AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical DysplasiaLLETZ-MCNCT05391243

Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone During Follicular Vs. Luteal Phase of the Menstrual Cycle (LLETZ-MC)

A study testing LLETZ in people with Cervical Dysplasia, run by Ruhr University of Bochum at 1 site in Germany.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide. Pre-cancerous lesions (dysplasias) are detected by the preventive smear test at the gynecologist and can thus contribute to a 100% chance of cure if they are clarified by a colposcopic examination as… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Dysplasia
What is being tested?
LLETZ
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
152 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Mar 2025to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written consent
  • Regular menstrual cycle, defined as an interval between 21 and 35 days and a bleeding duration between 3 and 10 days during the last 3 months
  • Colposcopy performed preoperatively
  • Histologically (by previously performed colposcopy) confirmed dysplasia (CIN 1, CIN 2 or CIN 3)
  • Suspicion of low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion based on Papanicolaou smear with inconclusive colposcopy and need for surgical workup to exclude lesions
  • Age >18 years

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with insufficient knowledge of the German language
  • Pre-existing oncological diseases
  • Blood coagulation disorders
  • Taking blood thinning substances
  • Use of a hormonal intrauterine device (e.g. Mirena);
  • Use of a progesterone pill or progesterone injectate;
  • Use of long cycle contraceptive (no monthly bleeding).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Clemens B. Tempfer, MD, MBA contact

+492323499 ext. 1801

clemens.tempfer@rub.de

Germany1 site
  • Marien Hospital Herne

    Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44625

    Clemens B Tempfer, MD

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Performance of Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) in Women with Cervical Dysplasia in the Follicular Phase Versus the Luteal Phase of the Menstrual Cycle: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide. Pre-cancerous lesions (dysplasias) are detected by the preventive smear test at the gynecologist and can thus contribute to a 100% chance of cure if they are clarified by a colposcopic examination as part of the dysplasia consultation and dysplastic lesions are then surgically removed if necessary (conization).

There are few data in the literature on the influence of the menstrual cycle on the bleeding pattern during and after conization. Hormonal variations during the menstrual cycle affect both the extent of blood flow to reproductive organs and hemostasis. In the follicular phase, there is a decrease in local blood flow in the uterus and pelvic organs and an increase in coagulability. Conversely, in the luteal phase there is an increase in local blood supply and a decrease in coagulability. Therefore, it seems reasonable to perform conization in the follicular phase to possibly reduce the extent and incidence of bleeding and bleeding complications. This assumption is supported by clinical observations. For example, there is evidence from other specialties that selection of the timing of surgery, taking into account the menstrual phase, may influence the risk of bleeding. Another factor of interest in menstruation-based surgical planning is psychological vulnerability, which may also vary with the menstrual cycle. Until now, consideration of the menstrual cycle in surgical planning for conization has not been standard practice and there is no recommendation in this regard in the current S3 guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Therefore, this study now aims to answer the question under prospective randomized conditions whether LLETZ conization performed during the follicular phase results in lower blood loss and higher patient satisfaction and lower anxiety scores compared to LLETZ conization performed during the luteal phase.

Read the detailed description

HPV and dysplasia of the uterine cervix

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the most common sexually transmitted pathogens worldwide. The prevalence in both male and female populations is high. Epidemiological estimates suggest that 85-91% of sexually active adults acquire at least one genital HPV infection by the age of 50, with approximately 95% of HPV infections being spontaneously eliminated within 2 years in terms of HPV immunological clearance. HPV preferentially infects the epithelial cells of the anogenital area and, through incorporation of HPV DNA into the host genome of the basal cells of the squamous epithelium of the cervix and subsequent expression of viral components, causes dysplastic changes in the cervical epithelium that, if left untreated, can develop into invasive carcinoma of the cervix (cervical carcinoma). Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common cancer as well as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide, responsible for 6.6% (570,000) of all new cancer cases and 7.5% (311,000) of cancer-related deaths in women in 2018. The precursor of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (approximately 80% of all cervical cancers) is cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which has three grades of expression (CIN1, CIN 2, and CIN 3). Compared with invasive cervical carcinoma, the incidence of precancerous lesions of the cervix uteri is much higher. It is estimated that approximately 100,000 women in Germany develop high-grade dysplasia (CIN2/CIN3) each year.

