AzTrials
AzTrials

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)NCT05414578

NORDTREAT Prospective Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease

An observational study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) and Crohn Disease (CD), run by University of Southern Denmark at 17 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primarily ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic disease entity affecting individuals of all ages, and which may severely impact the lives of the patients and their families as well as society. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
366 participants
Where
17 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
7 Feb 2022to 28 Feb 2025
How long will I take part?
52 Weeks
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients referred to the hospital on suspicion of IBD

Who may be able to join

  • Referred on the suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Adult (+18 years of age)
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • A previous known diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBD-U
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Unable to comply with protocol requirements (e.g., for reasons including alcohol and/or recreational drug abuse)

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 4 countries.

17 sites in 4 countries

Sweden6 sites
  • Höglandssjukhuset Eksjö

    Eksjö, Region Jönköpings Län, 57581

  • Universitetssjukhuset i Linköping

    Linköping, Region Östergötland, 58185

  • Universitetssjukhuset Örebro

    Örebro, Örebro County, 70185

  • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset

    Stockholm, Region Stockholm, 17176

  • Ersta Sjukhus

    Stockholm, 11691

  • Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala

    Uppsala, Region Uppsala, 75185

Other trials in Sweden

Denmark5 sites
  • University Hospital of Southern Denmark

    Aabenraa, 6200

  • SVS Esbjerg Hospital

    Esbjerg

  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense

  • OUH Svendborg Hospital

    Svendborg

  • SLB Vejle Hospital

    Vejle

Other trials in Denmark

Norway5 sites
  • Vestre Viken HF

    Drammen, 3004

  • Østfold Kalnes

    Grålum, 1714

  • Oslo Universitetssykehus

    Oslo, 0424

  • Sykehuset i Telemark

    Skien, 3710

  • Sykehuset i Vestfold

    Tønsberg, 3103

Other trials in Norway

Iceland1 site
  • Landspitali

    Reykjavik, 101

Other trials in Iceland

About this study

Official title: The Nordic IBD Study Within Personalized Medicine - Diagnosing and Prediction Using Molecular Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the NORDTREAT Prospective Cohort Study

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primarily ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic disease entity affecting individuals of all ages, and which may severely impact the lives of the patients and their families as well as society. Individuals with IBD may have to live with relapsing symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fatigue. Further, a substantial proportion of patients develop serious complications such as bowel obstruction and fistula, and some develop complicating liver disease and eventually colorectal cancer. The consequences are that many patients suffer hospitalizations, recurring sick-leave, life-long medication, and surgical interventions. As IBD has become increasingly common in Western populations there is a clear need to improve the outcome from IBD.

IBD is a heterogeneous disease entity with substantial differences between patients and personalized medicine may help provide strategies for better treatment . Currently, one of the main unmet needs is the glaring lack of robust biomarkers for individual disease characterization. This lack leads to delayed diagnosis, worse outcomes, increased mortality and an amplified disease burden. Furthermore, diagnosis of IBD is difficult and early diagnosis is crucial as it helps avoid the development of irreversible organ damage. Therefore, there is an emerging focus on the development of simple, non-invasive, and cheap biomarkers to support clinical decision-making in IBD.

Read more

This Nordic, prospective, clinical study has the aim of identifying markers that are associated with the diagnosis of IBD and prediction of clinical outcomes with various disease manifestations. Importantly, this study will evaluate the markers in a relevant clinical setting, i.e. among patients referred to the hospital for suspicion on IBD using the ECCO Criteria.

Specifically the aims of the study are to:

  • Improve the accuracy to diagnose IBD
  • Improve the accuracy to define the prognosis of IBD

The study is approved by the local Ethics Committee (S-20200051) and the local Data Agency (20/54594).

Read the detailed description

The primary aim is to identify molecular markers (e.g. in the blood and stools) for discrimination between individuals diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) inclusive Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBD-U), and those without (non-IBD). Participants with suspected IBD at baseline, with various disease pathways, will be evaluated again using a 1-year cohort study. Diagnosis and clinical outcome will be evaluated at referral and after 1 year of observation.

The secondary aims are, in addition to the molecular information, to investigate whether the inclusion of information on clinical and lifestyle factors as well as combination hereof (e.g. gene-environment interaction analyses) can improve the predictive potential of identifying IBD and distinguish the prognosis.

Study design: A prospective Nordic multicenter study on prognostic factors for the diagnosis and characterization of IBD among patients referred to the hospital on suspicion of IBD. A panel of possible prognostic biomarkers for diagnostic purposes will be applied to all participants.

Setting: All patients referred due to a suspicion of IBD to the departments of gastroenterology in Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Vejle Hospital, Esbjerg Hospital and potentially Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa will be invited to take part in the study. Participants will be included from January 2022 for a 1-year period or until 800 participants in the Nordic study (up to 400 in Denmark) have been included. The follow-up period is one-year including visits and questionnaires and an additional nine years of follow-up by the use of register data. Biological material will be obtained four times for participants with IBD, at week-2/0, and 12, 26 and 52 after the diagnosis has been established. Participants where IBD is not established (non-IBD) will only have biological material obtained at baseline (that is visit -2/0) and will have a clinical interview after 52 weeks. All participants are treated according to standard clinical practice by the clinical departments.

