AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney StonesPhase 4NCT05365477

Empiric Versus Selective Prevention Strategies for Kidney Stone Disease

A Phase 4 study testing Empiric Therapy: Diet, Empiric Therapy: Drug and Selective Therapy: Diet in people with Kidney Stones and Nephrolithiasis, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of this study are to 1) Conduct a randomized clinical trial of selective versus empiric diet plus pharmacologic therapy in high-risk stone formers and 2) Determine adverse effects from, and adherence to selective and empiric strategies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Stones, Nephrolithiasis
What is being tested?
Empiric Therapy: Diet, Empiric Therapy: Drug and Selective Therapy: Diet
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Aug 2022to 31 Mar 2026
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Two or more symptomatic kidney stone events in the last 5 years
  • Adult

Who cannot join

  • Medullary sponge kidney or renal tubular acidosis
  • Untreated urinary obstruction
  • Primary hyperparathyroidism
  • Primary hyperoxaluria
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammatory bowel disease or bowel resection
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Sarcoidosis
  • Cystinuria
  • Prior stone composition with uric acid, struvite, cystine, carbonate apatite
  • Use of specific medications (thiazides, topiramate, xanthine oxidase inhibitors, citrate, bicarbonate)
  • Chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher (eGFR<60)
  • Gouty arthritis or 3 gout episodes in 1 year
  • Known allergy to study medications
  • Hypokalemia or hyponatremia at screening.
  • Age < 18 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of Empiric Versus Selective Prevention Strategies for Kidney Stone Disease

The aims of this study are to 1) Conduct a randomized clinical trial of selective versus empiric diet plus pharmacologic therapy in high-risk stone formers and 2) Determine adverse effects from, and adherence to selective and empiric strategies.

Read the detailed description

Diet and pharmacologic interventions for preventing future kidney stone episodes are effective, however clinical guideline panels disagree on whether clinicians should perform selective therapy: performing 24-hour urine testing to guide choosing interventions to correct abnormal urinary parameters. The alternative strategy is empiric therapy: applying interventions without 24-hour urine testing. While 24-hour urine testing is considered the standard of care by nephrology and urology specialties for higher risk patients, the American College of Physicians does not recommend 24-hour urine testing.

This is a randomized clinical trial of selective versus empiric therapy for patients with presumed idiopathic calcium stone disease, representing >80% of the kidney stone population. The primary outcome is change in urinary supersaturation, which associates with symptomatic stone recurrence. We will recruit patients with presumed idiopathic calcium stone disease with at least 2 stone events within the previous 5 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to empiric diet plus thiazide with potassium citrate daily, or to selective diet plus pharmacologic therapy based on the 24-hour urine abnormalities identified at baseline and adjusted during follow-up. The primary outcomes will be the calculated calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate supersaturations. In addition, we will determine adverse effects from, and adherence to, selective and empiric strategies.

Being tested
Empiric Therapy: Diet, Empiric Therapy: Drug, Selective Therapy: Diet, Selective Therapy: Drug
Keywords
Prevention
Medical subject headings
Kidney Calculi, Nephrolithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Empiric Therapy: DietBehavioural

    Diet: High water intake - at least 2.5 liters daily Reduce sugar-sweetened cola intake to ≤3 cans per week. Reduce salt intake to <2000mg sodium daily Reduce red meat intake to two 4-ounce portions per week Normal calcium intake: 3 servings of dairy products (or their equivalents) per day Increase vegetable and fruit intake to ≥5 servings per day Reduce oxalate intake to <100 mg/day

  • Empiric Therapy: DrugDrug

    Drug(s): indapamide 1.25mg and potassium citrate 15mEq daily.

  • Selective Therapy: DietBehavioural

    Diet:

    Volume <2.5L Increase fluid intake to ≥ 2.5L/d, based on specific urine volume

    Calcium >250mg male, >200mg female Reduce red meat intake to two 4-oz portions/wk; reduce sodium intake to<2000mg/d, avoid vitamin D + calcium supplements

    Oxalate >40mg Reduce dietary oxalate intake to <100 mg/d; increase fiber intake to 25-35 g/d

    Citrate <450mg male, <550mg female Reduce red meat intake to two 4-oz portions/wk; increase fruit and vegetable intake to ≥5 svgs/d

    pH<5.8 Reduce red meat intake to two 4-oz portions/wk; increase fruit and vegetable intake to ≥5 svgs/d

    Uric acid >800mg male, >750mg female Reduce red meat intake to two 4- oz portions/wk; increase fruit and vegetable intake to ≥5 svgs/d

    Sodium >150mmol Reduce sodium intake to <2000mg/d

    Sulfate > 80mEq or urine urea nitrogen >14g Reduce red meat intake to three 3-4 oz portions/wk; increase fruit and vegetable intake to ≥5 svgs/d

  • Selective Therapy: DrugDrug

    Drug(s):

    For calcium >250mg male, >200mg female: indapamide 1.25mg and potassium chloride 20mEq. At 1 month if persistent, then increase to indapamide 2.5mg and potassium chloride 20mEq. For citrate <450mg male, <550mg female: potassium citrate 15mEq BID. At 1 month if persistent, then increase to potassium citrate 30mEq BID. For pH<5.8: potassium citrate 15mEq BID. At month if persistent, then increase to potassium citrate 30mEq BID. For uric acid >800mg male, >750mg female: allopurinol 300mg.

