Fall InjuryNCT05388227
Pole Walking Intervention in Retirement Communities
A study testing Pole walking in people with Fall Injury and Osteoporotic Fractures, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This patient-oriented, multi-site study aims to co-design and test a pole walking program with resident and staff representatives from participating independent living and retirement communities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fall Injury, Osteoporotic Fractures
- What is being tested?
- Pole walking
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 28 Jun 2022to 22 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being an ambulatory resident in the independent living/retirement communities.
- Pass the Get Active Questionnaire. If the participant has heart conditions, angina during daily living, balance, and bone or joint problems, then a Physician Clearance Form is required to be filled out and signed by the participant's family physician.
Who cannot join
- Using assistive devices for mobility.
- Being active (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ≥150 min/week).
- Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Saija Kontulainen, University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 1G9
About this study
Official title: Pole Walking Intervention Within Independent Living/Retirement Communities: Feasibility and Pilot
This patient-oriented, multi-site study aims to co-design and test a pole walking program with resident and staff representatives from participating independent living and retirement communities.
The first part of the study (feasibility phase) is a single-group trial designed to answer the main question: Is the pole walking program feasible in these settings? In this phase, all participants will take part in the program.
Read more
The second part of the study (pilot phase) is a two-group randomized trial that will assess whether the program helps improve physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, while also reducing sedentary time (time spent sitting or being inactive) in older adults living in independent living and retirement communities. Communities will be randomly assigned to either start the program right away or join a wait-list control group.
The program will include supervised group sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes each session, over a 12-week period. Sessions will take place outdoors when possible, or indoors if the weather is not suitable.
After follow-up assessments are complete, participants in the control group will also be offered the pole walking program at their communities.
Read the detailed description
Pole walking provides an attractive form of exercise therapy for older adults. It is a simple, well-tolerated, and effective means to improve overall functional fitness in older adults. Pole walking has improved upper and lower body muscle strength, cardiovascular endurance, and flexibility in community-dwelling older adults. It has been positively associated with balance, functional mobility, muscle strength, and aerobic exercise capacity in older adults. Pole walking is considered to offer a safe format for walking, as poles provide support and help with balance, and thus contribute to confidence in being active. However, there has not yet been a study assessing the feasibility and efficacy of a pole walking intervention in improving physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, and decreasing sedentary time in older adults living in independent living/retirement communities.
This patient-oriented, multi-site study consists of a feasibility and a pilot phase. The feasibility phase is a single-arm trial that will assess the feasibility and safety of implementing a pole walking intervention within independent living/retirement communities. In this phase, all participants will receive the intervention. The pilot phase is a two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized, wait-list controlled trial that will assess the efficacy of the pole walking intervention in improving physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, and decreasing sedentary time in older adults living in independent living/retirement communities. In this phase, our target is to include 50 residents from independent living/retirement communities. Sites will be randomized to either the intervention or a wait-list control group. The intervention will consist of group sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes per session, over a 12-week period. Pole walking exercises are tailored for participants and progressive in nature. Sessions will be led by trained peer, staff, or student instructors and conducted outdoors (indoors if weather conditions do not permit). After completing follow-up assessments, participants in the control group will also be offered the pole walking program at their sites.
- Conditions
- Fall Injury, Osteoporotic Fractures
- Being tested
- Pole walking
- Keywords
- Patient-oriented, Exercise Intervention, Feasibility, Pilot
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporotic Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pole walkingOther
The intervention will consist of group sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes per session, over a 12-week period. Pole walking exercises are tailored for participants and progressive in nature. Sessions will be led by trained peer, staff, or student instructors and conducted outdoors (indoors if weather conditions do not permit).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pole walking intervention | Experimental | Will participate in supervised, group pole walking intervention sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes per session, over a 12-week period. Receives: Other: Pole walking |
| Wait-list control | No intervention | Will continue life as usual during the 12-week period. However, after completing follow-up assessments, will also be offered the pole walking intervention at their communities. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - consent rate
Assessed by calculating consent rate (%) as the percentage of participants assessed for eligibility who consented.
Measured: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - recruitment rate
Assessed by calculating recruitment rate (participant/site/month) as the number of potentially eligible participants who consented divided by the number of recruiting sites and then divided by the number of months spent on recruitment.
Measured: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - retention rate
Assessed by calculating retention rate (%) as the percentage of eligible participants enrolled in the study who received the allocated intervention and completed both baseline and follow-up assessments.
Measured: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - attendance rate
Assessed by calculating attendance rate (%) as the percentage of available intervention sessions attended by each participant.
Measured: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - intervention acceptability score
Assessed by calculating intervention acceptability score (ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of an intervention ) using the 4-item intervention acceptability measure.
Measured: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - intervention appropriateness score
Assessed by calculating intervention appropriateness score (ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness of an intervention ) using the 4-item intervention appropriateness measure.
