Colitis, UlcerativePhase 4NCT05369832
An Open-label Study of Ozanimod in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice
A Phase 4 study testing Ozanimod in people with Colitis, Ulcerative, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 85 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the safety, efficacy, effects on quality of life (QOL), and biomarker response of ozanimod in participants with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colitis, Ulcerative
- What is being tested?
- Ozanimod
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 139 participants
- Where
- 85 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Dec 2022to 11 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC), with signs and symptoms consistent with UC for at least 3 months prior to the first study intervention administration
- Moderate to severely active UC disease activity, defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 through 9, inclusive, with the following minimum subscores:
- An SF subscore ≥ 1, AND ii) An RB subscore ≥ 1, AND iii) An ES ≥ 2 (endoscopy performed within 60 days of the first study intervention administration).
- Report of a previous colonoscopy that documents extent of disease
Who cannot join
- Current or recent (within 3 months of screening) evidence of fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation
- Extensive colonic resection or current stoma
- Colonic dysplasia that has not been removed
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
85 sites in 1 country.
85 sites in 1 country
United States85 sites
Local Institution - 0165
Apple Valley, California, 92307-1329
Local Institution - 0198
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Local Institution - 0200
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809-2440
Local Institution - 0038
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Novel Research LLC
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Local Institution - 0199
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Local Institution - 0084
Brooklyn, New York, 11203-2054
Local Institution - 0162
Camarillo, California, 93012-5156
Local Institution - 0206
Chandler, Arizona, 85224-1636
Local Institution - 0024
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63005-1248
Local Institution - 0171
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815-7313
Local Institution - 0051
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Local Institution - 0005
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3019
University of Cincinnati Physicians Company
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3019
Gastro Florida
Clearwater, Florida, 33756-3839
Local Institution - 0018
Clearwater, Florida, 33756-3839
Local Institution - 0188
Columbus, Ohio, 43235-5424
Local Institution - 0177
Cordova, Tennessee, 38018-6362
Local Institution - 0138
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Local Institution - 0048
Dothan, Alabama, 36305-1156
Local Institution - 0180
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631-4141
Local Institution - 0216
Gilbert, Arizona, 85297-0425
Local Institution - 0191
Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061-9121
Carolina Digestive Diseases
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834-3761
Local Institution - 0098
Gurnee, Illinois, 60031
Local Institution - 0050
Homestead, Florida, 33033
Local Institution - 0036
Houston, Texas, 77024-2469
Local Institution - 0163
Houston, Texas, 77024-2469
Ace Clinical Research Group: Digestive Health Associates
Houston, Texas, 77024
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Local Institution - 0052
Houston, Texas, 77030
Local Institution - 0192
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-8500
Local Institution - 0129
Katy, Texas, 77494
Local Institution - 0014
Lancaster, California, 93534-5856
OM Research LLC - Lancaster - ClinEdge - PPDS
Lancaster, California, 93534-5856
Local Institution - 0026
Lighthouse PT, Florida, 33064-7058
Local Institution - 0178
Littleton, Colorado, 80120-5641
Local Institution - 0209
Los Angeles, California, 90045-3119
Local Institution - 0183
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Local Institution - 0161
Lubbock, Texas, 79410-2014
Local Institution - 0197
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502
Local Institution - 0017
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-1311
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
GI Alliance: Mansfield - TDDC
Mansfield, Texas, 76063-6083
Local Institution - 0039
Mansfield, Texas, 76063-6083
Local Institution - 0061
Mentor, Ohio, 44060-6521
Local Institution - 0167
Miami, Florida, 33136-1002
Local Institution - 0049
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016-5861
Wellness Clinical Research-Miami Florida
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016-5861
Gastroenterology Group of Naples
Naples, Florida, 34102-5449
Local Institution - 0003
Naples, Florida, 34102-5449
Local Institution - 0168
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211-4981
Local Institution - 0187
New York, New York, 10016-6821
Local Institution - 0059
New York, New York, 10016-9401
NYU Langone Health -Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center
New York, New York, 10016-9401
Local Institution - 0176
New York, New York, 10021
Local Institution - 0045
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117-2927
Local Institution - 0184
Ocean Springs, Mississippi, 39564-5803
Local Institution - 0193
Ogden, Utah, 84403-3294
Local Institution - 0058
Orange Park, Florida, 32073-4752
Local Institution - 0205
Orlando, Florida, 32806-1110
Local Institution - 0037
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Local Institution - 0174
Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446-3661
Local Institution - 0060
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905-3105
Local Institution - 0027
Roswell, Georgia, 30076-4969
Local Institution - 0169
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132-0001
Local Institution - 0201
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3270
Local Institution - 0043
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4463
San Antonio Gastroenterology
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4463
Local Institution - 0002
San Diego, California, 92103-5639
Local Institution - 0208
San Diego, California, 92123-4207
Local Institution - 0185
San Jose, California, 95116
Local Institution - 0166
San Marcos, Texas, 78666-7502
Local Institution - 0130
Seattle, Washington, 98104-1356
Local Institution - 0125
Sun City, Arizona, 85351-2867
Local Institution - 0189
Tacoma, Washington, 98405-2318
Local Institution - 0181
Topeka, Kansas, 66606-1539
Local Institution - 0195
Tucson, Arizona, 85724-0001
Local Institution - 0046
Tyler, Texas, 75701-4464
Tyler Research Institute, LLC
Tyler, Texas, 75701-4464
Local Institution - 0170
Utica, New York, 13502
Local Institution - 0091
Webster, Texas, 77598
Local Institution - 0213
Weldon Spring, Missouri, 63304-9103
Local Institution - 0179
Wellington, Florida, 33414-3187
Local Institution - 0196
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A Phase 4, Prospective, Open-label Study of Ozanimod to Explore the Safety, Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Biomarker Response in Participants With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice
The purpose of this study is to explore the safety, efficacy, effects on quality of life (QOL), and biomarker response of ozanimod in participants with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Colitis, Ulcerative
- Being tested
- Ozanimod
- Keywords
- Ulcerative Colitis, Ozanimod, RPC-1063, Zeposia®, Inflammatory bowel disease
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OzanimodDrug
Also called Zeposia®, RPC-1063, BMS-986374
Specified dose on specified days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 - Advanced therapy-naive | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ozanimod |
| Cohort 2 - Advanced therapy-exposed | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ozanimod |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score:
- Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points,
- Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%,
- Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1
The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components:
- Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools),
- Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding),
- Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy).
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.
Measured: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score:
- Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points,
- Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%,
- Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1
The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components:
- Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools),
- Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding),
- Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy).
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.
Measured: At week 26
Secondary outcomes (26)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any new medical problem or worsening of a preexisting condition in a study participant who receives the study treatment. It does not have to be caused by the treatment. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal lab finding), symptom, or disease that happens around the time the study treatment is used, whether or not it is related to the treatment.
A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) is an AE that meets any of the following:
- Starts after the first dose of the study treatment (or within 84 days after stopping it) and was not present before; or
- Was already present before treatment but gets worse after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping it); or
- Has missing onset and end dates, making it unclear whether it occurred outside the treatment-emergent period.
Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one TEAE.
Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires in-patient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent/significant disability/incapacity.
Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TE SAE) is a SAE that meets any of the following:
- Starts after the first dose of the study treatment (or within 84 days after stopping it) and was not present before; or
- Was already present before treatment but gets worse after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping it); or
- Has missing onset and end dates, making it unclear whether it occurred outside the treatment-emergent period.
Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one TESAE.
Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event of Interest
This endpoint reports the number of participants who experienced Adverse Events of Interest (AEIs) during the study. AEIs include bradycardia, heart conduction abnormalities (second-degree and higher atrioventricular block), macular edema, malignancy, serious or opportunistic infection, pulmonary effects, hepatic effects, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and events associated with orthostatic hypotension (e.g., dizziness, lightheadedness, syncope, seizure). The Sponsor may request additional information for nonserious AEIs.
