AzTrials
AzTrials

Wet Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 2DAVIO2NCT05381948

Study of EYP-1901 in Subjects With Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration (wAMD)

A Phase 2 study testing EYP-1901 and Aflibercept 2mg/0.05mL Inj,Oph in people with Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 67 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase 2 randomized, double -masked study comparing the efficacy of EYP-1901 at 2 dose levels: 2060 microgram (mcg) and 3090 mcg against aflibercept. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
EYP-1901 and Aflibercept 2mg/0.05mL Inj,Oph
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
161 participants
Where
67 sitesUnited States
Study dates
30 Jun 2022to 24 Apr 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Documented diagnosis of wAMD in the study eye, with disease onset any time prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Documented anatomical response (that is, reduction in fluid on [spectral-domain - optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)] to previous intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in the study eye prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Previously treated with at least 2 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (that is, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept or faricimab) for wAMD per standard of care in the study eye within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Received previous anti-VEGF therapy 2 to 5 weeks (14 to 35 days) in the study eye prior to Screening Visit, but no more than 42 days prior to randomization to study treatment on Day 1.
  • Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 35 letters (20/200 Snellen equivalent) to 85 letters (20/20 Snellen equivalent) in the study eye at the Screening Visit and on Day 1.
  • Able to understand, and willingness to sign, the informed consent and to provide access to personal health information via Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with all scheduled visits, restrictions, and assessments.
  • For women of childbearing potential, or men with female partners of childbearing potential, agreement to the use of an appropriate form of contraception at the Screening Visit and for the duration of the study.

Who cannot join

  • History of pars plana vitrectomy surgery, submacular surgery, or other surgical intervention for AMD in the study eye.
  • Prior treatment with Visudyne® (verteporfin), external beam radiation therapy, or transpupillary thermotherapy in the study eye.
  • Previous treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid injection or device implantation in the study eye.
  • Previous focal laser photocoagulation used for AMD treatment in the study eye.
  • Total choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion size >12 disc areas [30.5 millimeter square (mm^2)] as assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA) in the study eye at the Screening Visit.
  • Central subfield thickness (CST) >350 micrometer (mcm) in the study eye at the Screening Visit or Day 1.
Show all 50Show fewer
  • Intraretinal cystic fluid >25 mcm in diameter involving the central subfield and/or disruption of normal morphology (loss of foveal depression, disruption of external limiting membrane) secondary to cystic intraretinal fluid within the central subfield, in the study eye at the Screening Visit. Diffuse (non-cystic) intraretinal fluid would not be excluded.
  • Subretinal hemorrhage in the subfoveal/juxtafoveal location and hemorrhage greater than 1 disc are (1.8 mm^2) if located less than 200 mcm from the foveal center in the study eye at either the Screening Visit or Day 1.
  • Subfoveal fibrosis, atrophy, or scarring in the center subfield in the study eye at the Screening Visit.
  • Fibrosis >50% of the total lesion, in the study eye at the Screening Visit.
  • Retinal pigment epithelium detachment (RPED) thickness >400 mcm at any point within 3 mm of the foveal center in the study eye at either the Screening Visit or Day 1.
  • Retinal pigment epithelial tear in the study eye at the Screening Visit or Day 1.
  • Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g., cataract or glaucoma) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have either required surgical intervention during the study to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition or affected interpretation of the study results.
  • Historical or active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye, other than expected findings from routine cataract surgery.
  • History of vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye within 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or treatment for retinal detachment or macular hole (stage 3 or 4) in the study eye.
  • Aphakia or pseudophakia with the absence of the posterior capsule in the study eye (YAG capsulotomy is permitted).
  • Spherical equivalent of the refractive error in the study eye demonstrating >8 diopters of myopia.
  • For subjects who have undergone prior refractive or cataract surgery in the study eye, preoperative refractive error in the study eye exceeding 8 diopters of myopia.
  • Intraocular surgery (including cataract surgery) in the study eye within 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Uncontrolled ocular hypertension or glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >25 mm of mercury (mmHg) or a cup to disc ratio >=0.8, despite treatment with 2 or more classes of antiglaucoma medication) and any such condition which the Investigator feels may require a glaucoma-filtering surgery while in the study.
  • History of glaucoma-filtering surgery, tube shunts, or microinvasive glaucoma surgery in the study eye.
  • History of corneal transplant in the study eye.
  • BCVA using ETDRS charts <30 letters (20/250 Snellen equivalent) in the fellow eye.
  • Worsening of BCVA ≥10 ETDRS letters in the study eye from the Screening Visit to Day 1.
  • Presence of CNV in either eye due to other causes aside from wAMD at the Screening Visit.
  • Treatment with Visudyne® in the fellow eye <7 days prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Prior participation in a clinical trial involving investigational anti-angiogenic drugs administered in either eye or systemically within 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Prior participation in a clinical trial involving investigational ocular gene therapy trial for either eye.
  • History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye.
  • Active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye.
  • Presence of any other systemic or ocular condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, could make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure (defined as systolic >180 mmHg and/or diastolic >100 mmHg), based on the average of three readings taken with the subject in a resting state.
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to screening or New York Hospital Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, uncontrolled angina, cardiomyopathy, ventricular arrhythmias or other cardiac conditions which, in the judgment of the investigator, could make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture.
  • Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) greater than 7% at the Screening Visit.
  • History of other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of EYP-1901.
  • Current treatment for any active systemic infection.
  • Previous use of any systemic anti-VEGF agents or intraocular brolucizumab in the study eye.
  • Use of oral corticosteroids (prednisone >10 mg/day or equivalent) within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
  • History or presence of bleeding disorders, including platelet disorders, hemorrhage, acquired or hereditary coagulation disorders (including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolisms), acquired or hereditary vascular disorders, stroke, or transient ischemic attack.
  • Excluding certain skin cancers (specifically, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma), any malignancy receiving treatment, or in remission less than 5 years prior to study entry.
  • History of allergy to fluorescein, not amenable to treatment.
  • Inability to obtain fundus photographs, FA, fundus autofluorescence, or SD-OCT images of sufficient quality to be analyzed and graded by the Central Reading Center.
  • Historical or active diagnosis of any medical or psychological condition that could interfere with the ability of the subject to give informed consent, or to comply with study or follow-up procedures.
  • Previous participation in any ocular or non-ocular (systemic) disease studies of investigational drugs within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit (excluding vitamins and minerals).
  • Use of anti-mitotic or anti-metabolite therapy within 30 days or 5 elimination half-lives of the Screening Visit, whichever is longer.
  • Intolerance, contraindication, or hypersensitivity to topical anesthetics, dyes, povidone iodine, mydriatic medications, or any of the ingredients of the EYP-1901 insert.
  • Requirement for continuous use of any protocol-prohibited medications or treatments.
  • Pregnant or nursing females; females of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of contraception during the study as outlined in this protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

