Atopic DermatitisPhase 3ROCKET-IgniteNCT05398445
A Study Evaluating Rocatinlimab in Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (ROCKET-IGNITE)
A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 202 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in monotherapy treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Rocatinlimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 769 participants
- Where
- 202 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- 31 May 2022to 13 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AD according to the AAD Consensus Criteria (2014) present for at least 12 months
- History of inadequate response to TCS (Topical Corticosteroid) of medium to higher potency (with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]).
- EASI score ≥16
- vIGA-AD score ≥3
- ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement
- Worst pruritus numerical rating scale ≥ 4
Who cannot join
- Treatment with a biological product within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1:
- Systemic corticosteroids
- Systemic immunosuppressants
- Phototherapy
- Janus kinase inhibitors
Show all 12Show fewer
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 1 week, prior to Day 1:
- TCS of any potency
- TCI
- Topical phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors
- Other topical immunosuppressive agents
- Combination topical agents including TCS of any potency, TCI, PDE4 inhibitors, or other topical immunosuppressive agents
Trial locations and contacts
202 sites in 21 countries.
202 sites in 21 countries
United States50 sites
Anaheim Clinical Trials
Anaheim, California, 92801
Cahaba Dermatology and Skin Health Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35244
Optima Research
Boardman, Ohio, 44512
Skin Care Research Incorporated
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Treasure Valley Medical Research
Boise, Idaho, 83706
IMMUNOe Research Centers
Centennial, Colorado, 80112
Dermatology Specialists of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
Onsite Clinical Solutions
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
Continental Clinical Solutions - Cherry Hill
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08034
Institute for Asthma and Allergy
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
DeNova Research
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
ClinOhio Research Services
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Dermatology Treatment and Research Center PA
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Palm Beach Dermatology Group
Delray Beach, Florida, 33484
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Onyx Clinical Research
Flint, Michigan, 48532
First OC Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Kaiser Permanente - Glendale Medical Center
Glendale, California, 91203
Industrial Medicine Associates Ima Clinical Research Inc
Hartsdale, New York, 10530
Cumberland Skin Center
Hermitage, Tennessee, 37076
Global Research Associates
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Jubilee Clinical Research Inc
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center of Lees Summit
Lee's Summit, Missouri, 64064
Long Beach Research Institute
Long Beach, California, 90805
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Dermatology Research Associates
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Education and Research Foundation Inc
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24501
Healthy Life Research
Miami, Florida, 33175
Savin Medical Group LLC
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
Frontier Derm Partners
Mill Creek, Washington, 98012
West Virginia Research Institute
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
Kirsch Dermatology LLC
Naples, Florida, 34102
Sadick Research Group
New York, New York, 10075
Unity Clinical Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73118
Pure Skin Dermatology and Aesthetics
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Alliance Dermatology and Mohs Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
The Indiana Clinical Trials Center PC
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Allcutis Research, Llc - Portsmouth
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Cura Clinical Research
Sherman Oaks, California, 91403
Industrial Medicine Associates Ima Clinical Research Inc
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
DermDox Dermatology, LLC
Sugarloaf, Pennsylvania, 18249
Genesis Clinical Research LLC
Tampa, Florida, 33606
The Woodlands Dermatology Associates
The Woodlands, Texas, 77380
Continental Clinical Solutions, LLC
Towson, Maryland, 21204
Dermatology Research Center of Oklahoma, PLLC
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74132
Essential Medical Research LLC
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137
Dundee Dermatology
West Dundee, Illinois, 60118
Wilmington Dermatology Center
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405
The Skin Surgery Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
China23 sites
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
Peking University Peoples Hospital
Beijing, 100044
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410011
Chengdu Second Peoples Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610021
The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000
The First Affiliated Hospital ,Sun-Yat Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510091
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
the First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Zhejiang Provincial Peoples Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310004
Affiliated Hangzhou First Peoples Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310020
Jiangyin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Jiangyin, Jiangsu, 214400
Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330000
Nanyang First Peoples Hospital
Nanyang, Henan, 473002
Sanmenxia Central Hospital
Sanmenxia, Henan, 472099
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
