COVID-19Phase 3NCT05415267
Immunosuppression and COVID-19 Boosters
A Phase 3 study testing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine in people with COVID-19, run by Kirby Institute at 5 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
It is important people receiving immunosuppressive therapy are provided with the best protection against COVID-19 because they are at greater risk of severe illness should they become infected. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- 21 Jul 2023to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult aged at least 18 years
- Previously vaccinated with 2 (or more) doses of any licensed COVID-19 vaccine who requires initiation of moderate-to-severe immunosuppression; most recent COVID-19 vaccine dose must have been given \> 3 months prior
- Planned significant immunosuppressive therapy for at least 1 year
- No cyclophosphamide, alemtuzumab or rituximab treatment in the past 5 years. Note: patient may have concurrent steroids with any treatments listed in protocol
- Voluntarily given written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Has underlying primary immunodeficiency
- Has received or likely to receive intravenous/subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IVIg/ScIg).
- Projected treatment is likely to involve plasma exchange
- Contraindication to receipt of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
- Intolerance of or previous allergic reaction to tetanus vaccination
- Patients switching immunosuppressive therapies following enrolment with an absolute lymphocyte count \<0.5 x 109/L immediately prior to screening
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
5 sites in 1 country
Australia5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148
Golo Ahlenstiel, MD-PhD, golo.ahlenstiel@health.nsw.gov.au
- Recruiting
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Frederick Lee, PhD, frederick.lee@health.nsw.gov.au
- Recruiting
Concord General Repatriation Hospital
Concord, New South Wales, 2137
Judith Trotman, MBChB, judith.trotman@health.nsw.gov.au
- Recruiting
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
Anthony Kelleher, PhD, akelleher@kirby.unsw.edu.au
- Recruiting
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Sarah Sasson, PhD, ssasson@kirby.unsw.edu.au
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Immunity-boosting Regimens for COVID-19 Upon Initiation of Immunosuppressive Therapy
It is important people receiving immunosuppressive therapy are provided with the best protection against COVID-19 because they are at greater risk of severe illness should they become infected. As severe immunosuppression can reduce the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination, doctors agree that COVID-19 boosters is are important to maximise the vaccine response in these people. However, we don't currently know the best time to give booster vaccines to people about to start immunosuppressive therapy. This research aims to address this knowledge gap by examining whether the greatest protection is provided by giving the COVID-19 booster just before the immunosuppressive therapy starts or by waiting and giving the booster 6 months after treatment start. At the 6-month timepoint, in many cases the more intensive immunosuppression is often weaning and the immune system is starting to rebuild.
Read the detailed description
Current guidelines for SARS-CoV2 vaccination in immunosuppressed populations are based on limited evidence. Additionally, guidelines for the use of SARS-CoV2 vaccines in autoimmune populations are somewhat contradictory, with the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations including advice to where possible administer booster vaccinations prior to commencing immunosuppression but to preferably vaccinate while the autoimmune disease is not active. In haematological conditions it is suggested that vaccination occur prior to B cell depletion therapies e.g. rituximab, or >6 months after its use. While these guidelines were developed for non-live vaccines in general, the evidence for COVID-19 vaccines is almost entirely based on expert opinion. Clearly, with these gaps and inconsistencies in the clinical guidelines there is equipoise for the optimal timing of a booster vaccination. One of the difficulties in this field is the wide diversity of patients receiving a variety of immunosuppressive therapies. We have therefore taken a pragmatic 'real-world' approach in our design by focusing on two broad patient groups that are more specifically stratify based on pre-define disease conditions and specific treatments.