    If both elevated calcium and low pH: indapamide 1.25mg and potassium citrate 15mEq BID If both elevated calcium and low citrate: indapamide 1.25mg and potassium citrate 15mEq BID

Study groups in NCT05365477
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Empiric TherapyActive comparatorDiet intervention and drug intervention not based on 24 hour urine results
Receives: Behavioral: Empiric Therapy: Diet; Drug: Empiric Therapy: Drug
Selective TherapyExperimentalDiet intervention and drug intervention based on 24 hour urine results
Receives: Behavioral: Selective Therapy: Diet; Drug: Selective Therapy: Drug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Calcium Oxalate Supersaturation

    Calcium oxalate supersaturation is calculated using an at-home, 24 hour urine collection. The value is calculated based on the EQUIL 2 equation and describes the likelihood of crystallization of calcium oxalate in solution. The test was performed by Litholink (Labcorp, Itasca, IL). The reference interval is 6.0 to 10.0. Higher number indicates a higher supersaturation value (e.g., increased calcium oxalate stone risk). A lower number indicates a lower supersaturation value (e.g., lower calcium oxalate stone risk). When the concentration of calcium and oxalate ions in the urine exceeds their solubility limit, the urine becomes supersaturated, which can lead to spontaneous precipitation of minerals and the formation of crystal nuclei. The measure is a unitless ratio because it is calculated by dividing the concentration product of calcium and oxalate ions in a fluid by their thermodynamic solubility product constant (both numerator and denominator have the same units).

    Measured: Assessed at two months

  2. Calcium Phosphate Supersaturation

    Calcium phosphate supersaturation is calculated using an at-home, 24 hour urine collection. The value is calculated based on the EQUIL 2 equation and describes the likelihood of crystallization of calcium phosphate in solution. The test was performed by Litholink (Labcorp, Itasca, IL). The reference interval is 0.5 to 2.0. Higher number indicates a higher supersaturation value (e.g., increased calcium phosphate stone risk). A lower number indicates a lower supersaturation value (e.g., lower calcium phosphate stone risk). When the concentration of calcium and phosphate ions in the urine exceeds their solubility limit, the urine becomes supersaturated, which can lead to spontaneous precipitation of minerals and the formation of crystal nuclei. The measure is a unitless ratio because it is calculated by dividing the concentration product of calcium and phosphate ions in a fluid by their thermodynamic solubility product constant (both numerator and denominator have the same units).

    Measured: Assessed at two months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Uric Acid Supersaturation

    Uric acid supersaturation is calculated using an at-home, 24 hour urine collection. The value is calculated based on the EQUIL 2 equation and describes the likelihood of crystallization of uric acid in solution. The test was performed by Litholink (Labcorp, Itasca, IL). The reference interval is <1.0. Higher number indicates a higher supersaturation value (e.g., increased uric acid stone risk). When the concentration of uric acid ions in the urine exceeds their solubility limit, especially in the context of urine pH, the urine becomes supersaturated, which can lead to spontaneous precipitation of minerals and the formation of crystal nuclei. The measure is a unitless ratio because it is calculated by dividing the concentration product of calcium and oxalate ions in a fluid by their thermodynamic solubility product constant (both numerator and denominator have the same units).

    Measured: Assessed at two months

  2. 24hr Urine Parameters

    Urinary calcium, oxalate, citrate, uric acid

    Measured: Measured at two months

  3. 24hr Urine Volume

    24hr Urine Volume among participants collected at 2 months.

    Measured: Two months

  4. 24hr Urine Sodium and Potassium

    24hr Urine Sodium and Potassium

    Measured: Two months

  5. 24hr Urine pH

    24hr Urine pH

    Measured: Two months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2022
  2. Study start4 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion26 Sep 2025
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05365477
Sponsor's protocol ID
200238
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
4 May 2022
Last updated
5 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Widmer A, Lee A, Koyama T, Goldfarb DS, Hsi RS, Silver HJ. Targeted versus empiric approach for prevention of recurrent kidney stones: Insights on diet therapy from a randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2026 Aug 11;65:106754. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2026.106754. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42617398

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Empiric Therapy: Diet, Empiric Therapy: Drug and Selective Therapy: Diet in people with Kidney Stones and Nephrolithiasis, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Calcium Oxalate Supersaturation (time frame: Assessed at two months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05365477, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in