Shanghai, 200443
The First Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001
The First Hospital Of Hebei Medical University
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000
Taizhou Central Hospital
Taizhou, Zhejiang, 318000
Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430022
Wuxi Peoples Hospital
Wuxi, Jiangsu, 241023
Japan19 sites
Asahikawa City Hospital
Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, 070-8610
Fukuoka University Hospital
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180
Matsuo Clinic
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 819-0373
Fukushima Medical University Hospital
Fukushima, Fukushima, 960-1295
Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center
Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0395
Teikyo University Hospital
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606
Nihon University Itabashi Hospital
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610
Mochida Dermatology Clinic
Izumiotsu-shi, Osaka, 595-0025
Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 211-8533
University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Kyoto, Kyoto, 602-8566
Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital
Kyoto, Kyoto, 607-8062
Takeoka Dermatology Clinic
Marugame-shi, Kagawa-ken, 763-0074
Iwate Medical University Uchimaru Medical Center
Morioka, Iwate, 020-8505
Aichi Medical University Hospital
Nagakute-shi, Aichi-ken, 480-1195
Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457-8510
Central Clinic
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-0821
Nagoya City University Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602
Kaji Dermatology Clinic
Nonoichi-shi, Ishikawa-ken, 921-8801
Dokkyo Medical University Hospital
Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, 321-0293
Canada12 sites
CCA Medical Research Corporation
Ajax, Ontario, L1S 7K8
SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1
Alberta Derma Surgery Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3
Vida Clinical Research
Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 4J8
LEADER Research
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 3C3
DermEdge Research Incorporated
Mississauga, Ontario, L4Y 4C5
Innovaderm Research Inc
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Canadian Dermatology Centre
North York, Ontario, M3B 0A7
Gordon Sussman Clinical Research Incorporated
North York, Ontario, M3B 3S6
Recherche Clinique Sigma Incorporated
Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8
Oak Ridges Aesthetics Centre
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4E 4L6
Skinsense Medical Research
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 2C1
Germany12 sites
Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte
Berlin, 10117
Dermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis-Mahlow
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, 15831
Hautarztpraxis Dr Niesmann und Dr Othlinghaus
Bochum, 44793
Rosenpark Research GmbH
Darmstadt, 64283
Universitaetsklinikum Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf - Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
Universitaetsklinikum Essen
Essen, 45174
Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing
Hamburg, 20246
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Hautarztpraxis Dres Leitz und Kollegen
Stuttgart, 70178
Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen
Tübingen, 72076
CentroDerm GmbH
Wuppertal, 42287
Poland10 sites
AKK Medical Spolka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia Centrum Medyczne Tu sie leczy
Gdansk, 80-280
Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
Katowice, 40-611
Centrum Zdrowia i Urody Maxxmed
Lublin, 20-080
Centrum Badawcze Panaceum Agnieszka Brzezicka Magdalena Lenkiewicz Spzoo
Malbork, 82-200
Twoja przychodnia Ncm
Nowa Sól, 67-100
Twoja przychodnia Pcm
Poznan, 61-293
Twoja Przychodnia Scm
Szczecin, 71-500
Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Spzoo
Tarnów, 33-100
Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka
Warsaw, 02-962
Dermatologiczna Praktyka Lekarska Michal Torz Dermaceum Centrum Badan Klinicznych
Wroclaw, 50-450
Spain10 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Catalonia, 08916
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, 35010
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
Madrid, 28031
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Pontevedra, Galicia, 36001
Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, Valencia, 46026
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009
Argentina9 sites
InAER - Investigaciones en Alergia y Enfermedades Respiratorias
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1425
Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia
Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, 1425
Cinme - Centro de Investigaciones Metabolicas
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1027AAP
Conexa Investigacion Clinica SA
CABA, Distrito Federal, C1012AAY
Fundacion Respirar
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1426ABP
Hospital Universitario Austral
Derqui, Pilar, Buenos Aires, B1629ODT
Fundacion Estudios Clinicos
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Instituto de Diagnostico Abc American British Cowdray
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Centro Dermatológico Schejtman
San Miguel, Buenos Aires, 1663
Brazil8 sites
Upeclin-Pesq Clin FacMed Botucatu
Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-686
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Hospital Ernesto Dornelles
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90160-093
IBPClin Instituto Brasil de Pesquisa Clinica
Rio de Janeiro, 20241-180
Hosp e Maternidade Dr Christovao da Gama
Santo André, São Paulo, 09030-010
Fundacao Abc - Centro Univ Fmabc
Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-870
Alergoalfa Nucleo Diagnostico Tratamento e Pesquisa Clinica em Alergia
São Paulo, 06454-010
Consultoria Medica e Pesquisa Clinica Cmpc
Sorocaba, São Paulo, 18040-425
