Type 2 DiabetesNCT05378282
Identification of Diabetic Nephropathy Biomarkers Through Transcriptomics
An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes With Renal Manifestations, run by Hospital Juarez de Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
According to the different epidemiological studies in Mexico the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy is 9.1%-40% in diabetic patients, however the complication is subdiagnosed when we see the numbers of uncontrolled diabetics (75%) and patients that are under continuous screening to prevent complications development… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes With Renal Manifestations
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 3 Sep 2021to 28 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Mexican patients with Type 2 Diabetes with or without Diabetic Nephropathy
Who may be able to join
- Patients with ≥ 20 years of T2D evolution with normoalbuminuria
- Patients without a personal or family history of kidney disease in 1st degree relatives Age ≥ 18 years
- T2D diagnosed at least 5 years before initiating renal replacement therapy Background or diabetic retinopathy by self-report to ensure that albuminuria was the consequence of diabetic nephropathy rather than a non-diabetic glomerulopathy albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/24 h in at least two out of three sterile urine samples no hematuria or signs (including cellular casts), history or predisposition to other kidney or urinary tract disease.
Who cannot join
- Diabetic patients without diabetic nephropathy
- Patients with type 1 diabetes, gesta- tional diabetes, uncontrollable hypertension, active cancer, heart failure, liver or kidney disease, cotreatment with corticosteroids or estrogens, conditions that can cause hyperglycemia, addiction to alcohol or illegal drugs, and dementia or severe psychiatric disor- ders were not included in this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
According to the different epidemiological studies in Mexico the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy is 9.1%-40% in diabetic patients, however the complication is subdiagnosed when we see the numbers of uncontrolled diabetics (75%) and patients that are under continuous screening to prevent complications development (only 12.6% had an annual albuminuria measurement). In addition, Mexican have an increased susceptibility to developing diabetic nephropathy. These data highlight the need to identify new biomarkers that could help us to identify those patients at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy, in order to take preventing measures to delay the progress of the disease to CKD and improve the quality of the patients. Thus, the comparison of transcriptomic profile between diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy is the first step to characterize this complication. In addition, we will be able to identify diabetic nephropathy biomarkers for development of new diagnostic tools and even to find therapeutic targets in Mexican from Hospital Juárez de México.
Read the detailed description
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is defined as a group of metabolic diseases characterized by chronic hyperglycemia, resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both. According to the National Health Survey 2012, in Mexico, approximately 1 out of 10 persons is affected with T2D, though is important to mention that these data only reflect subjects previously diagnosed with the disease, but we expect a two fold increase in this number when including newly diagnosed T2D patients. In addition, the prevalence of T2D in younger age groups has increased (25% of diabetes cases in Mexico occurs in young adults <43 years of age), which implies >20 years living with the disease. In consequence, T2D is found among the leading causes of death, which represents a health burden for the country.
It has been estimated that more than 40% of people with diabetes will develop chronic kidney disease (CKD), accounting for about 40% of all patients beginning renal replacement therapy. In the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, nephropathy is among the five leading causes of medical care in general hospitals in the area and in high-specialty hospitals. A study in Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, informed a 35% incidence of nephropathy was observed in diabetic patients. Cueto-Manzano et al., reported a 40% incidence of early nephropathy and 29% of established nephropathy in 756 diabetic patients from Jalisco. Other study in Mexico that included 3,609 diabetic patients in Guanajuato, reported a 23.8% of diabetic nephropathy. A recent study conducted in the State of Mexico, which included 44 458 subjects diagnosed with T2D, registered the presence of diabetic nephropathy in 9.1% .
Diabetic kidney disease is uncommon if diabetes is less than one decade duration. The highest incidence rates of 3% per year are on average seen 10 to 20 years after diabetes onset, after which the rate of nephropathy tapers off. It is important to say that a diabetic patient for 20 to 25 years without clinical signs of diabetic nephropathy has low chance to develop such complication. The progression of T2D to diabetic nephropathy has become a health problem, not only for the costs to health sector, but to the worsening of life quality of the patient and the outcomes.
