Postmenopausal OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT05405725
A Phase 3 Study to Compare Biosimilar Denosumab With Prolia®
A Phase 3 study testing ENZ215 and Prolia in people with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, run by Enzene Biosciences Ltd. at 48 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The Study will be conducted to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. The primary goal for the study is 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 85 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- ENZ215 and Prolia
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 504 participants
- Where
- 48 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Jul 2022to 18 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 85 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Willing to provide voluntary written informed consent and able to comply with the protocol requirements
- Postmenopausal women aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 85 years globally, except for Spain. In Spain specifically refer to the below criteria:
- Postmenopausal women aged ≥ 75 and ≤ 85 years with LS T-score ≤ -2.5 or
- Postmenopausal women aged ≥ 65 and < 75 years with LS T-score is ≤ -2.5 and a prior fragility fracture (except for hip fracture), including non-exclusionary vertebral fractures
- In both cases (i.e. criteria a and b), it must also be that these are women who present a contraindication for the use of bisphosphonates or who do not tolerate the oral route.
- Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 90 kg
Show all 10Show fewer
- Diagnosed with osteoporosis, with absolute BMD consistent with T-scores of ≤ 2.5 and ≥ - 4.0 at the lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) as measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at screening
- At least 5 years of postmenopausal status confirmed by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels at screening
- At least one hip joint and two vertebrae in L1-L4 region evaluable by DXA
- No other clinically significant medical history, vital signs, physical examination, laboratory profiles as deemed by the Investigator or designee that would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to denosumab or any of the excipients of the study drug
- Known intolerance to, or malabsorption of calcium or vitamin D supplements
- Previous exposure to Prolia® or any other denosumab biosimilar
- Previous use of oral bisphosphonates:
- Used for 3 or more years cumulatively
- If used for < 3 years, use within the past 12 months prior to screening
Show all 48Show fewer
- Use of intravenous bisphosphonates within the past 5 years prior to screening. If used more than 5 years prior, patients will be excluded if cumulative use was > 3 years.
- Use of parathyroid hormone or its derivatives, hormone replacement therapy, romosozumab, selective estrogen-receptor modulators, or tibolone or calcitonin within 12 months prior to enrollment Note: occasional use of intravaginal estrogen treatment is not exclusionary
- Any prior use of fluoride or strontium
- Systemic glucocorticoids (≥ 5 mg prednisone equivalent per day or cumulative dose ≥ 50 mg) for more than 10 days within 3 months prior to enrollment (topical and inhaled corticosteroids are allowed)
- Other bone active drugs (i.e. drugs affecting bone metabolism) including heparin, anti epileptics (except for benzodiazepines and pregabalin), antidepressants such as SSRIs, SNRIs, antipsychotics, systemic ketoconazole, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), lithium, protease inhibitors, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, or anabolic steroids within the past 3 months prior to screening or requiring treatment with these agents during the study.
- Note: Please refer to Section 6.11 for a comprehensive list of prohibited medications
- Known sensitivity to drug products derived from mammalian cell lines such as hormones, enzymes, cytokines, bone morphogenic proteins, clotting factors, antibodies, and fusion protein therapeutics. Patients with any known hypersensitivity to complex proteins such as monoclonal antibodies will be excluded.
- History of one severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures per Genant classification as determined by the central reading center
- History of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement
- Total hip or femoral neck T-score <-4.0
- History and/or presence of atypical femoral fracture
- Presence of any active healing fracture according to the Investigator's assessment
- History of any transplant or chronic immunosuppression (including patients on immunosuppressive therapy)
- Severe liver dysfunction (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] or aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 3 times upper limit of normal)
- Positive testing for hepatitis B (hepatitis B virus surface antigen [HbsAg]) or hepatitis C (hepatitis C virus antibody [HCV Ab]) virology
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive serology for HIV at screening
- Significantly impaired renal function (determined by glomerular filtration rate of < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, as calculated by the central laboratory) or receiving dialysis
- Oral or dental conditions:
- Osteomyelitis or history and/or presence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)
- Presence of risk factors for ONJ (e.g., periodontal disease, poorly fitting dentures, poor oral hygiene, invasive dental procedures such as tooth extractions within 6 months prior to screening)
- Active dental or jaw condition which requires oral surgery
- Planned invasive dental procedure
- Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or anticipated major surgery during the study
- Clinically significant leukopenia, neutropenia, or anemia as determined by the Investigator or any other clinically significant medical condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose a risk to patient safety or interfere with adherence to study procedures, study completion, or the interpretation of study results Note: In case of an abnormal laboratory result which in the opinion of the investigator may be an error, is borderline, or indeterminate for inclusion in the study, the investigator may consider repeating the test once in order to rule out laboratory error.
