AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyNCT05364567

Synergistic Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients With Vitiligo and Vitamin D Deficiency

A study testing cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and Phototherapy in people with Vitamin D Deficiency and Vitiligo, run by Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, randomized, controlled study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB no. 2018-04-017). All study participants consented the study and agreed the written informed consent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency, Vitiligo
What is being tested?
cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and Phototherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
29 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
1 May 2018to 1 May 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients diagnosed with non-segmental vitiligo based on clinical diagnosis.
  • patients who were ≥ 18 years old.
  • patients with lower serum vitamin D level (<20ng/mL).

Who cannot join

  • patients taking medicines such as thiazide, diuretics, lithium which can influence the serum vitamin D level.
  • pregnant or lactating women.
  • patients with diseases which can affect kidney such as chronic kidney disease, hyperparathyroidism, or hypoparathyroidism.
  • patients with uncontrolled chronic diseases like diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension
  • patients whose spot urine calcium level was over 30mg/dL.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients With Vitiligo Induced Additive Effects With Phototherapy

This prospective, randomized, controlled study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB no. 2018-04-017). All study participants consented the study and agreed the written informed consent. All participants who are applicable to the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group and the study group. Both groups were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). Study group had vitamin D supplementation through the injection additionally.

Being tested
cholecalciferol (vitamin D3), Phototherapy
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency, Vitiligo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)Drug

    The study group with vitamin D deficiency was treated with intramuscular injection of 200,000 IU cholecalciferol (Kwangdong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) once at baseline.

  • PhototherapyProcedure or surgery

    The phototherapy for treating depigmented areas was by using 308-nm xenon chloride excimer laser (E1, Jetema, Seoul, Korea) or NB-UVB (N-UVB 6000C, Choyang medical, Seongnam, Korea). The initial dose for excimer laser was decided based on the location of depigmented lesion with consideration of the previous results of the phototherapy;40-42 eye = 100mJ/cm2; head, face, ear, neck, axilla = 150mJ/cm2; arm, leg, trunk = 200mJ/cm2; wrist = 250mJ/cm2; elbow, knee = 300mJ/cm2; hand, foot = 400mJ/cm2; finger, toe = 600mJ/cm2; Meanwhile, initial dose for NB-UVB was 400mJ/cm2. If the erythema after laser disappears within 24 hours, the energy dose was increased by 50 mJ/cm2 for each treatment. But if the erythema sustained for 24-48 hours, the energy dose was maintained. If the erythema last longer than 48 hours, the energy dose was decreased by 50-100 mJ/cm2 at each session. If blistering or pain occured, the treatment was omitted until resolution of symptoms.

Study groups in NCT05364567
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study groupExperimentalThey were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). They had vitamin D supplementation through the injection of cholecalciferol additionally. The study group with vitamin D deficiency was treated with intramuscular injection of 200,000 IU cholecalciferol (Kwangdong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) once at baseline. Total study period was 6 months and the clinical assessments with checking adverse events were conducted every month.
Receives: Drug: cholecalciferol (vitamin D3); Procedure: Phototherapy
Control groupActive comparatorThey were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). Total study period was 6 months and the clinical assessments with checking adverse events were conducted every month.
Receives: Procedure: Phototherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: 2 month

  4. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: 3 month

  5. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: 4 month

  6. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: 5 month

  7. Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)

    Each VASI score was decided by multiplying the area of vitiligo and the extent of depigmentation.

    Measured: 6 month

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: 2 month

  4. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: 3 month

  5. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: 4 month

  6. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: 5 month

  7. Physician global assessment (PGA)

    The PGA score was calculated to check the improvement after treatments. The scale was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = 76-100%.

    Measured: 6 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2022
  2. Study start1 May 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion1 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
All participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the control group and the study group. Both groups were treated with phototherapy including 308-nm excimer laser or narrowband ultraviolet B. Study group additionally had vitamin D supplementation through the injection of cholecalciferol.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05364567
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-04-017
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
3 May 2022
Last updated
6 May 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and Phototherapy in people with Vitamin D Deficiency and Vitiligo, run by Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) (time frame: baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in