AzTrials
AzTrials

Transient Ischemic AttackNCT05369637

Multiple Interventions to Accelerate the Return to the Pre-event Level of Functioning After a TIA and Minor Stroke

A study testing Cognitive training, Physical exercise and Behavioral: Nutrition education in people with Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke, run by Instituto de Saude Publica da Universidade do Porto at 1 site in Portugal.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The occurrence of a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or a minor stroke is frequently assumed as a temporary and non-disabling event. Nevertheless, patients can experience subtle but meaningful impairments, including a decreased performance in activities of daily living (ADLs), a high prevalence of depression, cognitive… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Transient Ischemic Attack, Minor Stroke
What is being tested?
Cognitive training, Physical exercise and Behavioral: Nutrition education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
11 May 2022to Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18-85 years old;
  • Clinical diagnosis of transient ischemic stroke or minor stroke as defined by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≤3;
  • Onset of symptoms within the last seven days;
  • First-time stroke or TIA;
  • Four or more years of education;
  • Discharged home without the need for inpatient rehabilitation;
  • Modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2, inclusive.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to attend the face-to-face intervention sessions;
  • Previous diagnosis of Dementia or severe disability;
  • Contraindication for physical exercise;
  • Severe loss of hearing, vision, or communication skills;
  • Frailty, reduced life expectancy due to severe disease or need for regular treatments that compete with availability for intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ana Rute Costa, PhD contact

+351 22 206 1820

arcosta@ispup.up.pt

Micaela Gonçalves, Bachelor contact

+351 22 206 1820

esmeralda_micaela@hotmail.com

Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto

    Porto, 4050-600

    Ana Rute Costa, +351 22 206 1820

    Recruiting

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: Back to Normal - Multiple Non-pharmacological Interventions to Accelerate the Return to the Pre-event Level of Functioning After a Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke - a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The occurrence of a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or a minor stroke is frequently assumed as a temporary and non-disabling event. Nevertheless, patients can experience subtle but meaningful impairments, including a decreased performance in activities of daily living (ADLs), a high prevalence of depression, cognitive decline, physical deficits, hearing degeneration, with implications in returning to work, social relations and activities. Additionally, it has been described a higher risk of stroke among these patients, which highlights the importance of promoting secondary prevention, soon after these acute episodes. Therefore, this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of a three-month multidomain intervention program, composed of five non-pharmacological components which may contribute to accelerate the return to the pre-event level of functioning in patients with TIA and minor stroke. The results may guide future clinical practices and health policies aiming to reduce the overall burden of stroke.

Read the detailed description

This is pragmatic non-pharmacological RCT, which will include patients diagnosed with a TIA or a minor stroke recruited at the emergency or neurology departments of the Hospital Pedro Hispano, located in Matosinhos, Portugal (n=70). Those who accept to participate will be randomly allocated to 2 groups (1:1): (a) Intervention - will receive a combined approach of cognitive training, physical exercise, nutrition education and psychoeducation sessions, during three-months, as well as assessment/correction of hearing loss; (b) Control - participants will not be subject to any intervention. Both groups will receive the usual standard of care provided to these types of clinical diseases.

Data will be collected using different strategies. Trained interviewers will conduct face-to-face interviews, covering sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyles (including adherence to the mediterranean diet), health status, and will perform anthropometry and measure blood pressure as well as physical performance. The complete or partial recovery time of instrumental ADLs will be assessed using an adapted version of the Frenchay Activities Index. Disability and basic ADLs will be also evaluated (Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index, respectively). Cognitive function will be evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and a self-administered web-based tool for remote longitudinal assessment (Brain on Track), if applicable. Symptoms of anxiety and depression, as well as quality of life, will be evaluated through self-administered instruments. Levels of glycated hemoglobin and 24-hour urinary sodium, potassium and creatinine excretions, as well as pH levels, will be also measured. All participants will be evaluated at 0 and 3 months after the beginning of the intervention. Electronic medical records will be assessed to obtain clinical data.

Functionality recovery will be defined as a primary outcome and additional information regarding the feasibility, outcomes and sample size requirements of such programs will also be assessed, which is crucial to implement a large-scale RCT.

This project was previously approved by the Local Ethics Committee and by the Data Protection Officer of the Institute of Public Health of the University of Porto. In this context, all procedures will be undertaken to guarantee compliance with ethical standards, as well as data protection and safety, considering national and international laws.

