Acid Sphingomyelinase DeficiencyScreenPlusNCT05368038
ScreenPlus: A Comprehensive, Flexible, Multi-disorder Newborn Screening Program
An observational study of Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency and Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2, run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
ScreenPlus is a consented, multi-disorder pilot newborn screening program implemented in conjunction with the New York State Newborn Screening Program that provides families the option to have their newborn(s) screened for a panel of additional conditions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 4 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency, Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2, Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis
- What is being tested?
- Confirmatory Testing
- How many people
- 100,000 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 May 2021to 31 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 4 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: Newborns born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital who are less than four weeks old.
Who may be able to join
- All newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital
- Infants who are less than four weeks old, regardless of sex, gestational age, or health status.
Who cannot join
- A newborn screening sample is unavailable
- Infants who are more than four weeks old
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11219
NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11220
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
NYU Langone Health - Tisch Hospital
New York, New York, 10016
Mount Sinai West
New York, New York, 10019
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 10028
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Queens, New York, 11040
Jack D. Weiler Hospital
The Bronx, New York, 10461
ScreenPlus Coordinating Core, Children's Hospital at Montefiore
The Bronx, New York, 10467
About this study
ScreenPlus is a consented, multi-disorder pilot newborn screening program implemented in conjunction with the New York State Newborn Screening Program that provides families the option to have their newborn(s) screened for a panel of additional conditions. The study has three primary objectives: 1) define the analytic and clinical validity of multi-tiered screening assays for a flexible panel of disorders, 2) determine disease incidence in a large newborn population, and 3) assess the impact of early diagnosis on health outcomes. Over a nine-year period, ScreenPlus aims to screen 100,000 infants born in eight high birthrate hospitals in New York for a flexible panel of rare genetic disorders. This study will also evaluate the Ethical, Legal and Social issues pertaining to NBS for complex disorders, which will be done via online surveys that will be directed towards ScreenPlus parents who opt to participate and qualitative interviews with families of infants who are identified through ScreenPlus.
Read the detailed description
Soon after birth, all babies born in the United States have a newborn screening (NBS) test to check for certain medical conditions. All babies are screened, even if they appear healthy, because most of these conditions have no obvious physical findings in a newborn and might otherwise be diagnosed only after the development of serious problems, such as brain damage, organ damage, or death. In fact, NBS has been an integral part of preventable health care for over five decades, ever since the discovery that phenylketonuria is an easily diagnosed, preventable cause of intellectual disability.
Over the past two decades, there have been dramatic advances in screening technology, with a resulting increase in the number and complexity of disorders on NBS panels. This enhanced ability to screen brings questions about what types of disorders are appropriate for NBS. To that end, the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) was established in 2003 to make evidence-based recommendations at the national level regarding the suitability of various disorders for NBS. At present, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) includes 35 core disorders. The RUSP nomination process uses information about disease incidence and severity, natural history, benefits of early detection, safety and efficacy of treatment, analytic and clinical validity of the screening tests, as well as consideration of potential harms associated with screening and public health impact to determine whether a particular disorder is appropriate for NBS. However, there are many disorders for which this data is insufficient or missing. There are other disorders that challenge traditional NBS criteria by having predominantly later-onset phenotypes, poorly defined natural history, or unclear treatment outcomes. As these potentially life-threatening disorders might benefit from early detection, gathering and analyzing this data is both critical and timely. Accordingly, there is a great deal of interest in pilot NBS studies as a means to gather objective evidence about whether a disorder is appropriate for widespread screening.
ScreenPlus is a comprehensive, fluid, pilot NBS program that will screen 100,000 consented infants for specific disorders that are under consideration for universal NBS. This study will generate critical data about the validity of testing for these candidate disorders and provide estimates of disease incidence in a large newborn population. The investigators will evaluate different consent and engagement models, including direct, in-person interaction and the use of an electronic consent framework to educate parents about pilot NBS. The investigators will also collect nuanced information about the ethical implications of NBS, by conducting qualitative interviews with parents of children who have received a positive or uncertain NBS result. Parents who are eligible to participate in ScreenPlus will also have the opportunity to complete a flexible set of surveys of parent opinions about expanded NBS, research using dried blood spots, and other relevant topics. Furthermore, newborns who screen positive will be followed by a ScreenPlus physician. Through thoughtful collaboration with disease experts, the investigators will help systematically collect disease specific measures through detailed long-term follow-up which will enable us to critically evaluate how affected children identified through ScreenPlus are faring, allowing objective assessment of the impact early diagnosis has on outcome.