Recent data studying COVID-19 vaccine responses in patients on immunosuppressive therapies for autoimmune/inflammatory conditions demonstrate the greatest compromise in anti-Spike IgG occurs in those receiving combination immunosuppression particularly regimens that include methotrexate and other antimetabolites, and B cell depleting therapies. In patients with haematological malignancies the lowest vaccine responses were seen in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma. In patients with a haematological malignancy who have undergone a bone marrow transplant, immunisation to COVID-19 <6 months following transplantation resulted in poor IgG response to vaccine, while those immunised >6 months post-transplant had superior responses. In contrast, other targeted therapies including the integrin inhibitor vedoluzimab or anti IL-17/23 therapy (in the absence of concurrent methotrexate) have relatively preserved response to the initial vaccine regimen. Given the available data, we propose to study defined populations of two major immunosuppressed patient groups: Group 1): Haematological Malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients) and Autoimmune/Inflammatory Disease, and Group 2: Autologous and Allogeneic Bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. We will compare the difference between an immediate COVID-19 "booster" dose and a deferred COVID-19 "booster". In Group 1 "Immediate" is defined as prior to the commencement of moderate-to-severe immunosuppression and "Deferred" is defined as 6 months post commencement of moderate-to-severe immunosuppression. For Group 2 BMT patients, current national guidelines recommend 3 doses of pre-BMT COVID-19 vaccines followed by 3 doses of post-BMT COVID-19 vaccines initiated 6 months post-BMT. In Group 2 "Immediate" is defined as 6 months post-BMT and "Deferred" as >12 months post-BMT.
The primary endpoint will be the integrated area under the curve (AUC) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAb) activity over the first year of immunosuppression. At present the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 is the most robust correlate of protection against COVID-19. In both study Groups the comparator of a delayed boost at 6 months is based on the premise of maximising peak NAb responses by administering the booster after induction therapy is completed. Such a delay must be weighed against the risk of reduced immunity and breakthrough COVID-19 infection during this period. Such a risk will be monitored closely during the study with scheduled interim safety analyses and reviews by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB).
Participants in Group 1 will also receive a single diphtheria/tetanus (dT) toxoid booster as a comparator vaccine with the aim of determining whether the results of the optimal timing of the COVID-19 booster also apply to more traditional protein vaccines. If this is found to be the case, the results of this study may have broader implications for the vaccinology field and optimal clinical guidelines.
Primary Objective: to determine the anti-SARS-CoV-2 NAb response over 12 months from a booster with a SARS-CoV2 vaccine over 12 months in a population who; Group 1: are commencing moderate-to-severe immunosuppression for treatment of either a haematological malignancy (excluding BMT patients) or an autoimmune/inflammatory condition and are previously fully-immunised (i.e. had received 3 or more doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine including combinations) or, Group 2: have recently undergone a bone marrow transplant for a haematological malignancy and have previously received 3 post-BMT doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine including combinations.
We will determine the difference between the booster being administered as follows: Group 1: immediately prior to starting moderate-to-severe immunosuppression or at 6 months after therapy start, by monitoring the relative sustained immunogenicity over 1 year. Group 2: immediately at 6-months post-BMT or deferred until >12 months post-BMT.
Secondary Objectives:
- To assess a range of secondary immunological endpoints including:
- . To quantitate antibodies to tetanus toxoid integrated over the 12-month period post-randomisation.
- . To assess the safety and efficacy of the two approaches (immediate or deferred vaccination) including any indication of vaccine-induced disease flares and any breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2.
- . To analyse the response to the SARS-CoV2 vaccine including: i. Breadth of NAb against the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) ii. The kinetics of neutralizing antibody over time including responses to VOC iii. Memory T cell, B cell and natural killer (NK) cell responses to peptide sets representing different domains of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
- To assess these responses in populations stratified by broad disease type (i.e. haematological malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients), autoimmune/inflammatory disease or haematological malignancy post-BMT and different modes of immunosuppression e.g. chemotherapy, bone-marrow transplant, B-cell depleting therapies, cytokine inhibition.
- To use a computational biology approach to a) model the level of protection over time based on neutralizing antibody levels and b) model the boosting and decay of anti-Spike IgG, specific memory B, T and NK cell response to provide information on the impact of immunosuppression on vaccine protection over time.