Therapy of cervical dysplasia

Dysplasia of the cervix is typically detected during the gynecological screening examination at the gynecologist. Smears are taken from the ectocervix and endocervix and cytologically evaluated for dysplastic cells and smear quality after Papanicolaou staining. For further clarification of dysplastic changes, presentation to a specialized dysplasia consultation is recommended in the case of abnormalities with suspected presence of cervical dysplasia. Histological confirmation of abnormal areas is performed during colposcopic examination. The histopathological processing of the tissue samples and the colposcopic image of the spread of the changes in the cervix then allow individualized therapy planning.

Conization as the standard of surgical treatment

If precancerous lesions with the potential to develop into an invasive cervical tumor are detected, conization (= surgical removal of a cone of tissue from the cervix) is the method of choice for removing the diseased tissue. The worldwide standard surgical procedure for conization is LLETZ conization (="Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone"). In addition to the risk of local persistence of precancerous lesions if cervical dysplasia is incompletely removed, LLETZ also increases the risk of preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancy. This risk increases with increasing volume of removed tissue. To reduce or avoid the aforementioned complications, conization should be performed under colposcopic vision and as little healthy cervical tissue as possible should be removed.

Influence of the menstrual cycle on the bleeding pattern during and after conization

Hormonal variations during the menstrual cycle influence both the extent of blood flow to reproductive organs and hemostasis. Concentrations of fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor antigen, and von Willebrand factor activity show significant menstrual cycle variations with maximum values during the luteal phase. In this sense, during the first cycle phase, the follicular phase, there is a decrease in local blood flow in the uterus and pelvic organs and an increase in coagulability. In contrast, in the second cycle phase, the luteal phase, there is a subsequent increase in local blood supply and a decrease in coagulability. Therefore, it seems reasonable to perform conization in the follicular phase to possibly reduce the extent and incidence of bleeding and bleeding complications. This assumption is supported by clinical observations. For example, there is evidence from other specialties that selecting the timing of surgery, taking into account the menstrual phase, may influence the risk of bleeding. In two non-controlled, retrospective studies of patients undergoing mammary reduction surgery and rhinoplasty, the magnitude of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss was lower during the follicular phase than during the luteal phase. In addition, a small randomized trial of 73 patients undergoing cervical uterine surgery (loop electrosurgical excision procedure [LEEP]) found a demonstrable advantage in terms of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss when LEEP was performed during the follicular phase. Another factor of interest in menstruation-oriented surgical planning is psychological vulnerability, which also varies with the menstrual cycle. This factor, which is important for the extent of psychological stress and processing of surgery, also seems to be relevant in the context of conization. Thus, Paraskevaidis et al. were able to show in a randomized study that women who underwent LLETZ conization in the luteal phase had significantly higher anxiety scores and evaluated the surgery more negatively than women who underwent surgery during the follicular phase. This aspect also supports the usefulness of performing conization during the follicular phase. So far, consideration of the menstrual cycle in surgical planning of conization is not standard and there is no recommendation in this regard in the current S3 guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). To date, the selection of the appropriate time for surgery depends only on the patient's time preference and the availability of the surgical site.

Being tested
LLETZ
Keywords
cervical dysplasia, LLETZ, LEEP, conization, menstrual cycle
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LLETZProcedure or surgery

    Also called LEEP, conization

    Large loop excision of the transformation zone

Study groups in NCT05391243
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Follicular phaseOtherLLETZ performed during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle
Receives: Procedure: LLETZ
Luteal phaseOtherLLETZ performed during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle
Receives: Procedure: LLETZ

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intraoperative blood loss (weight)

    The intraoperative blood loss, measured by the net-weight (in grams) of the surgical swabs used for hemostasis

    Measured: During surgery

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Intraoperative blood loss (Hb)

    The intraoperative blood loss, assessed through the difference between the Hb values measured preoperatively and 2 hours postoperatively, respectively.

    Measured: Day of surgery

  2. Intraoperative blood loss (subjective)

    The extent of intraoperative blood loss estimated by the surgeon (blinded to menstrual cycle phase) using a subjective categorization (mild, moderate, severe).

    Measured: Immediately after surgery

  3. Postoperative bleeding (subjective)

    The extent of postoperative bleeding during the first 24 hours after surgery (assessed by the patient using an 11-item Numerical Rating Scale; 0 [minimal bleeding] - 10 [strong bleeding]).