The main risk factors of progression to diabetic nephropathy includes: hyperglycemia, response to drugs, and long duration of diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity and dyslipidemia. Most of these factors are modifiable by drugs or changes in life style. Therefore, the management of the modifiable risk factors is a key for preventing and delaying the decline in renal function. Early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy is another essential component in the management of diabetes and its complications such as nephropathy. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends the routine screening to diabetic subjects with progressive diabetic nephropathy and CKD. The most widely accepted guidelines of National Kidney Foundation were implicating in measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and stages of CKD using serum creatinine in patients. However, due to creatinine undergo tubular secretion in addition to glomerular filtration and its extrarenal elimination via the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in advanced renal failure, the GFR could be overestimated. In case of GFR, the techniques are overwhelming due to invasive methods and some markers are difficult to handle. Another marker used in the clinic is microalbuminuria, in most patients, the first sign of diabetic nephropathy is the moderate increase of urinary albumin excretion, i.e. 30-300 mg/g creatinine in a urine sample (also termed microalbuminuria). Patients who develop macroalbuminuria (>30-300 mg/g creatinine) are at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy. Nonetheless, approximately up to 40% of patients with moderate albuminuria returns to normoalbuminuria. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with type 1 diabetes or T2D experience a decline in eGFR, despite the presence of only moderate albuminuria or even normoalbuminuria. Consequently, the actual markers available in the clinic are inaccurate, so it is necessary the identification of new markers that can recognize those patients at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy to delay the progress of the complications taking the adequate measures.
The transcriptomics
The development of new technologies in the genomic era had allow the accelerated advance in system biology and the generation of knowledge in kidney development, homeostasis, and disease. In this context, transcriptome signatures associated with specific disease states can provide great information about pathogenic mechanisms and bring to light priority gene expression biomarker candidates . In addition, comparison of transcriptomes allows the identification of genes that are differentially expressed in distinct populations.
In general, the RNA-Seq technology is very useful for differential expression analysis, in which is commonly adopted five steps. First, the RNA samples are fragmented into small complementary DNA sequences (cDNA) and then sequenced from a high throughput platform. Second, the small generated sequences are mapped to a transcriptome. Third, the expression levels for each gene or isoform are estimated. Fourth, the mapped data are normalized and, e.g. using statistical and machine learning methods, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are identified. Finally, the relevance of the produced data is finally evaluated from a biological context.
A recent study by O´Conell et al. identified a set of 13 genes that was predictive for the development of renal fibrosis at 1 year of renal transplant, through microarray expression analysis of renal allograft recipients' biopsies. Thus, the authors suggest that the set of 13 genes could be used to identify kidney transplant recipients at risk of allograft loss before the development of irreversible damage. A study by Ju et al., revealed that epidermal growth factor (EGF) a tubule-specific protein critical for cell differentiation and regeneration, predicted eGFR, throughout transcriptome analysis on microdissected tubulointerstitial components of human renal biopsies of patients with CKD. In addition, the amount of EGF protein in urine (uEGF) showed significant correlation with intrarenal EGF mRNA, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, eGFR and rate of eGFR loss, suggesting that uEGF could be a good predictor of CKD progression. Other study demonstrated that serum miRNA profile is affected by hemodialysis contributing to subfertility and increased risk for cancer development. Therefore, transcriptomics could provide better diagnostic tools, prognostic biomarkers, and signaling pathways amenable to therapeutic targeting.