- Patient with an active infection or history of infection as follows:
- Any active infection for which systemic anti-infectives were used within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- A serious infection defined as requiring hospitalization or intravenous anti infectives within 8 weeks prior to randomization
- Recurrent or chronic infections or other active infection that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might compromise the safety of the patient
- Evidence of any of the following conditions per laboratory test results, medical history, electrocardiogram (ECG), DXA, or X-ray review:
- Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism Note: Clinical significance of abnormal TSH values in patients on stable replacement therapy due to hypothyroidism or on anti-thyroid medication should be assessed and discussed with the Medical Monitor.
- History or current hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism (intact parathyroid hormone levels not within normal range) Note: Mild secondary hyperparathyroidism in the context of vitamin D deficiency may be acceptable upon discussion with the Medical Monitor.
- Vitamin D deficiency defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D level < 20 ng/mL (< 50 nmol/L) Note: Patients can be enrolled if a repeat test (post supplementation) prior to enrollment shows corrected 25 (OH) vitamin D level ≥ 20 ng/mL (≥ 50 nmol/L).
- Current hypocalcemia (albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 8.0 mg/dL [< 2.0 mmol/L]) or hypercalcemia (albumin-adjusted serum calcium > 10.6 mg/dL [> 2.62 mmol/L])
- History of parathyroid surgery
- Any bone or metabolic disease which may affect BMD or interfere with the interpretation of the findings, e.g., osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteopetrosis, achondroplasia, Paget's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, or malabsorption syndrome
- Any malignancy, including solid tumors, and hematologic malignancies (except basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, cervical, or breast ductal carcinoma in situ, that have been completely excised and are considered cured) within the last 5 years
- Known or suspected history of alcoholism (including heavy drinking defined as consuming more than 3 drinks on one day or more than 7 drinks per week) or substance abuse within the past 12 months prior to the first dosing that the Investigator believes would interfere with understanding or completing the study
- Current heavy smoking, defined as smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day.
- Participated in any other clinical study in last 30 days prior to screening
- History and/or presence of significant cardiac disease as per Investigator's discretion, including but not restricted to:
- History of cardiac arrhythmia or long QT syndrome or ECG abnormalities at screening indicating significant risk for safety (e.g., that required hospitalization, emergency cardioversion, or defibrillation) ii. History and/or presence of myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening iii. History and/or presence of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure
- Suspected signs and symptoms of COVID-19/confirmed COVID-19 or with recent history of travel/contact (less than 2 weeks from screening) with any COVID-19 positive patient/isolation/quarantine
Trial locations and contacts
48 sites in 7 countries.
48 sites in 7 countries
Poland23 sites
Osteo-Medic S.C. A Racewicz
Bialystok
Szpital Uniwersytecki
Bydgoszcz
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Czestochowa
Częstochowa
Synexus Polska
Częstochowa
Synexus Polska
Gdansk
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Gdynia
Gdynia
Synexus Polska
Gdynia
Silmedic sp. z o.o.,ul. Gen. Wladyslawa Sikorskiego
Katowice
Synexus Polska
Katowice
ETG Kielce, ul. Zagorska
Kielce
Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne
Krakow
ETG Lodz, ul. Pilota Stanislawa Wigury
Lodz
Synexus Polska
Lodz
ETG Lublin, ul. Kunickiego
Lublin
Twoja Przychodnia Nowosolskie Centrum Medyczne,
Nowa Sól
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska
Poznan
Synexus Polska
Poznan
Twoja Przychodnia PCM
Poznan
ETG Siedlce
Siedlce
Twoja Przychodnia - Szczecinskie Centrum Medyczne
Szczecin
Synexus Polska
Warsaw
Synexus Polska
Wroclaw
Centrum Medyczne Kuba- Med
Zamość
Czechia8 sites
Research Center
Brno, 60200
G-CENTRUM Olomouc
Horní Město
Research Center
Pardubice
University Hospital.
Pilsen
Synexus Czech
Prague, 12000
Clinic
Prague, 14800
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
Prague
MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o.
