AzTrials
AzTrials

Iron-deficiency AnemiaNCT05365308

EHR-based Patient Identification and Panel Management of Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia

A study testing Clinical supports in people with Iron-deficiency Anemia, run by Northwestern University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective is to determine if a set of clinical supports that includes computer-assisted identification, an EHR registry, facilitated GI referral, and an EHR tool for documentation improves the timely referral and completion of bidirectional endoscopy in men aged 18 years and older and women aged 40 years and older… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Iron-deficiency Anemia
What is being tested?
Clinical supports
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
28 Feb 2022to 11 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Northwestern Medical Group primary care physician (internal medicine, family medicine or geriatrics)

Who cannot join

  • No primary care office practice within Northwestern Medical Group

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Northwestern University, Division of General Internal Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Stephen D Persell

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: EHR-based Patient Identification and Panel Management of Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia, a Pragmatic Primary Care Physician Randomized Trial of a Quality Improvement Method

The objective is to determine if a set of clinical supports that includes computer-assisted identification, an EHR registry, facilitated GI referral, and an EHR tool for documentation improves the timely referral and completion of bidirectional endoscopy in men aged 18 years and older and women aged 40 years and older with iron deficiency anemia.

Being tested
Clinical supports
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical supportsBehavioural

    Quality improvement tools for iron deficiency anemia that include computer-assisted identification, an EHR registry, facilitated GI referral, an EHR tool for documentation, and physician education

Study groups in NCT05365308
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention: Quality Improvement toolsExperimentalQuality improvement tools including: computer-assisted identification of iron deficiency anemia patients with an EHR registry, facilitated GI referral, an EHR tool for documentation, and physician education.
Receives: Behavioral: Clinical supports
Control: usual careNo interventionPhysicians will be notified at the start of the study that 120 days after the study start they will receive access to the quality improvement tools available to the intervention group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bidirectional endoscopy completed

    Completion of upper and lower endoscopy, assessed using automated queries of the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse occurring within the three years prior to the study start date and the 120 days following the study start date.

    Specificially, presence of one or more terms for a completed procedure from the code set for Espohagoduodenoscopy/Upper Endoscopy and one or more terms from the code set for Colonoscopy within the indicated time frame constitutes completion of the measure.

    Note:the investigators use a three-year look back because eligible patients may have completed either upper or lower endoscopy previously and only require one form of endoscopy during the study period.

    Measured: 120 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Endoscopy completed or scheduled

    Discrete evidence in the EHR that endoscopy has been completed or scheduled on or after the study start date.

    Specificially, presence in the Northwestern Medicine EHR of a completed or future scheduled procedure for one or more terms from the code set for Espohagoduodenoscopy/Upper Endoscopy or one or more terms from the code set for Colonoscopy within the indicated time frame constitutes completion of the measure.

    Note:the investigators use a three-year look back because eligible patients may have completed either upper or lower endoscopy previously and only require one form of endoscopy during the study period.

    Measured: 120 days

  2. Gastroenterology consultation completed

    Completion of a consultation with gastroenterology (in person or telehealth) on or after the study start date

    Specificially, this outcome is indicated by the presence in the Northwestern Medicine EHR of a completed office visit or telehealth visit with a physician, physician assistant or advance practice nurse in the within the specialty department of gastroenterology.

    Measured: 120 days

  3. GI referral provided or completed

    Receipt of a referral to gastroenterology or completion of a consultation with gastroenterology

    Specificially, this outcome is indicated by the presence in the Northwestern Medicine EHR of a completed office visit or telehealth visit with a physician, physician assistant or advance practice nurse in the within the specialty department of gastroenterology or the presence of a signed order for a gastroenterology referral or an endoscopy referral.

    Measured: 120 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2022
  2. Study start28 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion28 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion11 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Stratified physician-randomized controlled quality improvement intervention study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05365308
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00213747
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
14 Apr 2022
Last updated
8 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No data sharing plan.

Publications

  • Priyanath Gupta A, Patel D, Lee JY, Volpentesta M, Schachter M, Persell SD. Health information technology tools to accelerate gastrointestinal evaluation in patients with iron deficiency anaemia: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 15;13(2):e002565. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002565.

    PubMed 38626940

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Clinical supports in people with Iron-deficiency Anemia, run by Northwestern University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bidirectional endoscopy completed (time frame: 120 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05365308, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in