AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3ROCKET-IgniteNCT05398445

A Study Evaluating Rocatinlimab in Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (ROCKET-IGNITE)

A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 202 sites in 21 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in monotherapy treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Rocatinlimab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
769 participants
Where
202 sitesin 21 countries
Study dates
31 May 2022to 13 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AD according to the AAD Consensus Criteria (2014) present for at least 12 months
  • History of inadequate response to TCS (Topical Corticosteroid) of medium to higher potency (with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]).
  • EASI score ≥16
  • vIGA-AD score ≥3
  • ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement
  • Worst pruritus numerical rating scale ≥ 4

Who cannot join

  • Treatment with a biological product within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1
  • Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1:
  • Systemic corticosteroids
  • Systemic immunosuppressants
  • Phototherapy
  • Janus kinase inhibitors
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 1 week, prior to Day 1:
  • TCS of any potency
  • TCI
  • Topical phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors
  • Other topical immunosuppressive agents
  • Combination topical agents including TCS of any potency, TCI, PDE4 inhibitors, or other topical immunosuppressive agents

Trial locations and contacts

202 sites in 21 countries.

202 sites in 21 countries

United States50 sites
  • Anaheim Clinical Trials

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Cahaba Dermatology and Skin Health Center

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35244

  • Optima Research

    Boardman, Ohio, 44512

  • Skin Care Research Incorporated

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Treasure Valley Medical Research

    Boise, Idaho, 83706

  • IMMUNOe Research Centers

    Centennial, Colorado, 80112

  • Dermatology Specialists of Charlotte

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277

  • Onsite Clinical Solutions

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277

  • Continental Clinical Solutions - Cherry Hill

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08034

  • Institute for Asthma and Allergy

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815

  • DeNova Research

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • ClinOhio Research Services

    Columbus, Ohio, 43213

  • Dermatology Treatment and Research Center PA

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Palm Beach Dermatology Group

    Delray Beach, Florida, 33484

  • Henry Ford Health System

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Onyx Clinical Research

    Flint, Michigan, 48532

  • First OC Dermatology

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Kaiser Permanente - Glendale Medical Center

    Glendale, California, 91203

  • Industrial Medicine Associates Ima Clinical Research Inc

    Hartsdale, New York, 10530

  • Cumberland Skin Center

    Hermitage, Tennessee, 37076

  • Global Research Associates

    Homestead, Florida, 33030

  • Jubilee Clinical Research Inc

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106

  • Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center of Lees Summit

    Lee's Summit, Missouri, 64064

  • Long Beach Research Institute

    Long Beach, California, 90805

  • Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90027

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • Education and Research Foundation Inc

    Lynchburg, Virginia, 24501

  • Healthy Life Research

    Miami, Florida, 33175

  • Savin Medical Group LLC

    Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014

  • Frontier Derm Partners

    Mill Creek, Washington, 98012

  • West Virginia Research Institute

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505

  • Kirsch Dermatology LLC

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Sadick Research Group

    New York, New York, 10075

  • Unity Clinical Research

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73118

  • Pure Skin Dermatology and Aesthetics

    Orlando, Florida, 32819

  • Alliance Dermatology and Mohs Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85032

  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center PC

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Allcutis Research, Llc - Portsmouth

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Cura Clinical Research

    Sherman Oaks, California, 91403

  • Industrial Medicine Associates Ima Clinical Research Inc

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709

  • DermDox Dermatology, LLC

    Sugarloaf, Pennsylvania, 18249

  • Genesis Clinical Research LLC

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • The Woodlands Dermatology Associates

    The Woodlands, Texas, 77380

  • Continental Clinical Solutions, LLC

    Towson, Maryland, 21204

  • Dermatology Research Center of Oklahoma, PLLC

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74132

  • Essential Medical Research LLC

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

  • Wilmington Dermatology Center

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

  • The Skin Surgery Center for Clinical Research

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

China23 sites
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

  • Peking University Peoples Hospital

    Beijing, 100044

  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021

  • The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

    Changsha, Hunan, 410011

  • Chengdu Second Peoples Hospital

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610021

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000

  • The First Affiliated Hospital ,Sun-Yat Sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080

  • Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510091

  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120

  • the First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310004

  • Affiliated Hangzhou First Peoples Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310020

  • Jiangyin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    Jiangyin, Jiangsu, 214400

  • Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province

    Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330000

  • Nanyang First Peoples Hospital

    Nanyang, Henan, 473002

  • Sanmenxia Central Hospital

    Sanmenxia, Henan, 472099

  • Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital

    Shanghai, 200443

  • The First Hospital of China Medical University

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001

  • The First Hospital Of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

  • Taizhou Central Hospital

    Taizhou, Zhejiang, 318000

  • Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of science and Technology

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022

  • Wuxi Peoples Hospital

    Wuxi, Jiangsu, 241023

Other trials in China

Japan19 sites
  • Asahikawa City Hospital

    Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, 070-8610

  • Fukuoka University Hospital

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • Matsuo Clinic

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819-0373

  • Fukushima Medical University Hospital

    Fukushima, Fukushima, 960-1295

  • Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center

    Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0395

  • Teikyo University Hospital

    Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606

  • Nihon University Itabashi Hospital

    Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610

  • Mochida Dermatology Clinic

    Izumiotsu-shi, Osaka, 595-0025

  • Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital

    Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 211-8533

  • University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine

    Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566

  • Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital

    Kyoto, Kyoto, 607-8062

  • Takeoka Dermatology Clinic

    Marugame-shi, Kagawa-ken, 763-0074

  • Iwate Medical University Uchimaru Medical Center

    Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505

  • Aichi Medical University Hospital

    Nagakute-shi, Aichi-ken, 480-1195

  • Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457-8510

  • Central Clinic

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-0821

  • Nagoya City University Hospital

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602

  • Kaji Dermatology Clinic

    Nonoichi-shi, Ishikawa-ken, 921-8801

  • Dokkyo Medical University Hospital

    Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293

Other trials in Japan

Canada12 sites
  • CCA Medical Research Corporation

    Ajax, Ontario, L1S 7K8

  • SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre

    Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1

  • Alberta Derma Surgery Centre

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3

  • Vida Clinical Research

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 4J8

  • LEADER Research

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 3C3

  • DermEdge Research Incorporated

    Mississauga, Ontario, L4Y 4C5

  • Innovaderm Research Inc

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1

  • Canadian Dermatology Centre

    North York, Ontario, M3B 0A7

  • Gordon Sussman Clinical Research Incorporated

    North York, Ontario, M3B 3S6

  • Recherche Clinique Sigma Incorporated

    Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8

  • Oak Ridges Aesthetics Centre

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4E 4L6

  • Skinsense Medical Research

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 2C1

Other trials in Canada

Germany12 sites
  • Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte

    Berlin, 10117

  • Dermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis-Mahlow

    Blankenfelde-Mahlow, 15831

  • Hautarztpraxis Dr Niesmann und Dr Othlinghaus

    Bochum, 44793

  • Rosenpark Research GmbH

    Darmstadt, 64283

  • Universitaetsklinikum Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf - Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Universitaetsklinikum Essen

    Essen, 45174

  • Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Hautarztpraxis Dres Leitz und Kollegen

    Stuttgart, 70178

  • Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen

    Tübingen, 72076

  • CentroDerm GmbH

    Wuppertal, 42287

Other trials in Germany

Poland10 sites
  • AKK Medical Spolka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia Centrum Medyczne Tu sie leczy

    Gdansk, 80-280

  • Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita

    Katowice, 40-611

  • Centrum Zdrowia i Urody Maxxmed

    Lublin, 20-080

  • Centrum Badawcze Panaceum Agnieszka Brzezicka Magdalena Lenkiewicz Spzoo

    Malbork, 82-200

  • Twoja przychodnia Ncm

    Nowa Sól, 67-100

  • Twoja przychodnia Pcm

    Poznan, 61-293

  • Twoja Przychodnia Scm

    Szczecin, 71-500

  • Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Spzoo

    Tarnów, 33-100

  • Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka

    Warsaw, 02-962

  • Dermatologiczna Praktyka Lekarska Michal Torz Dermaceum Centrum Badan Klinicznych

    Wroclaw, 50-450

Other trials in Poland

Spain10 sites
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

    Badalona, Catalonia, 08916

  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907

  • Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, 35010

  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

    Madrid, 28006

  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

    Madrid, 28031

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

    Pontevedra, Galicia, 36001

  • Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223

  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe

    Valencia, Valencia, 46026

  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

    Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Argentina9 sites
  • InAER - Investigaciones en Alergia y Enfermedades Respiratorias

    Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1425

  • Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia

    Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1425

  • Cinme - Centro de Investigaciones Metabolicas

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1027AAP

  • Conexa Investigacion Clinica SA

    CABA, Distrito Federal, C1012AAY

  • Fundacion Respirar

    Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1426ABP

  • Hospital Universitario Austral

    Derqui, Pilar, Buenos Aires, B1629ODT

  • Fundacion Estudios Clinicos

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

  • Instituto de Diagnostico Abc American British Cowdray

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000

  • Centro Dermatológico Schejtman

    San Miguel, Buenos Aires, 1663

Other trials in Argentina

Brazil8 sites
  • Upeclin-Pesq Clin FacMed Botucatu

    Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-686

  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903

  • Hospital Ernesto Dornelles

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90160-093

  • IBPClin Instituto Brasil de Pesquisa Clinica

    Rio de Janeiro, 20241-180

  • Hosp e Maternidade Dr Christovao da Gama

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09030-010

  • Fundacao Abc - Centro Univ Fmabc

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-870

  • Alergoalfa Nucleo Diagnostico Tratamento e Pesquisa Clinica em Alergia

    São Paulo, 06454-010

  • Consultoria Medica e Pesquisa Clinica Cmpc

    Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18040-425

Other trials in Brazil

Czechia7 sites
  • Dermamedica, sro

    Náchod, 547 01

  • CCR Ostrava sro

    Ostrava, 702 00

  • Pratia Pardubice as

    Pardubice, 530 02

  • Clintrial sro

    Prague, 100 00

  • Pratia Prague sro

    Prague, 130 00

  • Fakultni nemocnice Bulovka

    Prague, 180 81

  • Krajska zdravotni as - Masarykova nemocnice Usti nad Labem oz

    Ústí nad Labem, 401 13

Other trials in Czechia

Greece7 sites
  • Athens Naval Hospital

    Athens, 11521

  • Thoracic General Hospital Of Athens Sotiria

    Athens, 11527

  • University General Hospital Attikon

    Athens, 12462

  • Andreas Syngros Hospital Of Venereal And Dermatological Diseases

    Athens, 16121

  • University General Hospital of Ioannina

    Ioannina, 45500

  • General University Hospital of Larissa

    Larissa, 41110

  • Papageorgiou General Hospital

    Thessaloniki, 56403

Other trials in Greece

South Korea6 sites
  • Korea University Ansan Hospital

    Ansansi, Gyeonggido, 15355

  • The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St Marys Hospital

    Incheon, 21431

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • National Medical Center

    Seoul, 04564

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

  • Korea University Guro Hospital

    Seoul, 08308

Other trials in South Korea

Taiwan6 sites
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital

    Tainan, 70403

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10002

  • Mackay Memorial Hospital Taipei Branch

    Taipei, 10449

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 11217

  • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Taoyuan, 33305

Other trials in Taiwan

Italy5 sites
  • Universita degli Studi Gabriele D Annunzio di Chieti e Pescara

    Chieti, 66100

  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan, 20122

  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia

    Perugia, 06156

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I

    Roma, 00161

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Slovakia5 sites
  • Fakultna Nemocnica s poliklinikou F D Roosevelta Banska Bystrica

    Banská Bystrica, 975 17

  • Derma therapy, spol s ro

    Bratislava, 851 01

  • Sanare spol sro

    Svidník, 089 01

  • Kaderma Majtan, sro

    Topoľčany, 955 01

  • Fakultna nemocnica Trnava

    Trnava, 917 75

Other trials in Slovakia

Portugal4 sites
  • Hospital Lusiadas Lisboa

    Lisbon, 1500-458

  • Hospital Cuf Descobertas

    Lisbon, 1998-018

  • Unidade Local de Saude de Matosinhos, EPE - Hospital Pedro Hispano

    Matosinhos Municipality, 4464-513

  • Unidade Local de Saude de Santo Antonio, EPE - Hospital de Santo Antonio

    Porto, 4099-001

Other trials in Portugal

Croatia3 sites
  • Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Naftalan

    Ivanić-Grad, 10310

  • Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center

    Zagreb, 10000

  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Latvia3 sites
  • Outpatient clinic Veselibas Centrs 4

    Riga, 1003

  • Outpatient clinic Veselibascentrs 4

    Riga, LV-1013

  • Smite Aija practice in dermatology and venerology

    Talsi, 3201

Other trials in Latvia

Hungary1 site
  • Medmare Bt

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Netherlands1 site
  • PreCare Trial and Recruitment

    Born, 6121 XK

Other trials in Netherlands

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Clinical Research of Puerto Rico

    San Juan, 00909

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, 24-week, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) Monotherapy in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in monotherapy treatment.

