Breast CancerNCT05369546
Lesion Composition and Quantitative Imaging Analysis on Breast Cancer Diagnosis
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University of Hawaii at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 85 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- q3CB
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2022to Jul 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 85 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All 600 women will be recruited and enrolled from one of three sites: Queen's Medical Center (Honolulu, HI), East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center (Hilo, HI), and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center \& Research Institute (Tampa, FL).
Who may be able to join
- Had a recent diagnostic mammogram with a BI-RADS diagnostic score 4 or 5 assigned by a radiologist (BIRADS are standardized mammography assessment categories: 4 is for "Suspicious abnormality", 5 is for "Highly suggestive of malignancy".
- Have not had biopsy
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- History of breast cancer or a mastectomy (removal of the breast) with Systemic Therapy (ex. Chemotherapy, hormones and hormone inhibitors, etc.).
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hawaii Radiology Associates, LTD (East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center)
Hilo, Hawaii, 96720
Scott Grosskreutz, MD, 808-935-1825
Scott Grosskreutz, MD
- Recruiting
The Queen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822
Richmond Clinical Research Associate, 808-691-7609, riwong@queens.org
Todd Seto, MD
- Recruiting
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Emily Research Services Project Coordinator, 813-745-5501, emily.amato@moffitt.org
Bethany L Niell, MD
About this study
The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. To do this, the investigators have developed an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols to acquire multispectral images to measure the composition of suspicious breast lesions. The central hypothesis is that breast tissue composition in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone.
Read the detailed description
Women with dense breast have not been shown to benefit by increased cancer detection of volumetric digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) but may benefit by lower recall rates. DBT screening biopsy rates are similar to 2D digital mammography; higher for first screening exams, lower thereafter with adjustment for age and breast density. In the U.S., 71% of biopsies do not result in a breast cancer diagnosis among women ages 40-79 who undergo breast cancer screening. To address the high rate of unnecessary biopsies, an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols has been developed to acquire multispectral images to measure the lipid/water/protein (L/W/P) composition of suspicious breast lesions. Malignant breast tissue has unique L/W/P composition fractions when compared to normal or benign breast tissue. This proposal aims to increase biopsy yield (BI-RADS-PPV3) through combining L/W/P biological biomarkers with quantitative morphological and textural image analysis. This combination of composition and physical descriptions of suspicious breast lesions is called q3CB. The benefits of adding q3CB to the current DBT screening/diagnostic imaging paradigm, that may already include computer aided detection, is not known. This study is designed to compare the expected biopsy yield with and without q3CB in a clinical reader study and explore how q3CB may be combine with existing technologies. The central hypothesis is that biological L/W/P fractions in breast tissue in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone. The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. The investigators rationale for the proposed research is that biological L/W/P descriptions of breast lesions will lead to more specific biopsy decisions and a better understanding of cancer types. Specifically, the project aims are 1) develop q3CB lesion signatures for distinguishing breast cancer lesions from benign lesions, using 600 prospectively-acquired DBT exams of women recommended to undergo biopsy; 2) conduct a clinical reader study to compare radiologists' performance on standard-of-care FFDM or DBT without and with the inclusion of q3CB signatures; 3) Investigate the utility of q3CB lesion signatures in a screening paradigm to improve sensitivity and specificity on CADe-identified suspicious lesions in the tasks of assessing malignancy as well as in associating with their association with cancer subtypes; Exploratory) explore the added sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy DBT in phantom studies that explore lesion size, composition, and breast density. The innovation of this study is the full characterization of lipid/water/protein lesion composition with DBT and how it complements existing computer aided diagnostic programs paired with clinical radiologists providing evidence ready for clinical translation of this unique and emerging technology.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- q3CB
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
q3CBDiagnostic test
The q3CB/ncCEM/DBT acquisition protocol consists of a combination of DBT volume reconstructions and projection dual-energy mammograms acquired with a clinical contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) protocol, without contrast administration agent.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quantify biological composition of lesions
Quantify the biological composition (lipid/water/protein) of suspicious lesions.
Measured: Baseline
Quantify morphology of lesions
Quantify morphology/texture (radiomics) of suspicious lesions.
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (2)
Comparison of radiologists' image interpretations with and without q3CB signatures
Difference in AUC between the "1st read" and "2nd read" image interpretations. In the "1st read," they will be provided with the FFDM/DBT images and in the "2nd read," they will also be provided with the ncCEM q3CB composition and radiomics signature (likelihood of malignancy).
