Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)NCT05414578
NORDTREAT Prospective Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease
An observational study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) and Crohn Disease (CD), run by University of Southern Denmark at 17 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primarily ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic disease entity affecting individuals of all ages, and which may severely impact the lives of the patients and their families as well as society. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), Crohn Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
- How many people
- 366 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2022to 28 Feb 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 52 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients referred to the hospital on suspicion of IBD
Who may be able to join
- Referred on the suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease
- Adult (+18 years of age)
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- A previous known diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBD-U
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to comply with protocol requirements (e.g., for reasons including alcohol and/or recreational drug abuse)
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 4 countries.
17 sites in 4 countries
Sweden6 sites
Höglandssjukhuset Eksjö
Eksjö, Region Jönköpings Län, 57581
Universitetssjukhuset i Linköping
Linköping, Region Östergötland, 58185
Universitetssjukhuset Örebro
Örebro, Örebro County, 70185
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset
Stockholm, Region Stockholm, 17176
Ersta Sjukhus
Stockholm, 11691
Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala
Uppsala, Region Uppsala, 75185
Denmark5 sites
University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Aabenraa, 6200
SVS Esbjerg Hospital
Esbjerg
Odense University Hospital
Odense
OUH Svendborg Hospital
Svendborg
SLB Vejle Hospital
Vejle
Norway5 sites
Vestre Viken HF
Drammen, 3004
Østfold Kalnes
Grålum, 1714
Oslo Universitetssykehus
Oslo, 0424
Sykehuset i Telemark
Skien, 3710
Sykehuset i Vestfold
Tønsberg, 3103
About this study
Official title: The Nordic IBD Study Within Personalized Medicine - Diagnosing and Prediction Using Molecular Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the NORDTREAT Prospective Cohort Study
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primarily ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic disease entity affecting individuals of all ages, and which may severely impact the lives of the patients and their families as well as society. Individuals with IBD may have to live with relapsing symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fatigue. Further, a substantial proportion of patients develop serious complications such as bowel obstruction and fistula, and some develop complicating liver disease and eventually colorectal cancer. The consequences are that many patients suffer hospitalizations, recurring sick-leave, life-long medication, and surgical interventions. As IBD has become increasingly common in Western populations there is a clear need to improve the outcome from IBD.
IBD is a heterogeneous disease entity with substantial differences between patients and personalized medicine may help provide strategies for better treatment . Currently, one of the main unmet needs is the glaring lack of robust biomarkers for individual disease characterization. This lack leads to delayed diagnosis, worse outcomes, increased mortality and an amplified disease burden. Furthermore, diagnosis of IBD is difficult and early diagnosis is crucial as it helps avoid the development of irreversible organ damage. Therefore, there is an emerging focus on the development of simple, non-invasive, and cheap biomarkers to support clinical decision-making in IBD.
Read more
This Nordic, prospective, clinical study has the aim of identifying markers that are associated with the diagnosis of IBD and prediction of clinical outcomes with various disease manifestations. Importantly, this study will evaluate the markers in a relevant clinical setting, i.e. among patients referred to the hospital for suspicion on IBD using the ECCO Criteria.
Specifically the aims of the study are to:
- Improve the accuracy to diagnose IBD
- Improve the accuracy to define the prognosis of IBD
The study is approved by the local Ethics Committee (S-20200051) and the local Data Agency (20/54594).
Read the detailed description
The primary aim is to identify molecular markers (e.g. in the blood and stools) for discrimination between individuals diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) inclusive Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBD-U), and those without (non-IBD). Participants with suspected IBD at baseline, with various disease pathways, will be evaluated again using a 1-year cohort study. Diagnosis and clinical outcome will be evaluated at referral and after 1 year of observation.
The secondary aims are, in addition to the molecular information, to investigate whether the inclusion of information on clinical and lifestyle factors as well as combination hereof (e.g. gene-environment interaction analyses) can improve the predictive potential of identifying IBD and distinguish the prognosis.