The investigators will share this important data with the NBS community to help inform objective decision-making about widespread screening recommendations. The ScreenPlus panel is fluid and disorders may be added/removed as disorders satisfy the study inclusion criteria. Additionally, recognizing that the NIH, advocacy groups, academics, and private industry all share a desire for clean, consented pilot NBS data, the investigators created a unique financial infrastructure. This investigator-driven arrangement permits all stakeholders to obtain aggregate data of interest in a mutually beneficial and cost-effective manner. ScreenPlus is guided by Scientific and Community Advisory Boards, who are comprised of rare disease experts, biochemistry specialists, physicians, bioethicists, and patient advocates. Overall, the investigators anticipate that ScreenPlus will become the premier consented pilot NBS program in the United States.
In sum, ScreenPlus will provide critical data about the appropriateness of NBS for candidate disorders, the feasibility and effectiveness of consented screening models, and parent informational needs and preferences as they relate to NBS for complex disorders.
- Conditions
- Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency, Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2, Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis, Fabry Disease, GM1 Gangliosidosis, Gaucher Disease
- Being tested
- Confirmatory Testing
- Keywords
- Newborn Screening, Rare Diseases, Families, Genetics, ELSI
- Medical subject headings
- Niemann-Pick Diseases, Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2, Xanthomatosis, Cerebrotendinous, Fabry Disease, Gangliosidosis, GM1, Gaucher Disease, Wolman Disease, Leukodystrophy, Metachromatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Confirmatory TestingDiagnostic test
All positive screens will be referred using standard notification procedures, where the New York State NBS reporting team contacts the ScreenPlus site medical geneticist, who will contact the newborn's pediatrician and family. The initial evaluation will include a clinical examination and confirmatory molecular studies, enzymatic and biomarker studies, when available. All aspects of the confirmatory testing will be at no cost to the participants. If confirmed to have a ScreenPlus disorder, the investigators will counsel the family and help connect them with treatment, clinical trials and disease specialists. The investigators will also provide emotional and social support resources to help in this journey.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital | Parents who give permission will have their infant's sample screened for the ScreenPlus panel. Infants who screen positive after multi-tiered testing will be referred to a ScreenPlus doctor for confirmatory testing and care coordination. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Confirmatory Testing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate the accuracy of the screening assays.
Accuracy of the screening assay will be defined in terms of positive predictive value (proportion of confirmed cases comparative to the total number of infants who screened positive).
Measured: Through study completion up to 9 years.
Define disease incidence in a large newborn population.
Disease incidence will be calculated as the proportion of infants with a disorder comparative to the total population of infants screened.
Measured: Through study completion up to 9 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 May 2022
- Study start10 May 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acid Sphingomyelinase DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Cure Sanfilippo Foundation, Dana's Angels Research Trust (DART), Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Orchard Therapeutics, Passage Bio, Inc., Genzyme, a Sanofi Company, Sio Gene Therapies, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., The FireFly Fund, The Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Family Foundations, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc, Ara Parseghian Medical Research Fund, New York State Department of Health, Case Western Reserve University, Chiesi USA, Inc., Mayo Clinic Biopharma Diagnostics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Melissa Wasserstein, MD, Principal investigator, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05368038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-10774
- Other IDs
- R01HD073292, 2019
- Acronym
- ScreenPlus
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kelly NR, Orsini JJ, Goldenberg AJ, Mulrooney NS, Boychuk NA, Clarke MJ, Paleologos K, Martin MM, McNeight H, Caggana M, Bailey SM, Eiland LR, Ganesh J, Kupchik G, Lumba R, Nafday S, Stroustrup A, Gelb MH, Wasserstein MP. ScreenPlus: A comprehensive, multi-disorder newborn screening program. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2023 Dec 14;38:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2023.101037. eCollection 2024 Mar.
PubMed 38173711Calonge N, Green NS, Rinaldo P, Lloyd-Puryear M, Dougherty D, Boyle C, Watson M, Trotter T, Terry SF, Howell RR; Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Committee report: Method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening of newborns and children. Genet Med. 2010 Mar;12(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04.
