AzTrials
AzTrials

Substance Use DisordersNCT05397691

Substance Use Prevention for Youth With Parents in Recovery

A study testing Modified Family Talk in people with Substance Use Disorders, run by Brown University at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Risk for substance use disorder (SUD) begins early in the life course. Although preventing and decreasing illicit and nonmedical drug use among youth is an urgent public health priority, there are currently few evidence-based prevention strategies feasible for delivery in the primary care setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Substance Use Disorders
What is being tested?
Modified Family Talk
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
29 Aug 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 12-18 years without diagnosed SUD
  • Comfortable speaking English or Spanish
  • 18 years or older
  • Receiving treatment for SUD
  • Receiving substance use care in the CODAC system
  • Comfortable speaking English or Spanish

Who cannot join

  • Presence of acute family crisis, such as recent death, incarceration, separation, divorce, or other stressor
  • Parent or youth with cognitive limitation or intellectual disability

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • CODAC

    Pawtucket, Rhode Island, 02904

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Substance Use Prevention for Youth With Parents in Recovery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Risk for substance use disorder (SUD) begins early in the life course. Although preventing and decreasing illicit and nonmedical drug use among youth is an urgent public health priority, there are currently few evidence-based prevention strategies feasible for delivery in the primary care setting. The investigators propose a three-year plan to collect critical pilot data to pilot test and optimize a dyadic intervention that aims to increase family resilience, strengthen coping skills, help families plan for the future, and prevent youth SUD.

The 'prototype' for the intervention approach is Family Talk, an evidence-based parent-youth dyadic intervention that can be delivered within the existing infrastructure of the patient-centered medical home. The investigators have made preliminary adaptations to the model in preparation for testing. To prepare for a subsequent efficacy study, a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of the intervention with 40 parent-youth dyads to optimize the intervention model will be conducted. The feasibility of the intervention will be evaluated. In addition, empiric estimates of study parameters to inform the planning of a fully powered randomized controlled trial and plausible intervention targets using semi-structured qualitative interviews will be obtained.

Read the detailed description

Within the context of a pilot randomized controlled trial, the objectives are to: 1. Optimize the content and delivery of the intervention through an iterative series of quality improvement cycles informed by structured feedback from parents, youth, and intervention providers after each session; 2. Field test study logistics, including participant recruitment, willingness to consent to a randomized trial; loss to follow-up; the acceptability and feasibility of the study measures; and 3. Obtain empiric estimates of study parameters to inform future clinical trial design, including within-group standard deviation of continuous measures; correlations of repeated measures; and proportion of control group subjects who experience each outcome. The products at the end of the pilot study will be an optimized intervention model, developed with parent and youth input and ready for efficacy testing; and a set of putative intervention targets ready to be tested in the subsequent trial. The ultimate goal is to develop an effective approach to youth substance use prevention, delivered within the infrastructure of the patient-centered medical home. If successful, this trajectory of work has the potential to identify a novel, family-centered approach to substance use disorder prevention for a high-risk population of youth whose parents are in recovery.

Being tested
Modified Family Talk, Control-like parameter estimation
Keywords
Family Talk, Parent-youth dyad, Family functioning, Coping strategies
Medical subject headings
Substance-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified Family TalkOther

    The Modified Family Talk intervention consists of six modules, each lasting approximately 60 minutes. Family Talk is intended to be delivered over a period of 12 weeks, with meetings occurring every 1-2 weeks.

  • Control-like parameter estimationOther

    Parameter estimation is designed to emulate best practices around comprehensive, high quality, patient-centered care for adults and youth. Participants will have access to collaborative adult Office Based Addiction Treatment (OBAT) clinical services, multidisciplinary adolescent primary care clinics with co-located adolescent substance use specialists, high quality social work services, integrated behavioral health, and access to patient navigators for assistance connecting to community resources.

Study groups in NCT05397691
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention refinement armExperimental20 parent-youth [12-18 years old] dyads will be randomized to this arm and receive the Modified Family Talk intervention.
Receives: Other: Modified Family Talk
Parameter estimation armExperimental20 parent-youth dyads randomized to this control-like arm will receive current best practice care in the patient-centered medical home
Receives: Other: Control-like parameter estimation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participation metrics

    The number of families approached and screened for the project, number ineligible, number refusing participation, and number ultimately enrolled will be assessed

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Reasons for not enrolling

    An investigator created questionnaire will be obtain the reasons why eligible potential participants did not enroll in the study.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Study attrition rates

    The percent of participants will be calculated by dividing the number of participants that complete the study by the total number of participants enrolled.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Number of sessions

    The number of sessions delivered by the intervention providers will be tracked.

    Measured: throughout the study up to 12 months

  5. Person-time of sessions

    The total and average person time for sessions delivered by the intervention providers will be tracked.

    Measured: throughout the study up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Youth substance use in preceding 90 days

    The Timeline Follow-back Interview (TLFB) is a 14 item instrument that will be used to assess substance use in the preceding 90 days and to evaluate for new onset of substance use, as well as increased frequency or intensity of use.