Study design: A prospective Nordic multicenter study on prognostic factors for the diagnosis and characterization of IBD among patients referred to the hospital on suspicion of IBD. A panel of possible prognostic biomarkers for diagnostic purposes will be applied to all participants.
Setting: All patients referred due to a suspicion of IBD to the departments of gastroenterology in Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Vejle Hospital, Esbjerg Hospital and potentially Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa will be invited to take part in the study. Participants will be included from January 2022 for a 1-year period or until 800 participants in the Nordic study (up to 400 in Denmark) have been included. The follow-up period is one-year including visits and questionnaires and an additional nine years of follow-up by the use of register data. Biological material will be obtained four times for participants with IBD, at week-2/0, and 12, 26 and 52 after the diagnosis has been established. Participants where IBD is not established (non-IBD) will only have biological material obtained at baseline (that is visit -2/0) and will have a clinical interview after 52 weeks. All participants are treated according to standard clinical practice by the clinical departments.
Clinical data consist of personal data, data on health and disease, lifestyle, laboratory measures, and disease activity scores including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical assessments, and laboratory data. Each participant will fill out validated questionnaires on disease activity, quality of life, and lifestyle using electronic links.
Data management: Study data registered by clinicians, study nurses and technicians will be stored in the web-based case report form (eCRF) Viedoc (Viedoc™, Uppsala, Sweden) or REDCap (Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN) at Odense University Hospital) for the diet questionnaire. The questionnaires are in Danish and the participants will have access to the questionnaires via an electronic link sent to their personal, electronic mailbox (REDCap) or via an investigator provided link to MyViedoc. All data will be stored in secure research storage facilities.
Statistical methods: We will develop multivariable prediction models relating multiple predictors for a particular individual to the probability of or risk for the presence (diagnosis of IBD at baseline) or future occurrence (prognosis) of a particular outcome such as severe IBD within the first year. Predictors such as biomarkers are covariates, explored as prognostic factors (independent variables).
The primary hypothesis is that the final biomarker will define the participant population into two groups each consisting of 50%: a biomarker positive group whereof 80% will be diagnosed with IBD and a biomarker negative group whereof 20% will be diagnosed with IBD.
For a comparison of two independent binomial proportions using the likelihood ratio statistic with a Chi-square approximation with a two-sided significance level of 0.05, a total sample size of 800 assuming a ratio biomarker positivity-to-negativity of 1 to 1 has an approximate power of 100% when the proportions of being diagnosed with IBD are 0.8 and 0.2. If we assume that we will have 800 study participants, we will potentially ("rule of thumb") be able to build a statistical model with as many as 80 covariates in the multivariable model.
The associations of the suspected important biomarkers with other variables will be tested with non-parametric tests: with Spearman rank correlation (rs) for continuous variables, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test, including a Wilcoxon-type test for trend across ordered groups where appropriate, for categorical variables. In general, logistic regression models will be used with individual marker as the exposure variables and the clinical response as the outcome (dependent variable). The analyses will be adjusted simultaneously for sex, age, and prescribed targeted therapy. Potential interaction between biomarker status (positive/negative) and specific drug type will be analyzed. Covariates (biomarkers) consist of various measures within genetics, transcriptomic, microbiomes, and proteomics.
Sample size considerations: Assuming that biomarker positivity constitutes 50% of the individuals enrolled at baseline, if our event rate is 10% on average, a total sample size of 800 patients (i.e. 400 biomarker positive) we will have a very good statistical power (99.7%) to detect a difference between proportions having surgery of 10% points (15% and 5%, respectively). If we decide to split the data set into two (2×400 individuals), in order to first build the model, and subsequently validate it in the second independent dataset, we will have 91.8% statistical power to detect a difference between groups. If the prognostic value of our biomarkers is not that effective separating the number of patients with severe IBD at week 52, we will still have more than 90% power to detect a difference between biomarker groups of 6% points (e.g. 10% and 4%, respectively).
Another consideration is the number of events (individuals having severe IBD at week 52) per variable (EPV) considered for inclusion in the multivariable model. For logistic regression modelling the EPV should be at least ten times the number of potential prognostic variables that could be included in the model. As a consequence of this logic, our expected sample size of 800 individuals (having 80 events) will, with reasonable confidence, allow us to create a multivariable model with up to 8 covariates simultaneously.
