Heel Fat Pad SyndromeSTEPNCT05385796
STEP Trial for Heel Fat Pad Syndrome
A study testing Loop taping in people with Heel Fat Pad Syndrome, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The primary objectives of this study are to investigate the immediate and short-term effect of heel fat pad loop taping (experimental intervention) vs. control taping (control intervention) on pain and function in individuals with heel fat pad syndrome (HFPS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heel Fat Pad Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Loop taping
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 8 Jun 2022to 10 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women 18 to 79 years of age
- History of plantar heel pain in either foot for at least one week and less than 3 years before enrollment
- Tenderness on palpation of the heel fat pad
- Self-reported worst unilateral or bilateral central heel pain of ≥ 3 on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the past week
- Pain ≥ 3 on NPRS during at least one of two pain-aggravating activities of 30-sec static single leg standing OR barefoot 20-meter walking assessed during the enrollment screening and before the tape application
Who cannot join
- Primary diagnoses of plantar heel pain (e.g., plantar fasciopathy, posterior tibialis tendinopathy, or tarsal tunnel syndrome) other than HFPS
- Ultrasound-measured plantar fascia thickness ≥ 4mm, combined with clinical presentations of plantar fasciopathy
- BMI ≥ 35
- Systemic inflammatory arthritis
- Diabetes
- Lumbar radiculopathy
Show all 9Show fewer
- Neurological conditions affecting gait and mobility
- Having received taping for HFPS within the last month
- Prior heel surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study of Taping for Heel Fat Pad Syndrome (STEP): A Randomized Controlled Crossover Single-blind Clinical Trial
The primary objectives of this study are to investigate the immediate and short-term effect of heel fat pad loop taping (experimental intervention) vs. control taping (control intervention) on pain and function in individuals with heel fat pad syndrome (HFPS). For mechanistic understanding of the effect of the loop taping, we will assess the immediate effect of taping on the pressure pain threshold and heel fat pad thickness.
Read the detailed description
The study objectives are to investigate the immediate and short-term effect of heel fat pad loop taping (experimental intervention) vs. control taping (control intervention) on pain and function in individuals with heel fat pad syndrome (HFPS). We hypothesize that the fat pad loop taping is superior to control taping in immediate and short-term pain reduction and short-term function and mobility improvement. To understand potential mechanisms underlying the benefits of the looping taping, we will assess the immediate effect of taping on the pressure pain threshold and heel fat pad thickness. We hypothesize that applying fat pad loop taping will increase the pressure pain threshold (i.e., diminished pain sensitivity) recorded by a mechanical pressure algometer and increase fat pad thickness quantified by ultrasound. Despite being the second leading cause of plantar heel pain, RCTs for conservative management do not exist. Findings of this proposed project will provide much-needed evidence on effective non-pharmacological managements of HFPS.
- Conditions
- Heel Fat Pad Syndrome
- Being tested
- Loop taping, Control taping
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Loop tapingOther
The participant lays prone on the treatment table with his/her feet dangling off the table. The physiotherapist cleans the heel with alcohol wipes. Care is taken to avoid erasing skin markings for respective algometer and ultrasound assessment by these wipes. The therapist applies 1-inch-width Elastikon tape around the heel, encircling and bunching the fat pad to centralize it and enhance its fullness and resilience to compression. The tape starts at the middle distal end of the fat pad and loop around the periphery and ends by crossing the starting point at the middle distal end of the fat pad. Two to three overlapping loops will be applied to ensure strong support during weight-bearing activities. Participants will be instructed to wear the loop taping for 3 days and remove the taping after responding to an online survey 3-days post intervention.
