AzTrials
AzTrials

Colitis, UlcerativePhase 4NCT05369832

An Open-label Study of Ozanimod in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice

A Phase 4 study testing Ozanimod in people with Colitis, Ulcerative, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 85 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the safety, efficacy, effects on quality of life (QOL), and biomarker response of ozanimod in participants with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colitis, Ulcerative
What is being tested?
Ozanimod
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
139 participants
Where
85 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Dec 2022to 11 Apr 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC), with signs and symptoms consistent with UC for at least 3 months prior to the first study intervention administration
  • Moderate to severely active UC disease activity, defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 through 9, inclusive, with the following minimum subscores:
  • An SF subscore ≥ 1, AND ii) An RB subscore ≥ 1, AND iii) An ES ≥ 2 (endoscopy performed within 60 days of the first study intervention administration).
  • Report of a previous colonoscopy that documents extent of disease

Who cannot join

  • Current or recent (within 3 months of screening) evidence of fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation
  • Extensive colonic resection or current stoma
  • Colonic dysplasia that has not been removed
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Trial locations and contacts

85 sites in 1 country.

85 sites in 1 country

United States85 sites
  • Local Institution - 0165

    Apple Valley, California, 92307-1329

  • Local Institution - 0198

    Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005

  • Local Institution - 0200

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809-2440

  • Local Institution - 0038

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Novel Research LLC

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Local Institution - 0199

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Local Institution - 0084

    Brooklyn, New York, 11203-2054

  • Local Institution - 0162

    Camarillo, California, 93012-5156

  • Local Institution - 0206

    Chandler, Arizona, 85224-1636

  • Local Institution - 0024

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63005-1248

  • Local Institution - 0171

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815-7313

  • Local Institution - 0051

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Local Institution - 0005

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3019

  • University of Cincinnati Physicians Company

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3019

  • Gastro Florida

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756-3839

  • Local Institution - 0018

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756-3839

  • Local Institution - 0188

    Columbus, Ohio, 43235-5424

  • Local Institution - 0177

    Cordova, Tennessee, 38018-6362

  • Local Institution - 0138

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Local Institution - 0048

    Dothan, Alabama, 36305-1156

  • Local Institution - 0180

    Englewood, New Jersey, 07631-4141

  • Local Institution - 0216

    Gilbert, Arizona, 85297-0425

  • Local Institution - 0191

    Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061-9121

  • Carolina Digestive Diseases

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834-3761

  • Local Institution - 0098

    Gurnee, Illinois, 60031

  • Local Institution - 0050

    Homestead, Florida, 33033

  • Local Institution - 0036

    Houston, Texas, 77024-2469

  • Local Institution - 0163

    Houston, Texas, 77024-2469

  • Ace Clinical Research Group: Digestive Health Associates

    Houston, Texas, 77024

  • Houston Methodist Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Local Institution - 0052

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Local Institution - 0192

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-8500

  • Local Institution - 0129

    Katy, Texas, 77494

  • Local Institution - 0014

    Lancaster, California, 93534-5856

  • OM Research LLC - Lancaster - ClinEdge - PPDS

    Lancaster, California, 93534-5856

  • Local Institution - 0026

    Lighthouse PT, Florida, 33064-7058

  • Local Institution - 0178

    Littleton, Colorado, 80120-5641

  • Local Institution - 0209

    Los Angeles, California, 90045-3119

  • Local Institution - 0183

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • Local Institution - 0161

    Lubbock, Texas, 79410-2014

  • Local Institution - 0197

    Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502

  • Local Institution - 0017

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-1311

  • University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • GI Alliance: Mansfield - TDDC

    Mansfield, Texas, 76063-6083

  • Local Institution - 0039

    Mansfield, Texas, 76063-6083

  • Local Institution - 0061

    Mentor, Ohio, 44060-6521

  • Local Institution - 0167

    Miami, Florida, 33136-1002

  • Local Institution - 0049

    Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016-5861

  • Wellness Clinical Research-Miami Florida

    Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016-5861

  • Gastroenterology Group of Naples

    Naples, Florida, 34102-5449

  • Local Institution - 0003

    Naples, Florida, 34102-5449

  • Local Institution - 0168

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37211-4981

  • Local Institution - 0187

    New York, New York, 10016-6821

  • Local Institution - 0059

    New York, New York, 10016-9401

  • NYU Langone Health -Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center