Czechia7 sites
Dermamedica, sro
Náchod, 547 01
CCR Ostrava sro
Ostrava, 702 00
Pratia Pardubice as
Pardubice, 530 02
Clintrial sro
Prague, 100 00
Pratia Prague sro
Prague, 130 00
Fakultni nemocnice Bulovka
Prague, 180 81
Krajska zdravotni as - Masarykova nemocnice Usti nad Labem oz
Ústí nad Labem, 401 13
Greece7 sites
Athens Naval Hospital
Athens, 11521
Thoracic General Hospital Of Athens Sotiria
Athens, 11527
University General Hospital Attikon
Athens, 12462
Andreas Syngros Hospital Of Venereal And Dermatological Diseases
Athens, 16121
University General Hospital of Ioannina
Ioannina, 45500
General University Hospital of Larissa
Larissa, 41110
Papageorgiou General Hospital
Thessaloniki, 56403
South Korea6 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansansi, Gyeonggido, 15355
The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St Marys Hospital
Incheon, 21431
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
National Medical Center
Seoul, 04564
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, 08308
Taiwan6 sites
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 83301
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, 70403
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10002
Mackay Memorial Hospital Taipei Branch
Taipei, 10449
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 11217
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, 33305
Italy5 sites
Universita degli Studi Gabriele D Annunzio di Chieti e Pescara
Chieti, 66100
Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, 20122
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia
Perugia, 06156
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I
Roma, 00161
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Torino, 10126
Slovakia5 sites
Fakultna Nemocnica s poliklinikou F D Roosevelta Banska Bystrica
Banská Bystrica, 975 17
Derma therapy, spol s ro
Bratislava, 851 01
Sanare spol sro
Svidník, 089 01
Kaderma Majtan, sro
Topoľčany, 955 01
Fakultna nemocnica Trnava
Trnava, 917 75
Portugal4 sites
Hospital Lusiadas Lisboa
Lisbon, 1500-458
Hospital Cuf Descobertas
Lisbon, 1998-018
Unidade Local de Saude de Matosinhos, EPE - Hospital Pedro Hispano
Matosinhos Municipality, 4464-513
Unidade Local de Saude de Santo Antonio, EPE - Hospital de Santo Antonio
Porto, 4099-001
Croatia3 sites
Special Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Naftalan
Ivanić-Grad, 10310
Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center
Zagreb, 10000
University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Zagreb, 10000
Latvia3 sites
Outpatient clinic Veselibas Centrs 4
Riga, 1003
Outpatient clinic Veselibascentrs 4
Riga, LV-1013
Smite Aija practice in dermatology and venerology
Talsi, 3201
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, 24-week, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) Monotherapy in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in monotherapy treatment.
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Rocatinlimab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Atopic Dermatitis, AMG 451, KHK4083, Rocatinlimab
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RocatinlimabDrug
Also called AMG 451
Participants will receive Rocatinlimab subcutaneously.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive a placebo subcutaneously.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Rocatinlimab Dose 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W) + loading dose at Week 2 Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab |
| Arm B | Experimental | Rocatinlimab Dose 2 Q4W + loading dose at Week 2 Receives: Drug: Rocatinlimab |
| Arm C | Placebo comparator | Placebo Q4W+ loading dose at Week 2 Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24
vIGA-AD was a validated instrument rating AD severity on a 5-point scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Almost clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity. Participants achieving a score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline were considered 'Clear' or 'Almost clear'. For rIGA 0/1, when vIGA-AD = 1, investigators answered: "Did participant have barely perceptible erythema, no induration/papulation, no lichenification, and no oozing/crusting?" If "Yes," the participant met rIGA 0/1; if "No," they did not. If vIGA-AD = 0, the participant met rIGA 0/1. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 24
EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (28)
Number of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 at Week 16
EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 at Week 16
The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 24
The EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 90 was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With a ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 24
The vIGA-AD was a validated assessment instrument used in clinical studies to globally rate the severity of AD on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = Clear, 1 = Almost clear, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe. Higher scores indicated greater disease severity. Participants who achieved a score of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction from baseline were considered to have achieved 'Clear' or 'Almost clear' status. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Facial AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Facial AD at Baseline
The severity of facial AD was assessed using the Facial AD Severity Scale (FASS). The FASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of facial AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hand AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Hand AD at Baseline
The severity of hand AD was assessed using the Hand Atopic Dermatitis Severity Scale (HASS). The HASS was an instrument used to rate the overall severity of hand AD based on a 5-category scale: clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 16
