Borderline Personality DisorderPhase 2NCT05399498
Psilocybin in Co-occuring Major Depressive Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder
A Phase 2 study testing Psilocybin in people with Borderline Personality Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of psilocybin in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Borderline Personality Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Psilocybin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-65
- Diagnosed with current major depressive disorder (MDD)
- Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of > 20
- Diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD)
- Borderline Personality Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale (BPD-SAS) score of > 20
- Ability to understand and sign the consent form
Who cannot join
- Unstable medical illness based on history or clinically significant abnormalities on baseline physical examination
- Current pregnancy or lactation, or inadequate contraception in women of childbearing potential
- Illegal substance use based on urine toxicology screening (except cannabis use)
- Current or past history of bipolar I disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder
- Active substance use disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An Open Label Study of Single-Dose Psilocybin for Major Depressive Disorder With Co-occurring Borderline Personality Disorder
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of psilocybin in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD).
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of psilocybin in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). Ten subjects with MDD and BPD will receive a single 25 mg oral dose of psilocybin. The hypothesis to be tested is that psilocybin will result significant reduction in symptoms of both MDD and BPD after 1 week and sustained for 4 weeks compared to baseline (improvement in symptoms will be indicated by lower scores on established outcome measures of MDD and BPD symptoms that have been used in prior studies).
- Being tested
- Psilocybin
- Keywords
- BPD, MDD, Psilocybin
- Medical subject headings
- Borderline Personality Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PsilocybinDrug
Psilocybin 25mg capsule
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Psilocybin | Experimental | Single 25 mg capsule oral dose of psilocybin Receives: Drug: Psilocybin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
The MADRS is a 10-item, clinician-administered scale that assesses depression symptoms during the last seven days. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 6, with 0 being "normal/not present" and 6 being "extreme." Scores from each item are added together to reach a total score. Higher total scores (ranging from 0-60) indicate higher severity levels of depression, while a score of 0 indicates no depressive symptoms. Change in scores from baseline to Visit 5 will be reported.
Measured: Baseline/Visit 1/Week 0 to Visit 5/Week 5
Change in Borderline Personality Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale (BPD-SAS) Total Score
The BPD-SAS covers a two-week time frame and contains 11 items, each representing a different symptom of BPD. Each item is rated on a five-point anchored rating scale of 0-4, with 0 representing no symptoms and 4 representing extreme symptoms. Total scores are computed by adding up the scores for each item (total scores range from 0-44) with higher scores indicating higher levels of severity of BPD symptoms. Change in the total score from Baseline to Visit 5 will be reported.
Measured: Baseline/Visit 1/Week 0 to Visit 5/Week 5
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
A clinician administered, single item scale measuring overall improvement of global severity of psychiatric illness. The scale itself assesses overall disorder improvement since baseline on a scale from 1 to 7 with 1 being "Very much improved" and 7 being "Very much worse." Results are reported as the scores from participants on Visit 5.
Measured: Visit 2/Week 1 to Visit 5/Week 5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Nov 2023
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025
- Study completion1 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Borderline Personality DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Open-label treatment study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Usona Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jon E Grant, MD, JD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05399498
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB22-0272
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 26 May 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gunderson J: Borderline Personality Disorder, 2nd ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 2000
Nakao K, Gunderson JG, Phillips KA, Tanaka N: Functional impairment in personality disorders. J Pers Disord 1992; 6:24-31
Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, Brown MZ, Gallop RJ, Heard HL, Korslund KE, Tutek DA, Reynolds SK, Lindenboim N. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-66. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757.
PubMed 16818865Blum N, St John D, Pfohl B, Stuart S, McCormick B, Allen J, Arndt S, Black DW. Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;165(4):468-78. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071079. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
PubMed 18281407McMain SF, Guimond T, Streiner DL, Cardish RJ, Links PS. Dialectical behavior therapy compared with general psychiatric management for borderline personality disorder: clinical outcomes and functioning over a 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;169(6):650-61. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11091416.
PubMed 22581157Lieb K, Vollm B, Rucker G, Timmer A, Stoffers JM. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):4-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062984.
PubMed 20044651Nickel MK, Muehlbacher M, Nickel C, Kettler C, Pedrosa Gil F, Bachler E, Buschmann W, Rother N, Fartacek R, Egger C, Anvar J, Rother WK, Loew TH, Kaplan P. Aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):833-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.833.
PubMed 16648324Schulz SC, Zanarini MC, Bateman A, Bohus M, Detke HC, Trzaskoma Q, Tanaka Y, Lin D, Deberdt W, Corya S. Olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: variable dose 12-week randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;193(6):485-92. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037903.
PubMed 19043153Zanarini MC, Schulz SC, Detke HC, Tanaka Y, Zhao F, Lin D, Deberdt W, Kryzhanovskaya L, Corya S. A dose comparison of olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1353-62. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04138yel.
PubMed 21535995Pascual JC, Soler J, Puigdemont D, Perez-Egea R, Tiana T, Alvarez E, Perez V. Ziprasidone in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):603-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0412.
PubMed 18251623Zanarini MC, Vujanovic AA, Parachini EA, Boulanger JL, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J. Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD): a continuous measure of DSM-IV borderline psychopathology. J Pers Disord. 2003 Jun;17(3):233-42. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.3.233.22147.
