Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNIVNCT05417503
Non Invasive Ventilation on Peripheral Muscle Function and Aerobic Performance
A study testing Non-invasive ventilation bi-level in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces respiratory load and demands on peripheral muscles. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of bi-level NIV on peripheral muscle function during isokinetic exercise and aerobic performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Non-invasive ventilation bi-level
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2017to 28 Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinically stable COPD patients (diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease), of both sexes, without exacerbation or changes in medication for at least one month before the study, and no dyspnea during daily activities (grades 2, 3, and 4 of the Medical Research Council - MRC scale) were included.
Who cannot join
- Those with a diagnosis of neoplasia, orthopedic or neurological conditions affecting exercise capacity, peripheral arterial obstructive disease, heart failure, kidney or liver disease, did not adapt, or failed to complete the study procedures, were excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59082-100
About this study
Official title: Acute Effects of NIV on Peripheral Muscle Function and Aerobic Performance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Piloty Study
Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces respiratory load and demands on peripheral muscles. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of bi-level NIV on peripheral muscle function during isokinetic exercise and aerobic performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This is a pilot crossover study performed with a non-probabilistic sample of 14 moderate to very severe COPD patients. Procedures carried out in two days. Dyspnea, quality of life, lung function, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity (6-minute walk test - 6MWT), and isokinetic assessment of the quadriceps were assessed. Blood samples (lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase concentration) were also collected. Right after, NIV was performed for 30 minutes (bi-level or placebo, according to randomization) followed by new blood sample collection, 6MWT, and isokinetic dynamometer tests. Before and after evaluations, the subjective perception of dyspnea and fatigue in the lower limbs was quantified. After a wash-out period of seven days, participants returned, and all assessments were performed again.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- Non-invasive ventilation bi-level, Non-invasive ventilation placebo
- Keywords
- COPD, Skeletal muscle, Non-Invasive Ventilation
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Non-invasive ventilation bi-levelOther
For the NIV intervention, two levels of positive airway pressure (bi-level) were used: the positive inspiratory airway pressure (IPAP) was fixed at 6 cmH2O (centimeters of water), which could be gradually increased up to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort. and gradually increased to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), While the expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was set at 3 cmH2O, it could be gradually increased up to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort.while expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was fixed at 3 cmH2O and gradually increased to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute).
Non-invasive ventilation placeboOther
The same pressure chosen by the subject during adaptation was used in the placebo intervention; however, a T tube was connected between the equipment and the circuit, creating a leak and leaving the circuit open. The tube characteristics were: 22 x 18 x 22 mm nebulizer T-connector.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| bi-level | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Non-invasive ventilation bi-level |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Non-invasive ventilation placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lung function
Lung function was assessed using a spirometer (Koko Digidoser, Longmont, USA), according to the American Thoracic Society/European Throracic Society recommendations14. At least three tests were performed, with a variation of less than 5%, and the highest value obtained was compared with predicted values for the Brazilian population.
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Respiratory muscle strength
Respiratory muscle strength was assessed using a digital manometer (MVD 300 - Brazil). Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures were performed from residual volume and total lung capacity, respectively, and values were compared with previously reference values for the Brazilian population
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Functional capacity
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in a flat 30-m corridor, according to the ATS recommendations17. Subjects were instructed to keep walking for six minutes, and standardized verbal incentives were given each minute. The perception of dyspnea (using the 10-point Borg scale) were assessed at rest, at the end of the 6MWT, and two minutes after the test. In this test, the walked distance (in meters) was considered for analysis.
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
COPD Assessement Test
The Portuguese version of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. Subjects were instructed to choose only one option in each item of the questionnaire (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness, and energy). Item scores range from 0 to 5 points resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40 points. The clinical impact of COPD was assessed according to the following stratification: mild (6-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30), and very severe (31-40)20.
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Disease severity
COPD severity was assessed using the BODE index (body mass index [B], degree of airway obstruction [O], dyspnea [D], and exercise capacity [E]). For each variable, the following scores were assigned: body mass index (BMI), from 0 to 1 point; degree of airflow obstruction (FEV1% predicted), from 0 to 3 points; dyspnea (MRC scale), from 0 to 3 points; exercise capacity (walked distance in the 6MWT), from 0 to 3 points. The final score of the index ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Quadriceps femoris performance
QF (Quadriceps femoris) strength was evaluated with subjects performing 20 repetitions at the same speed. The protocol established was designed to reach a fatigue threshold in the QF muscle. Dyspnea and perceived level of exertion (Borg scale) were also assessed before and after isokinetic evaluation.
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Biochemical analyzes
Before and after procedures, venous blood samples were collected by a blinded experienced pharmacist to analyze lactate, LDH enzyme, and CK (creatine kinase) concentration. Samples were processed, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes at room temperature. The serum concentration was assessed using a specific enzyme kit for each biomarker, following manufacturer's recommendations.
