AzTrials
AzTrials

Elbow FractureACEDTELBOWNCT05391139

Acute Effects of Dual Task on Physical Function in Patients With Elbow Joint Fracture

An observational study of Elbow Fracture, run by University of Valencia at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Elbow injuries account for up to 15% of emergency consultations. The complexity of this joint and the subtle imaging findings present even in severe injuries make diagnosis difficult and can delay treatment, causing pain and functional impotence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Elbow Fracture
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
7 Jun 2022to 20 Dec 2022
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Candidates for this study will be men and women over 18 years of age who have been diagnosed with a fracture of the elbow joint (types 1-3 and types 2-1 according to Müller's OA fracture classification), with or without a surgical approach and with date of injury and completion of their physiotherapy program in 2022-2023, and who begin their physiotherapy treatment between weeks 7 to 9 post-fracture.

Who may be able to join

  • Candidates for this study will be men and women over 18 years of age who have been diagnosed with a fracture of the elbow joint. The patients will voluntarily participate in the study, which will be carried out at the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, during the months of May 2022 to May 2023. All participants will be informed about the objectives and content of the research and information will be obtained. written informed consent. The study will conform to the Declaration of Helsinki and will be approved by the local ethics committee.

Who cannot join

  • Participants will be excluded if they have any involvement in the contralateral upper limb, if they have already had/have any other injury to the elbow or other anatomical part of the affected MS (in the last year), and if they have any other condition or disease in the which there is a contraindication to physical exercise. Also if they participate in physiotherapy programs external to the one carried out by us or in other research studies. In addition, if there is evidence of a severe failure in bone consolidation (separation greater than 5 mm), if there is neural injury, CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome), severe open fracture with muscle and periosteal loss, clinical picture not competent for physiotherapy by diagnosis doubtful and severe congenital instability of upper members.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Laura López-Bueno

    Valencia, 46005

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Acute Effects of Dual Task During Upper Limb Strengthening on Physical Function and Pain in Patients With Elbow Joint Fracture

Elbow injuries account for up to 15% of emergency consultations. The complexity of this joint and the subtle imaging findings present even in severe injuries make diagnosis difficult and can delay treatment, causing pain and functional impotence. Appropriate deterioration mitigation strategies include, but are not limited to, strengthening programs of sufficient intensity to stimulate anabolism and limit muscle loss and increase strength. The general recommendation for increasing muscle strength and neural adaptations in healthy subjects after sustaining an elbow fracture is moderate to heavy load resistance training with loads approximating 60%-80% of the one repetition maximum ( 1RM). However, high joint stress would be challenging and increase the risk of adverse consequences in such patients, so strategies are still needed to meet the challenges of effectively and safely adapting training loads to safely enable improvement. without requiring high joint stress. Resistance band work, coupled with the use of dual tasks, is a novel approach used during resistance training, especially among healthy populations, with promising results. The purpose of the study is to evaluate acute neuromuscular responses, pain intensity and RPE in patients with elbow joint fracture, with or without surgical approach, with different strategies to strengthen the upper limb.

Candidates for this study will be men and women over 18 years of age who have been diagnosed with a fracture of the elbow joint (types 1-3 and types 2-1 according to Müller's OA fracture classification), with or without a surgical approach and with date of injury and completion of their physiotherapy program in 2022-2023, and who begin their physiotherapy treatment between weeks 7 to 9 post-fracture.

Read the detailed description

Elbow injuries account for up to 15% of emergency consultations. The complexity of this joint and the subtle imaging findings present even in severe injuries make diagnosis difficult and can delay treatment, causing pain and functional impotence. Appropriate deterioration mitigation strategies include, but are not limited to, strengthening programs of sufficient intensity to stimulate anabolism and limit muscle loss and increase strength. The general recommendation for increasing muscle strength and neural adaptations in healthy subjects after sustaining an elbow fracture is moderate to heavy load resistance training with loads approximating 60%-80% of the one repetition maximum (1RM). However, high joint stress would be challenging and increase the risk of adverse consequences in such patients, so strategies are still needed to meet the challenges of effectively and safely adapting training loads to safely enable improvement. without requiring high joint stress. Resistance band work, coupled with the use of dual tasks, is a novel approach used during resistance training, especially among healthy populations, with promising results. The purpose of the study is to evaluate acute neuromuscular responses, pain intensity and RPE in patients with elbow joint fracture, with or without surgical approach, with different strategies to strengthen the upper limb.

