AzTrials
AzTrials

ContraceptionNCT05383924

Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion During Cesarean Section (CS) Versus Delayed Insertion

A study testing postplacental IUD insertion and delayed IUD insertion in people with Contraception and IUD, run by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

After ethical committee approval and written consent from the patients, this prospective quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on pregnant women planning to deliver by cesarean section and willing to participate in the study to investigate the value of immediate post placental IUD insertion versus… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Contraception, IUD
What is being tested?
postplacental IUD insertion and delayed IUD insertion
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 May 2021to 5 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant women planned for delivery by cesarean section in Ain Shams University Maternity hospital

Who cannot join

  • Women not consenting to use IUD as a contraceptive method and preferring other methods.
  • Any woman with condition included in Category 3 or 4 for Cu-IUD in medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use World Health Organization (WHO) 2015
  • Neuropsychiatric disorder causing altered mentality or perception
  • Intrapartum complications as chorioamnionitis, massive blood loss, or hysterectomy.
  • Anemic patients (hemoglobin level <10g/dl).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Patient's Compliance to Intrauterine Device: Immediate Postplacental Insertion Versus Delayed Insertion in Women Undergoing Planned Cesarean Section

After ethical committee approval and written consent from the patients, this prospective quasi-randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on pregnant women planning to deliver by cesarean section and willing to participate in the study to investigate the value of immediate post placental IUD insertion versus delayed insertion on patient's compliance in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital (ASUMH).

Read the detailed description
  • After protocol approval by the ethical committee of the department of Obstetrics \& Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University; pregnant woman planning to undergo elective cesarean section in ASUMH were recruited from the antenatal clinic.
  • Counselling was done about different postpartum contraceptive methods including immediate PPIUD and delayed IUD insertion.
  • An informed written consent was taken from all participants before enrollment in the study and after explaining the purpose, possible risks and complications.
  • History taking, examination, and investigations (CBC, follow-up Ultrasound) were done to identify eligible patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • Randomization: Eligible patients were quasi-randomized into 2 groups:

Group (A) (PPIUD group): immediate postplacental IUD insertion. Group (B) (delayed insertion group): delayed IUD insertion at the 6th week postpartum visit.

Randomization was done through "Alternation" method.

  • Allocation: the first patient (no.1) was allocated to group (A) and second patient (no.2) to group (B) and so on by ''Alternation method '' till fulfilling the sample size.

Procedure:

Type of IUD: Model T-shaped Copper 380 A: Safe-load® or Pregna®

  • Group A (PPIUD group): cesarean section (CS) was performed by experts in post-placental IUD insertion as follows: The IUD was inserted after removal of the placenta and after the uterus had become hemostatic. After initiating closure of the uterine incision, the IUD was placed at the top of uterine fundus manually. Before closing the uterine incision, the strings were placed gently in the lower uterine segment manually. After this was accomplished, the uterine incision closure could be completed. The strings usually descended spontaneously through the cervix during the puerperal period. If the cervix was closed, it would be dilated from above with ring forceps. Strings can be passed through the cervix with ring forceps. If this was done, the surgeon would recheck to make sure IUD remains at the fundus of the uterus prior to closing the uterine incision. Strings can be trimmed at a follow-up visit. Ultrasound was done after the CS to ensure proper placement of the IUD.
  • Group B (control group) (delayed insertion group): cesarean section was done by expert supervisors, then contacts were taken to arrange for delayed IUD Insertion at the 6th week postpartum visit as follows: IUD was prepared prior to starting procedure. Vaginal speculum was placed then prepared vaginal wall with betadine. Tenaculum was applied at anterior cervical position then uterine sounding was performed. IUD was placed according to package insert, then the threads were cut 2-3 cm from cervical os. Ultrasound was done to ensure proper placement of the IUD.
  • Follow-up: follow-up visits were conducted at 6, 12months post-insertion (questionnaire, ultrasound, hemoglobin level).
Conditions
Contraception, IUD
Being tested
postplacental IUD insertion, delayed IUD insertion
Keywords
IUD, immediate postplacental IUD, interval IUD insertion, compliance, expulsion
Medical subject headings
Patient Compliance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • postplacental IUD insertionProcedure or surgery