The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (worst observation carried forward [WOCF]) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24
The Worst Pruritus was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of itch. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their worst itch using this scale. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in itch intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Severity Scoring (SCORing) of AD (SCORAD) Itch Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16
The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in SCORAD Itch VAS Score at Week 24
The SCORAD Itch VAS was a component of the SCORAD tool used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. Itch VAS scale ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms of AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD severity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline DLQI ≥ 4
The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured participants' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 24
The DLQI was a 10-item, self-administered questionnaire, where the total score ranged from 0 to 30; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It was designed to measure the health-related quality of life of adult patients suffering from skin disease. The DLQI measured patients' perception of the impact of skin diseases on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the previous week. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD on health-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline POEM Score ≥ 4
The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in POEM Score at Week 24
The POEM was a 7-item validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in children and adults, where the POEM total score ranged from 0 to 28; higher scores represented a greater impact of AD. It evaluated the time spent in the past week with AD signs and symptoms: individual items of bleeding, oozing, cracked, flaking, and dry/rough skin, and their impact on sleep. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Only participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in AD skin pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
AD skin pain was assessed daily using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represented the highest intensity of AD skin pain. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score at Week 24
Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score was defined as the mean of daily scores reported by participants in an electronic diary assessing the quality of their sleep over the past 24 hours. Sleep disturbance was measured using an NRS consisting of a single item ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 indicated the highest level of sleep disturbance. Participants were asked to rate the intensity of their sleep disturbance using this scale each day. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in level of sleep disturbance.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-anxiety Subscale Score ≥ 8
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved HADS-depression Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-depression Subscale Score ≥ 8
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-anxiety Subscale Score at Week 24
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-Anxiety subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Anxiety severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-depression Subscale Score at Week 24
HADS was defined as a self-assessment questionnaire used to detect states of anxiety and depression in hospital outpatient settings. The HADS-depression subscale score ranged from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing a greater impact of AD. Depression severity was categorized as follows: 0 to 7 (Normal), 8 to 10 (Mild), 11 to 14 (Moderate), and 15 to 21 (Severe). Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were included in the analysis, and each participant's worst observation, including baseline value, before initiation of rescue therapy for AD was carried forward (WOCF) to all subsequent time points. A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in the impact of AD.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 8.7-point Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline SCORAD Total Score ≥ 8.7
The SCORAD total score used to assess the severity of AD using both physician and patient-reported data. SCORAD total score ranged from 0 to 103 with a higher score indicating more severe AD. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2022
- Study start31 May 2022
- Primary completion28 Nov 2024
- Study completion13 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 769 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05398445
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20210142
- Other IDs
- 2022-501540-15-00
- Acronym
- ROCKET-Ignite
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 24 May 2022
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.
Publications
Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Kabashima K, Luna PC, Hercogova JT, Spelman L, Worm M, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Mano H, Charuworn P, Wang A, Kricorian G. ROCKET: a phase 3 program evaluating the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immunotherapy. 2025 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2464528. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
PubMed 40012373Guttman-Yassky E, Kabashima K, Worm M, Luna PC, Hong HC, Chovatiya R, Bernstein JA, Kern JS, Ehst BD, Magnolo N, Herranz-Pinto P, Stein Gold L, Sofen H, Pink AE, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Yang Y, Shi R, Barragan C, Kricorian G, Schwartz-Sagi L, Bissonnette R. Efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in ROCKET-IGNITE and ROCKET-HORIZON: two global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 clinical trials. Lancet. 2026 Jan 3;407(10523):53-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01865-3. Epub 2025 Nov 25.
