Unplanned Hospital ReadmissionsNCT05413889
Validation and Implementation Design of an Epic Systems 30-day Unplanned Readmission Risk Model
A study testing Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in people with Unplanned Hospital Readmissions and Patients at High Risk of Unplanned Readmission, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective is to assess the implementation of a computerized clinical decision support (cCDS) tool for identifying patients at high risk of unplanned readmission who could benefit from existing care programs aimed at reducing readmissions Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Unplanned Hospital Readmissions, Patients at High Risk of Unplanned Readmission
- What is being tested?
- Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2023to 17 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Hospital (AHWFBH)
- 18 years or older
- meeting inpatient criteria
- admitted to hospitalist or general medicine teaching services
- Providers on the hospitalist or general medicine teaching services
Who cannot join
- Psychiatric diagnoses during index or subsequent admission
- left Against Medical Advice (AMA)
- planned readmission
- died during index admission
- Providers who opt out of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: Validation and Implementation Design of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Leveraging Epic Systems 30-day Unplanned Readmission Risk Model
The objective is to assess the implementation of a computerized clinical decision support (cCDS) tool for identifying patients at high risk of unplanned readmission who could benefit from existing care programs aimed at reducing readmissions
Read the detailed description
Providers from either service, which includes attending physicians, residents, hospitalists, and advanced practice providers (APPs), will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG will consist of placing the Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in the story board of providers. If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board. Providers will determine which TSC is best for the patient and may order whichever TSC is appropriate for the patient. The study team will not recommend TSCs. The risk of readmission score will be present from the time of admission for those in the IG. The CG will have the same TSC orders available to them; however, they will not have the risk of readmission score present in their workflow, as such the embedded link to TSC will also not be present.
- Being tested
- Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk scoreBehavioural
If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group (IG) | Experimental | The IG will consist of placing the Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in the story board of providers - If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board Receives: Behavioral: Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score |
| control group (CG) | No intervention | The CG will have the same transitional and supportive care services (TSC) orders available to them; however, they will not have the risk of readmission score present in their workflow |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Faith Health
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Faith Health
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Care Plus
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Care Plus
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Population Health Pharmacy
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Population Health Pharmacy
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Mobile Health Clinic
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Mobile Health Clinic
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Faith Health
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Faith Health
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group- High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Care Plus
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Care Plus
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Population Health Pharmacy
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Population Health Pharmacy
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Measured: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Mobile Health Clinic
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Mobile Health Clinic
Measured: Day 30
Provider Satisfaction Score
Provider satisfaction with clinical decision support tool measured by survey
Measured: Day 30
Secondary outcomes (1)
30 day Readmission Rate
proportion of index inpatient visits with an inpatient readmission within 30 days of index discharge
Measured: Day 30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2022
- Study start2 Feb 2023
- Primary completion15 Aug 2023
- Study completion17 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Unplanned Hospital ReadmissionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG will consist of placing the Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in the story board of providers. If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk \>20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board. Providers will determine which TSC is best for the patient and may order whichever TSC or any is appropriate for the patient. The CG will have the same TSC orders available to them; however, they will not have the risk of readmission score present in their workflow, as such the embedded link to TSC will also not be present. Providers, in both IG and CG, will have the option to order one or multiple TSC at their discretion.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Donna Williams, MD, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05413889
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00079395
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Study protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation and Implementation Design of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Leveraging Epic Systems 30-day Unplanned Readmission Risk Model
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05413889
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00079395
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective is to assess the implementation of a computerized clinical decision support (cCDS) tool for identifying patients at high risk of unplanned readmission who could benefit from existing care programs aimed at reducing readmissions
Detailed description
Providers from either service, which includes attending physicians, residents, hospitalists, and advanced practice providers (APPs), will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG will consist of placing the Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in the story board of providers. If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board. Providers will determine which TSC is best for the patient and may order whichever TSC is appropriate for the patient. The study team will not recommend TSCs. The risk of readmission score will be present from the time of admission for those in the IG. The CG will have the same TSC orders available to them; however, they will not have the risk of readmission score present in their workflow, as such the embedded link to TSC will also not be present.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG will consist of placing the Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in the story board of providers. If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board. Providers will determine which TSC is best for the patient and may order whichever TSC or any is appropriate for the patient. The CG will have the same TSC orders available to them; however, they will not have the risk of readmission score present in their workflow, as such the embedded link to TSC will also not be present. Providers, in both IG and CG, will have the option to order one or multiple TSC at their discretion.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention group (IG) | Experimental | Behavioral: Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk scoreThe IG will consist of placing the Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in the story board of providers - If a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board |
| control group (CG) | No intervention | –The CG will have the same transitional and supportive care services (TSC) orders available to them; however, they will not have the risk of readmission score present in their workflow |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Hospital (AHWFBH)
- 18 years or older
- meeting inpatient criteria
- admitted to hospitalist or general medicine teaching services
- Providers on the hospitalist or general medicine teaching services
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Psychiatric diagnoses during index or subsequent admission
- left Against Medical Advice (AMA)
- planned readmission
- died during index admission
- Providers who opt out of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk scoreIf a patient is identified as having a high risk of readmission defined as readmission risk >20%, a link to transitional and supportive care services (TSC) will be appear in the story board. | Behavioural | intervention group (IG) |
Primary outcome
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Faith Health
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Faith Health
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Care Plus
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Care Plus
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Population Health Pharmacy
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Population Health Pharmacy
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Mobile Health Clinic
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Control group - Mobile Health Clinic
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Faith Health
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Faith Health
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group- High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - High Risk Readmission Program (HRI)
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Care Plus
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Care Plus
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Population Health Pharmacy
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Population Health Pharmacy
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Geriatrics Transitional Care
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Mobile Health Clinic
Time frame: Day 30
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group - Mobile Health Clinic
Provider Satisfaction Score
Time frame: Day 30
Provider satisfaction with clinical decision support tool measured by survey
1 secondary outcome
30 day Readmission Rate
Time frame: Day 30
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Study protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Related trials for Unplanned Hospital Readmissions
Not yet recruiting
A Clinician-Patient Dual Behavior Change Framework to Leverage Informed Digital Nudges to Reduce Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes: A Trial for Scalable Strategy to Reduce Readmissions (PREVENT-R)
Readmission, Readmission Rates
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Psychoactive Drug Use and Acute Care Use After Trauma and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Wounds and Injuries, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of FEED@Home Intervention
Dementia, Dementia Severe
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Pharmacist-led Care Navigation Mediated by Digital Health Tools on Hospital Readmissions
Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating Intervention Allocation Policies for Reducing Hospital Readmissions at Michigan Medicine
Transition of Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Donna Williams, MD principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Epic 30-day unplanned readmission risk score in people with Unplanned Hospital Readmissions and Patients at High Risk of Unplanned Readmission, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of transitional and supportive care services (TSC) referrals by providers in the Intervention group (time frame: Day 30). The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2023.