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, transcriptomics, microalbuminuria, biomarkers
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic patients without diabetic nephropathy | i. Patients with ≥ 20 years of T2D evolution with normoalbuminuria ii. Patients without a personal or family history of kidney disease in 1st degree relatives iii. Age ≥ 18 years | |
| Diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy | i. T2D diagnosed at least 5 years before initiating renal replacement therapy ii. Background or diabetic retinopathy by self-report to ensure that albuminuria was the consequence of diabetic nephropathy rather than a non-diabetic glomerulopathy iii. albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/24 h in at least two out of three sterile urine samples iv. no hematuria or signs (including cellular casts), history or predisposition to other kidney or urinary tract disease. v. Age ≥ 18 years |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Differential Expression in blood and urine of diabetic patiens with and without diabetic nephropathy assesed by RNA seq
Different expression of down regulated and upregulated genes in blood and urine between patients with type II diabetes with and without diabetic nephropathy
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (18)
Demographic data of participants
Age, Serum creatinine, age and weight will be combined to report glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault formula
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Data of pharmacological treatment of participants
Pharmacological treatment, This information will be use as covariate in RNASeq
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Habits data, Smoking
This information will be use as covariate in RNASeq
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Habits data, Exercise
This information will be use as covariate in RNASeq
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Habits data, Special Diet
(proteic diet, low in calories), This information will be use as covariate in RNASeq
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Anthropometric data of participants, Height
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Anthropometric data of participants, Weight
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Glucose
To observe glycemic control of patients, due to have diagnostic of diabetes
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Glycated hemoglobin
To observe glycemic control of patients, due to have diagnostic of diabetes
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Serum creatinine
Serum creatinine, age and weight will be combined to report glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault formula
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Triglycerides
To observe metabolic control in patients
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Total Cholesterol
To observe metabolic control in patients
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, High density lipoproteins (HDL)
To observe metabolic control in patients
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Low density lipoproteins (LDL)
To observe metabolic control in patients, risk of cardiometabolic disease
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Uric acid
To observe metabolism in patients
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
To observe renal function in patients
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Urea
To observe renal function in patients
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Molecular data, Whole messenger RNA sequencing
Data of whole messenger in blood and urine
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2022
- Study start3 Sep 2021
- Primary completion28 Feb 2023
- Study completion28 Feb 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (32)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Juarez de Mexico
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05378282
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HJM 0513/18-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The IPD will not be shared
Publications
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S062. No abstract available.
PubMed 20042775Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Davila-Cervantes CA, Zamora-Macorra M, Trejo-Valdivia B, Gonzalez-Villalpando ME. Incidence of type 2 diabetes in Mexico: results of the Mexico City Diabetes Study after 18 years of follow-up. Salud Publica Mex. 2014 Jan-Feb;56(1):11-7. doi: 10.21149/spm.v56i1.7318.
PubMed 24912516Secretaría de Salud. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. 2012
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014. No abstract available.
PubMed 24357209Vora JP, Ibrahim HA, Bakris GL. Responding to the challenge of diabetic nephropathy: the historic evolution of detection, prevention and management. J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Oct-Nov;14(10-11):667-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001058.
PubMed 11095158Benjamín; T-D, Antonio; M-MM, Eugenia; C-PM, A D-EMT, Lucia; r-D, Patricia; R-C, et al. DETECCIÓN DE MICROALBUMINURIA EN PACIENTES DIABÉTICOS TIPO II. Bioquimia. 2007(SA126)
Cueto-Manzano AM, Cortes-Sanabria L, Martinez-Ramirez HR, Rojas-Campos E, Barragan G, Alfaro G, Flores J, Anaya M, Canales-Munoz JL. Detection of early nephropathy in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005 Aug;(97):S40-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09707.x.
PubMed 16014099Bello-Chavolla OY, Rojas-Martinez R, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Hernandez-Avila M. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in Mexico. Nutr Rev. 2017 Jan;75(suppl 1):4-12. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw030.
PubMed 28049745Gheith O, Farouk N, Nampoory N, Halim MA, Al-Otaibi T. Diabetic kidney disease: world wide difference of prevalence and risk factors. J Nephropharmacol. 2015 Oct 9;5(1):49-56. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 28197499Tziomalos K, Athyros VG. Diabetic Nephropathy: New Risk Factors and Improvements in Diagnosis. Rev Diabet Stud. 2015 Spring-Summer;12(1-2):110-8. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2015.12.110. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
PubMed 26676664Zenteno-Castillo P, Munoz-Lopez DB, Merino-Reyes B, Vega-Sanchez A, Preciado-Puga M, Gonzalez-Yebra AL, Kornhauser C. Prevalence of diabetic nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in rural communities of Guanajuato, Mexico. Effect after 6 months of Telmisartan treatment. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2015 Aug 18;2(4):125-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2015.08.001. eCollection 2015 Dec.
PubMed 29159116American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011. No abstract available.
