of patient reported pain. The change in pain scores will be evaluated using a linear mixed model.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  7. Number of phone calls and secure messages

    The overall volume of phone calls and secure messages between each patient and the clinical team will be reported.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

  8. Predictive value of ED Visit and/or hospital admission

    To prospectively validate a risk model predicting ED visits and admissions due to treatment side effects via Model area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Accuracy of a previously developed model will be prospectively assessed during the course of this study. The model currently generates an assessment of risk that a patient will have an Chemotherapy Measure (OP-35) qualifying event in the 30-day period following an infusional therapy administration. An OP-35 event is defined as: One or more inpatient admissions for anemia, dehydration, diarrhea, emesis, fever, nausea, neutropenia, pain, pneumonia, or sepsis within 30 days of chemotherapy treatment.

    Measured: Up to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2022
  2. Study start15 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Logistical constraints

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be randomized 2:1 to intervention arm or the standard of care arm
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05359042
Sponsor's protocol ID
214511
Other IDs
NCI-2022-02553
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
27 Apr 2022
Last updated
8 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes platform and Health Related Quality of Life Surveys in people with Gastrointestinal Cancers and Gastrointestinal Cancer Metastatic, run by University of California, San Francisco.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients who engaged with the ePRO tool (time frame: Up to 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in