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Youth substance use screening

    Brief Screener for Tobacco, Alcohol, and other Drugs (BSTAD), a brief, validated instrument designed for use in primary care will be used to screen youth for substance use, including use of tobacco (adapted to include e-cigarettes and vaping products), alcohol, marijuana, prescription medications (including opioids), heroin, and other illicit substance use in the past year.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Family Communication

    Family communication will be assessed by the 10-item Family Problem-Solving Communication Index that evaluates family communication patterns in response to problems or conflicts and identifies affirming and incendiary communication patterns. Each item has a choice of answers, which correlate with 0-3 points where 0 = False' 1 = Mostly false' 2 = Mostly true' 3 = True. The answers to different items are added together for an "affirming communication" subscale and an "incendiary communication" subscale. Reverse score items 3 \& 9. For Affirming Communication: items 2' 4' and 6' 8'10 are summed. For Incendiary Communication: items 1' 3' 5' 7' 9 are summed. The subscales can range from 0-15. Higher scores for the affirming communication subscale are more favorable, while lower scores for the incendiary communication subscale are more favorable.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Family Functioning

    The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) will be used to assess family functioning. IPPA consists of 25 items for the mother, 25 items for the father, and 25 items for the adolescent and uses a 5-point LIkert scale for each items. The IPPA is scored by reverse-scoring the negatively worded items and then summing the response values in each section. This self-report scale measures youth perceptions of attachment to parents/caregivers along three dimensions: trust, communication, and alienation

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  5. Depression

    Depression will be assessed using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS).Total QIDS scores range from 0 to 27, with scores of 5 or lower indicative of no depression, scores from 6 to 10 indicating mild depression, 11 to 15 indicating moderate depression, 16 to 20 reflecting severe depression, and total scores greater than 21 indicating very severe depression.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  6. Perceived Stress

    Perceived stress will be assessed using the 10 item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The range of responses for each item is from 0-4, where 0 = Never 1 = Almost Never 2 = Sometimes 3 = Fairly Often 4 = Very Often. total scores can range from 0 to 40 and higher scores are correlated with more perceived stress.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  7. Problem solving skills

    Problem solving skills will be assessed with the Social Problem Solving Inventory -Revised (SPSI-R). This 25 item instrument measures problem orientation and problem-solving skills in 5 dimensions: positive (PPO) and negative orientation(NPO) ; avoidance (AS); impulsivity (ICS) ; and rationality (RPS). Each dimension subscale scores range from 0 to 20, and the total scores of the SPSI-R: S range from 0 to 100. Higher subscores on PPO and RPS, and lower subscores of NPO, ICS, and AS indicate good social problem solving.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  8. Self-efficacy coping strategies

    Coping strategies will be assessed by the 26 item Coping Self-Efficacy Scale which measures ability to cope with life changes in three domains: problem-focused coping, handling unpleasant thoughts, and getting support from family/friends. Anchor points on the scale are 0 ('cannot do at all'), 5 ('moderately certain can do') and 10 ('certain can do'). A high score - between 17 and 20 - indicates a highly resilient coper, and a low score - between 4 and 13 - suggests a low resilient coper.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  9. Types of coping strategies

    The Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) measures 14 different adaptive and problematic coping styles. Respondents rate items on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I've been doing this a lot). Each scale is comprised of 2 items. Higher scores indicate increased utilization of that specific coping strategy. There is no overall total score.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  10. Social support

    Social support will be assessed using the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report (SAS-SR). It examines social and role functioning in six areas: work; social activities; relationships with family; spouse or partner; parent; member of family unit. Each question is rated on a five-point scale from which subscale means and an overall mean can be obtained. Higher scores denote greater impairment. Role areas not relevant to the respondent can be skipped

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  11. Youth perceptions of peer, sibling, parental substance use

    The Personal Experience Inventory will be used to assess this outcome. It assesses 3 domains: peer use (5 items); sibling use (4 items); and parent use (4 items). The response options include Likert scales that correspond to answers such as Never/Once or Twice/Sometimes/Often, Strongly Disagree/Disagree/Agree/Strongly Agree, which in turn correspond to scores of 1-4. Subscale scores can be compared to population norms and cutoffs.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2022
  2. Study start29 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05397691
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022003505
Other IDs
1R34DA052836-01A1
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
23 May 2022
Last updated
6 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Upon completion of study analyses and publications, the investigators will make data and non-publishable documentation (such as research protocols, data collection instruments, other findings) available to internal and external bona fide researchers upon request in a timely fashion. The de-identified data will be made available to others only after discussion with the study team and under a formal data-sharing agreement that provides for: 1. commitment to use data for research purposes only and not to identify individual study participants; 2. commitment to use appropriate information technology systems to keep data secure; and 3. commitment to returning or destroying data after analyses are complete. The research team will also work with the Boston University Medical Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) to assure protection of confidentiality, as necessary.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified Family Talk in people with Substance Use Disorders, run by Brown University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participation metrics (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in