Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4OPTIMIZE-APTNCT05418556
OPTIMIZE-APT: Tailored Versus Conventional Antiplatelet Therapy After Intravascular Imaging-guided Drug-eluting Stent Implantation
A Phase 4 study testing aspirin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Asan Medical Center at 33 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
Objectives: To assess the safety of tailored antiplatelet therapy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone strategy) in patients who received optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT) Hypothesis: Tailored antiplatelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) is… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- aspirin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,944 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 21 Oct 2022to 31 Dec 2032
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women ≥19 years
- Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI
- Significant de novo coronary artery lesions suitable for DES implantation
- Patients who underwent optimized stent implantation either by IVUS or OCT
- Using IVUS
- MSA >5.5 mm2, or MSA >90% of the MLA at the distal reference segment
Show all 15Show fewer
- Plaque burden <50% with 5 mm of both stent edge
- No edge dissection; thrombus or plaque protrusion occupying < 10% of the stent area
- Using OCT
- MSA >4.5 mm2, or MSA >90% of the MLA at the distal reference segment
- No significant malapposition
- No significant edge dissection†; thrombus or plaque protrusion occupying < 10% of the stent area
- (Significant malapposition is defined as strut separation ≥ 0.3 mm from the vessel wall extending over a length > 3 mm.
- †Significant dissection is defined as a dissection penetrating the medial layer and extending over more than one quadrant.)
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site
Who cannot join
- Angiographic exclusion criteria: any of the followings 1. Bypass graft lesions 2. Lesions in which impaired delivery of imaging catheters is expected:
- Extreme angulation (≥90°) proximal to or within the target lesion.
- Excessive tortuosity (≥ two 45° angles) proximal to or within the target lesion.
- Heavy calcification proximal to or within the target lesion.
- In-stent restenosis
- Hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degradants and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Persistent thrombocytopenia (platelet count <80,000/μl)
- Any history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage / TIA or ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
- A known intolerance or hypersensitivity to a study drug (aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor) or heparin
- Patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulants or cilostazol
- Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure.
- A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer.
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study.
- History of liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B or C) or biliary tract obstruction
- Life expectancy < 1 years for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes
- Cardiogenic shock at the index admission
- Patient's pregnant or breast-feeding
- Active bleeding or extreme-risk for major bleeding (e.g. active peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal pathology with a high risk for bleeding, malignancies with a high risk for bleeding)
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
33 sites in 1 country
South Korea33 sites, 32 recruiting
- Recruiting
Bucheon Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si
Ha Wook Park, MD
Ha Wook Park, MD
- Recruiting
Dong-A University Hospital
Busan
Yong Rak Cho, MD
Yong Rak Cho, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
Busan
Tae Hyun Yang, MD
Tae Hyun Yang, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
Busan
Dongk-kie Kim, MD
Dongk-kie Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Kosin University Gospel Hospital
Busan
Jeong Ho Heo, MD
Jeong Ho Heo, MD
- Recruiting
Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital
Changwon
Jae Seok Bae, MD
Jae Seok Bae, MD
- Recruiting
Kangwon National University Hospital
Chuncheon
Bong Ki Lee, MD
Bong Ki Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Chungju
Sang Min Kim, MD
Sang Min Kim, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Daegu Catholic Univ Medical Center
Daegu
Jin Bae Lee, MD
Jin Bae Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu
Hyuck jun yoon, MD
Hyuck jun yoon, MD
- Recruiting
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu
NAM KYUN KIM, MD
Nam kyun Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Veterans Hospital
Daegu
Sang Wook Kang, MD
Sang Wook Kang, MD
- Recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon ST. Mary's Hospital
Daejeon
Kyusup Lee, MD
Kyusup Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Gangneung Asan Hospital
Gangneung
Han Bit Park, MD
Han Bit Park, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Hallym Univ. Medical Center.