Measured: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - intervention feasibility score
Assessed by calculating intervention feasibility score (ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility of an intervention ) using the 4-item intervention feasibility measure.
Measured: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Physical function - functional balance/mobility
Assessed by the timed "up \& go" test.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Physical function - lower-body strength
Assessed by the 30-s chair stand test.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Health-related quality of life
Assessed by the 36-item short form survey, which provides a score ranging from 0-100 for each of its 8 scales (the higher the scale scores, the more favorable the corresponding health states).
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Safety of pole walking intervention
Assessed by the seriousness and relatedness to the intervention of recorded adverse events.
Measured: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Physical function - functional capacity
Assessed by the 6-min walk test.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Physical function - upper-body strength
Assessed by the grip strength test.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Physical activity/sedentary time
Assessed by 7-day accelerometry.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Fear of falling
Assessed by the 10-item falls efficacy scale, which provides a total score ranging from 10-100, with higher scores suggesting greater fear of falling.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Body composition - musculoskeletal properties of the lower leg
Assessed by the peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Body composition - musculoskeletal properties of the forearm
Assessed by the peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Measured: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2022
- Study start28 Jun 2022
- Primary completion22 Sep 2025
- Study completion22 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fall InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The feasibility phase of this study is a single-group trial with a primary purpose of assessing the feasibility of implementing a pole walking intervention within independent living/retirement communities. The pilot phase of this study is a two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized, wait-list controlled trial with a primary purpose of assessing the efficacy of the pole walking intervention in improving physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, and decreasing sedentary time in older adults living in independent living/retirement communities. In this phase, we anticipate enrolling 50 participants from residents of independent living/retirement communities. Communities will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or a wait-list control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Saskatchewan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation, Saskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented Research
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Saija Kontulainen, University of Saskatchewan
- Investigators
- Saija A Kontulainen, PhD, Principal investigator, Professor, College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05388227
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 141
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 18 May 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Keramati M, Rostami Haji Abadi M, Kontulainen S. Implementing a patient-oriented pole walking intervention in retirement homes: A non-randomized feasibility trial. PLoS One. 2026 Jun 17;21(6):e0349290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349290. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42308223
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pole Walking Intervention Within Independent Living/Retirement Communities: Feasibility and Pilot
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05388227
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 141
- Conditions
- Fall Injury, Osteoporotic Fractures
- Keywords
- Patient-oriented, Exercise Intervention, Feasibility, Pilot
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SaskatchewanUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation, Saskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented Research
- Study start
- 28 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This patient-oriented, multi-site study aims to co-design and test a pole walking program with resident and staff representatives from participating independent living and retirement communities.
The first part of the study (feasibility phase) is a single-group trial designed to answer the main question: Is the pole walking program feasible in these settings? In this phase, all participants will take part in the program.
The second part of the study (pilot phase) is a two-group randomized trial that will assess whether the program helps improve physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, while also reducing sedentary time (time spent sitting or being inactive) in older adults living in independent living and retirement communities. Communities will be randomly assigned to either start the program right away or join a wait-list control group.
The program will include supervised group sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes each session, over a 12-week period. Sessions will take place outdoors when possible, or indoors if the weather is not suitable.
After follow-up assessments are complete, participants in the control group will also be offered the pole walking program at their communities.
Detailed description
Pole walking provides an attractive form of exercise therapy for older adults. It is a simple, well-tolerated, and effective means to improve overall functional fitness in older adults. Pole walking has improved upper and lower body muscle strength, cardiovascular endurance, and flexibility in community-dwelling older adults. It has been positively associated with balance, functional mobility, muscle strength, and aerobic exercise capacity in older adults. Pole walking is considered to offer a safe format for walking, as poles provide support and help with balance, and thus contribute to confidence in being active. However, there has not yet been a study assessing the feasibility and efficacy of a pole walking intervention in improving physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, and decreasing sedentary time in older adults living in independent living/retirement communities.
