AzTrials
AzTrials

MyositisPhase 2SPIREANCT05379634

A Study of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

A Phase 2 study testing Nipocalimab and Glucocorticoids in people with Myositis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 57 sites in 13 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with active idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myositis
What is being tested?
Nipocalimab and Glucocorticoids
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
36 participants
Where
57 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
5 Jul 2022to 17 Sep 2026
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Disease classification criteria: Participant meets the diagnostic criteria of probable or definite idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) based on 2017 The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for adult IIM at least 6 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention
  • If a participant is on regular or as needed treatment with low potency topical glucocorticoids (GC) that are allowed in the study or topical tacrolimus (TAC) to treat skin lesions, the dose and frequency should be stable for greater than or equal to (>=) 4 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention as well as maintained at the same dose until Week 52 of the study
  • Antibody positivity criteria: Any 1 of the myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) positive: dermatomyositis (DM): anti-Mi-2 (Mi-2/nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase [NuRD] complex), anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-Gamma (TIF1-Gamma), anti- nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2), anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 activating enzyme; anti- antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA-5) antibodies. Or immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): anti- signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti- 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies. Or anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS): anti- histidyl- ribonucleic acid [tRNA] synthetase (Jo-1), anti- threonyl-tRNA synthetase (PL7), anti- alanyl-tRNA synthetase (PL12), anti- isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (OJ), and anti- glycyl-tRNA synthetase (EJ) antibodies. If all MSAs are negative or more than 1 MSA is positive within different subtypes (defined by the central laboratory) at screening, the tests should be repeated during the screening period. If the same results are observed at retesting, the participant should not be enrolled in the study

Who cannot join

  • Has a juvenile myositis diagnosis and now >=18 years old
  • Has cancer-associated myositis defined as cancer diagnosis within 3 years of myositis diagnosis except for cervical carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
  • Has comorbidities (example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) which have required 3 or more courses of oral GC within 1 year prior to screening
  • Has a history of primary immunodeficiency or secondary immunodeficiency not related to the treatment of the participants IIM
  • Has experienced myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke within 12 weeks of screening

Trial locations and contacts

57 sites in 13 countries.

57 sites in 13 countries

United States19 sites
  • Augusta University

    Augusta, Georgia, 30912

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

  • Attune Health Autoimmune and Inflamation Care and Research

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • FM Clinical Research, LLC South Florida Neurology Associates, P. A.

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33487

  • The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc.

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43203

  • Nervie and Muscle Center of Texas

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Texas at Houston Medical School

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • University of California Irvine Medical Center

    Orange, California, 92868

  • ACME Research Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center

    Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118

  • University of Pennsylvania - Perelman School of Medicine

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Research PLLC

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • Integral Rheumatology And Immunology Specialists

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081

  • HonorHealth Neurology

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251

  • University of South Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

    Torrance, California, 90502

Other trials in United States

Japan9 sites
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center

    Fukuoka, 810 8563

  • Fukushima Medical University Hospital

    Fukushima, 960 1295

  • St Marianna University Hospital

    Kanagawa, 216 8511

  • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center

    Kawachi-Nagano, 586 8521

  • Tokushukai Chiba-Nishi General Hospital

    Matsudo-shi, 270-2251

  • Shinshu University Hospital

    Matsumoto, 390-8621

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Sendai, 980 8574

  • St. Luke's International Hospital

    Tokyo, 104 8560

  • Nippon Medical School Hospital

    Tokyo, 113 8603

Other trials in Japan

Italy4 sites
  • A.O. Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona

    Ancona, 60126

  • IRCSS Ospedale San Raffaele Turro

    Milan, 20127

  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

    Pavia, 27100

  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

Mexico4 sites
  • Centro Integral en Reumatologia S A de C V

    Guadalajara, 44160

  • Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Basica y Clinica, S.C.

    Guadalajara, 44690

  • CITER Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento de las Enfermedades Reumaticas S A de C V

    México, 06700

  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran

    Mexico City, 14080

Other trials in Mexico

France3 sites
  • Hospital Pasteur

    Nice, 06000

  • Hopital Pitie Salpetriere

    Paris, 75013

  • Nouvel Hopital Civil

    Strasbourg, 67091

Other trials in France

Germany3 sites
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen

    München, 80336

  • Immanuel Klinik Rudersdorf

    Rüdersdorf Bei Berlin, 15562

Other trials in Germany

Spain3 sites
  • Hosp. Univ. de Bellvitge

    Barcelona, 08907

  • Hosp. Univ. de La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hosp. Univ. Marques de Valdecilla

    Santander, 39008

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Western General Hospital

    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU

  • University College London Hospitals NHSFT

    London, WC1N 3BG

  • Salford Royal Hospital

    Salford, M6 8HD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Canada2 sites
  • Lawson Health Research / London Health Sciences Center Research

    London, Ontario, N6C 2R5

  • AMIR Research

    Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3T2

Other trials in Canada

Hungary2 sites
  • Orszagos Mozgasszervi Intezet ORFI Campus

    Budapest, 1023

  • Debreceni Egyetem

    Debrecen, 4032

Other trials in Hungary

Poland2 sites
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy

    Bydgoszcz, 85 168

  • Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji im prof dr hab med Eleonory Reicher

    Warsaw, 02 637

Other trials in Poland

South Korea2 sites
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Ajou University Hospital

    Suwon, 16499

Other trials in South Korea

Czechia1 site
  • Revmatologicky ustav

    Prague, 128 50

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with active idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

Conditions
Myositis
Being tested
Nipocalimab, Placebo, Glucocorticoids
Medical subject headings
Myositis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NipocalimabDrug

    Also called JNJ-80202135, JNJ-86507083

    Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously in double-blind period and LTE period.