Measured: Baseline
Sensitivity and Specificity of readers' responses for the BI-RADs assessment categories
Sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated: a BI-RADS assessment of 4a or higher (i.e., 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5) defined a positive call for cancer diagnosis and, conversely, a BI-RADS assessment of 3 or lower (i.e., 3, 2, and 1) defined a negative call for cancer diagnosis.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2022
- Study start1 Aug 2022
- Primary completionJul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Hawaii
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Queen's Medical Center, Hawaii Radiologic Associates, Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John A Shepherd, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Hawaii Cancer Research Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05369546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHEPHERD-2021-2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lesion Composition and Quantitative Imaging Analysis on Breast Cancer Diagnosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05369546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHEPHERD-2021-2
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of HawaiiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Queen's Medical Center, Hawaii Radiologic Associates, Ltd.
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. To do this, the investigators have developed an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols to acquire multispectral images to measure the composition of suspicious breast lesions. The central hypothesis is that breast tissue composition in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone.
Detailed description
Women with dense breast have not been shown to benefit by increased cancer detection of volumetric digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) but may benefit by lower recall rates. DBT screening biopsy rates are similar to 2D digital mammography; higher for first screening exams, lower thereafter with adjustment for age and breast density. In the U.S., 71% of biopsies do not result in a breast cancer diagnosis among women ages 40-79 who undergo breast cancer screening. To address the high rate of unnecessary biopsies, an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols has been developed to acquire multispectral images to measure the lipid/water/protein (L/W/P) composition of suspicious breast lesions. Malignant breast tissue has unique L/W/P composition fractions when compared to normal or benign breast tissue. This proposal aims to increase biopsy yield (BI-RADS-PPV3) through combining L/W/P biological biomarkers with quantitative morphological and textural image analysis. This combination of composition and physical descriptions of suspicious breast lesions is called q3CB. The benefits of adding q3CB to the current DBT screening/diagnostic imaging paradigm, that may already include computer aided detection, is not known. This study is designed to compare the expected biopsy yield with and without q3CB in a clinical reader study and explore how q3CB may be combine with existing technologies. The central hypothesis is that biological L/W/P fractions in breast tissue in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone. The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. The investigators rationale for the proposed research is that biological L/W/P descriptions of breast lesions will lead to more specific biopsy decisions and a better understanding of cancer types. Specifically, the project aims are 1) develop q3CB lesion signatures for distinguishing breast cancer lesions from benign lesions, using 600 prospectively-acquired DBT exams of women recommended to undergo biopsy; 2) conduct a clinical reader study to compare radiologists' performance on standard-of-care FFDM or DBT without and with the inclusion of q3CB signatures; 3) Investigate the utility of q3CB lesion signatures in a screening paradigm to improve sensitivity and specificity on CADe-identified suspicious lesions in the tasks of assessing malignancy as well as in associating with their association with cancer subtypes; Exploratory) explore the added sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy DBT in phantom studies that explore lesion size, composition, and breast density. The innovation of this study is the full characterization of lipid/water/protein lesion composition with DBT and how it complements existing computer aided diagnostic programs paired with clinical radiologists providing evidence ready for clinical translation of this unique and emerging technology.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All 600 women will be recruited and enrolled from one of three sites: Queen's Medical Center (Honolulu, HI), East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center (Hilo, HI), and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center \& Research Institute (Tampa, FL).
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Had a recent diagnostic mammogram with a BI-RADS diagnostic score 4 or 5 assigned by a radiologist (BIRADS are standardized mammography assessment categories: 4 is for "Suspicious abnormality", 5 is for "Highly suggestive of malignancy".
- Have not had biopsy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- History of breast cancer or a mastectomy (removal of the breast) with Systemic Therapy (ex. Chemotherapy, hormones and hormone inhibitors, etc.).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| q3CBThe q3CB/ncCEM/DBT acquisition protocol consists of a combination of DBT volume reconstructions and projection dual-energy mammograms acquired with a clinical contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) protocol, without contrast administration agent. | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Quantify biological composition of lesions
Time frame: Baseline
Quantify the biological composition (lipid/water/protein) of suspicious lesions.
Quantify morphology of lesions
Time frame: Baseline
Quantify morphology/texture (radiomics) of suspicious lesions.
2 secondary outcomes
Comparison of radiologists' image interpretations with and without q3CB signatures
Time frame: Baseline
Sensitivity and Specificity of readers' responses for the BI-RADs assessment categories
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John A Shepherd, PhD principal investigator
University of Hawaii Cancer Research Center
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University of Hawaii at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact John A Shepherd, PhD (808-440-5234, johnshep@hawaii.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quantify biological composition of lesions (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2023.