EcologyNCT05372705
Reducing Eco-anxiety Using Selfies
A study testing Short videos in people with Ecology and Anxiety, run by Yale University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purposes of this study are to test among adolescent viewers the utility of selfie (TikTok) short video-based interventions to: 1. Reduce ecological anxiety, 2. Increase ecological agency, 3. Compare two different types of messaging, and 4. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Short videos
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,200 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2022to 30 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- English-speaking
- Living in the US
- Ages 14 - 18
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Yale Child Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Yale Child Study Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
About this study
Official title: Reducing Eco-anxiety and Increasing Eco-action in Adolescents Using Selfie Videos: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The purposes of this study are to test among adolescent viewers the utility of selfie (TikTok) short video-based interventions to:
- Reduce ecological anxiety,
- Increase ecological agency,
- Compare two different types of messaging, and
- Examine the role of viewer's gender and race as independent factors on the outcomes of interest.
Read the detailed description
Intervention videos will each be TikTok self-recorded videos (of 58-second duration) featuring the same underage professional (ages 16) acting as simulated participant. Video 1 ("Negative") will focus on impending ecological catastrophic outcomes; Video 2 ("Positive") will focus on the actions that youth will be able to take in preventing such outcomes; and Video 3 ("Neutral") will include content unrelated to ecological concerns.
We intend to assign ~1,000 individuals aged 14-18 in a randomized way, in equal proportions, and stratified by sex and race, to view one of the three TikTok videos: Positive, Negative, or Neutral.
Assessments will occur at baseline and post-intervention, and will include:
- Demographics (baseline only),
- Primary outcome:
- Climate Change Anxiety scale (13 items)
- Secondary outcome:
- Climate Hope scale (11 items)
- Behavioral intentions (6 items; adapted from)29,
- Hopefulness and agency sliders (2 items), and
- Three words
- Being tested
- Short videos
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Short videosBehavioural
Intervention videos will each be of 90-second duration and feature four underage professionals (ages 16) acting as simulated patients. All videos will focus on an empowered presenter with depression sharing their personal story regarding depression and describe how social supports from family, friends, and community, as well as professional help assisted them in overcoming symptoms of their illness. The actors will include a transgender male, a cis-gender male, a transgender female, and a cis-gender female.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Positive | Active comparator | ~58-second selfie video (TikTok) of an adolescent presenting a "can do" / climate action / positive perspective on global warming Receives: Behavioral: Short videos |
| Negative | Active comparator | ~58-second selfie video (TikTok) of an adolescent presenting an "it's already too late" / climate catastrophe / negative perspective on global warming Receives: Behavioral: Short videos |
| Neutral | Active comparator | ~58-second selfie video (TikTok) of an adolescent discussing a topic unrelated to climate change or global warming Receives: Behavioral: Short videos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS)
The CCAS is the sum of 13 items (Clayton and Karazsia; Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2020). Each of the items is a statement on which participants are asked to rate their agreement on a 5-point Likert-type scale: from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Almost always".)
The range of the scale is from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate greater eco-axiety.
Measured: Within 10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Climate Change Hope Scale (CCHS)
The CCHS is the sum of 11 items (Li and Moore; Environ Behav, 2018). Each of the items is a statement on which participants are asked to rate their agreement on a 5-point Likert-type scale: from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("A great deal".)
The range of the scale is from 11 to 55; higher scores indicate greater hope regarding environmental action.
Measured: Within 10 minutes
Change in Environmental Action Scale-Behavioral Intentions (EAS-BI)
We will use the Behavioral Intentions component of the Environmental Action Scale (Alisat and Riemer; J Environ Psychol, 2015.) The BI component is the sum of 6 items. Each of the items is a statement on which participants are asked to rate their agreement on a 5-point Likert-type scale: from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("A great deal".)
The range of the scale is from 6 to 30; higher scores indicate greater environmental action behavioral intentions.
Measured: Within 10 minutes
Change in Hopefulness "slider"
Participants will be asked to rate how hopeful they are about global warming. They will move a continuous slider ranging from 0 ("Not hopeful at all; we are doomed regarding global warming and its consequences") to 100 ("Very hopeful; our actions can revert and prevent global warming and its consequences".)
Measured: Within 10 minutes
Change in Agency "slider"
Participants will be asked to rate how much agency they consider having around global warming. They will move a continuous slider ranging from 0 ("There is nothing that I can do about it") to 100 ("There is a lot that I can do about it".)
Measured: Within 10 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2022
- Study start15 Jun 2022
- Primary completion20 Jul 2022
- Study completion30 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EcologyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05372705
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000028980_d
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 9 May 2022
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Martin A, Calhoun A, Paez J, Amsalem D. Destigmatizing perceptions about Black adolescent depression: randomized controlled trial of brief social contact-based video interventions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;63(11):1270-1278. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13570. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
PubMed 35066880Amsalem D, Martin A. Reducing depression-related stigma and increasing treatment seeking among adolescents: randomized controlled trial of a brief video intervention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;63(2):210-217. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13427. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
PubMed 33821507Amsalem D, Halloran J, Penque B, Celentano J, Martin A. Effect of a Brief Social Contact Video on Transphobia and Depression-Related Stigma Among Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220376. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0376.