- To use this evidence-base to inform policies regarding timing of additional SARS-CoV-2 boosters in vulnerable populations about to commence immunosuppression/or following bone marrow transplant. These findings will identify those patient groups most appropriate for synthetic COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies and will contribute to our understanding of vaccinology in the setting of immunosuppression and BMT more broadly, an area that remains poorly understood.
- To compare the change in health-related quality of life over time between "immediate" and "deferred" booster strategies.
Participant population
Participants will be recruited through a clinical network of specialist physicians at Sydney hospitals who will be recruiting from their Departments of Haematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Gastroenterology and Neurology. A total of 320 participants will be enrolled into one of two Groups will be enrolled as outlined below:
Group 1: will comprise 280 participants commencing immunosuppression for the management of a pre-defined group of haematological malignancies (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients) or autoimmune/inflammatory conditions as outlined below Group 2: will comprise 40 participants who have undergone a bone marrow transplant for a haematological malignancy as outlined below.
Group 1:
Haemato-Oncology: Haematological Malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients) - B-CLL; Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma; Multiple Myeloma; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Systematic Autoimmunity: to include: ANCA associated-vasculitis; polyarteritis nodosa; Churg-Strauss syndrome; ankylosing spondylitis; autoimmune hepatitis; IgG4 disease; inflammatory bowel disease; psoriatic arthritis; psoriasis; rheumatoid arthritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; Sjogren's syndrome; myasthenia gravis; and multiple sclerosis. Receiving the following agents:
B-Cell Depletion therapies e.g. rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab (N=40) Anti-metabolite therapies: azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate or methotrexate (Moderate Immunosuppression) (N=40) Tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibition (N=40) (with or without azathioprine or methotrexate or leflunomide to prevent anti-drug antibodies) Cyclophosphamide or alemtuzumab (severe immunosuppression) (N=40) Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors +/- leflunomide (N=40) Anti-IL-17 and/or 23 monoclonal antibodies e.g. sekukinumab (N=40).
Group 2:
Bone Marrow Transplant (N=40) Haematological malignancy - autologous or allogenic-transplant (excluding for treatment of a primary Immunodeficiency).
Study Design
This is a randomised, open-label, multi-centre clinical trial to be conducted over 52 weeks.
Participants will be enrolled into one of two Groups as described above. Group 1 participants will be screened to confirm their diagnosis and that they are to commence treatment that involves >1 year on moderate-to-severe immunosuppressive therapy. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either Arm A; Immediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0 and a booster of combined diphtheria toxoid/tetanus toxoid (dT vaccine) at 24 weeks, or Arm B; dT vaccine at week 0 and a deferred SARS-CoV-2 booster at 24 weeks. Participants will be followed until week48 and attend study visits at screening, randomisation, vaccination* and then at weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 25, 28, 36 and 48.
Group 2 participants will be screened and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either Arm C; Immediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0 or Arm D delayed SARS-CoV-2 booster at 24 weeks.
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Being tested
- diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine
- Keywords
- Vaccination, Immunology
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccineBiological
Also called ADT Booster
The diphtheria/tetanus toxoids vaccine will be given to participants enrolled into Group 1 as a comparator vaccine to the mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine with the aim of determining whether the results related to COVID-19 vaccine timing also apply to more traditional protein-based vaccines.
