AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseBand Vs GauzeNCT05409716

Compressive Elastic Dressing Versus TR Band

A study testing Compressive Elastic dressing for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach and Wristband TR band for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by An-Najah National University at 2 sites in Palestinian Territories.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Radial approach is widely established in cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic treatments. It has been shown to decrease bleeding, vascular problems, and mortality rates when compared to the femoral approach. It also offers better comfort to patients through early mobility and lowers hospital expenses. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Compressive Elastic dressing for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach and Wristband TR band for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
2 sitesPalestinian Territories
Study dates
1 Aug 2020to 1 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years
  • Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the consent form.
  • Patients with an indication for coronary catheterization
  • Clinically stable patients
  • Patients with palpable pulses on at least one of the radial arteries.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are hemodynamically unstable (systolic blood pressure less 90mmhg)
  • Patients with radial AV shunt for hemodialysis
  • Patients with previous CABG using radial artery
  • Patients with Renaud phenomenon or lymphedema
  • Patients who had vascular problems at the puncture site before the hemostasis process started.
  • Failure to obtain radial access

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Palestinian Territories2 sites
  • An-Najah National University Hospital

    Nablus, West Bank, P4170051

  • An-Najah National University Hospital

    Nablus

Other trials in Palestinian Territories

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Compressive Elastic Dressing and Hemostatic TR Band Following Cardiac Intervention Utilizing the Radial Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Radial approach is widely established in cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic treatments. It has been shown to decrease bleeding, vascular problems, and mortality rates when compared to the femoral approach. It also offers better comfort to patients through early mobility and lowers hospital expenses.

Previously, there were no specific devices for radial artery hemostasis. Many different types of dressings were used in various hospitals with no standardization. This raises the question of whether specific devices surpass dressings in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular complications.

Read more

The primary goal of this study was to examine the effectiveness of compression dressings and hemostatic wristbands on patients undergoing cardiac procedures via radial approach in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular problems.

The hemostatic wristband TR BandR (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized in one group, while compressive elastic dressing, standardized as 13 threads gauze overlapped, opened, longitudinally pleated once and wrapped, making a 5-cm long cylinder, 1-cm in height, was used in the other.

Being tested
Compressive Elastic dressing for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach, Wristband TR band for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach
Keywords
Radial approach, Wristband, TR Band, compressive dressing, cardiac catheterization, radial artery, safeguard, randomized controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction, Angina, Unstable, Angina, Stable, Acute Coronary Syndrome, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Compressive Elastic dressing for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approachProcedure or surgery

    Following cardiac procedure using radial approach, compressive elastic dressing, standardized as 13 threads gauze overlapped, opened, longitudinally pleated once and wrapped, making a 5-cm long cylinder, 1-cm in height, fixed with elastic crepe bandage was used to achieve hemostasis.

  • Wristband TR band for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approachProcedure or surgery

    Following cardiac procedure using radial approach, hemostatic wristband TR BandR (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized was used to achieve hemostasis.

Study groups in NCT05409716
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Compressive Elastic dressingExperimentalPatients who received compressive elastic dressing as a hemostasis technique after coronary angiography using radial approach.
Receives: Procedure: Compressive Elastic dressing for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach
wristband TR BandActive comparatorPatients who received wristband TR Band as a hemostasis technique after coronary angiography using radial approach.
Receives: Procedure: Wristband TR band for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compression "hemostasis" time

    The time from the placement of the hemostatic Wristband or Compressive dressing until its removal (when there's no blood oozing after removal), measured by minutes.

    Measured: Up to 240 minutes after placement

  2. Number of patient with Hematoma and Grade of hematoma

    It is defined by EASY hematoma scale.

    Measured: Within 24 hours after the procedure

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Number of patient with Radial artery occlusion

    Radial artery patency was checked by evaluating radial pulse, capillary refill, hand color, temperature, and assessing the puncture site and hand for any hematoma or bleeding. In the event of an access site hematoma or any other ischemia sign, the patient will be sent to the radiology department for further assessment with radial artery Doppler.

    Measured: Within 24 hours after the procedure

  2. Ischemic changes to the hand

    It is noted by clinical features of pallor, absence of pulse, pain, cold, paresthesia or paralysis.

    Measured: Within 24 hours after the procedure

  3. Post-procedural pain

    Assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, which is an 11 point subjective scale (0-10) where 0 refers for no pain, 1-3 for mild pain, 4-6 for moderate pain and 7-10 for severe pain.

    Measured: Within 24 hours after the procedure

  4. Number of patient with Radial Artery Occlusion on follow up

    Radial artery patency was checked by evaluating radial pulse and Doppler Ultrasonography.

    Measured: After 4 weeks of the procedure.

  5. Patient satisfaction of the used compression methode Assessed by Likert scale for satisfaction

    Assessed by Likert scale for satisfaction , which is a 5 point subjective scale (1-5) where 1 refers for Not at all satisfied , 2 for slightly satisfied , 3 for moderately satisfied, 4 for Very satisfied and 5 for Extremely satisfied.

    Measured: Within 24 hrs

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2022
  2. Study start1 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion1 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05409716
Sponsor's protocol ID
TR-Band Vs Gauze Swab
Acronym
Band Vs Gauze
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
4 Jun 2022
Last updated
29 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Compressive Elastic dressing for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach and Wristband TR band for hemostasis in cardiac procedure using radial approach in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction, run by An-Najah National University at 2 sites in Palestinian Territories.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Palestinian Territories. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compression "hemostasis" time (time frame: Up to 240 minutes after placement). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in