67 sites in 1 country.

67 sites in 1 country

United States67 sites
  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    ‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Abilene, Texas, 79606

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Asheville, North Carolina, 28803

  • EyePoint Investigative Sites

    Austin, Texas, 78750

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21209

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Campbell, California, 95008

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Carmel, Indiana, 46290

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29414

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60616

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33761

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Coral Springs, Florida, 33067

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Encino, California, 91436

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Eugene, Oregon, 97401

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Fairfax, Virginia, 22031

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Glendale, California, 91203

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49446

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Hauppauge, New York, 11788

  • EyePoint Investigative Sites

    Houston, Texas, 77025

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Huntington Beach, California, 92647

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Irvine, California, 92697

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Lakeland, Florida, 33805

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Lakewood, Colorado, 80228

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Lemont, Illinois, 60439

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Liverpool, New York, 13088

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    McAllen, Texas, 78503

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Melbourne, Florida, 32901

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Miami, Florida, 33143

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Owings Mills, Maryland, 21117

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Pasadena, California, 91107

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Pensacola, Florida, 32503

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85053

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Plano, Texas, 75075

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Poway, California, 92064

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Redlands, California, 92373

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Reno, Nevada, 89502

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Sacramento, California, 95825

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Saint Louis, Michigan, 55416

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78240

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Shirley, New York, 11967

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Silverdale, Washington, 98383

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Springdale, Arkansas, 72762

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Springfield, Oregon, 97488

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63128

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33711

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33609

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    The Woodlands, Texas, 77384

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Wake Forest, North Carolina, 27587

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Warrenton, Virginia, 20186

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266

  • EyePoint Investigative Site

    Winter Haven, Florida, 33880

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Study of EYP-1901, a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), Compared to Aflibercept in Subjects With Wet AMD

This is a phase 2 randomized, double -masked study comparing the efficacy of EYP-1901 at 2 dose levels: 2060 microgram (mcg) and 3090 mcg against aflibercept.

Read the detailed description

This study is evaluating the 2 doses of EYP-1901 against aflibercept in a randomized study.

Being tested
EYP-1901, Aflibercept 2mg/0.05mL Inj,Oph
Keywords
wAMD, EYP-1901, EyePoint

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EYP-1901Drug

    Intravitreal Injection

  • Aflibercept 2mg/0.05mL Inj,OphDrug

    Also called Eylea

    Intravitreal Injection

Study groups in NCT05381948
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EYP-1901 2060 mcgExperimentalEYP-1901 2060 mcg, single dose
Receives: Drug: EYP-1901
EYP-1901 3090 mcgExperimentalEYP-1901 3090 mcg, single dose
Receives: Drug: EYP-1901
AfliberceptActive comparatorAflibercept 2 milligram (mg) [0.05 milliliter (mL)] every 8 weeks
Receives: Drug: Aflibercept 2mg/0.05mL Inj,Oph

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline Averaged Over Weeks 28 and 32