A Treatment Emergent AEI is an AEI that starts after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping), worsens relative to baseline in this period (or within 84 days after stopping), or has missing dates making the timing unclear.
Participants meeting any of these conditions are counted as having at least one AEI.
Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
This endpoint measures the number of participants who experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) that resulted in discontinuation of study treatment.
An Adverse Event (AE) is any new medical problem or worsening of a preexisting condition in a study participant who receives the study treatment. It does not have to be caused by the treatment. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (such as an abnormal lab finding), symptom, or disease that happens around the time the study treatment is used, whether or not it is related to the treatment.
A TEAE is an AE that: starts after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping) and was not present before; or was preexisting but worsens after the first dose (or within 84 days after stopping); or has missing dates that prevent determining whether it occurred outside the treatment emergent period.
Measured: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Assessments
Number of participants experiencing clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory testing including hematology, chemistry and urinalysis.
Measured: From first dose of study medication through end of study (Up to approximately 728 days)
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Clinical remission is defined as a Partial Mayo Score of ≤ 2.5.
The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is without using endoscopy. It combines three components:
- Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
- Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
- Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment)
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.
A score of 2.5 or below suggests the disease is in remission.
Measured: At week 52 and week 104
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission (Partial Mayo Score) is defined as:
- Meeting the criteria for clinical remission by Partial Mayo Score <=2.5, and
- No use of oral systemic corticosteroids in the prior 90 days.
The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure ulcerative colitis activity without endoscopy. It combines three components:
- Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
- Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
- Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment)
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity
Measured: At week 52 and week 104
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score is defined as:
- Decrease in partial Mayo score ⩾ 2 points and ⩾ 30% from baseline, and
- Decrease in rectal bleeding subscore > 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding score < 1 This represents a marked improvement in disease activity.
The Partial Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure ulcerative colitis activity without endoscopy. It combines three components:
- Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
- Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
- Physician's Global Assessment (PGA): range 0-3 (higher score = worse overall condition based on physician's judgment)
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning fewer symptoms and better disease control, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.
Measured: At week 52 and week 104
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score is defined as meeting all of the following criteria:
- Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with at least a 1-point decrease from baseline
- Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0
- Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1
The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9):
- SF subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
- RB subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
- ES: range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy)
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.
Measured: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Endoscopic Response is defined as:
- A decrease from baseline of ≥ 1 point in the Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES).
Mayo Endoscopic Score: range 0-3
- Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
- Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing
Measured: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Endoscopic Improvement is defined as:
- Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES) ≤ 1
Mayo Endoscopic Score (ES): range 0-3
- Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
- Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing
Measured: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Histological Improvement is defined as:
- Achieving a Geboes score < 3.1
The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope.
- Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity.
- Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
- Lower Geboes scores = less inflammation and better healing
Measured: At week 12
Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12 for Cohort 1
IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).
It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:
- Bowel symptoms (10 items)
- Systemic symptoms (5 items)
- Emotional function (12 items)
- Social function (5 items)
Scoring: Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).
An increase from baseline reflects improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall HRQOL.
Measured: At baseline and week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 12] for Cohort 1
IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).
It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:
- Bowel symptoms: 10 items
- Systemic symptoms: 5 items
- Emotional function: 12 items
- Social function: 5 items
Scoring:
- Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
- Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).
A change from baseline in total score of ≥16 points reflect meaningful IBDQ response. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Measured: At baseline and week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 1 at Week 12
IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).
It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:
- Bowel symptoms: 10 items
- Systemic symptoms: 5 items
- Emotional function: 12 items
- Social function: 5 items
Scoring:
- Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
- Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).