COVID-19 vaccineBiological
All participants will receive a COVID-19 booster vaccination at either week 0 or week 24 depending on their randomised study arm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 Arm A | Active comparator | Immediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0 and booster of combined diphtheria toxoid/tetanus toxoid (dT vaccine) at week 24. Receives: Biological: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine; Biological: COVID-19 vaccine |
| Group 1 Arm B | Active comparator | dT vaccine at week 0 and SARS-CoV-2 deferred booster at week 24. Receives: Biological: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine; Biological: COVID-19 vaccine |
| Group 2 Arm C | Active comparator | Immediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0. Receives: Biological: COVID-19 vaccine |
| Group 2 Arm D | Active comparator | Delayed SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 24 Receives: Biological: COVID-19 vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody (NAb) response over 12 months
Integrated time-weighted area under the curve (AUC) change from baseline in anti-SARS- CoV-2 NAb over 12 months from a SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination
Measured: 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Tetanus toxoid NAb response over 12 months
Integrated time-weighted AUC change from baseline in tetanus toxoid NAb over 12 months from a diphtheria/tetanus toxoids booster vaccination
Measured: 48 weeks
Safety of immediate versus deferred COV-19 booster vaccination
Comparison of adverse events, disease flares and breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections between immediate and deferred arms in Group 1 and Group 2
Measured: 48 weeks
Efficacy of immediate versus deferred COV-19 booster vaccination
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response between immediate and deferred arms in Group 1 and Group 2
Measured: 48 weeks
Analysis of the response to the SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination
Breadth of NAb against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, kinetics of NAb over time including the response to variants of concern, and memory T cell, B cell and natural killer (NK) cell responses to peptide sets representing different domains of the of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
Measured: 48 weeks
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in study populations stratified by their broad qualifying disease types
Antibody responses in participants with a study qualifying haematological malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant [BMT]), or an autoimmune/ inflammatory disease, or a haematological malignancy following a BMT and by different modes of immunosuppression
Measured: 48 weeks
Comparison of health-related quality of life between the immediate and deferred SARS-CoV-2 booster strategies
Change from baseline in health-related quality of life assessed by the EQ-5D-3L between the two booster strategies
Measured: 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2022
- Study start21 Jul 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kirby Institute
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Seqirus Pty Ltd, Australia, Medical Research Future Fund
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sarah C Sasson, PhD, Principal investigator, The Kirby Institute UNSW Sydney
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05415267
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIRCUIT Study
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Carey DL, Ahlenstiel G, Brilot F, Brown DA, Bull R, Crowther H, Cunningham A, Davenport MP, Diamond P, Hamad N, Johnston A, Kelleher AD, Lee FJ, Matthews GV, Petoumenos K, Quichua GC, Swaminathan S, Trotman J, Turville S, Vukic S, Wong P, Sasson SC. Comparison of immunity-boosting regimens for COVID-19 upon initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (CIRCUIT): study protocol for a randomised, controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Apr 24;16(4):e115259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115259.
PubMed 42031476Zorger AM, Hirsch C, Baumann M, Feldmann M, Brockelmann PJ, Mellinghoff S, Monsef I, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N. Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with haematological malignancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 21;5(5):CD015530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015530.pub2.
PubMed 40396505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Immunity-boosting Regimens for COVID-19 Upon Initiation of Immunosuppressive Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05415267
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIRCUIT Study
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Keywords
- Vaccination, Immunology
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kirby InstituteOther government
- Collaborators
- Seqirus Pty Ltd, Australia, Medical Research Future Fund
- Study start
- 21 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It is important people receiving immunosuppressive therapy are provided with the best protection against COVID-19 because they are at greater risk of severe illness should they become infected. As severe immunosuppression can reduce the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination, doctors agree that COVID-19 boosters is are important to maximise the vaccine response in these people. However, we don't currently know the best time to give booster vaccines to people about to start immunosuppressive therapy. This research aims to address this knowledge gap by examining whether the greatest protection is provided by giving the COVID-19 booster just before the immunosuppressive therapy starts or by waiting and giving the booster 6 months after treatment start. At the 6-month timepoint, in many cases the more intensive immunosuppression is often weaning and the immune system is starting to rebuild.