    New York, New York, 10016-9401

  • Local Institution - 0176

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Local Institution - 0045

    North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117-2927

  • Local Institution - 0184

    Ocean Springs, Mississippi, 39564-5803

  • Local Institution - 0193

    Ogden, Utah, 84403-3294

  • Local Institution - 0058

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073-4752

  • Local Institution - 0205

    Orlando, Florida, 32806-1110

  • Local Institution - 0037

    Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684

  • Local Institution - 0174

    Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446-3661

  • Local Institution - 0060

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02905-3105

  • Local Institution - 0027

    Roswell, Georgia, 30076-4969

  • Local Institution - 0169

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132-0001

  • Local Institution - 0201

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3270

  • Local Institution - 0043

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4463

  • San Antonio Gastroenterology

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4463

  • Local Institution - 0002

    San Diego, California, 92103-5639

  • Local Institution - 0208

    San Diego, California, 92123-4207

  • Local Institution - 0185

    San Jose, California, 95116

  • Local Institution - 0166

    San Marcos, Texas, 78666-7502

  • Local Institution - 0130

    Seattle, Washington, 98104-1356

  • Local Institution - 0125

    Sun City, Arizona, 85351-2867

  • Local Institution - 0189

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405-2318

  • Local Institution - 0181

    Topeka, Kansas, 66606-1539

  • Local Institution - 0195

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724-0001

  • Local Institution - 0046

    Tyler, Texas, 75701-4464

  • Tyler Research Institute, LLC

    Tyler, Texas, 75701-4464

  • Local Institution - 0170

    Utica, New York, 13502

  • Local Institution - 0091

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Local Institution - 0213

    Weldon Spring, Missouri, 63304-9103

  • Local Institution - 0179

    Wellington, Florida, 33414-3187

  • Local Institution - 0196

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 4, Prospective, Open-label Study of Ozanimod to Explore the Safety, Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Biomarker Response in Participants With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice

The purpose of this study is to explore the safety, efficacy, effects on quality of life (QOL), and biomarker response of ozanimod in participants with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice.

Being tested
Ozanimod
Keywords
Ulcerative Colitis, Ozanimod, RPC-1063, Zeposia®, Inflammatory bowel disease
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OzanimodDrug

    Also called Zeposia®, RPC-1063, BMS-986374

    Specified dose on specified days

Study groups in NCT05369832
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1 - Advanced therapy-naiveExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Ozanimod
Cohort 2 - Advanced therapy-exposedExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Ozanimod

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12

    Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score:

    • Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points,
    • Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%,
    • Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1

    The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components:

    • Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools),
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding),
    • Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy).

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.

    Measured: At week 12

  2. Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score:

    • Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points,
    • Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%,
    • Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1

    The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components:

    • Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools),
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding),
    • Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy).

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.

    Measured: At week 26

Secondary outcomes (26)
  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any new medical problem or worsening of a preexisting condition in a study participant who receives the study treatment. It does not have to be caused by the treatment. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal lab finding), symptom, or disease that happens around the time the study treatment is used, whether or not it is related to the treatment.

    A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) is an AE that meets any of the following:

    • Starts after the first dose of the study treatment (or within 84 days after stopping it) and was not present before; or
    • Was already present before treatment but gets worse after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping it); or
    • Has missing onset and end dates, making it unclear whether it occurred outside the treatment-emergent period.

    Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one TEAE.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires in-patient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent/significant disability/incapacity.

    Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TE SAE) is a SAE that meets any of the following:

    • Starts after the first dose of the study treatment (or within 84 days after stopping it) and was not present before; or
    • Was already present before treatment but gets worse after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping it); or
    • Has missing onset and end dates, making it unclear whether it occurred outside the treatment-emergent period.

    Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one TESAE.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event of Interest

    This endpoint reports the number of participants who experienced Adverse Events of Interest (AEIs) during the study. AEIs include bradycardia, heart conduction abnormalities (second-degree and higher atrioventricular block), macular edema, malignancy, serious or opportunistic infection, pulmonary effects, hepatic effects, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and events associated with orthostatic hypotension (e.g., dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope, seizure). The Sponsor may request additional information for nonserious AEIs.

    A Treatment Emergent AEI is an AEI that starts after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping), worsens relative to baseline in this period (or within 84 days after stopping), or has missing dates making the timing unclear.

    Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one AEI.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation

    This endpoint measures the number of participants who experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) that resulted in discontinuation of study treatment.

    An Adverse Event (AE) is any new medical problem or worsening of a preexisting condition in a study participant who receives the study treatment. It does not have to be caused by the treatment. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal lab finding), symptom, or disease that happens around the time the study treatment is used, whether or not it is related to the treatment.

    A TEAE is an AE that: starts after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping) and was not present before; or was preexisting but worsens after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping); or has missing dates that prevent determining whether it occurred outside the treatment emergent period.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)

  5. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Assessments

    Number of participants experiencing clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory testing including hematology, chemistry and urinalysis.

    Measured: From first dose of study medication through end of study (Up to approximately 728 days)

  6. Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104

    Clinical remission is defined as a Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2.5.

    The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is without using endoscopy. It combines three components:

    • Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
    • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

    A score of 2.5 or below suggests the disease is in remission.

    Measured: At week 52 and week 104

  7. Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104

    Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission (Partial Mayo Score) is defined as:

    • Meeting the criteria for clinical remission by Partial Mayo Score <=2.5, and
    • No use of oral systemic corticosteroids in the prior 90 days.

    The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure ulcerative colitis activity without endoscopy. It combines three components:

    • Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
    • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity

    Measured: At week 52 and week 104

  8. Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104

    Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score is defined as:

    • Decrease in partial Mayo score ⩾ 2 points and ⩾ 30% from baseline, and
    • Decrease in rectal bleeding subscore > 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding score < 1 This represents a marked improvement in disease activity.

    The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure ulcerative colitis activity without endoscopy. It combines three components:

    • Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
    • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

    Measured: At week 52 and week 104

  9. Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12

    Clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score is defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

    • Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with at least a 1-point decrease from baseline
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0
    • Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1

    The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9):

    • SF subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
    • RB subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
    • ES: range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

    Measured: At week 12

  10. Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 1 at Week 12

    Endoscopic Response is defined as:

    • A decrease from baseline of ≥ 1 point in the Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES).

    Mayo Endoscopic Score: range 0-3

    • Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
    • Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

    Measured: At week 12

  11. Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12

    Endoscopic Improvement is defined as:

    • Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES) ≤ 1

    Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES): range 0-3

    • Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
    • Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

    Measured: At week 12

  12. Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12

    Histological Improvement is defined as:

    • Achieving a Geboes score < 3.1

    The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope.

    • Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity.
    • Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
    • Lower Geboes scores = less inflammation and better healing

    Measured: At week 12

  13. Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12 for Cohort 1

    IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).

    It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:

    • Bowel symptoms (10 items)
    • Systemic symptoms (5 items)
    • Emotional function (12 items)
    • Social function (5 items)

    Scoring: Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).

    An increase from baseline reflects improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall HRQOL.

    Measured: At baseline and week 12

  14. Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 12] for Cohort 1

    IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).

    It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:

    • Bowel symptoms: 10 items
    • Systemic symptoms: 5 items
    • Emotional function: 12 items
    • Social function: 5 items

    Scoring:

    • Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
    • Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).

    A change from baseline in total score of ≥16 points reflect meaningful IBDQ response. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

    Measured: At baseline and week 12

  15. Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 1 at Week 12

    IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).