Clinical data consist of personal data, data on health and disease, lifestyle, laboratory measures, and disease activity scores including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical assessments, and laboratory data. Each participant will fill out validated questionnaires on disease activity, quality of life, and lifestyle using electronic links.

Data management: Study data registered by clinicians, study nurses and technicians will be stored in the web-based case report form (eCRF) Viedoc (Viedoc™, Uppsala, Sweden) or REDCap (Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN) at Odense University Hospital) for the diet questionnaire. The questionnaires are in Danish and the participants will have access to the questionnaires via an electronic link sent to their personal, electronic mailbox (REDCap) or via an investigator provided link to MyViedoc. All data will be stored in secure research storage facilities.

Statistical methods: We will develop multivariable prediction models relating multiple predictors for a particular individual to the probability of or risk for the presence (diagnosis of IBD at baseline) or future occurrence (prognosis) of a particular outcome such as severe IBD within the first year. Predictors such as biomarkers are covariates, explored as prognostic factors (independent variables).

The primary hypothesis is that the final biomarker will define the participant population into two groups each consisting of 50%: a biomarker positive group whereof 80% will be diagnosed with IBD and a biomarker negative group whereof 20% will be diagnosed with IBD.

For a comparison of two independent binomial proportions using the likelihood ratio statistic with a Chi-square approximation with a two-sided significance level of 0.05, a total sample size of 800 assuming a ratio biomarker positivity-to-negativity of 1 to 1 has an approximate power of 100% when the proportions of being diagnosed with IBD are 0.8 and 0.2. If we assume that we will have 800 study participants, we will potentially ("rule of thumb") be able to build a statistical model with as many as 80 covariates in the multivariable model.

The associations of the suspected important biomarkers with other variables will be tested with non-parametric tests: with Spearman rank correlation (rs) for continuous variables, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test, including a Wilcoxon-type test for trend across ordered groups where appropriate, for categorical variables. In general, logistic regression models will be used with individual marker as the exposure variables and the clinical response as the outcome (dependent variable). The analyses will be adjusted simultaneously for sex, age, and prescribed targeted therapy. Potential interaction between biomarker status (positive/negative) and specific drug type will be analyzed. Covariates (biomarkers) consist of various measures within genetics, transcriptomic, microbiomes, and proteomics.

Sample size considerations: Assuming that biomarker positivity constitutes 50% of the individuals enrolled at baseline, if our event rate is 10% on average, a total sample size of 800 patients (i.e. 400 biomarker positive) we will have a very good statistical power (99.7%) to detect a difference between proportions having surgery of 10% points (15% and 5%, respectively). If we decide to split the data set into two (2×400 individuals), in order to first build the model, and subsequently validate it in the second independent dataset, we will have 91.8% statistical power to detect a difference between groups. If the prognostic value of our biomarkers is not that effective separating the number of patients with severe IBD at week 52, we will still have more than 90% power to detect a difference between biomarker groups of 6% points (e.g. 10% and 4%, respectively).

Another consideration is the number of events (individuals having severe IBD at week 52) per variable (EPV) considered for inclusion in the multivariable model. For logistic regression modelling the EPV should be at least ten times the number of potential prognostic variables that could be included in the model. As a consequence of this logic, our expected sample size of 800 individuals (having 80 events) will, with reasonable confidence, allow us to create a multivariable model with up to 8 covariates simultaneously.

Project organization: NORDTREAT is part of a larger Nordic project (DK, SE, NO and IS) where regular meetings will be held between the partners. Collaborative research and material transfer agreements will be conducted with the national and international collaborators.

In addition to the scientific reporting of results, major findings with translational implications will be communicated to health professionals, patient organizations, public health policy makers, and to the general public through various media and news activities.

Keywords
Prospective clinical study, Biomarkers, Diagnosis, Prognosis
Medical subject headings
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative, Disease

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improving the accuracy to diagnose IBD

    The primary endpoint in the cross-sectional study will be diagnosis, i.e., IBD (including CD, UC, IBD-U) or non-IBD (patients that are not diagnosed with IBD) at referral. IBD is diagnosed according to the ECCO criteria based on endoscopic, histologic and/or radiological criteria.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

  2. Improving the accuracy to define prognosis of IBD

    The primary endpoint in the longitudinal cohort study will be severe IBD at week 52 defined as:

    • IBD-related surgery or
    • IBD-related hospitalization (except planned procedures) or
    • IBD-related death

    Measured: Week 52

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Lack of corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 12*

    ● Clinical remission, CD: Patient reported outcome 2 (abdominal pain ≤ 1 and stool frequency ≤ 3) or Harvey Bradshaw Index < 5