Detailed description
Current guidelines for SARS-CoV2 vaccination in immunosuppressed populations are based on limited evidence. Additionally, guidelines for the use of SARS-CoV2 vaccines in autoimmune populations are somewhat contradictory, with the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations including advice to where possible administer booster vaccinations prior to commencing immunosuppression but to preferably vaccinate while the autoimmune disease is not active. In haematological conditions it is suggested that vaccination occur prior to B cell depletion therapies e.g. rituximab, or >6 months after its use. While these guidelines were developed for non-live vaccines in general, the evidence for COVID-19 vaccines is almost entirely based on expert opinion. Clearly, with these gaps and inconsistencies in the clinical guidelines there is equipoise for the optimal timing of a booster vaccination. One of the difficulties in this field is the wide diversity of patients receiving a variety of immunosuppressive therapies. We have therefore taken a pragmatic 'real-world' approach in our design by focusing on two broad patient groups that are more specifically stratify based on pre-define disease conditions and specific treatments.
Recent data studying COVID-19 vaccine responses in patients on immunosuppressive therapies for autoimmune/inflammatory conditions demonstrate the greatest compromise in anti-Spike IgG occurs in those receiving combination immunosuppression particularly regimens that include methotrexate and other antimetabolites, and B cell depleting therapies. In patients with haematological malignancies the lowest vaccine responses were seen in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma. In patients with a haematological malignancy who have undergone a bone marrow transplant, immunisation to COVID-19 <6 months following transplantation resulted in poor IgG response to vaccine, while those immunised >6 months post-transplant had superior responses. In contrast, other targeted therapies including the integrin inhibitor vedoluzimab or anti IL-17/23 therapy (in the absence of concurrent methotrexate) have relatively preserved response to the initial vaccine regimen. Given the available data, we propose to study defined populations of two major immunosuppressed patient groups: Group 1): Haematological Malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients) and Autoimmune/Inflammatory Disease, and Group 2: Autologous and Allogeneic Bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. We will compare the difference between an immediate COVID-19 "booster" dose and a deferred COVID-19 "booster". In Group 1 "Immediate" is defined as prior to the commencement of moderate-to-severe immunosuppression and "Deferred" is defined as 6 months post commencement of moderate-to-severe immunosuppression. For Group 2 BMT patients, current national guidelines recommend 3 doses of pre-BMT COVID-19 vaccines followed by 3 doses of post-BMT COVID-19 vaccines initiated 6 months post-BMT. In Group 2 "Immediate" is defined as 6 months post-BMT and "Deferred" as >12 months post-BMT.
The primary endpoint will be the integrated area under the curve (AUC) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAb) activity over the first year of immunosuppression. At present the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 is the most robust correlate of protection against COVID-19. In both study Groups the comparator of a delayed boost at 6 months is based on the premise of maximising peak NAb responses by administering the booster after induction therapy is completed. Such a delay must be weighed against the risk of reduced immunity and breakthrough COVID-19 infection during this period. Such a risk will be monitored closely during the study with scheduled interim safety analyses and reviews by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB).
Participants in Group 1 will also receive a single diphtheria/tetanus (dT) toxoid booster as a comparator vaccine with the aim of determining whether the results of the optimal timing of the COVID-19 booster also apply to more traditional protein vaccines. If this is found to be the case, the results of this study may have broader implications for the vaccinology field and optimal clinical guidelines.
Primary Objective: to determine the anti-SARS-CoV-2 NAb response over 12 months from a booster with a SARS-CoV2 vaccine over 12 months in a population who; Group 1: are commencing moderate-to-severe immunosuppression for treatment of either a haematological malignancy (excluding BMT patients) or an autoimmune/inflammatory condition and are previously fully-immunised (i.e. had received 3 or more doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine including combinations) or, Group 2: have recently undergone a bone marrow transplant for a haematological malignancy and have previously received 3 post-BMT doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine including combinations.
We will determine the difference between the booster being administered as follows: Group 1: immediately prior to starting moderate-to-severe immunosuppression or at 6 months after therapy start, by monitoring the relative sustained immunogenicity over 1 year. Group 2: immediately at 6-months post-BMT or deferred until >12 months post-BMT.
Secondary Objectives:
- To assess a range of secondary immunological endpoints including:
- . To quantitate antibodies to tetanus toxoid integrated over the 12-month period post-randomisation.