Uherské Hradiště
Lithuania7 sites
JSC Saules seimos medicinos ce
Kaunas, 49449
Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno klinikos
Kaunas, 50161
Kaunas City Polyclinic
Kaunas, 51270
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital
Kaunas
Republican Siauliai Hospital
Šiauliai
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Vilnius, 08661
National Osteoporosis Center
Vilnius, 09310
Bulgaria4 sites
University Hospital
Plovdiv, 4027
Medical Center Teodora,
Rousse, 7000
DCC XVII-Sofia EOOD
Sofia, 1505
Research Center(Medical Center Synexus Sofia EOOD)
Sofia, 1784
Serbia4 sites
Institute for Rheumatology
Belgrade
Zvezdara University Medical Center
Belgrade
Institute for Treatment and Rehabilitation Niska Banja
Niška Banja
Clinical Hospital Centre Bezanijska Kosa
Zemun
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
The Study will be conducted to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.
The primary goal for the study is
- To evaluate the efficacy of ENZ215 when compared to Prolia® in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, in terms of change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline to Month 12 and
- To compare the AUEC of sCTX levels from baseline to Month 6
Read the detailed description
The study will be divided into three periods: Screening period: up to 35 days; Double-blind treatment period of 12 months; and Open-label, switch-over period of six months.
Five hundred four (504) patients (252 patients in each treatment arm) will be enrolled in this study. All eligible patients will be randomized in the double blind treatment period in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and Month 6. These participants will complete study at 12 months. A PK sub-study will be conducted in a subset of 120 participants with 60 participants in each arm.
A subset of 120 participants randomised to Prolia arm and who completed 12 months of the double-blind treatment period without any significant safety concerns per the Investigator's discretion will be offered to enroll in the open-label, switch-over extension period. After re-consenting for the open-label, switch-over study, the participants will be re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) SC at Month 12. These participants will complete the study at Month 18.
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- ENZ215, Prolia
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ENZ215Biological
Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive ENZ215 (60mg)
ProliaBiological
Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive Prolia
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ENZ215 | Experimental | ENZ215 Injection: - 60 mg denosumab administered as a single subcutaneous injection at day 1 and at month 6 Receives: Biological: ENZ215 |
| Prolia | Active comparator | Prolia Injection: - 60 mg denosumab administered as a single subcutaneous injection at day 1 and at month 6 Receives: Biological: Prolia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To Evaluate the Efficacy of ENZ215 When Compared to Prolia in Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, in Terms of Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine.
The percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) measured by DXA from baseline to month 12 and the mean (±SD) percentage change over time is displayed for the ITT set.
The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study intervention in the double-blind treatment period. In the ITT analysis set, treatment was assigned based on the study intervention to which participants were randomised, regardless of which treatment they actually received.
Measured: Month 12
Area Under the Effect Curve (AUEC) of % Change From Baseline (%CfB) of Serum C-telopeptide of Type-1 Collagen (sCTX) Levels
The AUEC of %CfB in sCTX of ENZ215 was assessed as part of pharmacodynamics assessment to compare with Prolia® in female participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis. This outcome measure was assessed for initial 6 months
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (5)
To Compare the Immunogenicity Potential of ENZ215 and Prolia
ADAs incidence such as ADA positive, ADA negative, NAB positive, NAB negative assessed at baseline and different timepoints from 1 month to 12 months and during open-label switch over period assessed. Subjects were considered as post-treatment ADA and NAb positive if they had at least one "Positive" ADA and NAb result after the first drug exposure. Post-treatment ADA and NAb status was determined regardless of the results at pre-dose.
Measured: From Baseline to Month 12 for Double blind treatment period and to month 18 for Open label switchover treatment period
To Compare the Pharmacokinetics of ENZ215 and Prolia
Comparison of PK parameters of ENZ215 and Prolia over 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Serum Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (sP1NP) Levels
Percent change from baseline in type 1 N-terminal propeptide (sP1NP) levels at 6 months
Measured: Month 6
To Compare the Change in BMD at the Lumbar Spine at Month 6
Percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine measured by DXA from baseline at month 6
Measured: Baseline to Month 6
To Compare the Change in BMD at Total Hip and Femoral Neck
Percentage change in BMD at total hip and femoral neck measured by DXA from baseline to Month to predefined timepoint
Measured: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2022
- Study start4 Jul 2022
- Primary completion18 Jul 2024
- Study completion18 Jul 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Postmenopausal OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study is having two periods, in first period its parallel assignment, second period is switch over design.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 504 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Enzene Biosciences Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Alkem Laboratories Ltd
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05405725
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALK22/ENZ215-DEN2
- Other IDs
- 2021-004811-26
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 12 May 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05405725
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALK22/ENZ215-DEN2
- Conditions
- Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 504 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Enzene Biosciences Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Alkem Laboratories Ltd
- Study start
- 4 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jul 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Feb 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Study will be conducted to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.