Project organization: NORDTREAT is part of a larger Nordic project (DK, SE, NO and IS) where regular meetings will be held between the partners. Collaborative research and material transfer agreements will be conducted with the national and international collaborators.
In addition to the scientific reporting of results, major findings with translational implications will be communicated to health professionals, patient organizations, public health policy makers, and to the general public through various media and news activities.
- Keywords
- Prospective clinical study, Biomarkers, Diagnosis, Prognosis
- Medical subject headings
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease, Colitis, Ulcerative, Disease
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Improving the accuracy to diagnose IBD
The primary endpoint in the cross-sectional study will be diagnosis, i.e., IBD (including CD, UC, IBD-U) or non-IBD (patients that are not diagnosed with IBD) at referral. IBD is diagnosed according to the ECCO criteria based on endoscopic, histologic and/or radiological criteria.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
Improving the accuracy to define prognosis of IBD
The primary endpoint in the longitudinal cohort study will be severe IBD at week 52 defined as:
- IBD-related surgery or
- IBD-related hospitalization (except planned procedures) or
- IBD-related death
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (18)
Lack of corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 12*
● Clinical remission, CD: Patient reported outcome 2 (abdominal pain ≤ 1 and stool frequency ≤ 3) or Harvey Bradshaw Index < 5
● Clinical remission, UC: Patient reported outcome 2 (rectal bleeding = 0 and stool frequency = 0) or Partial Mayo (< 3 and no score >1)
*Both local acting systemic administered (budesonide) and systemic steroids (prednisolon)
Measured: Week 12
Lack of corticosteroid-free endoscopic healing at week 52*
● Endoscopic healing, CD: Simple endoscopic score in CD < 3 points or absence of ulcerations (e.g. SES-CD ulceration subscores = 0)
● Endoscopic healing, UC: Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0 points, or UC endoscopic index of severity ≤ 1 points
*Both local acting systemic administered (budesonide) and systemic steroids (prednisolon)
Measured: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life (daily functioning and quality of life)
● The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (with a scale from 1-7); where
1 is eg. "All of the time" and 7 is "At no time" or 1 is "No energy" and 7 is "Full of energy"
Measured: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life (perception of health)
● Short Form 36 is an 11-item questionnaire on the patient's perception of his/her health (with scales from 1-3, 1-5, 1-6 or yes / no) where e.g. 1 denotes "Excellent" and 5 denotes "Bad" or 1 denotes "No pain" and 6 denotes "Very strong pain".
Measured: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life
● The 14-item version of the IBD Disability Index (modified to be suitable as a self-report) is a questionnaire on IBD and perception of health. The scales range from eg.:
- Very good / Good / Moderate / Bad / Very bad
- Yes / No
- None / Mild / Moderate / Severe / Extreme
Measured: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life (fecal incontinence)
● Fecal incontinence according to the Wexner score (with a scale from 0-20); where 0 is perfect continence and 20 is complete incontinence.
Measured: Week 52
Mid-term complications
- Bowel damage in CD according to the Lémann index
- IBD-related surgery and hospitalizations defined as:
- Surgery, UC: any colectomy
- Surgery, CD: any CD-related surgery
- Hospitalizations: A composite endpoint combining the total number of IBD-related hospitalizations (including readmissions), and the cumulative length of hospital stay.
- Disease extension in UC: focus on macroscopic proximal disease extension
Measured: Week 52
Long-term complications
- Gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal dysplasia
- Cancer
- Mortality
Measured: Week 52
Surgery in CD due to obstructive symptoms (stenosis)
Cumulative number of surgeries in CD due to stenosis
Measured: Week 52
Anxiety and depression
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item scale with seven items each for anxiety and depression subscales. Scoring ranges from 0 to 3 and a score above 8 denotes anxiety or depression respectively.