    Also called immediate postplacental IUD insertion

    patients will have immediate postplacental IUD insertion as follows: The IUD is inserted after removal of the placenta and after the uterus has become hemostatic. After initiating closure of the uterine incision, the IUD is placed at the top of uterine fundus manually. Before closing the uterine incision, the strings are placed gently in the lower uterine segment manually. After this is accomplished, the uterine incision closure can be completed. The strings will usually descend spontaneously through the cervix during the puerperal period. If the cervix is closed, it'll be dilated from above with ring forceps. Strings can be passed through the cervix with ring forceps. If this is done, the surgeon will recheck to make sure IUD remains at the fundus of the uterus prior to closing the uterine incision. Strings can be trimmed at a follow-up visit.

    Ultrasound will be done after the CS to ensure proper placement of the IUD.

  • delayed IUD insertionProcedure or surgery

    Also called interval IUD insertion

    cesarean section will be done, then contacts will be taken to arrange for delayed IUD insertion at the 6th week postpartum visit as follows: Prepare IUD prior to starting procedure Place vaginal speculum then prepare vaginal wall with betadine Apply tenaculum at anterior cervical position then insert and remove uterine sound Place IUD according to package insert then cut threads 2-3 cm from cervical os. Ultrasound will be done to ensure proper placement of the IUD.

Study groups in NCT05383924
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
postplacental IUD (PP-IUD) insertionActive comparatorpatients will have immediate postplacental IUD insertion
Receives: Procedure: postplacental IUD insertion
delayed IUD insertionActive comparatorcesarean section will be done, then contacts will be taken to arrange for delayed IUD insertion at the 6th week postpartum visit
Receives: Procedure: delayed IUD insertion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient compliance

    compliance to IUD will be assessed by a user satisfaction questionnaire with scoring system: Q1, on a scale from 0 to 10, Are You satisfied of using Cu-IUD as a contraceptive method? (When 0 means "Not at all satisfied" and 10 means "Extremely Satisfied") 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Q2, Will you continue to use Cu-IUD in future or reuse it after discontinuation? 1 = Yes 0 = No Q3, Do you recommend Cu-IUD for others to use it as a contraceptive method?

    1 = Yes 0 = No

    Measured: at 6 months after the procedure

  2. Patient compliance

    compliance to IUD will be assessed by a user satisfaction questionnaire with scoring system: Q1, on a scale from 0 to 10, Are You satisfied of using Cu-IUD as a contraceptive method? (When 0 means "Not at all satisfied" and 10 means "Extremely Satisfied") 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Q2, Will you continue to use Cu-IUD in future or reuse it after discontinuation? 1 = Yes 0 = No Q3, Do you recommend Cu-IUD for others to use it as a contraceptive method?

    1 = Yes 0 = No

    Measured: at 12 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Abnormal Bleeding pattern

    heavy menstrual bleeding or other abnormal uterine bleeding as reported by history taking

    Measured: at 12 months after the procedure

  2. dyspareunia

    pain during intercourse, as reported by history taking

    Measured: at 12months after the procedure

  3. Efficiency

    successful insertion and proper position of the IUD, as confirmed by ultrasound imaging

    Measured: at 6 months after the procedure

  4. Efficiency

    proper position of the IUD, as confirmed by ultrasound imaging

    Measured: at 12 months after the procedure

  5. Anemia

    hemoglobin drop by follow-up of hemoglobin level after the procedure

    Measured: at 12months after the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2022
  2. Study start1 May 2021
  3. Primary completion1 May 2022
  4. Study completion5 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study aims to compare immediate postplacental IUD insertion versus delayed insertion as regards patient's compliance in women undergoing planned cesarean section. One group will have the IUD inserted during cesarean section. Another group will undergo IUD insertion after 6 weeks of delivery by CS.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05383924
Sponsor's protocol ID
FMASU MS720/2021
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
14 May 2022
Last updated
23 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: upon reasonable request to the principal investigator, individual participant data can be shared

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing postplacental IUD insertion and delayed IUD insertion in people with Contraception and IUD, run by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient compliance (time frame: at 6 months after the procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in