AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteopeniaNCT05381168

Calcium From Fish Bone in Volunteers With Osteopenia

A study testing Calcium from fish bone and Calcium carbonate in people with Osteopenia, run by Chulalongkorn University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of this study are to explore efficacy and safety of calcium from fish bone in volunteers with osteopenia. The volunteers are divided into 2 groups which are calcium from fish bone treatment group and calcium carbonate treatment group. Both groups received the calciums everyday for 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Osteopenia
What is being tested?
Calcium from fish bone and Calcium carbonate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
20 May 2022to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male age more than 70 years or female age more than 65 years or all age volunteers that have at least 1 risk factors which are menopause before 45 years, menopause with the height reduction (more than 4 cm), body mass index less than 20 kg/mm2, bone fracture history, taking some medicine that has an effect on bone density reduction, have disease that has an effect on bone density reduction, Father and mother have bone fracture history, fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in intermediate risk, osteoporosis self-assessment tool for asian (OSTA) score, khon kaen osteoporosis study (KKOS) score in intermediate risk or higher intermediate risk
  • Bone mineral density between -1 to -2.5
  • No osteosclerosis
  • Can read and write
  • Willing to be volunteer

Who cannot join

  • Allergic to calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, collagen, and osteocalcin
  • Taking calcium or vitamin D with in 14 days before the study start
  • Taking osteosclerosis' medicine
  • Have uncontrolled diseases
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Participating in other study

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Calcium From Fish Bone in Volunteers With Osteopenia

The aims of this study are to explore efficacy and safety of calcium from fish bone in volunteers with osteopenia. The volunteers are divided into 2 groups which are calcium from fish bone treatment group and calcium carbonate treatment group. Both groups received the calciums everyday for 6 months. Bone mineral density, blood examination, physical examination, adverse events, and satisfaction are evaluated before and after treatment.

Read the detailed description

The aims of this study are to explore efficacy and safety of calcium from fish bone in volunteers with osteopenia. The volunteers are divided into 2 groups which are calcium from fish bone treatment group and calcium carbonate treatment group. Both groups received the calciums everyday for 6 months. Bone mineral density is analyzed before and after treatment. Osteocalcin, total procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), beta-crosslaps, parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, phosphate level, vitamin D level (Serum 25(OH)D), albumin, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and complete blood count (CBC) are assessed before and after taking for 3 and 6 months. Physical performance and food diary are also tested and records. Moreover, adverse effects including skin allergy, gastrointestinal abnormality, respiratory abnormality are evaluated. Satisfaction is asked after treatment.

Conditions
Osteopenia
Being tested
Calcium from fish bone, Calcium carbonate
Keywords
osteopenia, calcium, fish bone, efficacy, safety
Medical subject headings
Bone Diseases, Metabolic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Calcium from fish boneDietary supplement

    Calcium from fish bone contained calcium 312 mg and vitamin D 100 IU per capsule.

  • Calcium carbonateDietary supplement

    Calcium carbonate contained calcium 600 mg and vitamin D 200 IU per capsule.

Study groups in NCT05381168
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Calcium from fish boneExperimentalThe volunteer will receive calcium from fish bone 4 capsules per day for 6 months.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Calcium from fish bone
Calcium carbonateActive comparatorThe volunteer will receive calcium carbonate 2 tablets per day for 6 months.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Calcium carbonate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bone mineral density score

    Bone mineral density score is measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner (DEXA scanner). It shows in term of T-score. The outcomes are compared bone mineral density score of calcium from fish bone group to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Osteocalcin level

    Changing of osteocalcin level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Total procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) level

    Changing of P1NP level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Beta-crosslaps level

    Changing of beta-crosslaps level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) level

    Changing of PTH level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Blood calcium level

    Changing of blood calcium level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Blood phosphate level

    Changing of blood phosphate level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Vitamin D level

    Changing of vitamin D level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Liver function level

    Changing of liver function level (aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)) of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Creatinine level

    Changing of creatinine (Cr) level of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Blood urea nitrogen level

    Changing of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Pain score

    Changing of pain score using visual analogue scale (0 painless to 10 very pain) of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Short physical performance battery score

    Changing of short physical performance battery score (0 weak to 12 very strong)of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  13. Grip strength

    Changing of grip strength (kilogram) of calcium from fish bone group compared to calcium carbonate group.

    Measured: 6 months

  14. Skin allergic reactions

    The outcome measurements of skin allergic reactions are appearance (have or no have) of rash, edema, bullae, pain, and itching.

    Measured: 6 months

  15. Respiratory tract abnormality

    The outcome measurements of respiratory tract abnormality are appearance (have or no have) of shortness of breath and asthma.

    Measured: 6 months

  16. Gastrointestinal tract abnormality

    The outcome measurements of gastrointestinal tract abnormality are appearance (have or no have) of nausea, vomiting, flatulence, constipation, and diarrhea.

    Measured: 6 months

  17. Satisfaction level

    Satisfaction score (0 unsatisfied to 10 very satisfied)

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2022
  2. Study start20 May 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The volunteers are divided into 2 groups which are calcium from fish bone treatment group and calcium carbonate treatment group. Both groups receive the calciums every day for 6 months.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
48 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05381168
Sponsor's protocol ID
176/64
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
5 May 2022
Last updated
19 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Calcium from fish bone and Calcium carbonate in people with Osteopenia, run by Chulalongkorn University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bone mineral density score (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in