Measured: Week 52
Fatigue Questionnaire
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Fatigue (IBD-F) Part One is a 5-item scale where scoring ranges from 0 to 4. Zero denotes no fatigue and 4 denotes extreme fatigue.
Measured: Week 52
Flares
Cumulative number of flares at 1 year
Measured: Week 52
Glucocorticoid exposures
Cumulative glucocorticoid exposures at 1 year
Measured: Week 52
Adverse drug reactions
Cumulative number of adverse drug reactions
Measured: Week 52
Increased faecal calprotectin at week 52
Increased faecal calprotectin is defined as cumulative number of patients with a concentration of faecal calprotectin higher than 250 μg/g
Measured: Week 52
Time to start of biological therapy
Cumulative number of days before start of biological therapy
Measured: Week 52
Time to onset of event (IBD-related surgery or IBD-related hospitalization)
Cumulative number of days before onset of IBD-related surgery or IBD-related hospitalization
Measured: Week 52
The composite secondary outcome of the proportion of patients who experience severe IBD within 52 weeks after inclusion
Cumulative number of patients who experience:
- Need for medication between diagnosis and one year (immunomodulators, biologicals, steroids) or
- Need for surgery between diagnosis and one year or
- Need for hospitalization between diagnosis and one year or
- Number of relapses between diagnosis and one year.
Measured: Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2022
- Study start7 Feb 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion28 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Southern DenmarkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 366 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 52 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nordic Bioscience A/S, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Aalborg University, Colitis-Crohn Foreningen, Uppsala University, Örebro University, Sweden, Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, University of Oslo, University of Kiel, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jens Kjeldsen, Professor, Principal investigator, Odense University HospitalVibeke Andersen, Professor, Principal investigator, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05414578
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NORDTREAT_MOK 2022
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 8 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Fejrskov A, Fuchtbauer JD, Daviethsdottir LG, Halfvarson J, Hoivik ML, Jensen MD, Mortensen JH, Nielsen LN, Rejler M, Repsilber D, Soderholm JD, Aalykke C, Andersen V, Christensen R, Kjeldsen J. Novel biomarker profiles to improve individual diagnosis and prognosis in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: protocol for the Nordic inception cohort study (NORDTREAT). BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083144.
PubMed 38754881
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Nordic IBD Study Within Personalized Medicine - Diagnosing and Prediction Using Molecular Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the NORDTREAT Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05414578
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NORDTREAT_MOK 2022
- Keywords
- Prospective clinical study, Biomarkers, Diagnosis, Prognosis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 366 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nordic Bioscience A/S, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Aalborg University, Colitis-Crohn Foreningen, Uppsala University, Örebro University, Sweden, Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, University of Oslo, University of Kiel, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primarily ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic disease entity affecting individuals of all ages, and which may severely impact the lives of the patients and their families as well as society. Individuals with IBD may have to live with relapsing symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fatigue. Further, a substantial proportion of patients develop serious complications such as bowel obstruction and fistula, and some develop complicating liver disease and eventually colorectal cancer. The consequences are that many patients suffer hospitalizations, recurring sick-leave, life-long medication, and surgical interventions. As IBD has become increasingly common in Western populations there is a clear need to improve the outcome from IBD.
IBD is a heterogeneous disease entity with substantial differences between patients and personalized medicine may help provide strategies for better treatment . Currently, one of the main unmet needs is the glaring lack of robust biomarkers for individual disease characterization. This lack leads to delayed diagnosis, worse outcomes, increased mortality and an amplified disease burden. Furthermore, diagnosis of IBD is difficult and early diagnosis is crucial as it helps avoid the development of irreversible organ damage. Therefore, there is an emerging focus on the development of simple, non-invasive, and cheap biomarkers to support clinical decision-making in IBD.
This Nordic, prospective, clinical study has the aim of identifying markers that are associated with the diagnosis of IBD and prediction of clinical outcomes with various disease manifestations. Importantly, this study will evaluate the markers in a relevant clinical setting, i.e. among patients referred to the hospital for suspicion on IBD using the ECCO Criteria.