    ● Clinical remission, UC: Patient reported outcome 2 (rectal bleeding = 0 and stool frequency = 0) or Partial Mayo (< 3 and no score >1)

    *Both local acting systemic administered (budesonide) and systemic steroids (prednisolon)

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Lack of corticosteroid-free endoscopic healing at week 52*

    ● Endoscopic healing, CD: Simple endoscopic score in CD < 3 points or absence of ulcerations (e.g. SES-CD ulceration subscores = 0)

    ● Endoscopic healing, UC: Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 points, or UC endoscopic index of severity ≤ 1 points

    *Both local acting systemic administered (budesonide) and systemic steroids (prednisolon)

    Measured: Week 52

  3. Disease impact on patients life (daily functioning and quality of life)

    ● The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (with a scale from 1-7); where

    1 is eg. "All of the time" and 7 is "At no time" or 1 is "No energy" and 7 is "Full of energy"

    Measured: Week 52

  4. Disease impact on patients life (perception of health)

    ● Short Form 36 is an 11-item questionnaire on the patient's perception of his/her health (with scales from 1-3, 1-5, 1-6 or yes / no) where e.g. 1 denotes "Excellent" and 5 denotes "Bad" or 1 denotes "No pain" and 6 denotes "Very strong pain".

    Measured: Week 52

  5. Disease impact on patients life

    ● The 14-item version of the IBD Disability Index (modified to be suitable as a self-report) is a questionnaire on IBD and perception of health. The scales range from eg.:

    • Very good / Good / Moderate / Bad / Very bad
    • Yes / No
    • None / Mild / Moderate / Severe / Extreme

    Measured: Week 52

  6. Disease impact on patients life (fecal incontinence)

    ● Fecal incontinence according to the Wexner score (with a scale from 0-20); where 0 is perfect continence and 20 is complete incontinence.

    Measured: Week 52

  7. Mid-term complications

    • Bowel damage in CD according to the Lémann index
    • IBD-related surgery and hospitalizations defined as:
    • Surgery, UC: any colectomy
    • Surgery, CD: any CD-related surgery
    • Hospitalizations: A composite endpoint combining the total number of IBD-related hospitalizations (including readmissions), and the cumulative length of hospital stay.
    • Disease extension in UC: focus on macroscopic proximal disease extension

    Measured: Week 52

  8. Long-term complications

    • Gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal dysplasia
    • Cancer
    • Mortality

    Measured: Week 52

  9. Surgery in CD due to obstructive symptoms (stenosis)

    Cumulative number of surgeries in CD due to stenosis

    Measured: Week 52

  10. Anxiety and depression

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item scale with seven items each for anxiety and depression subscales. Scoring ranges from 0 to 3 and a score above 8 denotes anxiety or depression respectively.

    Measured: Week 52

  11. Fatigue Questionnaire

    The Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Fatigue (IBD-F) Part One is a 5-item scale where scoring ranges from 0 to 4. Zero denotes no fatigue and 4 denotes extreme fatigue.

    Measured: Week 52

  12. Flares

    Cumulative number of flares at 1 year

    Measured: Week 52

  13. Glucocorticoid exposures

    Cumulative glucocorticoid exposures at 1 year

    Measured: Week 52

  14. Adverse drug reactions

    Cumulative number of adverse drug reactions

    Measured: Week 52

  15. Increased faecal calprotectin at week 52

    Increased faecal calprotectin is defined as cumulative number of patients with a concentration of faecal calprotectin higher than 250 μg/g

    Measured: Week 52

  16. Time to start of biological therapy

    Cumulative number of days before start of biological therapy

    Measured: Week 52

  17. Time to onset of event (IBD-related surgery or IBD-related hospitalization)

    Cumulative number of days before onset of IBD-related surgery or IBD-related hospitalization

    Measured: Week 52

  18. The composite secondary outcome of the proportion of patients who experience severe IBD within 52 weeks after inclusion

    Cumulative number of patients who experience:

    • Need for medication between diagnosis and one year (immunomodulators, biologicals, steroids) or
    • Need for surgery between diagnosis and one year or
    • Need for hospitalization between diagnosis and one year or
    • Number of relapses between diagnosis and one year.

    Measured: Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2022
  2. Study start7 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
366 participants (actual)
Target duration
52 Weeks
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05414578
Sponsor's protocol ID
NORDTREAT_MOK 2022
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
28 Apr 2022
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Fejrskov A, Fuchtbauer JD, Daviethsdottir LG, Halfvarson J, Hoivik ML, Jensen MD, Mortensen JH, Nielsen LN, Rejler M, Repsilber D, Soderholm JD, Aalykke C, Andersen V, Christensen R, Kjeldsen J. Novel biomarker profiles to improve individual diagnosis and prognosis in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: protocol for the Nordic inception cohort study (NORDTREAT). BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083144.

    PubMed 38754881

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) and Crohn Disease (CD), run by University of Southern Denmark at 17 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improving the accuracy to diagnose IBD (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05414578, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in