PubMed 20042772Slocum JL, Heung M, Pennathur S. Marking renal injury: can we move beyond serum creatinine? Transl Res. 2012 Apr;159(4):277-89. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
PubMed 22424431National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Feb;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266. No abstract available.
PubMed 11904577Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, Levey AS. Assessing kidney function--measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 8;354(23):2473-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054415. No abstract available.
PubMed 16760447
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Identification of Diabetic Nephropathy Biomarkers Through Transcriptomics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05378282
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HJM 0513/18-1
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes, transcriptomics, microalbuminuria, biomarkers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Juarez de MexicoOther government
- Study start
- 3 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
According to the different epidemiological studies in Mexico the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy is 9.1%-40% in diabetic patients, however the complication is subdiagnosed when we see the numbers of uncontrolled diabetics (75%) and patients that are under continuous screening to prevent complications development (only 12.6% had an annual albuminuria measurement). In addition, Mexican have an increased susceptibility to developing diabetic nephropathy. These data highlight the need to identify new biomarkers that could help us to identify those patients at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy, in order to take preventing measures to delay the progress of the disease to CKD and improve the quality of the patients. Thus, the comparison of transcriptomic profile between diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy is the first step to characterize this complication. In addition, we will be able to identify diabetic nephropathy biomarkers for development of new diagnostic tools and even to find therapeutic targets in Mexican from Hospital Juárez de México.
Detailed description
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is defined as a group of metabolic diseases characterized by chronic hyperglycemia, resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both. According to the National Health Survey 2012, in Mexico, approximately 1 out of 10 persons is affected with T2D, though is important to mention that these data only reflect subjects previously diagnosed with the disease, but we expect a two fold increase in this number when including newly diagnosed T2D patients. In addition, the prevalence of T2D in younger age groups has increased (25% of diabetes cases in Mexico occurs in young adults <43 years of age), which implies >20 years living with the disease. In consequence, T2D is found among the leading causes of death, which represents a health burden for the country.
It has been estimated that more than 40% of people with diabetes will develop chronic kidney disease (CKD), accounting for about 40% of all patients beginning renal replacement therapy. In the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, nephropathy is among the five leading causes of medical care in general hospitals in the area and in high-specialty hospitals. A study in Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, informed a 35% incidence of nephropathy was observed in diabetic patients. Cueto-Manzano et al., reported a 40% incidence of early nephropathy and 29% of established nephropathy in 756 diabetic patients from Jalisco. Other study in Mexico that included 3,609 diabetic patients in Guanajuato, reported a 23.8% of diabetic nephropathy. A recent study conducted in the State of Mexico, which included 44 458 subjects diagnosed with T2D, registered the presence of diabetic nephropathy in 9.1% .
Diabetic kidney disease is uncommon if diabetes is less than one decade duration. The highest incidence rates of 3% per year are on average seen 10 to 20 years after diabetes onset, after which the rate of nephropathy tapers off. It is important to say that a diabetic patient for 20 to 25 years without clinical signs of diabetic nephropathy has low chance to develop such complication. The progression of T2D to diabetic nephropathy has become a health problem, not only for the costs to health sector, but to the worsening of life quality of the patient and the outcomes.
The main risk factors of progression to diabetic nephropathy includes: hyperglycemia, response to drugs, and long duration of diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity and dyslipidemia. Most of these factors are modifiable by drugs or changes in life style. Therefore, the management of the modifiable risk factors is a key for preventing and delaying the decline in renal function. Early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy is another essential component in the management of diabetes and its complications such as nephropathy. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends the routine screening to diabetic subjects with progressive diabetic nephropathy and CKD. The most widely accepted guidelines of National Kidney Foundation were implicating in measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and stages of CKD using serum creatinine in patients. However, due to creatinine undergo tubular secretion in addition to glomerular filtration and its extrarenal elimination via the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in advanced renal failure, the GFR could be overestimated. In case of GFR, the techniques are overwhelming due to invasive methods and some markers are difficult to handle. Another marker used in the clinic is microalbuminuria, in most patients, the first sign of diabetic nephropathy is the moderate increase of urinary albumin excretion, i.e. 30-300 mg/g creatinine in a urine sample (also termed microalbuminuria). Patients who develop macroalbuminuria (>30-300 mg/g creatinine) are at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy. Nonetheless, approximately up to 40% of patients with moderate albuminuria returns to normoalbuminuria. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with type 1 diabetes or T2D experience a decline in eGFR, despite the presence of only moderate albuminuria or even normoalbuminuria. Consequently, the actual markers available in the clinic are inaccurate, so it is necessary the identification of new markers that can recognize those patients at high risk for developing diabetic nephropathy to delay the progress of the complications taking the adequate measures.