Specifically the aims of the study are to:
- Improve the accuracy to diagnose IBD
- Improve the accuracy to define the prognosis of IBD
The study is approved by the local Ethics Committee (S-20200051) and the local Data Agency (20/54594).
Detailed description
The primary aim is to identify molecular markers (e.g. in the blood and stools) for discrimination between individuals diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) inclusive Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBD-U), and those without (non-IBD). Participants with suspected IBD at baseline, with various disease pathways, will be evaluated again using a 1-year cohort study. Diagnosis and clinical outcome will be evaluated at referral and after 1 year of observation.
The secondary aims are, in addition to the molecular information, to investigate whether the inclusion of information on clinical and lifestyle factors as well as combination hereof (e.g. gene-environment interaction analyses) can improve the predictive potential of identifying IBD and distinguish the prognosis.
Study design: A prospective Nordic multicenter study on prognostic factors for the diagnosis and characterization of IBD among patients referred to the hospital on suspicion of IBD. A panel of possible prognostic biomarkers for diagnostic purposes will be applied to all participants.
Setting: All patients referred due to a suspicion of IBD to the departments of gastroenterology in Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Vejle Hospital, Esbjerg Hospital and potentially Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa will be invited to take part in the study. Participants will be included from January 2022 for a 1-year period or until 800 participants in the Nordic study (up to 400 in Denmark) have been included. The follow-up period is one-year including visits and questionnaires and an additional nine years of follow-up by the use of register data. Biological material will be obtained four times for participants with IBD, at week-2/0, and 12, 26 and 52 after the diagnosis has been established. Participants where IBD is not established (non-IBD) will only have biological material obtained at baseline (that is visit -2/0) and will have a clinical interview after 52 weeks. All participants are treated according to standard clinical practice by the clinical departments.
Clinical data consist of personal data, data on health and disease, lifestyle, laboratory measures, and disease activity scores including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical assessments, and laboratory data. Each participant will fill out validated questionnaires on disease activity, quality of life, and lifestyle using electronic links.
Data management: Study data registered by clinicians, study nurses and technicians will be stored in the web-based case report form (eCRF) Viedoc (Viedoc™, Uppsala, Sweden) or REDCap (Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN) at Odense University Hospital) for the diet questionnaire. The questionnaires are in Danish and the participants will have access to the questionnaires via an electronic link sent to their personal, electronic mailbox (REDCap) or via an investigator provided link to MyViedoc. All data will be stored in secure research storage facilities.
Statistical methods: We will develop multivariable prediction models relating multiple predictors for a particular individual to the probability of or risk for the presence (diagnosis of IBD at baseline) or future occurrence (prognosis) of a particular outcome such as severe IBD within the first year. Predictors such as biomarkers are covariates, explored as prognostic factors (independent variables).
The primary hypothesis is that the final biomarker will define the participant population into two groups each consisting of 50%: a biomarker positive group whereof 80% will be diagnosed with IBD and a biomarker negative group whereof 20% will be diagnosed with IBD.
For a comparison of two independent binomial proportions using the likelihood ratio statistic with a Chi-square approximation with a two-sided significance level of 0.05, a total sample size of 800 assuming a ratio biomarker positivity-to-negativity of 1 to 1 has an approximate power of 100% when the proportions of being diagnosed with IBD are 0.8 and 0.2. If we assume that we will have 800 study participants, we will potentially ("rule of thumb") be able to build a statistical model with as many as 80 covariates in the multivariable model.
The associations of the suspected important biomarkers with other variables will be tested with non-parametric tests: with Spearman rank correlation (rs) for continuous variables, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test, including a Wilcoxon-type test for trend across ordered groups where appropriate, for categorical variables. In general, logistic regression models will be used with individual marker as the exposure variables and the clinical response as the outcome (dependent variable). The analyses will be adjusted simultaneously for sex, age, and prescribed targeted therapy. Potential interaction between biomarker status (positive/negative) and specific drug type will be analyzed. Covariates (biomarkers) consist of various measures within genetics, transcriptomic, microbiomes, and proteomics.