PubMed 35212749Benoit L, Thomas I, Martin A. Review: Ecological awareness, anxiety, and actions among youth and their parents - a qualitative study of newspaper narratives. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022 Feb;27(1):47-58. doi: 10.1111/camh.12514. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PubMed 34687125
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing Eco-anxiety and Increasing Eco-action in Adolescents Using Selfie Videos: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05372705
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2000028980_d
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purposes of this study are to test among adolescent viewers the utility of selfie (TikTok) short video-based interventions to:
- Reduce ecological anxiety,
- Increase ecological agency,
- Compare two different types of messaging, and
- Examine the role of viewer's gender and race as independent factors on the outcomes of interest.
Detailed description
Intervention videos will each be TikTok self-recorded videos (of 58-second duration) featuring the same underage professional (ages 16) acting as simulated participant. Video 1 ("Negative") will focus on impending ecological catastrophic outcomes; Video 2 ("Positive") will focus on the actions that youth will be able to take in preventing such outcomes; and Video 3 ("Neutral") will include content unrelated to ecological concerns.
We intend to assign ~1,000 individuals aged 14-18 in a randomized way, in equal proportions, and stratified by sex and race, to view one of the three TikTok videos: Positive, Negative, or Neutral.
Assessments will occur at baseline and post-intervention, and will include:
- Demographics (baseline only),
- Primary outcome:
- Climate Change Anxiety scale (13 items)
- Secondary outcome:
- Climate Hope scale (11 items)
- Behavioral intentions (6 items; adapted from)29,
- Hopefulness and agency sliders (2 items), and
- Three words
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Positive | Active comparator | Behavioral: Short videos~58-second selfie video (TikTok) of an adolescent presenting a "can do" / climate action / positive perspective on global warming |
| Negative | Active comparator | Behavioral: Short videos~58-second selfie video (TikTok) of an adolescent presenting an "it's already too late" / climate catastrophe / negative perspective on global warming |
| Neutral | Active comparator | Behavioral: Short videos~58-second selfie video (TikTok) of an adolescent discussing a topic unrelated to climate change or global warming |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- English-speaking
- Living in the US
- Ages 14 - 18
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Short videosIntervention videos will each be of 90-second duration and feature four underage professionals (ages 16) acting as simulated patients. All videos will focus on an empowered presenter with depression sharing their personal story regarding depression and describe how social supports from family, friends, and community, as well as professional help assisted them in overcoming symptoms of their illness. The actors will include a transgender male, a cis-gender male, a transgender female, and a cis-gender female. | Behavioural | Negative, Neutral, Positive |
Primary outcome
Change in Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS)
Time frame: Within 10 minutes
The CCAS is the sum of 13 items (Clayton and Karazsia; Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2020). Each of the items is a statement on which participants are asked to rate their agreement on a 5-point Likert-type scale: from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Almost always".) The range of the scale is from 13 to 65; higher scores indicate greater eco-axiety.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Climate Change Hope Scale (CCHS)
Time frame: Within 10 minutes
Change in Environmental Action Scale-Behavioral Intentions (EAS-BI)
Time frame: Within 10 minutes
Change in Hopefulness "slider"
Time frame: Within 10 minutes
Change in Agency "slider"
Time frame: Within 10 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2022.
- Background: PubMed 35066880Martin A, Calhoun A, Paez J, Amsalem D. Destigmatizing perceptions about Black adolescent depression: randomized controlled trial of brief social contact-based video interventions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;63(11):1270-1278. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13570. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 33821507Amsalem D, Martin A. Reducing depression-related stigma and increasing treatment seeking among adolescents: randomized controlled trial of a brief video intervention. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;63(2):210-217. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13427. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 35212749Amsalem D, Halloran J, Penque B, Celentano J, Martin A. Effect of a Brief Social Contact Video on Transphobia and Depression-Related Stigma Among Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220376. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0376.
- Background: PubMed 34687125Benoit L, Thomas I, Martin A. Review: Ecological awareness, anxiety, and actions among youth and their parents - a qualitative study of newspaper narratives. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022 Feb;27(1):47-58. doi: 10.1111/camh.12514. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ecology
RecruitingObservational study
Skin Microbial Ecology in Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Multilevel Ecological and COM-B Determinants of Medication Adherence in Adults With Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
Not yet recruiting
Clear Aligner Cleaning: Brushing, Chlorhexidine, and BlueM Effects on Oral Microbial Ecology and Periodontal Indices
Gingivitis, Dental Plaque
RecruitingObservational study
The Role of Skin Microecology in Diabetic Skin Lesions
Diabetic Foot, Diabetic Dermopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Short videos in people with Ecology and Anxiety, run by Yale University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS) (time frame: Within 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05372705, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2022.