Measured: change from baseline and 30 minutes intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Dec 2017
- Primary completion24 Jan 2018
- Study completion28 Feb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Patri-cia Angelica de Miranda Silva Nogueira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
- Investigators
- Patrícia Nogueira, Principal investigator, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05417503
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1a2b3c4d5e6f7g
- Acronym
- NIV
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 14 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Effects of NIV on Peripheral Muscle Function and Aerobic Performance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Piloty Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05417503
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NIV / 1a2b3c4d5e6f7g
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- COPD, Skeletal muscle, Non-Invasive Ventilation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces respiratory load and demands on peripheral muscles. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of bi-level NIV on peripheral muscle function during isokinetic exercise and aerobic performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This is a pilot crossover study performed with a non-probabilistic sample of 14 moderate to very severe COPD patients. Procedures carried out in two days. Dyspnea, quality of life, lung function, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity (6-minute walk test - 6MWT), and isokinetic assessment of the quadriceps were assessed. Blood samples (lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase concentration) were also collected. Right after, NIV was performed for 30 minutes (bi-level or placebo, according to randomization) followed by new blood sample collection, 6MWT, and isokinetic dynamometer tests. Before and after evaluations, the subjective perception of dyspnea and fatigue in the lower limbs was quantified. After a wash-out period of seven days, participants returned, and all assessments were performed again.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| bi-level | Experimental | Other: Non-invasive ventilation bi-level |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Non-invasive ventilation placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Clinically stable COPD patients (diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease), of both sexes, without exacerbation or changes in medication for at least one month before the study, and no dyspnea during daily activities (grades 2, 3, and 4 of the Medical Research Council - MRC scale) were included.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those with a diagnosis of neoplasia, orthopedic or neurological conditions affecting exercise capacity, peripheral arterial obstructive disease, heart failure, kidney or liver disease, did not adapt, or failed to complete the study procedures, were excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive ventilation bi-levelFor the NIV intervention, two levels of positive airway pressure (bi-level) were used: the positive inspiratory airway pressure (IPAP) was fixed at 6 cmH2O (centimeters of water), which could be gradually increased up to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort. and gradually increased to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), While the expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was set at 3 cmH2O, it could be gradually increased up to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort.while expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was fixed at 3 cmH2O and gradually increased to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute). | Other | bi-level |
| Non-invasive ventilation placeboThe same pressure chosen by the subject during adaptation was used in the placebo intervention; however, a T tube was connected between the equipment and the circuit, creating a leak and leaving the circuit open. The tube characteristics were: 22 x 18 x 22 mm nebulizer T-connector. | Other | placebo |
Primary outcome
Lung function
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Lung function was assessed using a spirometer (Koko Digidoser, Longmont, USA), according to the American Thoracic Society/European Throracic Society recommendations14. At least three tests were performed, with a variation of less than 5%, and the highest value obtained was compared with predicted values for the Brazilian population.
Respiratory muscle strength
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Respiratory muscle strength was assessed using a digital manometer (MVD 300 - Brazil). Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures were performed from residual volume and total lung capacity, respectively, and values were compared with previously reference values for the Brazilian population
Functional capacity
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in a flat 30-m corridor, according to the ATS recommendations17. Subjects were instructed to keep walking for six minutes, and standardized verbal incentives were given each minute. The perception of dyspnea (using the 10-point Borg scale) were assessed at rest, at the end of the 6MWT, and two minutes after the test. In this test, the walked distance (in meters) was considered for analysis.
COPD Assessement Test
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
The Portuguese version of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. Subjects were instructed to choose only one option in each item of the questionnaire (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness, and energy). Item scores range from 0 to 5 points resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40 points. The clinical impact of COPD was assessed according to the following stratification: mild (6-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30), and very severe (31-40)20.
Disease severity
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
COPD severity was assessed using the BODE index (body mass index [B], degree of airway obstruction [O], dyspnea [D], and exercise capacity [E]). For each variable, the following scores were assigned: body mass index (BMI), from 0 to 1 point; degree of airflow obstruction (FEV1% predicted), from 0 to 3 points; dyspnea (MRC scale), from 0 to 3 points; exercise capacity (walked distance in the 6MWT), from 0 to 3 points. The final score of the index ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
2 secondary outcomes
Quadriceps femoris performance
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention
Biochemical analyzes
Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jun 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
PRA-216 COPD Safety and Biomarker Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Efficacy and Safety Study of AERO-007, an Inhaled LABA+LAMA Combination for Nebulization Delivery in COPD Patients
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Solrikitug in Participants With COPD (ZION)
COPD
RecruitingPhase 2
To Evaluate the Effect of EXPD-101/FXS7553 Compared With Placebo in Patients With COPD Over 52 Weeks of Treatment
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrícia Nogueira principal investigator
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Non-invasive ventilation bi-level in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lung function (time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2022.