PubMed 41314226
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, 24-week, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab (AMG 451) Monotherapy in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05398445
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROCKET-Ignite / 20210142
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Atopic Dermatitis, AMG 451, KHK4083, Rocatinlimab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 769 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jul 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in monotherapy treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Drug: RocatinlimabRocatinlimab Dose 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W) + loading dose at Week 2 |
| Arm B | Experimental | Drug: RocatinlimabRocatinlimab Dose 2 Q4W + loading dose at Week 2 |
| Arm C | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo Q4W+ loading dose at Week 2 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of AD according to the AAD Consensus Criteria (2014) present for at least 12 months
- History of inadequate response to TCS (Topical Corticosteroid) of medium to higher potency (with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]).
- EASI score ≥16
- vIGA-AD score ≥3
- ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Treatment with a biological product within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1:
- Treatment with any of the following medications or therapies within 1 week, prior to Day 1:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RocatinlimabAlso: AMG 451Participants will receive Rocatinlimab subcutaneously. | Drug | Arm A, Arm B |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive a placebo subcutaneously. | Drug | Arm C |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
vIGA-AD was a validated instrument rating AD severity on a 5-point scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Almost clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; 4 = Severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity. Participants achieving a score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline were considered 'Clear' or 'Almost clear'. For rIGA 0/1, when vIGA-AD = 1, investigators answered: "Did participant have barely perceptible erythema, no induration/papulation, no lichenification, and no oozing/crusting?" If "Yes," the participant met rIGA 0/1; if "No," they did not. If vIGA-AD = 0, the participant met rIGA 0/1. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EASI was designed and widely used to assess the severity and extent of AD across four anatomical regions. It evaluated key signs of inflammation, including erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification. The total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. EASI 75 was defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in the total EASI score. Participants initiating rescue therapy for AD were classified as nonresponders at all subsequent time points.
28 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Achieved EASI 75 at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved vIGA-AD 0/1 at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With a ≥ 2-Point Reduction From Baseline (vIGA-AD 0/1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Facial AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Facial AD at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hand AD Severity Score of Clear at Week 24 for Participants With Hand AD at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Worst Pruritus NRS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Severity Scoring (SCORing) of AD (SCORAD) Itch Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in SCORAD Itch VAS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline DLQI ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline POEM Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in POEM Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 3-point Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 in Participants With Baseline Weekly Average of Daily AD Skin Pain NRS Score ≥ 3
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Disturbance NRS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Anxiety Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-anxiety Subscale Score ≥ 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved HADS-depression Subscale Score < 8 at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline HADS-depression Subscale Score ≥ 8
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-anxiety Subscale Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in HADS-depression Subscale Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 8.7-point Reduction From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score at Week 24 in Participants With Baseline SCORAD Total Score ≥ 8.7
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 40012373Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson E, Bissonnette R, Eichenfield LF, Kabashima K, Luna PC, Hercogova JT, Spelman L, Worm M, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Mano H, Charuworn P, Wang A, Kricorian G. ROCKET: a phase 3 program evaluating the efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immunotherapy. 2025 Feb;17(2):83-94. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2025.2464528. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41314226Guttman-Yassky E, Kabashima K, Worm M, Luna PC, Hong HC, Chovatiya R, Bernstein JA, Kern JS, Ehst BD, Magnolo N, Herranz-Pinto P, Stein Gold L, Sofen H, Pink AE, Esfandiari E, Arai T, Yang Y, Shi R, Barragan C, Kricorian G, Schwartz-Sagi L, Bissonnette R. Efficacy and safety of rocatinlimab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in ROCKET-IGNITE and ROCKET-HORIZON: two global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 clinical trials. Lancet. 2026 Jan 3;407(10523):53-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01865-3. Epub 2025 Nov 25.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LT-002-158 Tablets in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Participants 6 Months to <18 Years of Age With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema
RecruitingPhase 2
Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis
Eczema, Dermatitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Long Term Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Afimkibart (RO7790121) in Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Baricitinib in Patients With Job Syndrome With Lupus-Like Disease and/or Atopic Dermatitis
Hyper IgE Syndrome From STAT3 Mutation, Job s Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
202 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rocatinlimab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Amgen at 202 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 202 sites in United States, China, Japan, Canada, Germany and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Achieved Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) 1 Response With Presence of Only Barely Perceptible Erythema or vIGA-AD 0 Response (Revised Investigator's Global Assessment [rIGA] 0/1) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05398445, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2026.