Control tapingOther
The participant lays prone on the treatment table with his/her feet dangling off the table. The physiotherapist cleans the heel with alcohol wipes. The therapist applies 1-inch-width Elastikon tape around the heel, lightly encircling the heel fat pad without any force/pressure or attempt to bunch or centralize the fat pad. The tape starts at the middle distal end of the fat pad and loop around the periphery and ends by crossing the starting point at the middle distal end of the fat pad. Two to three overlapping loops will be applied. Participants will be instructed to wear the control taping for 3 days and remove the taping after responding to an online survey 3-days post intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Loop taping | Experimental | Loop taping of the heel fat pad Receives: Other: Loop taping |
| Control taping | Placebo comparator | Control taping of the heel fat pad Receives: Other: Control taping |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the most pain-aggravating activity
The primary outcome is pain experienced during the most pain-aggravating activity (e.g., 30-sec static single leg standing or 20-meter barefoot walking) reported during the initial visit. Participants verbally select a value that corresponds with the intensity of pain that they experience. "0" means "no pain" and "10" means "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable". The NPRS, an 11-point (i.e., 0-10) measure of pain intensity, is recommended as a core outcome measure in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments and has excellent reliability and validity for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Measured: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change from pre-intervention to 3 days post-intervention in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the past 24 hours
Participants verbally select a value that corresponds with the average intensity of pain that they experience in the past 24 hours. Participants verbally select a value that corresponds with the intensity of pain that they experience. "0" means "no pain" and "10" means "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable". The NPRS, an 11-point (i.e., 0-10) measure of pain intensity, is recommended as a core outcome measure in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments and has excellent reliability and validity for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3 days post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention to 3 days post-intervention in Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ)
The FHSQ is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 13 items in 4 domains of foot pain (4 items), foot function (4 items), footwear (3 items), and general foot health (2 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from no (score =1) to severe (score = 5) pain, problems, or limitations. Responses to footwear questions are on a 5-point bipolar Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree regarding shoe fit, discomfort wearing shoes, and shoewear available. Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst foot health) to 100 (optimal foot health). Higher scores indicate better foot health and quality of life. A validated Danish version of FHSQ is available. Good FHSQ test/retest and interrater/intrarater reliability and validity have been established for patients with foot disorders.
Measured: pre-intervention, 3 days post-intervention
Global Rating of Change (GROC)
Another core outcome measure for chronic musculoskeletal pain is the GROC, a widely used single-item instrument that asks each participant to indicate whether and to what extent they perceive change has occurred pre vs. post-intervention. This global rating is unique because, unlike other self-reported outcomes, it allows each participant to decide what he/she considers most important and relevant change. In the proposed study, participants will be queried "With respect to your heel pain, how would you describe it after the intervention compared to before the intervention?" and quantify the perceived change on a 7-point visual analogue scale of -3 to +3, where "-3" indicates "much worse", "0" indicates "no change", and "+3" indicates "much improved". GROC has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool for musculoskeletal conditions.
Measured: 3 days post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Pain sensitivity by pressure pain thresholds
Pain sensitivity is quantified by measuring pressure pain thresholds (PPT) on the most painful spot on the heel fat pad, confirmed by palpation. Participants lay prone on the examination table, with the feet hanging freely over the edge of the table. The examiner places the 1-cm2 probe of a hand held mechanical pressure algometer perpendicular to the skin, and gradually increase the pressure at a rate of 30 kPa/s. Participants will report when the sensation changes from pressure, to the first onset of pain. This will be repeated three times, with a 30-second break between tests, and the average used for the analysis. The probe location will be marked on the skin to ensure placement consistency between pre- and post-intervention testing. The interrter and intrarater reliability of PPT assessment for patients with plantar heel pain was good at ICC 0.80-0.94 for intrarater and 0.75-0.92 for interrater.
Measured: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Heel fat pad thickness
An ultrasound unit with a 6-13 MHz transducer frequency will be used to measure the heel fat pad thickness. Participants lay prone on the examination table, with the feet hanging freely over the edge of the table. The plantar fat pad will be marked by a sagittal midline; the ultrasound transducer will be placed on the midline for a transverse scan to measure the largest distance between the calcaneus and the skin. The average of two sonographic measurements will be used for analysis. The intrarater and interrater sonographic assessment of heel fat pad thickness was excellent with the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.81 to 0.96.
Measured: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2022
- Study start8 Jun 2022
- Primary completion10 Dec 2023
- Study completion10 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heel Fat Pad SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Northwestern UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- This is a randomized, controlled, participant-blinded trial, with a 2-arm crossover design.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aalborg University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alison H Chang, Principal investigator, Northwestern University & Aalborg University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05385796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N-20210042
- Acronym
- STEP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 16 May 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chang AH, Skov KB, Sorensen T, Rathleff MS, Riel H, Lyng KD, Olesen JL, Christensen M. Loop Taping for Heel Fat Pad Syndrome: A Crossover Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2026 Dec;19(4):e70229. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70229.
PubMed 42891962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Taping for Heel Fat Pad Syndrome (STEP): A Randomized Controlled Crossover Single-blind Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05385796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STEP / N-20210042
- Conditions
- Heel Fat Pad Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northwestern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aalborg University
- Study start
- 8 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objectives of this study are to investigate the immediate and short-term effect of heel fat pad loop taping (experimental intervention) vs. control taping (control intervention) on pain and function in individuals with heel fat pad syndrome (HFPS). For mechanistic understanding of the effect of the loop taping, we will assess the immediate effect of taping on the pressure pain threshold and heel fat pad thickness.