PubMed 20154628Wasserstein MP, Caggana M, Bailey SM, Desnick RJ, Edelmann L, Estrella L, Holzman I, Kelly NR, Kornreich R, Kupchik SG, Martin M, Nafday SM, Wasserman R, Yang A, Yu C, Orsini JJ. The New York pilot newborn screening program for lysosomal storage diseases: Report of the First 65,000 Infants. Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):631-640. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0129-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
PubMed 30093709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ScreenPlus: A Comprehensive, Flexible, Multi-disorder Newborn Screening Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05368038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ScreenPlus / 2019-10774
- Conditions
- Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency, Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2, Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis, Fabry Disease, GM1 Gangliosidosis, Gaucher Disease
- Keywords
- Newborn Screening, Rare Diseases, Families, Genetics, ELSI
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 100,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Cure Sanfilippo Foundation, Dana's Angels Research Trust (DART), Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Orchard Therapeutics, Passage Bio, Inc., Genzyme, a Sanofi Company, Sio Gene Therapies, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., The FireFly Fund, The Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Family Foundations, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc, Ara Parseghian Medical Research Fund, New York State Department of Health, Case Western Reserve University, Chiesi USA, Inc., Mayo Clinic Biopharma Diagnostics
- Study start
- 10 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ScreenPlus is a consented, multi-disorder pilot newborn screening program implemented in conjunction with the New York State Newborn Screening Program that provides families the option to have their newborn(s) screened for a panel of additional conditions. The study has three primary objectives: 1) define the analytic and clinical validity of multi-tiered screening assays for a flexible panel of disorders, 2) determine disease incidence in a large newborn population, and 3) assess the impact of early diagnosis on health outcomes. Over a nine-year period, ScreenPlus aims to screen 100,000 infants born in eight high birthrate hospitals in New York for a flexible panel of rare genetic disorders. This study will also evaluate the Ethical, Legal and Social issues pertaining to NBS for complex disorders, which will be done via online surveys that will be directed towards ScreenPlus parents who opt to participate and qualitative interviews with families of infants who are identified through ScreenPlus.
Detailed description
Soon after birth, all babies born in the United States have a newborn screening (NBS) test to check for certain medical conditions. All babies are screened, even if they appear healthy, because most of these conditions have no obvious physical findings in a newborn and might otherwise be diagnosed only after the development of serious problems, such as brain damage, organ damage, or death. In fact, NBS has been an integral part of preventable health care for over five decades, ever since the discovery that phenylketonuria is an easily diagnosed, preventable cause of intellectual disability.
Over the past two decades, there have been dramatic advances in screening technology, with a resulting increase in the number and complexity of disorders on NBS panels. This enhanced ability to screen brings questions about what types of disorders are appropriate for NBS. To that end, the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) was established in 2003 to make evidence-based recommendations at the national level regarding the suitability of various disorders for NBS. At present, the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) includes 35 core disorders. The RUSP nomination process uses information about disease incidence and severity, natural history, benefits of early detection, safety and efficacy of treatment, analytic and clinical validity of the screening tests, as well as consideration of potential harms associated with screening and public health impact to determine whether a particular disorder is appropriate for NBS. However, there are many disorders for which this data is insufficient or missing. There are other disorders that challenge traditional NBS criteria by having predominantly later-onset phenotypes, poorly defined natural history, or unclear treatment outcomes. As these potentially life-threatening disorders might benefit from early detection, gathering and analyzing this data is both critical and timely. Accordingly, there is a great deal of interest in pilot NBS studies as a means to gather objective evidence about whether a disorder is appropriate for widespread screening.
ScreenPlus is a comprehensive, fluid, pilot NBS program that will screen 100,000 consented infants for specific disorders that are under consideration for universal NBS. This study will generate critical data about the validity of testing for these candidate disorders and provide estimates of disease incidence in a large newborn population. The investigators will evaluate different consent and engagement models, including direct, in-person interaction and the use of an electronic consent framework to educate parents about pilot NBS. The investigators will also collect nuanced information about the ethical implications of NBS, by conducting qualitative interviews with parents of children who have received a positive or uncertain NBS result. Parents who are eligible to participate in ScreenPlus will also have the opportunity to complete a flexible set of surveys of parent opinions about expanded NBS, research using dried blood spots, and other relevant topics. Furthermore, newborns who screen positive will be followed by a ScreenPlus physician. Through thoughtful collaboration with disease experts, the investigators will help systematically collect disease specific measures through detailed long-term follow-up which will enable us to critically evaluate how affected children identified through ScreenPlus are faring, allowing objective assessment of the impact early diagnosis has on outcome.