PubMed 12839102
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label Study of Single-Dose Psilocybin for Major Depressive Disorder With Co-occurring Borderline Personality Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05399498
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB22-0272
- Keywords
- BPD, MDD, Psilocybin
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Usona Institute
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Oct 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of psilocybin in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD).
Detailed description
The primary objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of psilocybin in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). Ten subjects with MDD and BPD will receive a single 25 mg oral dose of psilocybin. The hypothesis to be tested is that psilocybin will result significant reduction in symptoms of both MDD and BPD after 1 week and sustained for 4 weeks compared to baseline (improvement in symptoms will be indicated by lower scores on established outcome measures of MDD and BPD symptoms that have been used in prior studies).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Open-label treatment study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Psilocybin | Experimental | Drug: PsilocybinSingle 25 mg capsule oral dose of psilocybin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18-65
- Diagnosed with current major depressive disorder (MDD)
- Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of > 20
- Diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD)
- Borderline Personality Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale (BPD-SAS) score of > 20
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Unstable medical illness based on history or clinically significant abnormalities on baseline physical examination
- Current pregnancy or lactation, or inadequate contraception in women of childbearing potential
- Illegal substance use based on urine toxicology screening (except cannabis use)
- Current or past history of bipolar I disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder
- Active substance use disorder
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PsilocybinPsilocybin 25mg capsule | Drug | Experimental: Psilocybin |
Primary outcome
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline/Visit 1/Week 0 to Visit 5/Week 5
The MADRS is a 10-item, clinician-administered scale that assesses depression symptoms during the last seven days. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 6, with 0 being "normal/not present" and 6 being "extreme." Scores from each item are added together to reach a total score. Higher total scores (ranging from 0-60) indicate higher severity levels of depression, while a score of 0 indicates no depressive symptoms. Change in scores from baseline to Visit 5 will be reported.
Change in Borderline Personality Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale (BPD-SAS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline/Visit 1/Week 0 to Visit 5/Week 5
The BPD-SAS covers a two-week time frame and contains 11 items, each representing a different symptom of BPD. Each item is rated on a five-point anchored rating scale of 0-4, with 0 representing no symptoms and 4 representing extreme symptoms. Total scores are computed by adding up the scores for each item (total scores range from 0-44) with higher scores indicating higher levels of severity of BPD symptoms. Change in the total score from Baseline to Visit 5 will be reported.
1 secondary outcome
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
Time frame: Visit 2/Week 1 to Visit 5/Week 5
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BackgroundGunderson J: Borderline Personality Disorder, 2nd ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 2000
- BackgroundNakao K, Gunderson JG, Phillips KA, Tanaka N: Functional impairment in personality disorders. J Pers Disord 1992; 6:24-31
- Background: PubMed 16818865Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, Brown MZ, Gallop RJ, Heard HL, Korslund KE, Tutek DA, Reynolds SK, Lindenboim N. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-66. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757.
- Background: PubMed 18281407Blum N, St John D, Pfohl B, Stuart S, McCormick B, Allen J, Arndt S, Black DW. Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;165(4):468-78. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071079. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 22581157McMain SF, Guimond T, Streiner DL, Cardish RJ, Links PS. Dialectical behavior therapy compared with general psychiatric management for borderline personality disorder: clinical outcomes and functioning over a 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;169(6):650-61. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11091416.
- Background: PubMed 20044651Lieb K, Vollm B, Rucker G, Timmer A, Stoffers JM. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):4-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062984.
- Background: PubMed 16648324Nickel MK, Muehlbacher M, Nickel C, Kettler C, Pedrosa Gil F, Bachler E, Buschmann W, Rother N, Fartacek R, Egger C, Anvar J, Rother WK, Loew TH, Kaplan P. Aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):833-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.833.
- Background: PubMed 19043153Schulz SC, Zanarini MC, Bateman A, Bohus M, Detke HC, Trzaskoma Q, Tanaka Y, Lin D, Deberdt W, Corya S. Olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: variable dose 12-week randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;193(6):485-92. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037903.
- Background: PubMed 21535995Zanarini MC, Schulz SC, Detke HC, Tanaka Y, Zhao F, Lin D, Deberdt W, Kryzhanovskaya L, Corya S. A dose comparison of olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1353-62. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04138yel.
- Background: PubMed 18251623Pascual JC, Soler J, Puigdemont D, Perez-Egea R, Tiana T, Alvarez E, Perez V. Ziprasidone in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):603-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0412.
- Background: PubMed 12839102Zanarini MC, Vujanovic AA, Parachini EA, Boulanger JL, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J. Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD): a continuous measure of DSM-IV borderline psychopathology. J Pers Disord. 2003 Jun;17(3):233-42. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.3.233.22147.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Borderline Personality Disorder
Recruiting
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Versus Theta Burst Stimulation on Impulsivity, Emotional Dysregulation, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Borderline Personality Disorder Patients
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Ketamine Infusion for Symptomatic Improvement in Severe Borderline Personality Disorder
Infusion of Ketamine in Severe Borderline Personality Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
Recruiting
Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Emotion Regulation Skills Training in Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
RecruitingPhase 2
MDMA in Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Mindfulness-based Neurofeedback to Augment Psychotherapy for Adults With Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jon E Grant, MD, JD, MPH principal investigator
University of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Psilocybin in people with Borderline Personality Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score (time frame: Baseline/Visit 1/Week 0 to Visit 5/Week 5). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05399498, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.