- . To assess the safety and efficacy of the two approaches (immediate or deferred vaccination) including any indication of vaccine-induced disease flares and any breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2.
- . To analyse the response to the SARS-CoV2 vaccine including: i. Breadth of NAb against the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) ii. The kinetics of neutralizing antibody over time including responses to VOC iii. Memory T cell, B cell and natural killer (NK) cell responses to peptide sets representing different domains of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
- To assess these responses in populations stratified by broad disease type (i.e. haematological malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients), autoimmune/inflammatory disease or haematological malignancy post-BMT and different modes of immunosuppression e.g. chemotherapy, bone-marrow transplant, B-cell depleting therapies, cytokine inhibition.
- To use a computational biology approach to a) model the level of protection over time based on neutralizing antibody levels and b) model the boosting and decay of anti-Spike IgG, specific memory B, T and NK cell response to provide information on the impact of immunosuppression on vaccine protection over time.
- To use this evidence-base to inform policies regarding timing of additional SARS-CoV-2 boosters in vulnerable populations about to commence immunosuppression/or following bone marrow transplant. These findings will identify those patient groups most appropriate for synthetic COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies and will contribute to our understanding of vaccinology in the setting of immunosuppression and BMT more broadly, an area that remains poorly understood.
- To compare the change in health-related quality of life over time between "immediate" and "deferred" booster strategies.
Participant population
Participants will be recruited through a clinical network of specialist physicians at Sydney hospitals who will be recruiting from their Departments of Haematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Gastroenterology and Neurology. A total of 320 participants will be enrolled into one of two Groups will be enrolled as outlined below:
Group 1: will comprise 280 participants commencing immunosuppression for the management of a pre-defined group of haematological malignancies (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients) or autoimmune/inflammatory conditions as outlined below Group 2: will comprise 40 participants who have undergone a bone marrow transplant for a haematological malignancy as outlined below.
Group 1:
Haemato-Oncology: Haematological Malignancy (excluding bone marrow transplant recipients) - B-CLL; Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma; Multiple Myeloma; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Systematic Autoimmunity: to include: ANCA associated-vasculitis; polyarteritis nodosa; Churg-Strauss syndrome; ankylosing spondylitis; autoimmune hepatitis; IgG4 disease; inflammatory bowel disease; psoriatic arthritis; psoriasis; rheumatoid arthritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; Sjogren's syndrome; myasthenia gravis; and multiple sclerosis. Receiving the following agents:
B-Cell Depletion therapies e.g. rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab (N=40) Anti-metabolite therapies: azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate or methotrexate (Moderate Immunosuppression) (N=40) Tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibition (N=40) (with or without azathioprine or methotrexate or leflunomide to prevent anti-drug antibodies) Cyclophosphamide or alemtuzumab (severe immunosuppression) (N=40) Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors +/- leflunomide (N=40) Anti-IL-17 and/or 23 monoclonal antibodies e.g. sekukinumab (N=40).
Group 2:
Bone Marrow Transplant (N=40) Haematological malignancy - autologous or allogenic-transplant (excluding for treatment of a primary Immunodeficiency).
Study Design
This is a randomised, open-label, multi-centre clinical trial to be conducted over 52 weeks.
Participants will be enrolled into one of two Groups as described above. Group 1 participants will be screened to confirm their diagnosis and that they are to commence treatment that involves >1 year on moderate-to-severe immunosuppressive therapy. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either Arm A; Immediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0 and a booster of combined diphtheria toxoid/tetanus toxoid (dT vaccine) at 24 weeks, or Arm B; dT vaccine at week 0 and a deferred SARS-CoV-2 booster at 24 weeks. Participants will be followed until week48 and attend study visits at screening, randomisation, vaccination* and then at weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, 25, 28, 36 and 48.