A total score of ≥170 points reflects IBDQ remission, meaning the participant reports very few symptoms and good overall quality of life. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Measured: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score is defined as meeting all of the following criteria:
- Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with at least a 1-point decrease from baseline
- Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0
- Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1
The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9):
- SF subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
- RB subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
- ES: range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy)
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition, and higher scores meaning more severe disease activity.
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Endoscopic Response is defined as:
- A decrease from baseline of ≥ 1 point in the Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES).
This represents the percentage of treated participants who achieved a decrease from baseline of at least 1 point in the Mayo ES, indicating improvement in mucosal appearance during endoscopy.
Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3
- Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
- Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Endoscopic Improvement is defined as:
- Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1
This represents the percentage of treated participants with Mayo ES ≤ 1, indicating mild or no inflammation.
Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3
- Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
- Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Endoscopic Remission is defined as:
- Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES) = 0
This represents the percentage of treated participants with Mayo ES = 0, indicating complete mucosal healing.
Mayo Endoscopic Sub score (ES): range 0-3
- Higher ES scores = more severe inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
- Lower ES scores = less inflammation and better mucosal healing
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Histological Improvement is defined as:
- Achieving a Geboes score < 3.1
The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope.
- Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity.
- Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
- Lower Geboes scores = less inflammation and better healing
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Histological Remission is defined as:
- Achieving a Geboes score < 2
The Geboes score is a grading system used to assess inflammation in tissue samples under a microscope.
- Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity.
- Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
- Lower Geboes scores = minimal or no inflammation and better healing
Measured: At week 26
Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 26 for Cohort 2
IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).
It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:
- Bowel symptoms (10 items)
- Systemic symptoms (5 items)
- Emotional function (12 items)
- Social function (5 items)
Scoring: Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best"). Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).
An increase from baseline reflects improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall HRQOL.
Measured: At baseline and week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 26] for Cohort 2
IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).
It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:
- Bowel symptoms: 10 items
- Systemic symptoms: 5 items
- Emotional function: 12 items
- Social function: 5 items
Scoring:
- Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
- Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).
A change from baseline in total score of ≥16 points reflect meaningful IBDQ response. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Measured: At baseline and week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 2 at Week 26
IBDQ is a tool to assess patient experience in inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative Colitis [UC] and Crohn's Disease [CD]).
It includes 32 questions across 4 dimensions:
- Bowel symptoms: 10 items
- Systemic symptoms: 5 items
- Emotional function: 12 items
- Social function: 5 items
Scoring:
- Each question ranges from 1 ("worst") to 7 ("best").
- Total score: 32-224, with higher scores indicating better quality of life (QOL).
A total score of ≥170 points reflect IBDQ remission, meaning the participant reports very few symptoms and good overall quality of life. The IBDQ is used in registrational studies to evaluate bowel symptoms, functional abdominal symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission (modified mayo score) is defined as:
- Meeting the criteria for clinical remission by Modified Mayo Score [Stool Frequency (SF) subscore ≤ 1, with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline and; Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore = 0 and; Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1], and
- No oral systemic steroid use in the prior 90 days.
The Modified Mayo Score is the sum of the following components (Range: 0-9):
- Stool Frequency (SF) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools)
- Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore: range 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding)
- Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy)
The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with:
- Lower scores = less disease activity and better clinical condition
- Higher scores = more severe disease activity
Measured: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) is defined as:
- Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES) ≤ 1, and
- Geboes score < 3.1
Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (ES): range 0-3
- Higher ES scores = more severe visible inflammation and worse mucosal appearance
- Lower ES scores = less visible inflammation and better mucosal healing
Geboes Score:
- Each domain is graded on a scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 5.4, with higher scores indicating more severe histologic disease activity
- Higher Geboes scores = more severe microscopic inflammation
- Lower Geboes scores = less microscopic inflammation and better tissue healing
Meeting both criteria (ES ≤ 1 and Geboes < 3.1) shows improvement in both endoscopic appearance and microscopic tissue health.