    The BCVA was measured according to the standard procedure originally developed for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The ETDRS letter score calculated when 20 or more letters were read correctly at 4.0 meters; the visual acuity letter score was equal to the total number of letters read correctly at 4.0 meters plus 30. The score ranges from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate positive outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 28 and 32

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity up to Week 56

    The BCVA was measured according to the standard procedure originally developed for ETDRS. The ETDRS letter score calculated when 20 or more letters were read correctly at 4.0 meters; the visual acuity letter score was equal to the total number of letters read correctly at 4.0 meters plus 30. The score ranges from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate positive outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 32 and 56

  2. Percentage of Subjects With >=5, >=10, and >=15 BCVA Letter Change From Baseline up to Week 56

    The BCVA was measured according to the standard procedure originally developed for ETDRS. The ETDRS letter score calculated when 20 or more letters were read correctly at 4.0 meters; the visual acuity letter score was equal to the total number of letters read correctly at 4.0 meters plus 30. The score ranges from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate positive outcome measure. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 32 and 56

  3. Percentage of Subjects Not Receiving Supplemental Injection of Aflibercept up to Week 56

    Supplemental therapy was any unscheduled injection of aflibercept, whether or not a subject had met rescue criteria. For the aflibercept arm, any aflibercept injection following Week 8 which did not occur at Weeks 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, or 56, was supplemental therapy. For either of the EYP-1901 arms, any aflibercept injection following the Week 8 visit was supplemental therapy.

    Measured: Weeks 32 and 56

  4. Median Time to First Supplemental Aflibercept Injection in the Study Eye Following the EYP-1901 Dose at Week 8

    Time to first supplemental aflibercept injection following Week 8 study treatment was defined as the date of the first supplemental aflibercept injection minus the date of the Week 8 study treatment administration, divided by 7 days per week. Subjects who did not receive any supplemental aflibercept injection following study treatment administration at Week 8 were censored at their date of last visit (those who completed) or date of last contact (those who discontinued the study early).

    Measured: From Week 8 to Week 56

  5. Number of Aflibercept Intravitreal Injections up to Week 56 (Including Loading Dose)

    Normalized number of aflibercept injections including loading dose was calculated as (number of aflibercept injections received plus all loading doses received) / (time within study period in months), multiplied by 6 months (Week 32) or 12 months (Week 56).

    Measured: Weeks 32 and 56

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) by Spectral-Domain - Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) up to Week 56

    The SD-OCT assessments in study eye was taken by a study-certified OCT technician according to the standardized procedures described in the Study Manual. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 32 and 56

  7. Change From Baseline in Height of Subretinal Fluid by Spectral-Domain - Optical Coherence Tomography up to Week 56

    The SD-OCT assessments in study eye was taken by a study-certified OCT technician according to the standardized procedures described in the Study Manual. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 32 and 56

  8. Percentage of Subjects With No Detectable Intraretinal Fluid/Cysts in the Central Subfield up to Week 56

    The percentage of subjects with no detectable intraretinal fluid/cysts in the central subfield were summarized by scheduled visit and for any time post-baseline visits. Intraretinal fluid was assessed for the categories 'Absent', 'Present, not clinically significant', 'Present, clinically significant' and 'Not Done'. If intraretinal fluid assessment at any scheduled visit fell under the category 'Absent or Present, not clinically significant', then it was considered as no detectable intraretinal fluid in that scheduled visit.

    Measured: Weeks 32 and 56

  9. Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Area by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) up to Week 56

    The total lesion area was defined as the active vascular component [classic and occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV)] and the non-vascular/fibrotic component (fibrosis, serous pigment epithelial detachment, elevated blocking hemorrhage or hyperplastic pigment). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 32 and 56

  10. Change From Baseline in Total Choroidal Neovascularization Area by Fluorescein Angiography up to Week 56

    The total CNV area included the measured area of classic and occult components. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement before the initiation of study treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 32 and 56

  11. Systemic Exposure to EYP-1901 Measured Through Plasma Levels up to Week 56

    Blood samples were collected at the study visits to determine the EYP-1901 and its main metabolite concentrations.

    Measured: Up to Week 56

  12. Ocular Exposure to EYP-1901 Measured Through Aqueous Humor (AH) Levels up to Week 32

    The AH samples were collected at the study visits to determine the EYP-1901 and its main metabolite concentrations.

    Measured: Up to Week 32

  13. Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events up to Week 56

    An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered an investigational or marketed (medicinal) product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product. An serious AE is any AE that results in one of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; requires in-patient hospitalization; results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical event. The TEAEs are AEs that occur after the first dose of study treatment.

    administration.

    Measured: From the study drug administration (Day 1) up to end of the study, approximately 56 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2022
  2. Study start30 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion29 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion24 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
161 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05381948
Sponsor's protocol ID
EYP-1901-201
Acronym
DAVIO2
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
9 May 2022
Last updated
15 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing EYP-1901 and Aflibercept 2mg/0.05mL Inj,Oph in people with Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 67 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 50 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 67 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline Averaged Over Weeks 28 and 32 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 28 and 32). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in