This study will be developed as part of the project "Multiple Interventions to Prevent Cognitive Decline" (MIND-Matosinhos).

Being tested
Cognitive training, Physical exercise, Behavioral: Nutrition education, Psychoeducation, Diagnosis and correction of hearing impairment
Keywords
Transient Ischemic Attack, Minor Stroke, Non-Pharmacological Interventions, Activities of Daily Living, Randomized Controlled Trial
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Attack, Transient

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive trainingBehavioural

    This component will comprise the following activities:

    1. In-person group training (monthly): 60-minute sessions, supervised by a psychologist; ii. Home individual training (≥5 times per week): unsupervised 30-minutes remote sessions, using the COGWEB® online platform or paper/pencil exercises (for those participants without computer/internet or who do not use one autonomously).
  • Physical exerciseBehavioural

    This component will be based on 60-minute sessions including aerobic, resistance, agility/balance and flexibility exercises, supervised by a physical education teacher:

    1. In-person group training (monthly); ii. In-person group training or remote synchronous training or provision of education booklets with photos and exercise instructions to be performed individually (twice weekly), depending on the evolution of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.
  • Behavioral: Nutrition educationBehavioural

    This component will be based on the following activities:

    1. In-person group 120-minute sessions (monthly), guided by a nutritionist, comprising: presentation and discussion of healthy and easy to cook recipes by the nutritionist and preparation of healthy meals by the participants; ii. In-person individual appointment with a nutritionist (monthly).
  • PsychoeducationBehavioural

    This component will be based on in-person group sessions (monthly; 60-minute) supervised by a psychologist, aiming to promote the acquisition of important knowledge about secondary prevention and support people understanding, exploring, and self-managing their emotions and impairments.

  • Diagnosis and correction of hearing impairmentOther

    This component will be based on a evaluation session conducted by otolaryngologists and audiologists, who will evaluate previous hearing problems and use of hearing aids, and include an otoscopy and an audiogram.

Study groups in NCT05369637
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-pharmacological InterventionExperimentalParticipants in the intervention group will receive a multidomain non-pharmacological program, including cognitive training, physical exercise, nutrition education, psychoeducation, and diagnosis and correction of hearing impairment.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive training; Behavioral: Physical exercise; Behavioral: Behavioral: Nutrition education; Behavioral: Psychoeducation; Other: Diagnosis and correction of hearing impairment
Control groupNo interventionControl group will receive the usual standard of care provided to these clinical diseases.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to recovery in each instrumental activity of daily living

    Time to recovery in each instrumental activity of daily living measured by an adapted version of the Frenchay Activities Index.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Recruitment timeframe

    Proportion of participants recruited within the seven days post-onset of symptoms will be calculated as the number of participants recruited within the time frame divided by the total number of participants.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Adherence to each component of the intervention

    Proportion of adherence to each component of the intervention and to different intervention modalities (remote/in person), calculated as the number of sessions attended divided by the total number of sessions implemented. For remote cognitive training the outcome will be the absolute number of sessions.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Dropout

    Proportion of participants who dropped out of the study, calculated as the number of participants who dropped out after attending at least one session divided by the total number of participants who attended at least one session.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Time of follow-up

    Number of days between the first and the last session attended by the participant.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Complete assessment of participants

    For each study outcome, proportion of participants with complete information, calculated at baseline and follow-up, as the number of participants with complete information divided by the total number of participants evaluated.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Implemented sessions

    Proportion of sessions implemented, calculated as the number of sessions that the research team was able to implement divided by the total number of sessions planned.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Cognitive performance

    Variation of participant's cognitive performance assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This scale varies from 0 (worst cognitive performance) to 30 points (best cognitive performance).

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Memory complaints

    Variation of the self-reported memory complaints, assessed using the Subjective Memory Complaints Scale, between the baseline and follow-up assessments. This scale varies from 0 (best score) to 21 points (worst score). Scores over three points indicate the presence of self-reported memory complaints.

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet

    Variation of participant's self-reported adherence to the Mediterranean diet, assessed using the Mediterranean food pattern (MEDAS) scale, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This scale varies from 0 (lowest adherence to the Mediterranean diet) to 14 points (highest adherence to the Mediterranean diet). A score over 10 points indicates good adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

    Measured: 3 months

  7. Anxiety and depression

    Variation of the anxiety and depression scores, assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This scale varies from 0 (best score) to 21 points (worst score).