Measured: At week 26
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2022
- Study start16 Dec 2022
- Primary completion21 Jan 2025
- Study completion11 Apr 2025
Why it stopped: Business objectives have changed.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Colitis, UlcerativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05369832
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM047-029
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 6 May 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 4, Prospective, Open-label Study of Ozanimod to Explore the Safety, Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Biomarker Response in Participants With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05369832
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM047-029
- Conditions
- Colitis, Ulcerative
- Keywords
- Ulcerative Colitis, Ozanimod, RPC-1063, Zeposia®, Inflammatory bowel disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Business objectives have changed.
- Enrolment
- 139 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Feb 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to explore the safety, efficacy, effects on quality of life (QOL), and biomarker response of ozanimod in participants with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 - Advanced therapy-naive | Experimental | Drug: Ozanimod |
| Cohort 2 - Advanced therapy-exposed | Experimental | Drug: Ozanimod |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC), with signs and symptoms consistent with UC for at least 3 months prior to the first study intervention administration
- Moderate to severely active UC disease activity, defined as a modified Mayo score of 4 through 9, inclusive, with the following minimum subscores:
- Report of a previous colonoscopy that documents extent of disease
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Current or recent (within 3 months of screening) evidence of fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or bowel perforation
- Extensive colonic resection or current stoma
- Colonic dysplasia that has not been removed
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OzanimodAlso: Zeposia®, RPC-1063, BMS-986374Specified dose on specified days | Drug | Cohort 1 - Advanced therapy-naive, Cohort 2 - Advanced therapy-exposed |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At week 12
Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score: * Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points, * Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%, * Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools), * Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding), * Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy). The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Clinical response is defined as meeting all of the following improvements from baseline in the Modified Mayo Score: * Decrease from baseline ≥ 2 points, * Decrease from baseline ≥ 35%, * Decrease from baseline in the Rectal Bleeding (RB) subscore ≥ 1 point or absolute RB subscore ≤ 1 The Modified Mayo Score is a tool that helps doctors measure how active ulcerative colitis is. It combines three components: * Stool Frequency (SF): scored 0-3 (higher score = more frequent stools), * Rectal Bleeding (RB): scored 0-3 (higher score = more bleeding), * Endoscopic Subscore (ES): scored 0-3 (higher score = more severe inflammation seen during endoscopy). The total score ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores meaning more severe disease activity and lower scores meaning less disease activity and better clinical condition.
26 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event of Interest
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through post-medication follow-up visit (Up to approximately 812 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Assessments
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through end of study (Up to approximately 728 days)
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Time frame: At week 52 and week 104
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Time frame: At week 52 and week 104
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response by Partial Mayo Score at Week 52 and 104
Time frame: At week 52 and week 104
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At week 12
Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12 for Cohort 1
Time frame: At baseline and week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 12] for Cohort 1
Time frame: At baseline and week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 1 at Week 12
Time frame: At week 12
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Response for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Improvement for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Histological Remission for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score From Baseline to Week 26 for Cohort 2
Time frame: At baseline and week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response [Change in Total Score (≥16 Points) From Baseline to Week 26] for Cohort 2
Time frame: At baseline and week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission [Total Score (≥170 Points)] for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Percent of Participants Achieving Histo-endoscopic Mucosal Improvement (HEMI) for Cohort 2 at Week 26
Time frame: At week 26
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colitis, Ulcerative
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Registry of Difficult-to-Treat Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), Crohn Disease
Recruiting
Multi-omics Dissection of Gut Microbiome Engraftment During FMT
Recurrent C. Difficile (rCDI), Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
Not yet recruiting
Online Pain Education for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Regulation in Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn s Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of How the Medicine Called "Etrasimod" Works in Children With the Gut Disease Called Ulcerative Colitis
Colitis, Ulcerative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
85 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ozanimod in people with Colitis, Ulcerative, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 85 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 85 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Measured by Modified Mayo Score for Cohort 1 at Week 12 (time frame: At week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.