Candidates for this study will be men and women over 18 years of age who have been diagnosed with a fracture of the elbow joint (types 1-3 and types 2-1 according to Müller's OA fracture classification), with or without a surgical approach and with date of injury and completion of their physiotherapy program in 2022-2023, and who begin their physiotherapy treatment between weeks 7 to 9 post-fracture. The patients will voluntarily participate in the study, which will be carried out at the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, during the months of May 2022 to May 2023. All participants will be informed about the objectives and content of the research and information will be obtained. written informed consent. The study will conform to the Declaration of Helsinki and will be approved by the local ethics committee. Participants will be excluded if they have any involvement in the contralateral upper limb, if they have already had/have any other injury to the elbow or other anatomical part of the affected MS (in the last year), and if they have any other condition or disease in the which there is a contraindication to physical exercise.

Also if they participate in physiotherapy programs external to the one carried out by us or in other research studies. In addition, if there is evidence of a severe failure in bone consolidation (separation greater than 5 mm), if there is neural injury, CRPS (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome), severe open fracture with muscle and periosteal loss, clinical picture not competent for physiotherapy by diagnosis doubtful and severe congenital instability of MMSS. The study consists of observational session will be held. The experimental protocol begins with the evaluation of neuromuscular responses, self-perceived pain intensity and RPE from the use of different intensities of elastic resistance, during elbow flexion and extension, at a controlled speed of 1.5 sec/phase. For this purpose, 1.5 m long elastic bands will be available, which will be previously stretched to approximately 25% of their initial length. This intensity is selected because it appears to correspond to the appropriate weight which is equivalent to 30% of 1RM and is considered a light intensity. At the end of each set of the exercise, you will be asked about RPE (Borg CR10) and pain in the joint. The exercises must be performed with the available range of movement of the subject. Participants are asked to move their body and trunk as little as possible and to perform the exercise smoothly, without stopping or accelerating. Elbow flexion will be performed in a sitting position and extension in the supine position, both stable positions, with exact fastening of the bands on the panel of the Rocher Cage, located in the therapeutic room.

The subjects, in a counterbalanced way, will perform 4 different conditions, with 10 minutes of rest between them: the possibilities are 1) perform all possible repetitions of elbow flexion with the appropriate band; 2) perform all possible repetitions of elbow flexion with the appropriate band, and following a dual task; 3) perform as many elbow extension reps as possible with the appropriate band; 4) perform as many elbow extension repetitions as possible with the appropriate band, and following a dual task.

Conditions
Elbow Fracture
Medical subject headings
Elbow Fractures

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mobility

    The experimental protocol begins with the evaluation of neuromuscular responses, self-perceived pain intensity and RPE from the use of different intensities of elastic resistance, during elbow flexion and extension. This intensity is selected because it appears to correspond to the appropriate weight which is equivalent to 30% of 1RM and is considered a light intensity.

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Kinesiophobia

    Kinesiophobia will be evaluated mainly through the Spanish version of the Kinesiophobia Tampa Scale in a selfrecorded manner. This instrument has shown adequate reliability (showing an internal consistency of α=0.79). The total score ranges between 11 and 44 points, with higher levels of kinesiophobia the higher the score obtained on the scale. In addition, kinesiophobia specific to the type of exercise performed will be assessed, with a self-perceived scale from 0 to 10, where patients will indicate the fear of performing all possible repetitions during a strength exercise.

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Shoulder functionality

    It will be evaluated using the DASH questionnaire in Spanish. The assessment of the ability to perform various tasks (open a new or very tight jar, write, turn a key, prepare food, etc.), The score can range between 30 and 150 points.

    A higher score indicates a higher level of disability and severity, while a lower percentage indicates a low level of disability. This questionnaire has shown adequate reliability (showing an internal consistency of α=0.96).

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Self-reported pain intensity

    The patient marks a point on the scale and subsequently, the clinician or researcher quantifies the number of mm indicated by the patient.Therefore, the self-perceived pain intensity range travels from 0-100 mm. VAS is the most widely used so far in research to assess pain intensity.

    Measured: 1 day

  4. Measurement of range of motion

    The degrees of movement (ROM) of the following joints shall be actively and passively measured by means of a manual goniometer: elbow (flexion and extension), forearm (pronation and supination), wrist (flexion and extension), metacarpophalangeal (flexion), proximal intephalangeal (flexion) and distal interphalangeal (flexion).

    Measured: 1 day

  5. Isometric elbow extension/flexion force

    They will be evaluated with a portable handheld dynamometer. The tests will be carried out against a fixed resistance:

    the participants were with their elbows at 90º, in a sitting position with an upright posture, without a backrest and with both feet placed flat on the floor, with force exerted against a fixed table. 3 maximum contractions of 5 seconds will be performed, separated by 1 minute of rest, selecting the average value of these 3 for later analysis.

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2022
  2. Study start7 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion10 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05391139
Sponsor's protocol ID
ID0002
Acronym
ACEDTELBOW
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
20 May 2022
Last updated
10 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Elbow Fracture, run by University of Valencia at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mobility (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in