The investigators will share this important data with the NBS community to help inform objective decision-making about widespread screening recommendations. The ScreenPlus panel is fluid and disorders may be added/removed as disorders satisfy the study inclusion criteria. Additionally, recognizing that the NIH, advocacy groups, academics, and private industry all share a desire for clean, consented pilot NBS data, the investigators created a unique financial infrastructure. This investigator-driven arrangement permits all stakeholders to obtain aggregate data of interest in a mutually beneficial and cost-effective manner. ScreenPlus is guided by Scientific and Community Advisory Boards, who are comprised of rare disease experts, biochemistry specialists, physicians, bioethicists, and patient advocates. Overall, the investigators anticipate that ScreenPlus will become the premier consented pilot NBS program in the United States.
In sum, ScreenPlus will provide critical data about the appropriateness of NBS for candidate disorders, the feasibility and effectiveness of consented screening models, and parent informational needs and preferences as they relate to NBS for complex disorders.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital | – | Diagnostic Test: Confirmatory TestingParents who give permission will have their infant's sample screened for the ScreenPlus panel. Infants who screen positive after multi-tiered testing will be referred to a ScreenPlus doctor for confirmatory testing and care coordination. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 4 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Newborns born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital who are less than four weeks old.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital
- Infants who are less than four weeks old, regardless of sex, gestational age, or health status.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A newborn screening sample is unavailable
- Infants who are more than four weeks old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Confirmatory TestingAll positive screens will be referred using standard notification procedures, where the New York State NBS reporting team contacts the ScreenPlus site medical geneticist, who will contact the newborn's pediatrician and family. The initial evaluation will include a clinical examination and confirmatory molecular studies, enzymatic and biomarker studies, when available. All aspects of the confirmatory testing will be at no cost to the participants. If confirmed to have a ScreenPlus disorder, the investigators will counsel the family and help connect them with treatment, clinical trials and disease specialists. The investigators will also provide emotional and social support resources to help in this journey. | Diagnostic test | Newborn infants born at a ScreenPlus pilot hospital |
Primary outcome
Evaluate the accuracy of the screening assays.
Time frame: Through study completion up to 9 years.
Accuracy of the screening assay will be defined in terms of positive predictive value (proportion of confirmed cases comparative to the total number of infants who screened positive).
Define disease incidence in a large newborn population.
Time frame: Through study completion up to 9 years.
Disease incidence will be calculated as the proportion of infants with a disorder comparative to the total population of infants screened.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38173711Kelly NR, Orsini JJ, Goldenberg AJ, Mulrooney NS, Boychuk NA, Clarke MJ, Paleologos K, Martin MM, McNeight H, Caggana M, Bailey SM, Eiland LR, Ganesh J, Kupchik G, Lumba R, Nafday S, Stroustrup A, Gelb MH, Wasserstein MP. ScreenPlus: A comprehensive, multi-disorder newborn screening program. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2023 Dec 14;38:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2023.101037. eCollection 2024 Mar.
- Background: PubMed 20154628Calonge N, Green NS, Rinaldo P, Lloyd-Puryear M, Dougherty D, Boyle C, Watson M, Trotter T, Terry SF, Howell RR; Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Committee report: Method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening of newborns and children. Genet Med. 2010 Mar;12(3):153-9. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04.
- Background: PubMed 30093709Wasserstein MP, Caggana M, Bailey SM, Desnick RJ, Edelmann L, Estrella L, Holzman I, Kelly NR, Kornreich R, Kupchik SG, Martin M, Nafday SM, Wasserman R, Yang A, Yu C, Orsini JJ. The New York pilot newborn screening program for lysosomal storage diseases: Report of the First 65,000 Infants. Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):631-640. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0129-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency
RecruitingObservational study
National Multicentre Study of the Natural History of Acid Sphingo-myelinase Deficiency in Adults and Children
Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency (ASMD), Niemann Pick Disease
Recruiting
Study of the Prevalence of Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency/Niemann Pick AB and B Disease in Patients With Diffuse Interstitial Lung Disease
Splenomegaly, Splenectomy
RecruitingObservational study
A Real-world Long-term Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Olipudase Alfa Therapy in Pediatric Patients Less Than 2 Years of Age With Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency (ASMD)
Niemann-Pick Diseases, Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Check: Expanded Screening in Newborns
Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Fragile X Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
GammaGA: Prevalence of Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency Disease (ASMD) and Gaucher Disease in Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathies and/or Multiple Myeloma
Gaucher Disease, Acid SphingoMyelinase Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Melissa Wasserstein, MD principal investigator
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency and Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Neuronal, 2, run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate the accuracy of the screening assays. (time frame: Through study completion up to 9 years.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05368038, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2026.