Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT05416606
Prostate Bipolar Enucleation and Resection Versus Open Prostatectomy
A study testing transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate and open surgical transvesical prostatectomy in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Helwan University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- What is being tested?
- transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate and open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2020to 1 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male patients
- Age more than 50 years
- Prostate size of more than 80 ml
- IPSS ≥ 8, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 15 mL/s
- Indications for surgery
- Refractory retention (failed ≥1 trial of voiding).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Associated bladder Stones.
- Associated recurrent gross Hematuria.
- Associated with recurrent Infections.
- Associated renal insufficiency.
- Bother symptoms refractory to medical treatment.
Who cannot join
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
- Patient with active UTI.
- Prostate less than 80 ml.
- Severe associated comorbidities.
- Previous urethral, prostate, and bladder surgeries,
- Patients diagnosed with neurogenic bladder.
- Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Transurethral Bipolar Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate Versus Open Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. In this study, a mixed technique called transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate (TBERP) was compared to the standard open prostatectomy.
Read the detailed description
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. In this study, a mixed technique called transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate (TBERP) was compared to the standard open prostatectomy.
This is a Comparative, Prospective Study conducted on men over 50 years.The patients were randomly distributed into two groups treated by TBERP and OP. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1-week post catheter removal and 1-3-months postoperatively in terms of blood loss, operation time, the weight of resected prostatic tissues, post-operative catheterisation period, hospital stay, IPSS, PVR, prostate volume, early complications (recatheterization, urine retention, UTI and irritative symptoms) and late complications (urinary incontinence, urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture).
- Conditions
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Being tested
- transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate, open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
- Keywords
- Transurethral enucleation, Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate, plasma enucleation, prostate enucleation, Open Prostatectomy, BPH, Benign prostatic hyperplasia
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostateProcedure or surgery
Also called TUVERP
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
open surgical transvesical prostatectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called Transvesical prostatectomy
open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate | Active comparator | transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate Receives: Procedure: transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate |
| open prostatectomy | Active comparator | open surgical transvesical prostatectomy Receives: Procedure: open surgical transvesical prostatectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
operative time
To measure the difference between the two procedure regarding operative time measured in minutes.
Measured: Three months
recovery outcome
To measure the difference between the two procedure regarding mean hospital stays measured in days and catheterization period measured in days
Measured: Three months
Secondary outcomes (3)
peri-operative complication
to measure the difference between the two procedures regarding incidence of early complications including re-catheterization, acute urinary retention, early irritative symptoms and urinary tract infections and incidence of late complications Including urinary incontinence, Urethral strictures,and bladder neck contracture.
Measured: Three months
weight of resected prostatic tissues
to measure the difference between the two procedures regarding weight of resected prostatic tissues Measured in gram
Measured: Three months
post-operative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score.
to measure the difference between the two procedures regarding IPSS score. Score 0 to 7 points considered mild symptoms, 8 to 19 points considered moderate symptoms, 20 to 35 points considered severe symptoms
Measured: Three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Oct 2020
- Primary completion1 Jun 2022
- Study completion1 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- In this study, a hybrid technique, that combines two types of techniques using the same cutting current and technological setup, will be proposed enucleation of the prostate gland with the plasma vaporization electrode and resection with a TURis cutting loop. This technique is defined as transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate (TVERP) comparing it with open prostatectomy.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Helwan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Fawzy Hassan Mahdy Elsyaad, Helwan University
- Investigators
- Tarek Salem, professor, Study director, Helwan university faculty of medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05416606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 51-2020
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mahon JT, McVary KT. New Alternative Treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Minimally Invasive Urology: Springer; 2020. p. 283-305.
Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT; Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2S):S189-S197. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.071. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
PubMed 28012747De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Cicione AM, Tubaro A. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Urologic Principles and Practice: Springer; 2020. p. 341-55.
Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, Gandhi MC, Kaplan SA, Kohler TS, Lerner LB, Lightner DJ, Parsons JK, Roehrborn CG, Welliver C, Wilt TJ, McVary KT. Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
PubMed 29775639Zheng X, Han X, Cao D, Wang Y, Xu H, Yang L, Wei Q, Ai J. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Button-Type Bipolar Plasma Vaporization and Transurethral Resection for the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 21;16(12):1564-1572. doi: 10.7150/ijms.38618. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31839744Xie L, Mao Q, Chen H, Qin J, Zheng X, Lin Y, Wang X, Liu B. Transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate with plasma vaporization button electrode for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a feasibility study. J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1264-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0125. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
PubMed 22530928Sagen E, Namnuan RO, Hedelin H, Nelzen O, Peeker R. The morbidity associated with a TURP procedure in routine clinical practice, as graded by the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Scand J Urol. 2019 Aug;53(4):240-245. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1623312. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
PubMed 31156002Morton S, McGuiness L, Harding C, Thorpe A. A review of surgery and new technology procedures for the management of benign prostatic obstruction. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2019;12(6):474-86.
Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G, Tema G, Albanesi L, Tariciotti P, Rizzo G, Falavolti C, Aloisi P, Vincenti G, Lombardo R. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs. open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single centre 3-year comparison. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):110-116. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0080-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
PubMed 30131603Lokeshwar SD, Harper BT, Webb E, Jordan A, Dykes TA, Neal DE Jr, Terris MK, Klaassen Z. Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Oct;8(5):529-539. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.01.
PubMed 31807429
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transurethral Bipolar Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate Versus Open Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05416606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 51-2020
- Conditions
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Keywords
- Transurethral enucleation, Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate, plasma enucleation, prostate enucleation, Open Prostatectomy, BPH, Benign prostatic hyperplasia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Helwan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. In this study, a mixed technique called transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate (TBERP) was compared to the standard open prostatectomy.
Detailed description
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in aging men accompanied by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Open prostatectomy (OP) is still considered the first-line treatment for more than 80 ml prostate size. In this study, a mixed technique called transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate (TBERP) was compared to the standard open prostatectomy.
This is a Comparative, Prospective Study conducted on men over 50 years.The patients were randomly distributed into two groups treated by TBERP and OP. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1-week post catheter removal and 1-3-months postoperatively in terms of blood loss, operation time, the weight of resected prostatic tissues, post-operative catheterisation period, hospital stay, IPSS, PVR, prostate volume, early complications (recatheterization, urine retention, UTI and irritative symptoms) and late complications (urinary incontinence, urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- In this study, a hybrid technique, that combines two types of techniques using the same cutting current and technological setup, will be proposed enucleation of the prostate gland with the plasma vaporization electrode and resection with a TURis cutting loop. This technique is defined as transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate (TVERP) comparing it with open prostatectomy.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate | Active comparator | Procedure: transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostatetransurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate |
| open prostatectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: open surgical transvesical prostatectomyopen surgical transvesical prostatectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Male patients
- Age more than 50 years
- Prostate size of more than 80 ml
- IPSS ≥ 8, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 15 mL/s
- Indications for surgery
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
- Patient with active UTI.
- Prostate less than 80 ml.
- Severe associated comorbidities.
- Previous urethral, prostate, and bladder surgeries,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostateAlso: TUVERPtransurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate | Procedure or surgery | transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate |
| open surgical transvesical prostatectomyAlso: Transvesical prostatectomyopen surgical transvesical prostatectomy | Procedure or surgery | open prostatectomy |
Primary outcome
operative time
Time frame: Three months
To measure the difference between the two procedure regarding operative time measured in minutes.
recovery outcome
Time frame: Three months
To measure the difference between the two procedure regarding mean hospital stays measured in days and catheterization period measured in days
3 secondary outcomes
peri-operative complication
Time frame: Three months
weight of resected prostatic tissues
Time frame: Three months
post-operative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score.
Time frame: Three months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2022.
- BackgroundMahon JT, McVary KT. New Alternative Treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Minimally Invasive Urology: Springer; 2020. p. 283-305.
- Results publication: PubMed 28012747Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT; Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2S):S189-S197. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.071. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
- Results publicationDe Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Cicione AM, Tubaro A. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Urologic Principles and Practice: Springer; 2020. p. 341-55.
- Results publication: PubMed 29775639Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, Gandhi MC, Kaplan SA, Kohler TS, Lerner LB, Lightner DJ, Parsons JK, Roehrborn CG, Welliver C, Wilt TJ, McVary KT. Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 31839744Zheng X, Han X, Cao D, Wang Y, Xu H, Yang L, Wei Q, Ai J. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Button-Type Bipolar Plasma Vaporization and Transurethral Resection for the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 21;16(12):1564-1572. doi: 10.7150/ijms.38618. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 22530928Xie L, Mao Q, Chen H, Qin J, Zheng X, Lin Y, Wang X, Liu B. Transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate with plasma vaporization button electrode for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a feasibility study. J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1264-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0125. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 31156002Sagen E, Namnuan RO, Hedelin H, Nelzen O, Peeker R. The morbidity associated with a TURP procedure in routine clinical practice, as graded by the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Scand J Urol. 2019 Aug;53(4):240-245. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1623312. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
- Results publicationMorton S, McGuiness L, Harding C, Thorpe A. A review of surgery and new technology procedures for the management of benign prostatic obstruction. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2019;12(6):474-86.
- Results publication: PubMed 30131603Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G, Tema G, Albanesi L, Tariciotti P, Rizzo G, Falavolti C, Aloisi P, Vincenti G, Lombardo R. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs. open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single centre 3-year comparison. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):110-116. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0080-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 31807429Lokeshwar SD, Harper BT, Webb E, Jordan A, Dykes TA, Neal DE Jr, Terris MK, Klaassen Z. Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Oct;8(5):529-539. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.01.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Recruiting
Comparing Rezum and Urolift
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Recruiting
Ambulatory Long Length URodynamics Evaluation
Urology, Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Aulea Veloxion™ Disposable Resectoscope System for Operational Efficiency in Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Two Fixed-dose Combinations in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. (BENIPRO)
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tarek Salem, professor study director
Helwan university faculty of medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate and open surgical transvesical prostatectomy in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Helwan University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
operative time (time frame: Three months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05416606, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2022.