Being tested
Rocatinlimab, Placebo
Keywords
Atopic Dermatitis, AMG 451, KHK4083, Rocatinlimab
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RocatinlimabDrug

    Also called AMG 451

    Participants will receive Rocatinlimab subcutaneously.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Participants will receive a placebo subcutaneously.

Study groups in NCT05398445
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm AExperimentalRocatinlimab Dose 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W) + loading dose at Week 2
Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab
Arm BExperimentalRocatinlimab Dose 2 Q4W + loading dose at Week 2
Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab
Arm CPlacebo comparatorPlacebo Q4W+ loading dose at Week 2
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24

    vIGA-AD was a validated instrument rating AD severity on a 5-point scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Almost clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity. Participants achieving a score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline were considered 'Clear' or 'Almost clear'. For rIGA 0/1, when vIGA-AD = 1, investigators answered: "Did participant have barely perceptible erythema, no induration/papulation, no lichenification, and no oozing/crusting?" If "Yes," the participant met rIGA 0/1; if "No," they did not. If vIGA-AD = 0, the participant met rIGA 0/1. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 24

    EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Number of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 at Week 16

    EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Number of Participants Who Achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 at Week 16

    The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  3. Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4

    The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  4. Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4

    The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 24

    The EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 90 was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  7. Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With a ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 24

    The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  8. Number of Participants Who Achieved Facial AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Facial AD at Baseline

    The severity of facial AD was assessed using the Facial AD Severity Scale (FASS). The FASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of facial AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Number of Participants Who Achieved Hand AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Hand AD at Baseline

    The severity of hand AD was assessed using the Hand Atopic Dermatitis Severity Scale (HASS). The HASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of hand AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 16

    The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (worst observation carried forward [WOCF]) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24

    The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Severity Scoring (SCORing) of AD (SCORAD) Itch Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16

    The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  13. Change From Baseline in SCORAD Itch VAS Score at Week 24

    The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  14. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline DLQI ≥ 4

    The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured participants' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 24

    The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured patients' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD on health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  16. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline POEM Score ≥ 4

    The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline in POEM Score at Week 24

    The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  18. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Only participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  19. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  20. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  21. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  22. Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3

    AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  23. Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score at Week 24

    Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score was defined as the mean of daily scores reported by participants in an electronic diary assessing the quality of their sleep over the past 24 hours. Sleep disturbance was measured using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 indicated the highest level of sleep disturbance. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their sleep disturbance using this scale each day. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in level of sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  24. Number of Participants Who Achieved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-anxiety Subscale Score ≥ 8

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  25. Number of Participants Who Achieved HADS-depression Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-depression Subscale Score ≥ 8

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  26. Change From Baseline in HADS-anxiety Subscale Score at Week 24

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-Anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  27. Change From Baseline in HADS-depression Subscale Score at Week 24

    HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  28. Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 8.7-point Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline SCORAD Total Score ≥ 8.7

    The SCORAD total score used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. SCORAD total score ranged from 0 to 103 with a higher score indicating more severe AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2022
  2. Study start31 May 2022
  3. Primary completion28 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion13 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
769 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05398445
Sponsor's protocol ID
20210142
Other IDs
2022-501540-15-00
Acronym
ROCKET-Ignite
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
24 May 2022
Last updated
23 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.

Publications

  • Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Kabashima K, Luna PC, Hercogova JT, Spelman L, Worm M, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Mano H, Charuworn P, Wang A, Kricorian G. ROCKET: a phase 3 program evaluating the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immunotherapy. 2025 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2464528. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

    PubMed 40012373
  • Guttman-Yassky E, Kabashima K, Worm M, Luna PC, Hong HC, Chovatiya R, Bernstein JA, Kern JS, Ehst BD, Magnolo N, Herranz-Pinto P, Stein Gold L, Sofen H, Pink AE, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Yang Y, Shi R, Barragan C, Kricorian G, Schwartz-Sagi L, Bissonnette R. Efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in ROCKET-IGNITE and ROCKET-HORIZON: two global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 clinical trials. Lancet. 2026 Jan 3;407(10523):53-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01865-3. Epub 2025 Nov 25.

    PubMed 41314226

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 202 sites in 21 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 202 sites in United States, China, Japan, Canada, Germany and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05398445, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
ROCKET-Ignite Clinical Trial NCT05398445 | AzTrials