The transcriptomics
The development of new technologies in the genomic era had allow the accelerated advance in system biology and the generation of knowledge in kidney development, homeostasis, and disease. In this context, transcriptome signatures associated with specific disease states can provide great information about pathogenic mechanisms and bring to light priority gene expression biomarker candidates . In addition, comparison of transcriptomes allows the identification of genes that are differentially expressed in distinct populations.
In general, the RNA-Seq technology is very useful for differential expression analysis, in which is commonly adopted five steps. First, the RNA samples are fragmented into small complementary DNA sequences (cDNA) and then sequenced from a high throughput platform. Second, the small generated sequences are mapped to a transcriptome. Third, the expression levels for each gene or isoform are estimated. Fourth, the mapped data are normalized and, e.g. using statistical and machine learning methods, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are identified. Finally, the relevance of the produced data is finally evaluated from a biological context.
A recent study by O´Conell et al. identified a set of 13 genes that was predictive for the development of renal fibrosis at 1 year of renal transplant, through microarray expression analysis of renal allograft recipients' biopsies. Thus, the authors suggest that the set of 13 genes could be used to identify kidney transplant recipients at risk of allograft loss before the development of irreversible damage. A study by Ju et al., revealed that epidermal growth factor (EGF) a tubule-specific protein critical for cell differentiation and regeneration, predicted eGFR, throughout transcriptome analysis on microdissected tubulointerstitial components of human renal biopsies of patients with CKD. In addition, the amount of EGF protein in urine (uEGF) showed significant correlation with intrarenal EGF mRNA, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, eGFR and rate of eGFR loss, suggesting that uEGF could be a good predictor of CKD progression. Other study demonstrated that serum miRNA profile is affected by hemodialysis contributing to subfertility and increased risk for cancer development. Therefore, transcriptomics could provide better diagnostic tools, prognostic biomarkers, and signaling pathways amenable to therapeutic targeting.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetic patients without diabetic nephropathy | – | –i. Patients with ≥ 20 years of T2D evolution with normoalbuminuria ii. Patients without a personal or family history of kidney disease in 1st degree relatives iii. Age ≥ 18 years |
| Diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy | – | –i. T2D diagnosed at least 5 years before initiating renal replacement therapy ii. Background or diabetic retinopathy by self-report to ensure that albuminuria was the consequence of diabetic nephropathy rather than a non-diabetic glomerulopathy iii. albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/24 h in at least two out of three sterile urine samples iv. no hematuria or signs (including cellular casts), history or predisposition to other kidney or urinary tract disease. v. Age ≥ 18 years |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Mexican patients with Type 2 Diabetes with or without Diabetic Nephropathy
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with ≥ 20 years of T2D evolution with normoalbuminuria
- Patients without a personal or family history of kidney disease in 1st degree relatives Age ≥ 18 years
- T2D diagnosed at least 5 years before initiating renal replacement therapy Background or diabetic retinopathy by self-report to ensure that albuminuria was the consequence of diabetic nephropathy rather than a non-diabetic glomerulopathy albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/24 h in at least two out of three sterile urine samples no hematuria or signs (including cellular casts), history or predisposition to other kidney or urinary tract disease.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diabetic patients without diabetic nephropathy
- Patients with type 1 diabetes, gesta- tional diabetes, uncontrollable hypertension, active cancer, heart failure, liver or kidney disease, cotreatment with corticosteroids or estrogens, conditions that can cause hyperglycemia, addiction to alcohol or illegal drugs, and dementia or severe psychiatric disor- ders were not included in this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Differential Expression in blood and urine of diabetic patiens with and without diabetic nephropathy assesed by RNA seq
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Different expression of down regulated and upregulated genes in blood and urine between patients with type II diabetes with and without diabetic nephropathy
18 secondary outcomes
Demographic data of participants
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Data of pharmacological treatment of participants
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Habits data, Smoking
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Habits data, Exercise
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Habits data, Special Diet
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Anthropometric data of participants, Height
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Anthropometric data of participants, Weight
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Glucose
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Glycated hemoglobin
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Serum creatinine
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Triglycerides
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Total Cholesterol
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, High density lipoproteins (HDL)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Low density lipoproteins (LDL)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Uric acid
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Blood urea nitrogen (BUN)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biochemical data of participants, Urea
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Molecular data, Whole messenger RNA sequencing
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2023.