Detailed description
The study objectives are to investigate the immediate and short-term effect of heel fat pad loop taping (experimental intervention) vs. control taping (control intervention) on pain and function in individuals with heel fat pad syndrome (HFPS). We hypothesize that the fat pad loop taping is superior to control taping in immediate and short-term pain reduction and short-term function and mobility improvement. To understand potential mechanisms underlying the benefits of the looping taping, we will assess the immediate effect of taping on the pressure pain threshold and heel fat pad thickness. We hypothesize that applying fat pad loop taping will increase the pressure pain threshold (i.e., diminished pain sensitivity) recorded by a mechanical pressure algometer and increase fat pad thickness quantified by ultrasound. Despite being the second leading cause of plantar heel pain, RCTs for conservative management do not exist. Findings of this proposed project will provide much-needed evidence on effective non-pharmacological managements of HFPS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a randomized, controlled, participant-blinded trial, with a 2-arm crossover design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Loop taping | Experimental | Other: Loop tapingLoop taping of the heel fat pad |
| Control taping | Placebo comparator | Other: Control tapingControl taping of the heel fat pad |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Men or women 18 to 79 years of age
- History of plantar heel pain in either foot for at least one week and less than 3 years before enrollment
- Tenderness on palpation of the heel fat pad
- Self-reported worst unilateral or bilateral central heel pain of ≥ 3 on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the past week
- Pain ≥ 3 on NPRS during at least one of two pain-aggravating activities of 30-sec static single leg standing OR barefoot 20-meter walking assessed during the enrollment screening and before the tape application
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Primary diagnoses of plantar heel pain (e.g., plantar fasciopathy, posterior tibialis tendinopathy, or tarsal tunnel syndrome) other than HFPS
- Ultrasound-measured plantar fascia thickness ≥ 4mm, combined with clinical presentations of plantar fasciopathy
- BMI ≥ 35
- Systemic inflammatory arthritis
- Diabetes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Loop tapingThe participant lays prone on the treatment table with his/her feet dangling off the table. The physiotherapist cleans the heel with alcohol wipes. Care is taken to avoid erasing skin markings for respective algometer and ultrasound assessment by these wipes. The therapist applies 1-inch-width Elastikon tape around the heel, encircling and bunching the fat pad to centralize it and enhance its fullness and resilience to compression. The tape starts at the middle distal end of the fat pad and loop around the periphery and ends by crossing the starting point at the middle distal end of the fat pad. Two to three overlapping loops will be applied to ensure strong support during weight-bearing activities. Participants will be instructed to wear the loop taping for 3 days and remove the taping after responding to an online survey 3-days post intervention. | Other | Loop taping |
| Control tapingThe participant lays prone on the treatment table with his/her feet dangling off the table. The physiotherapist cleans the heel with alcohol wipes. The therapist applies 1-inch-width Elastikon tape around the heel, lightly encircling the heel fat pad without any force/pressure or attempt to bunch or centralize the fat pad. The tape starts at the middle distal end of the fat pad and loop around the periphery and ends by crossing the starting point at the middle distal end of the fat pad. Two to three overlapping loops will be applied. Participants will be instructed to wear the control taping for 3 days and remove the taping after responding to an online survey 3-days post intervention. | Other | Control taping |
Primary outcome
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the most pain-aggravating activity
Time frame: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention
The primary outcome is pain experienced during the most pain-aggravating activity (e.g., 30-sec static single leg standing or 20-meter barefoot walking) reported during the initial visit. Participants verbally select a value that corresponds with the intensity of pain that they experience. "0" means "no pain" and "10" means "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable". The NPRS, an 11-point (i.e., 0-10) measure of pain intensity, is recommended as a core outcome measure in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments and has excellent reliability and validity for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
5 secondary outcomes
Change from pre-intervention to 3 days post-intervention in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the past 24 hours
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3 days post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention to 3 days post-intervention in Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ)
Time frame: pre-intervention, 3 days post-intervention
Global Rating of Change (GROC)
Time frame: 3 days post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Pain sensitivity by pressure pain thresholds
Time frame: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Heel fat pad thickness
Time frame: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42891962Chang AH, Skov KB, Sorensen T, Rathleff MS, Riel H, Lyng KD, Olesen JL, Christensen M. Loop Taping for Heel Fat Pad Syndrome: A Crossover Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2026 Dec;19(4):e70229. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70229.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alison H Chang principal investigator
Northwestern University & Aalborg University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Loop taping in people with Heel Fat Pad Syndrome, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the most pain-aggravating activity (time frame: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05385796, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.