  • PlaceboOther

    Nipocalimab matching placebo will be administered intravenously in double-blind period.

  • GlucocorticoidsDrug

    Prednisone or equivalent will be administered orally as Glucocorticoid.

Study groups in NCT05379634
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NipocalimabExperimentalParticipants will receive Nipocalimab at Week 0 (Baseline) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to Week 50 during double-blind period. Participants on glucocorticoids (GC) at baseline will receive a stable dose of oral GC (prednisone or equivalent) from 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention to Week 0. No changes in GC doses are allowed between Week 0 and Week 24. From Week 24 to Week 44, GC doses will be tapered. No changes to GC doses will be allowed from Week 44 to Week 52. Eligible participants will enter long-term extension (LTE) period and continue receiving Nipocalimab starting from Week 52 up to Week 98 and will be followed up to Week 106.
Receives: Drug: Nipocalimab; Drug: Glucocorticoids
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive Nipocalimab matching placebo at Week 0 (Baseline) and then Q2W up to Week 50 during double-blind period. Participants on GC at baseline will receive a stable dose of oral GC (prednisone or equivalent) from 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention to Week 0. No changes in GC doses are allowed between Week 0 and Week 24. From Week 24 to Week 44, GC doses will be tapered. No changes to GC doses will be allowed from Week 44 to Week 52. Eligible participants will enter LTE period and will receive Nipocalimab treatment Q2W starting from Week 52 up to Week 98 and will be followed up to Week 106.
Receives: Other: Placebo; Drug: Glucocorticoids

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 20) in IMACS TIS and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS at Week 52 and on <=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (>=) 20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: physicians' global activity, patient global activity (PtGA), manual muscle testing (MMT)-8, muscle enzymes, myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT), and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI). The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Week 52

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24

  2. IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Week 52

  3. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 at Week 52

    Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 52 will be reported. Manual muscle testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  5. IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Week 24

  6. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Week 52

  7. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Major Improvement (>=60) in IMACS TIS

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Major improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=60 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: At Weeks 24 and 52

  8. Change From Baseline in MMT-8 at Week 24

    Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 will be reported. Manual Muscle Testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Weeks 24 and Week 52

    Change from baseline in PhGA at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. Physician Global Activity is a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  10. Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Global Assessment (Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool [MDAAT]) at Weeks 24 and 52

    Change from baseline in MDAAT score at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. This is a validated tool which measures the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle. MDAAT is scored on a 10 centimeter (cm) scale ranging from 0-10 cm where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity. Higher score indicates more disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  11. Change From Baseline in Serum Muscle Enzymes Levels at Weeks 24 and 52

    Change from baseline in serum muscle enzymes levels (creatine kinase [CK], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], and aldolase) at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  12. Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral Glucocorticoids (GC) Reduction to 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent), Among Participants on Oral GC Greater Than (>) 5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.

    Measured: From Week 44 through Week 52

  13. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on <=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: From Week 44 through Week 52

  14. Percentage of Participants on <=5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants on <=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported.

    Measured: From Week 44 through Week 52

  15. Percentage of Participants who Achieve At Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to 5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >5 mg/day at baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: From Week 44 through Week 52

  16. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: From Week 44 through Week 52

  17. Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >7.5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.

    Measured: At Week 44 through Week 52

  18. Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline

    Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC >7.5 mg/day at Baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS >=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: From Week 44 through Week 52

  19. IMACS TIS Over Time

    IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: Up to 106 weeks

  20. Change From Baseline in the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) Scale Score at Weeks 24 and 52

    The CDASI scale is a validated dermatomyositis (DM) specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  21. Change in CDASI Scale Score Over Time

    The CDASI scale is a validated DM specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.

    Measured: Up to 106 Weeks

  22. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

    Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.

    Measured: Up to 106 weeks

  23. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product; is medically important.

    Measured: Up to 106 weeks

  24. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)- Physical Function (PF)-20

    PROMIS-PF-20 is a participant self-administered 20-item questionnaire assessing the physical function domain. It includes 14 items regarding patients' ability to conduct specific functional activities and 6 items regarding the extent to which their health limits their ability to perform a range of physical activities currently. The 5-point response options for the former items range from 1 "Unable to do" to 5 "Without any difficulty" and the latter items range from 1 "Cannot do" to 5 "Not at all" with higher scores indicating better functioning. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher score indicates better physical function.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 52

  25. Change From Baseline in Functional Disability Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    HAQ-DI score assess functional status of participant. It is 20 question instrument that assess degree of functional disability a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and common activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0=indicating no difficulty, to 3=indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Total HAQ score is average of the computed categories scores ranging from 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  26. Serum Nipocalimab Concentration Over Time

    Serum nipocalimab concentration over time will be reported. Serum nipocalimab concentration will be derived using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling.

    Measured: Baseline Up to Week 98

  27. Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay Method

    Number of participants with ADA to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.

    Measured: Baseline Up to Week 106

  28. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (Nabs) to Nipocalimab Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay Method

    Number of participants with Nabs to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.

    Measured: Baseline Up to Week 106

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2022
  2. Study start5 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion4 Sep 2025
  4. Study completion17 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05379634
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR109210
Other IDs
80202135IIM2001, 2023-505314-20-00, 2023
Acronym
SPIREA
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
17 May 2022
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at www.innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu
Expanded access
Available

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Nipocalimab and Glucocorticoids in people with Myositis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 57 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 57 sites in United States, Japan, Italy, Mexico, France and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 20) in IMACS TIS and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52 (time frame: At Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in