    Measured: 3 months

  8. Reported quality of life

    Variation of participant's quality of life, assessed using the EuroQol Group scale - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) scale, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This scale is subdivided in two subscales: a) five multiple choice questions, with five response possibilities, which produce a score that varies from 5 (best score) to 25 points (worst score); b) visual analogic scale, that varies from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score).

    Measured: 3 months

  9. Handgrip strength

    Variation of participant's handgrip strength, assessed using a dynamometer, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments.

    Measured: 3 months

  10. Agility 1

    Variation of participant's agility and balance, assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test scale, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This is measured in time units (seconds) and varies from 0 (best score) to infinite (worst score).

    Measured: 3 months

  11. Agility 2

    Variation of participant's agility and balance, assessed using the Unipedal Stance Test, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This is measured in time units (seconds) and varies from 0 (best score) to infinite (worst score).

    Measured: 3 months

  12. Upper body strength

    Variation of participant's upper body strength assessed using the 30-second arm curl test, from the Senior Fitness Test.

    Measured: 3 months

  13. Lower body strength

    Variation of participant's lower body strength assessed using the 30-second chair stand test, from the Senior Fitness Test.

    Measured: 3 months

  14. Upper body flexibility

    Variation of participant's upper body flexibility assessed using the back-scratch test, from the Senior Fitness Test.

    Measured: 3 months

  15. Lower body flexibility

    Variation of participant's lower body flexibility assessed using the chair sit-and-reach test, from the Senior Fitness Test.

    Measured: 3 months

  16. Agility 3

    Variation of participant's agility and dynamic balance assessed using the 8-foot distance test (2,44 meters), from the Senior Fitness Test.

    Measured: 3 months

  17. Aerobic endurance

    Variation of participant's aerobic endurance assessed using the 2-minute step test, from the Senior Fitness Test.

    Measured: 3 months

  18. Lower limb function

    Variation of participant's lower limb function, assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), which tests 3 dimensions: standing balance, walking speed, and chair stands. Each component is scored between 0-4, total score from 0 (poor performance) to 12 (best performance).

    Measured: 3 months

  19. Functional capacity to perform basic activities of daily living

    Variation of participant's independence on performing basic activities of daily living, using the Barthel Index, which ranges from 0 to 20 and higher scores represent increased functionality and independence.

    Measured: 3 months

  20. Disability

    Variation of participant's disability assessed via modified Rankin Scale, with scores ranging from 0 (perfect health) to 6 (dead).

    Measured: 3 months

  21. 24-hour urinary sodium excretion

    Variation of participant's urinary sodium excretion, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This parameter will be measured through a laboratory analysis of participants' 24-hour urinary samples and will be analyzed as a proxy of dietary salt intake.

    Measured: 3 months

  22. 24-hour urinary potassium excretion

    Variation of participant's urinary potassium excretion, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This parameter will be measured through a laboratory analysis of participants' 24-hour urinary samples and will be analyzed as a proxy of dietary potassium intake.

    Measured: 3 months

  23. Levels of glycated hemoglobin

    Variation of participant's levels of glycated hemoglobin, between the baseline and the follow-up assessments. This parameter will be measured through a laboratory analysis of participants' blood sample and will be used to analyze glycemic control.

    Measured: 3 months

  24. Body mass index

    Variation of participant's body mass index between the baseline and the follow-up assessments.

    Measured: 3 months

  25. Blood pressure

    Variation of participant's systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the baseline and the follow-up assessments.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2022
  2. Study start11 May 2022
  3. Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05369637
Sponsor's protocol ID
75/CES/JAS/2021
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
2 May 2022
Last updated
3 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Goncalves M, Lima MJ, Fonseca A, Duque C, Costa AR, Cruz VT. Study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to recover functionality after a transient ischaemic attack or a minor stroke: the 'Back to Normal' trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 28;13(4):e069593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069593.

    PubMed 37117001

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive training, Physical exercise and Behavioral: Nutrition education in people with Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke, run by Instituto de Saude Publica da Universidade do Porto at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ana Rute Costa, PhD (+351 22 206 1820, arcosta@ispup.up.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to recovery in each instrumental activity of daily living (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05369637, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in