Sample size considerations: Assuming that biomarker positivity constitutes 50% of the individuals enrolled at baseline, if our event rate is 10% on average, a total sample size of 800 patients (i.e. 400 biomarker positive) we will have a very good statistical power (99.7%) to detect a difference between proportions having surgery of 10% points (15% and 5%, respectively). If we decide to split the data set into two (2×400 individuals), in order to first build the model, and subsequently validate it in the second independent dataset, we will have 91.8% statistical power to detect a difference between groups. If the prognostic value of our biomarkers is not that effective separating the number of patients with severe IBD at week 52, we will still have more than 90% power to detect a difference between biomarker groups of 6% points (e.g. 10% and 4%, respectively).
Another consideration is the number of events (individuals having severe IBD at week 52) per variable (EPV) considered for inclusion in the multivariable model. For logistic regression modelling the EPV should be at least ten times the number of potential prognostic variables that could be included in the model. As a consequence of this logic, our expected sample size of 800 individuals (having 80 events) will, with reasonable confidence, allow us to create a multivariable model with up to 8 covariates simultaneously.
Project organization: NORDTREAT is part of a larger Nordic project (DK, SE, NO and IS) where regular meetings will be held between the partners. Collaborative research and material transfer agreements will be conducted with the national and international collaborators.
In addition to the scientific reporting of results, major findings with translational implications will be communicated to health professionals, patient organizations, public health policy makers, and to the general public through various media and news activities.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 52 Weeks
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients referred to the hospital on suspicion of IBD
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Referred on the suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease
- Adult (+18 years of age)
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- A previous known diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBD-U
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to comply with protocol requirements (e.g., for reasons including alcohol and/or recreational drug abuse)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Improving the accuracy to diagnose IBD
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
The primary endpoint in the cross-sectional study will be diagnosis, i.e., IBD (including CD, UC, IBD-U) or non-IBD (patients that are not diagnosed with IBD) at referral. IBD is diagnosed according to the ECCO criteria based on endoscopic, histologic and/or radiological criteria.
Improving the accuracy to define prognosis of IBD
Time frame: Week 52
The primary endpoint in the longitudinal cohort study will be severe IBD at week 52 defined as: * IBD-related surgery or * IBD-related hospitalization (except planned procedures) or * IBD-related death
18 secondary outcomes
Lack of corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 12*
Time frame: Week 12
Lack of corticosteroid-free endoscopic healing at week 52*
Time frame: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life (daily functioning and quality of life)
Time frame: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life (perception of health)
Time frame: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life
Time frame: Week 52
Disease impact on patients life (fecal incontinence)
Time frame: Week 52
Mid-term complications
Time frame: Week 52
Long-term complications
Time frame: Week 52
Surgery in CD due to obstructive symptoms (stenosis)
Time frame: Week 52
Anxiety and depression
Time frame: Week 52
Fatigue Questionnaire
Time frame: Week 52
Flares
Time frame: Week 52
Glucocorticoid exposures
Time frame: Week 52
Adverse drug reactions
Time frame: Week 52
Increased faecal calprotectin at week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Time to start of biological therapy
Time frame: Week 52
Time to onset of event (IBD-related surgery or IBD-related hospitalization)
Time frame: Week 52
The composite secondary outcome of the proportion of patients who experience severe IBD within 52 weeks after inclusion
Time frame: Week 52
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38754881Fejrskov A, Fuchtbauer JD, Daviethsdottir LG, Halfvarson J, Hoivik ML, Jensen MD, Mortensen JH, Nielsen LN, Rejler M, Repsilber D, Soderholm JD, Aalykke C, Andersen V, Christensen R, Kjeldsen J. Novel biomarker profiles to improve individual diagnosis and prognosis in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: protocol for the Nordic inception cohort study (NORDTREAT). BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083144.
Related trials for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
Recruiting
Effect of Mediterranean Diet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens Kjeldsen, Professor principal investigator
Odense University Hospital
Vibeke Andersen, Professor principal investigator
University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa
17 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) and Crohn Disease (CD), run by University of Southern Denmark at 17 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Improving the accuracy to diagnose IBD (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05414578, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.