AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT05369546

Lesion Composition and Quantitative Imaging Analysis on Breast Cancer Diagnosis

An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University of Hawaii at 3 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 85 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
q3CB
How many people
600 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to Jul 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 85 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All 600 women will be recruited and enrolled from one of three sites: Queen's Medical Center (Honolulu, HI), East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center (Hilo, HI), and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center \& Research Institute (Tampa, FL).

Who may be able to join

  • Had a recent diagnostic mammogram with a BI-RADS diagnostic score 4 or 5 assigned by a radiologist (BIRADS are standardized mammography assessment categories: 4 is for "Suspicious abnormality", 5 is for "Highly suggestive of malignancy".
  • Have not had biopsy

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • History of breast cancer or a mastectomy (removal of the breast) with Systemic Therapy (ex. Chemotherapy, hormones and hormone inhibitors, etc.).

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

John A Shepherd, PhD contact

808-440-5234

johnshep@hawaii.edu

Leila Kazemi contact

808-440-5231

lkazemi@hawaii.edu

United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Hawaii Radiology Associates, LTD (East Hawaii Women's Imaging Center)

    Hilo, Hawaii, 96720

    Scott Grosskreutz, MD, 808-935-1825

    Scott Grosskreutz, MD

    Recruiting
  • The Queen's Medical Center

    Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822

    Richmond Clinical Research Associate, 808-691-7609, riwong@queens.org

    Todd Seto, MD

    Recruiting
  • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Inc.

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

    Emily Research Services Project Coordinator, 813-745-5501, emily.amato@moffitt.org

    Bethany L Niell, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. To do this, the investigators have developed an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols to acquire multispectral images to measure the composition of suspicious breast lesions. The central hypothesis is that breast tissue composition in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone.

Read the detailed description

Women with dense breast have not been shown to benefit by increased cancer detection of volumetric digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) but may benefit by lower recall rates. DBT screening biopsy rates are similar to 2D digital mammography; higher for first screening exams, lower thereafter with adjustment for age and breast density. In the U.S., 71% of biopsies do not result in a breast cancer diagnosis among women ages 40-79 who undergo breast cancer screening. To address the high rate of unnecessary biopsies, an innovative way to use FDA-approved breast imaging protocols has been developed to acquire multispectral images to measure the lipid/water/protein (L/W/P) composition of suspicious breast lesions. Malignant breast tissue has unique L/W/P composition fractions when compared to normal or benign breast tissue. This proposal aims to increase biopsy yield (BI-RADS-PPV3) through combining L/W/P biological biomarkers with quantitative morphological and textural image analysis. This combination of composition and physical descriptions of suspicious breast lesions is called q3CB. The benefits of adding q3CB to the current DBT screening/diagnostic imaging paradigm, that may already include computer aided detection, is not known. This study is designed to compare the expected biopsy yield with and without q3CB in a clinical reader study and explore how q3CB may be combine with existing technologies. The central hypothesis is that biological L/W/P fractions in breast tissue in combination with analysis of morphological and textural tissue characteristics will yield significantly higher breast cancer specificity than conventional interpretation of DBT alone. The objective is to better identify suspicious breast lesions that need to be biopsied for malignancy in women currently recommended for biopsy. The long-term goal is to reduce unnecessary biopsies and increase biopsy yield. The investigators rationale for the proposed research is that biological L/W/P descriptions of breast lesions will lead to more specific biopsy decisions and a better understanding of cancer types. Specifically, the project aims are 1) develop q3CB lesion signatures for distinguishing breast cancer lesions from benign lesions, using 600 prospectively-acquired DBT exams of women recommended to undergo biopsy; 2) conduct a clinical reader study to compare radiologists' performance on standard-of-care FFDM or DBT without and with the inclusion of q3CB signatures; 3) Investigate the utility of q3CB lesion signatures in a screening paradigm to improve sensitivity and specificity on CADe-identified suspicious lesions in the tasks of assessing malignancy as well as in associating with their association with cancer subtypes; Exploratory) explore the added sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy DBT in phantom studies that explore lesion size, composition, and breast density. The innovation of this study is the full characterization of lipid/water/protein lesion composition with DBT and how it complements existing computer aided diagnostic programs paired with clinical radiologists providing evidence ready for clinical translation of this unique and emerging technology.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
q3CB
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • q3CBDiagnostic test

    The q3CB/ncCEM/DBT acquisition protocol consists of a combination of DBT volume reconstructions and projection dual-energy mammograms acquired with a clinical contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) protocol, without contrast administration agent.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quantify biological composition of lesions

    Quantify the biological composition (lipid/water/protein) of suspicious lesions.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Quantify morphology of lesions

    Quantify morphology/texture (radiomics) of suspicious lesions.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Comparison of radiologists' image interpretations with and without q3CB signatures

    Difference in AUC between the "1st read" and "2nd read" image interpretations. In the "1st read," they will be provided with the FFDM/DBT images and in the "2nd read," they will also be provided with the ncCEM q3CB composition and radiomics signature (likelihood of malignancy).

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Sensitivity and Specificity of readers' responses for the BI-RADs assessment categories

    Sensitivity and specificity values will be calculated: a BI-RADS assessment of 4a or higher (i.e., 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5) defined a positive call for cancer diagnosis and, conversely, a BI-RADS assessment of 3 or lower (i.e., 3, 2, and 1) defined a negative call for cancer diagnosis.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2022
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completionJul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05369546
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHEPHERD-2021-2
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
27 Apr 2022
Last updated
2 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by University of Hawaii at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact John A Shepherd, PhD (808-440-5234, johnshep@hawaii.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quantify biological composition of lesions (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in