Group 2 participants will be screened and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either Arm C; Immediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0 or Arm D delayed SARS-CoV-2 booster at 24 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 Arm A | Active comparator | Biological: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine, Biological: COVID-19 vaccineImmediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0 and booster of combined diphtheria toxoid/tetanus toxoid (dT vaccine) at week 24. |
| Group 1 Arm B | Active comparator | Biological: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine, Biological: COVID-19 vaccinedT vaccine at week 0 and SARS-CoV-2 deferred booster at week 24. |
| Group 2 Arm C | Active comparator | Biological: COVID-19 vaccineImmediate SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 0. |
| Group 2 Arm D | Active comparator | Biological: COVID-19 vaccineDelayed SARS-CoV-2 booster at week 24 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult aged at least 18 years
- Previously vaccinated with 2 (or more) doses of any licensed COVID-19 vaccine who requires initiation of moderate-to-severe immunosuppression; most recent COVID-19 vaccine dose must have been given \> 3 months prior
- Planned significant immunosuppressive therapy for at least 1 year
- No cyclophosphamide, alemtuzumab or rituximab treatment in the past 5 years. Note: patient may have concurrent steroids with any treatments listed in protocol
- Voluntarily given written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Has underlying primary immunodeficiency
- Has received or likely to receive intravenous/subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IVIg/ScIg).
- Projected treatment is likely to involve plasma exchange
- Contraindication to receipt of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccineAlso: ADT BoosterThe diphtheria/tetanus toxoids vaccine will be given to participants enrolled into Group 1 as a comparator vaccine to the mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine with the aim of determining whether the results related to COVID-19 vaccine timing also apply to more traditional protein-based vaccines. | Biological | Group 1 Arm A, Group 1 Arm B |
| COVID-19 vaccineAll participants will receive a COVID-19 booster vaccination at either week 0 or week 24 depending on their randomised study arm | Biological | Group 1 Arm A, Group 1 Arm B, Group 2 Arm C, Group 2 Arm D |
Primary outcome
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody (NAb) response over 12 months
Time frame: 48 weeks
Integrated time-weighted area under the curve (AUC) change from baseline in anti-SARS- CoV-2 NAb over 12 months from a SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination
6 secondary outcomes
Tetanus toxoid NAb response over 12 months
Time frame: 48 weeks
Safety of immediate versus deferred COV-19 booster vaccination
Time frame: 48 weeks
Efficacy of immediate versus deferred COV-19 booster vaccination
Time frame: 48 weeks
Analysis of the response to the SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination
Time frame: 48 weeks
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in study populations stratified by their broad qualifying disease types
Time frame: 48 weeks
Comparison of health-related quality of life between the immediate and deferred SARS-CoV-2 booster strategies
Time frame: 48 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42031476Carey DL, Ahlenstiel G, Brilot F, Brown DA, Bull R, Crowther H, Cunningham A, Davenport MP, Diamond P, Hamad N, Johnston A, Kelleher AD, Lee FJ, Matthews GV, Petoumenos K, Quichua GC, Swaminathan S, Trotman J, Turville S, Vukic S, Wong P, Sasson SC. Comparison of immunity-boosting regimens for COVID-19 upon initiation of immunosuppressive therapy (CIRCUIT): study protocol for a randomised, controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Apr 24;16(4):e115259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-115259.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40396505Zorger AM, Hirsch C, Baumann M, Feldmann M, Brockelmann PJ, Mellinghoff S, Monsef I, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N. Vaccines for preventing infections in adults with haematological malignancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 21;5(5):CD015530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015530.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Dapagliflozin for Long COVID Syndrome
COVID - 19, Long COVID Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Analysis of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Convalescent Plasma
Asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection Laboratory-Confirmed, Symptomatic COVID-19 Infection Laboratory-Confirmed
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sarah C Sasson, PhD principal investigator
The Kirby Institute UNSW Sydney
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (adsorbed) vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine in people with COVID-19, run by Kirby Institute at 5 sites in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dianne L Carey, PhD (+61 2 9385 0908, dcarey@kirby.unsw.edu.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody (NAb) response over 12 months (time frame: 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05415267, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2026.