    It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:

    • Bowel symptoms: 10 items
    • Systemic symptoms: 5 items
    • Emotional function: 12 items
    • Social function: 5 items

    Scoring:

    • Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
    • Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).

    A total score of ≥170 points reflects IBDQ remission, meaning the participant reports very few symptoms and good overall quality of life. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

    Measured: At week 12

  16. Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score is defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

    • Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with at least a 1-point decrease from baseline
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0
    • Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1

    The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9):

    • SF subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
    • RB subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
    • ES: range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.

    Measured: At week 26

  17. Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Endoscopic Response is defined as:

    • A decrease from baseline of ≥ 1 point in the Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES).

    This represents the percentage of treated participants who achieved a decrease from baseline of at least 1 point in the Mayo ES, indicating improvement in mucosal appearance during endoscopy.

    Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3

    • Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
    • Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

    Measured: At week 26

  18. Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Endoscopic Improvement is defined as:

    • Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1

    This represents the percentage of treated participants with Mayo ES ≤ 1, indicating mild or no inflammation.

    Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3

    • Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
    • Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

    Measured: At week 26

  19. Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Endoscopic Remission is defined as:

    • Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES) = 0

    This represents the percentage of treated participants with Mayo ES = 0, indicating complete mucosal healing.

    Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES): range 0-3

    • Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
    • Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing

    Measured: At week 26

  20. Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Histological Improvement is defined as:

    • Achieving a Geboes score < 3.1

    The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope.

    • Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity.
    • Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
    • Lower Geboes scores = less inflammation and better healing

    Measured: At week 26

  21. Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Histological Remission is defined as:

    • Achieving a Geboes score < 2

    The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope.

    • Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity.
    • Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
    • Lower Geboes scores = minimal or no inflammation and better healing

    Measured: At week 26

  22. Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 26 for Cohort 2

    IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).

    It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:

    • Bowel symptoms (10 items)
    • Systemic symptoms (5 items)
    • Emotional function (12 items)
    • Social function (5 items)

    Scoring: Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).

    An increase from baseline reflects improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall HRQOL.

    Measured: At baseline and week 26

  23. Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 26] for Cohort 2

    IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).

    It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:

    • Bowel symptoms: 10 items
    • Systemic symptoms: 5 items
    • Emotional function: 12 items
    • Social function: 5 items

    Scoring:

    • Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
    • Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).

    A change from baseline in total score of ≥16 points reflect meaningful IBDQ response. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

    Measured: At baseline and week 26

  24. Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).

    It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:

    • Bowel symptoms: 10 items
    • Systemic symptoms: 5 items
    • Emotional function: 12 items
    • Social function: 5 items

    Scoring:

    • Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
    • Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).

    A total score of ≥170 points reflect IBDQ remission, meaning the participant reports very few symptoms and good overall quality of life. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

    Measured: At week 26

  25. Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission (modified mayo score) is defined as:

    • Meeting the criteria for clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score [Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline and; Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0 and; Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1], and
    • No oral systemic steroid use in the prior 90 days.

    The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9):

    • Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
    • Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
    • Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy)

    The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with:

    • Lower scores = less disease activity and better clinical condition
    • Higher scores = more severe disease activity

    Measured: At week 26

  26. Percent of Participants Achieving Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) for Cohort 2 at Week 26

    Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) is defined as:

    • Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1, and
    • Geboes score < 3.1

    Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3

    • Higher ES scores = more severe visible inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
    • Lower ES scores = less visible inflammation and better mucosal healing

    Geboes Score:

    • Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity
    • Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
    • Lower Geboes scores = less microscopic inflammation and better tissue healing

    Meeting both criteria (ES ≤ 1 and Geboes < 3.1) shows improvement in both endoscopic appearance and microscopic tissue health.

    Measured: At week 26

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2022
  2. Study start16 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion21 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion11 Apr 2025

Why it stopped: Business objectives have changed.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
139 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05369832
Sponsor's protocol ID
IM047-029
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
6 May 2022
Last updated
10 Feb 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Ozanimod in people with Colitis, Ulcerative, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 85 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 85 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12 (time frame: At week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in