The primary goal for the study is
- To evaluate the efficacy of ENZ215 when compared to Prolia® in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, in terms of change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline to Month 12 and
- To compare the AUEC of sCTX levels from baseline to Month 6
Detailed description
The study will be divided into three periods: Screening period: up to 35 days; Double-blind treatment period of 12 months; and Open-label, switch-over period of six months.
Five hundred four (504) patients (252 patients in each treatment arm) will be enrolled in this study. All eligible patients will be randomized in the double blind treatment period in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and Month 6. These participants will complete study at 12 months. A PK sub-study will be conducted in a subset of 120 participants with 60 participants in each arm.
A subset of 120 participants randomised to Prolia arm and who completed 12 months of the double-blind treatment period without any significant safety concerns per the Investigator's discretion will be offered to enroll in the open-label, switch-over extension period. After re-consenting for the open-label, switch-over study, the participants will be re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) SC at Month 12. These participants will complete the study at Month 18.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study is having two periods, in first period its parallel assignment, second period is switch over design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ENZ215 | Experimental | Biological: ENZ215ENZ215 Injection: - 60 mg denosumab administered as a single subcutaneous injection at day 1 and at month 6 |
| Prolia | Active comparator | Biological: ProliaProlia Injection: - 60 mg denosumab administered as a single subcutaneous injection at day 1 and at month 6 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 85 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Willing to provide voluntary written informed consent and able to comply with the protocol requirements
- Postmenopausal women aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 85 years globally, except for Spain. In Spain specifically refer to the below criteria:
- Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 90 kg
- Diagnosed with osteoporosis, with absolute BMD consistent with T-scores of ≤ 2.5 and ≥ - 4.0 at the lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) as measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at screening
- At least 5 years of postmenopausal status confirmed by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels at screening
Key exclusion criteria (48 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to denosumab or any of the excipients of the study drug
- Known intolerance to, or malabsorption of calcium or vitamin D supplements
- Previous exposure to Prolia® or any other denosumab biosimilar
- Previous use of oral bisphosphonates:
- Use of intravenous bisphosphonates within the past 5 years prior to screening. If used more than 5 years prior, patients will be excluded if cumulative use was > 3 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ENZ215Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive ENZ215 (60mg) | Biological | ENZ215 |
| ProliaEnrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive Prolia | Biological | Prolia |
Primary outcome
To Evaluate the Efficacy of ENZ215 When Compared to Prolia in Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, in Terms of Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine.
Time frame: Month 12
The percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) measured by DXA from baseline to month 12 and the mean (±SD) percentage change over time is displayed for the ITT set. The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study intervention in the double-blind treatment period. In the ITT analysis set, treatment was assigned based on the study intervention to which participants were randomised, regardless of which treatment they actually received.
Area Under the Effect Curve (AUEC) of % Change From Baseline (%CfB) of Serum C-telopeptide of Type-1 Collagen (sCTX) Levels
Time frame: Month 6
The AUEC of %CfB in sCTX of ENZ215 was assessed as part of pharmacodynamics assessment to compare with Prolia® in female participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis. This outcome measure was assessed for initial 6 months
5 secondary outcomes
To Compare the Immunogenicity Potential of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time frame: From Baseline to Month 12 for Double blind treatment period and to month 18 for Open label switchover treatment period
To Compare the Pharmacokinetics of ENZ215 and Prolia
Time frame: 12 months
Serum Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (sP1NP) Levels
Time frame: Month 6
To Compare the Change in BMD at the Lumbar Spine at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
To Compare the Change in BMD at Total Hip and Femoral Neck
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Sensorimotor Balance Training vs Digitally Augmented Core Stabilization in Women With Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Abaloparatide Added to Ongoing Denosumab vs Continued Denosumab Alone
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
RecruitingPhase 4
Combined Anabolic Therapy
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Osteoporosis
Recruiting
Study of the Impact of Mother-of-pearl Nutritional Supplementation on the Prevention of Post-menopausal Osteoporosis
Post Menopausal Osteoporosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of TST002 Injection in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis or Low Bone Mass
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, Low Bone Mass
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
48 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ENZ215 and Prolia in people with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, run by Enzene Biosciences Ltd. at 48 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 48 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 48 sites in Poland, Czechia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Serbia and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To Evaluate the Efficacy of ENZ215 When Compared to Prolia in Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, in Terms of Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine. (time frame: Month 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.