- Background: PubMed 20042775American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S062. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24912516Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Davila-Cervantes CA, Zamora-Macorra M, Trejo-Valdivia B, Gonzalez-Villalpando ME. Incidence of type 2 diabetes in Mexico: results of the Mexico City Diabetes Study after 18 years of follow-up. Salud Publica Mex. 2014 Jan-Feb;56(1):11-7. doi: 10.21149/spm.v56i1.7318.
- BackgroundSecretaría de Salud. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. 2012
- Background: PubMed 24357209American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11095158Vora JP, Ibrahim HA, Bakris GL. Responding to the challenge of diabetic nephropathy: the historic evolution of detection, prevention and management. J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Oct-Nov;14(10-11):667-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001058.
- BackgroundBenjamín; T-D, Antonio; M-MM, Eugenia; C-PM, A D-EMT, Lucia; r-D, Patricia; R-C, et al. DETECCIÓN DE MICROALBUMINURIA EN PACIENTES DIABÉTICOS TIPO II. Bioquimia. 2007(SA126)
- Background: PubMed 16014099Cueto-Manzano AM, Cortes-Sanabria L, Martinez-Ramirez HR, Rojas-Campos E, Barragan G, Alfaro G, Flores J, Anaya M, Canales-Munoz JL. Detection of early nephropathy in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005 Aug;(97):S40-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09707.x.
- Background: PubMed 28049745Bello-Chavolla OY, Rojas-Martinez R, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Hernandez-Avila M. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in Mexico. Nutr Rev. 2017 Jan;75(suppl 1):4-12. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw030.
- Background: PubMed 28197499Gheith O, Farouk N, Nampoory N, Halim MA, Al-Otaibi T. Diabetic kidney disease: world wide difference of prevalence and risk factors. J Nephropharmacol. 2015 Oct 9;5(1):49-56. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 26676664Tziomalos K, Athyros VG. Diabetic Nephropathy: New Risk Factors and Improvements in Diagnosis. Rev Diabet Stud. 2015 Spring-Summer;12(1-2):110-8. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2015.12.110. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 29159116Zenteno-Castillo P, Munoz-Lopez DB, Merino-Reyes B, Vega-Sanchez A, Preciado-Puga M, Gonzalez-Yebra AL, Kornhauser C. Prevalence of diabetic nephropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in rural communities of Guanajuato, Mexico. Effect after 6 months of Telmisartan treatment. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2015 Aug 18;2(4):125-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2015.08.001. eCollection 2015 Dec.
- Background: PubMed 20042772American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The IPD will not be shared
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Impact of the Accu-Chek SmartGuide CGM Solution on the Mean Change in Time in Range Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Participants With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Enrolling by invitation
MTM2MTG Pilot Ancillary Study
Diet, Healthy, HbA1c
Active, not recruiting
Metabolic and Inflammatory Outcomes of the Ketogenic Diet Comparing Saturated and Unsaturated Fat Sources
PreDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Testing the Safety and Possible Benefits of an Ear Injection of a New Compound, Paliroden, in People With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Difficulty Understanding Speech in Noisy Situations
Cochlear Synaptopathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Research Study to Check the Safety of NNC9836-0001 When Given to Healthy Participants and Participants With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Type 2 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes With Renal Manifestations, run by Hospital Juarez de Mexico at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Differential Expression in blood and urine of diabetic patiens with and without diabetic nephropathy assesed by RNA seq (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05378282, which also lists 32 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2023.