AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstetrical Brachial Plexus PalsySCOPENCT05403034

Study of the Biological Function of Muscle Satellite Cells From Patients With Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy

A study testing Muscle biopsy in people with Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this prospective work is to study the consequences of obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis on the rotator muscles of the shoulder. The hypothesis is that shoulder stiffness of these children is due to an impairment of the shoulder rotator muscles. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 15 years
Conditions the study is for
Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy
What is being tested?
Muscle biopsy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
17 Oct 2022to 25 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • OBPP children with a planned shoulder surgery (arthrolysis and/or muscle transfer).

Who cannot join

  • other neurological disorders, post-traumatic shoulder stiffness

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Chu Montpellier

    Montpellier, 34000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Study of the Biological Function of Muscle Satellite Cells From Patients With Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy Satellite Cell Obstetrical PlExus (SCOPE)

The purpose of this prospective work is to study the consequences of obstetrical brachial plexus paralysis on the rotator muscles of the shoulder. The hypothesis is that shoulder stiffness of these children is due to an impairment of the shoulder rotator muscles. The investigators want to test the regenerative capacities of these muscles. The development of a cellular model of this pathology will allow to test new therapeutic perspectives and to validate our hypothesis.

Read the detailed description

During delivery, there can be a lesion of the nerve roots of the brachial plexus (cervical C5-C8 and/or thoracic T1 roots). The newborn presents at birth a paralysis of the arm (Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Paralysis: OBPP). One third of children with OBPP will have sequelae despite daily rehabilitation. The most frequent disability is shoulder stiffness. The current hypothesis is that this stiffness is due to a permanent imbalance between the affected shoulder muscles (lateral rotators) and the muscles less affected by the paralysis (medial rotators). Because of this imbalance, the injured shoulder is spontaneously positioned in medial rotation. This position would lead to retractions at the front of the joint despite rehabilitation. In case of incomplete recovery, growth disorders of the shoulder joint (dysplasia) appear as well as a functional handicap.

The management, from the age of 2 years, in case of shoulder stiffness and dysplasia, is surgery (arthrolysis) to regain mobility. During this operation, a muscle transfer can also be performed to strengthen the lateral rotator muscles.

However, despite surgery, mobility deficits often recur within a few years. To understand the origin of the lateral and medial rotation deficits, the investigators conducted an anatomopathological study of the rotator muscles in these children. The preliminary results show a significant damage of the rotator muscles with the presence of fibrosis which could explain the rotational stiffness and the functional impairment. To better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms, the investigatorswill set up an OBPP model in cell culture to understand the regenerative capacities and to test new pharmacological approaches.

Being tested
Muscle biopsy
Keywords
Brachial plexus, Neonatal brachial plexus palsy, Denervation, Muscle atrophy, Muscle regeneration, Botulinum toxin, Satellite cell, Primary human muscle cell culture
Medical subject headings
Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy, Muscular Atrophy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Muscle biopsyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Shoulder arthrolysis, Shoulder muscle transfer

    Peroperative muscle biopsy will be performed during a planned shoulder surgery (arthrolysis and/or muscle transfer)

Study groups in NCT05403034
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OBPP childrenExperimentalOBPP children operated on to treat shoulder stiffness.
Receives: Procedure: Muscle biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of muscle regeneration capacity: proliferation capacity

    Proliferation capacity of satellite cells assessed by immunofluorescence: percentage of Pax 7 positive cells/total desmin positive cells

    Measured: 30 days

  2. assessment of muscle regeneration capacity: differenciation capacity

    Differentiation capacity of satellite cells assessed by histology: fusion index (number of nuclei in a myotubule compared to total number of nuclei in the sample) in percentage

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Effect of botulinum toxin on the proliferation potential of satellite cells: proliferation capacity

    Proliferation capacity of satellite cells assessed by immunofluorescence: percentage of Pax 7 positive cells/total desmin positive cells.

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Effect of botulinum toxin on the proliferation potential of satellite cells: differentiation capacity

    Differentiation capacity of satellite cells assessed by histology: fusion index (number of nuclei in a myotubule compared to total number of nuclei in the sample) in percentage

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2022
  2. Study start17 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion25 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05403034
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL21_0524
Other IDs
2021-A02669-32
Acronym
SCOPE
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
26 Apr 2022
Last updated
18 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Douillard M, Deheb Z, Bozon A, Raison-Peyron N, Dereure O, Moulis L, Soria A, Du-Thanh A. Over diagnosis of bradykinin angioedema in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers. World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Aug 19;16(8):100809. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100809. eCollection 2023 Aug.

    PubMed 37638360

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Muscle biopsy in people with Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of muscle regeneration capacity: proliferation capacity (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05403034, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in