This patient-oriented, multi-site study consists of a feasibility and a pilot phase. The feasibility phase is a single-arm trial that will assess the feasibility and safety of implementing a pole walking intervention within independent living/retirement communities. In this phase, all participants will receive the intervention. The pilot phase is a two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized, wait-list controlled trial that will assess the efficacy of the pole walking intervention in improving physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, and decreasing sedentary time in older adults living in independent living/retirement communities. In this phase, our target is to include 50 residents from independent living/retirement communities. Sites will be randomized to either the intervention or a wait-list control group. The intervention will consist of group sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes per session, over a 12-week period. Pole walking exercises are tailored for participants and progressive in nature. Sessions will be led by trained peer, staff, or student instructors and conducted outdoors (indoors if weather conditions do not permit). After completing follow-up assessments, participants in the control group will also be offered the pole walking program at their sites.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The feasibility phase of this study is a single-group trial with a primary purpose of assessing the feasibility of implementing a pole walking intervention within independent living/retirement communities. The pilot phase of this study is a two-arm, parallel-group, cluster-randomized, wait-list controlled trial with a primary purpose of assessing the efficacy of the pole walking intervention in improving physical activity, physical function, body composition, fear of falling, and health-related quality of life, and decreasing sedentary time in older adults living in independent living/retirement communities. In this phase, we anticipate enrolling 50 participants from residents of independent living/retirement communities. Communities will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or a wait-list control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pole walking intervention | Experimental | Other: Pole walkingWill participate in supervised, group pole walking intervention sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes per session, over a 12-week period. |
| Wait-list control | No intervention | –Will continue life as usual during the 12-week period. However, after completing follow-up assessments, will also be offered the pole walking intervention at their communities. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Being an ambulatory resident in the independent living/retirement communities.
- Pass the Get Active Questionnaire. If the participant has heart conditions, angina during daily living, balance, and bone or joint problems, then a Physician Clearance Form is required to be filled out and signed by the participant's family physician.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Using assistive devices for mobility.
- Being active (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ≥150 min/week).
- Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pole walkingThe intervention will consist of group sessions held at the participating communities, 2-3 times per week, for 20-60 minutes per session, over a 12-week period. Pole walking exercises are tailored for participants and progressive in nature. Sessions will be led by trained peer, staff, or student instructors and conducted outdoors (indoors if weather conditions do not permit). | Other | Pole walking intervention |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - consent rate
Time frame: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Assessed by calculating consent rate (%) as the percentage of participants assessed for eligibility who consented.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - recruitment rate
Time frame: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Assessed by calculating recruitment rate (participant/site/month) as the number of potentially eligible participants who consented divided by the number of recruiting sites and then divided by the number of months spent on recruitment.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - retention rate
Time frame: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Assessed by calculating retention rate (%) as the percentage of eligible participants enrolled in the study who received the allocated intervention and completed both baseline and follow-up assessments.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - attendance rate
Time frame: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)
Assessed by calculating attendance rate (%) as the percentage of available intervention sessions attended by each participant.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - intervention acceptability score
Time frame: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Assessed by calculating intervention acceptability score (ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of an intervention ) using the 4-item intervention acceptability measure.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - intervention appropriateness score
Time frame: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Assessed by calculating intervention appropriateness score (ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater appropriateness of an intervention ) using the 4-item intervention appropriateness measure.
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - intervention feasibility score
Time frame: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Assessed by calculating intervention feasibility score (ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility of an intervention ) using the 4-item intervention feasibility measure.
Physical function - functional balance/mobility
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Assessed by the timed "up \& go" test.
Physical function - lower-body strength
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Assessed by the 30-s chair stand test.
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Assessed by the 36-item short form survey, which provides a score ranging from 0-100 for each of its 8 scales (the higher the scale scores, the more favorable the corresponding health states).
7 secondary outcomes
Safety of pole walking intervention
Time frame: Follow-up assessment sessions (after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility phase)
Physical function - functional capacity
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Physical function - upper-body strength
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Physical activity/sedentary time
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Fear of falling
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Body composition - musculoskeletal properties of the lower leg
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Body composition - musculoskeletal properties of the forearm
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up assessment sessions (before and after the 12-week intervention of the study's feasibility and pilot phases)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42308223Keramati M, Rostami Haji Abadi M, Kontulainen S. Implementing a patient-oriented pole walking intervention in retirement homes: A non-randomized feasibility trial. PLoS One. 2026 Jun 17;21(6):e0349290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349290. eCollection 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fall Injury
Recruiting
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Adrenal Adapt on Sleep Quality, Daytime Energy, Stress Resilience, and Cognitive Performance.
Improves Daytime Energy Levels, Reduces Afternoon Energy Crashes and Midday Fatigue
Recruiting
Effects of a Community-based Multicomponent Physical Exercise Program on Physical Function, Frailty, and Sarcopenia in Older Adults From the Municipality of Santoña: a Quasi-experimental Study.
Frailty/Sarcopenia, Frailty in Older Adults
Not yet recruiting
Effects of a Novel Perturbation Balance Training Program on Laboratory and Real-World Trip-Induced Losses of Balance and Falls Among Balance-Impaired Older Adults
Accidental Fall
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Vision Care in Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Patients
Falls, Ulcer, Pressure
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Saija A Kontulainen, PhD principal investigator
Professor, College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pole walking in people with Fall Injury and Osteoporotic Fractures, run by University of Saskatchewan at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of pole walking intervention - consent rate (time frame: After the completion of the study's feasibility phase (1 year)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05388227, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.