    Measured: Interview 14 days after surgery

  4. Postoperative bleeding (days)

    The number of postoperative days where bleeding occurred

    Measured: Interview 14 days after surgery

  5. Patient's anxiety

    The patient's anxiety level due to surgery as measured by the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, situational anxiety STAI-S, trait anxiety, STAI-T). Score range 20 to 80 points for each of the two parts of the test (a higher score means higher levels of anxiety).

    Measured: On the day of surgery, before surgery

  6. Rate of complications

    The occurring intra- and postoperative complications in a period within 14 days after surgery

    Measured: During surgery up to 14 days post surgery

  7. Cone mass

    The weight of the cone specimen (measured in grams in the unfixed state)

    Measured: During surgery, immediately after the excision

  8. Procedure duration

    Duration of the procedure (from start until complete hemostasis is achieved)

    Measured: At surgery

  9. Patient satisfaction

    Overall patient satisfaction (11-item numerical rating scale).

    Measured: At discharge and 14 days after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2022
  2. Study startMar 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective randomized trial with 2 groups (follicular phase, luteal phase)
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
152 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05391243
Sponsor's protocol ID
LLETZ-MC-1
Acronym
LLETZ-MC
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
20 May 2022
Last updated
31 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be shared upon reasonable request made to the corresponding author. This includes individual participant data underlying the results presented here, after deidentification, as well as data dictionaries and the the study protocol. Data is available after publication, without a specific end date. Requesting investigators must show that their proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

Publications

  • Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, Reno H, Zenilman JM, Bolan GA. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul 23;70(4):1-187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.

    PubMed 34292926
  • Chesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Nov;41(11):660-4. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000193.

    PubMed 25299412
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

    PubMed 30207593
  • Kuhn W. [Colposcopy in the diagnosis of early cervical cancer]. Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1480-9. German.

    PubMed 21984389
  • Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Feb 10;106(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00245-2.

    PubMed 12551795
  • Bevis KS, Biggio JR. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

    PubMed 21345402
  • Jin G, LanLan Z, Li C, Dan Z. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

    PubMed 23843155
  • Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, Arbyn M, Prendiville W. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):685-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03252.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

    PubMed 22329499
  • Shaco-Levy R, Eger G, Dreiher J, Benharroch D, Meirovitz M. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014 Jan;33(1):83-8. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182763158.

    PubMed 24300540
  • Preaubert L, Gondry J, Mancini J, Chevreau J, Lamblin G, Atallah A, Lavoue V, Caradec C, Baldauf JJ, Bryand A, Henno S, Villeret J, Agostini A, Douvier S, Jarniat A, Riethmuller D, Mendel A, Brun JL, Rakotomahenina H, Carcopino X. Benefits of Direct Colposcopic Vision for Optimal LLETZ Procedure: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jan;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000156.

    PubMed 26704328
  • Knol HM, Kemperman RF, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Mulder AB, Meijer K. Haemostatic variables during normal menstrual cycle. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jan;107(1):22-9. doi: 10.1160/TH11-07-0481. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

    PubMed 22159564
  • Kadir RA, Economides DL, Sabin CA, Owens D, Lee CA. Variations in coagulation factors in women: effects of age, ethnicity, menstrual cycle and combined oral contraceptive. Thromb Haemost. 1999 Nov;82(5):1456-61.

    PubMed 10595638
  • Andersson O, Blomback M, Bremme K, Wramsby H. Prediction of changes in levels of haemostatic variables during natural menstrual cycle and ovarian hyperstimulation. Thromb Haemost. 1997 May;77(5):901-4.

    PubMed 9184400
  • Sariguney Y, Demirtas Y, Findikcioglu F, Ayhan S, Latifoglu O, Cenetoglu S, Celebi C. Proper timing of breast reduction during the menstrual cycle. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Dec;53(6):528-31. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000134753.15282.cd.

    PubMed 15602247
  • Findikcioglu K, Findikcioglu F, Demirtas Y et al. (2009) Effect of the menstrual cycle on intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty patients. Eur J Plast Surg(32): 77e81

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing LLETZ in people with Cervical Dysplasia, run by Ruhr University of Bochum at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Clemens B. Tempfer, MD, MBA (+492323499 ext. 1801, clemens.tempfer@rub.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intraoperative blood loss (weight) (time frame: During surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05391243, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in