Hwaseong-si
Jeen Hwa Lee, MD
Jeen Hwa Lee, MD
- Not yet recruiting
dongguk University Medical Center
Ilsan
Jae sik Jang, MD
Jae sik Jang, MD
- Recruiting
Jeju National University Hospital
Jeju City
Joon Hyouk Choi, MD
Joon Hyouk Choi, MD
- Recruiting
Jeonbuk National University Hospital
Jeonju
Yisik Kim, MD
Yisik Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
Jinju
Jin Sin Koh, MD
Jin Sin Koh, MD
- Recruiting
Chungnam National University Hospital
Jungnam
Jae Hwan Lee, MD
Jae Hwan Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital
Jungnam
Won mook Hwang, MD
Won mook Hwang, MD
- Recruiting
Dankook University Hospital
Jungnam
tae soo kang, MD
tae soo kang, MD
- Recruiting
Asan Medical Center
Seoul
Seung-Whan Lee, MD, seungwlee@amc.seoul.kr
Seung-Whan Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul
seung jae Lee, MD
seung jae Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul
Soon Jun Hong, MD
Soon Jun Hong, MD
- Recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul
Pum Joon Kim, MD
Pum Joon Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Veterans Hospital Service Medical Center
Seoul
Chang Hoon Lee, MD
Chang Hoon Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Ajou University Hospital
Suwon
Myeong Ho Yoon, MD
Myeong Ho Yoon, MD
- Completed
The Catholic University of Korea, ST. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon
- Not yet recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu ST. Mary's Hospital
Uijeongbu-si
Chan Joon Kim, MD
Chan Joon Kim, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Dongkang Hospital
Ulsan
Byung jun Kim, MD
Byung jun Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan
Gyung Min Park, MD
Gyung Min Park, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan
Kook Jin Chun, MD
Kook Jin Chun, MD
About this study
Objectives: To assess the safety of tailored antiplatelet therapy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone strategy) in patients who received optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT)
Hypothesis: Tailored antiplatelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) is superior to conventional antiplatelet strategy in terms of clinically relevant bleeding and noninferior for ischemic composite adverse events in patients who received intravascular imaging-guided optimized DES implantation. (Optimized stent evaluated by on-site IVUS/OCT could act as an essential criterion for decision making for tailored antithrombotic strategy)
Read the detailed description
Objective: To assess the safety of tailored antiplatelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) in patients who received optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT)
Design: Prospective, open label, multi-center, dual arm, randomized trial Number of Subjects 3,944 subjects (1972:1972) Study Population: Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing imaging-guided PCI
Study Design:
- Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a) conventional DAPT strategy or b) tailored anti-platelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) after optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging.
- All subjects will be clinically followed at 1(or 3), 6, and 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 50 months
Co-primary Endpoints:
- Ischemic composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 12 months post-PCI
- Net adverse clinical events, defined as the ischemic composite plus clinically relevant bleeding at 12 months post-PCI
- Clinically relevant bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 12 months post-PCI
Statistics and Analysis: The study was designed to test the hypothesis that tailored antithrombotic strategy, as compared to the conventional DAPT, would be superior for clinically relevant bleeding, noninferior to the ischemic composite adverse events and NACE. The primary analysis would be evaluated by intention-to-treat analysis. With 3756 (each 1,878) patients, this study has >80% power to detect noninferiority of tailored antiplatelet strategy for ischemic composite adverse event, >85% power to detect noninferiority of tailored antiplatelet strategy for NACE, and >85% power to detect superiority of the tailored antiplatelet arm on clinically relevant bleeding. To compensate for 5% attrition rate, 3,944 (each 1,972) patients will be randomized.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- aspirin
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
aspirinDrug
Also called clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor
DAPT strategy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Arm | Active comparator | The intended regimen is 12 months of DAPT with aspirin plus clopidogrel for CCS or aspirin plus a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) for ACS. For patients with CCS, a minimum DAPT duration of 6 months is permitted at the treating physician's discretion. Receives: Drug: aspirin |
| Tailored Arm | Experimental | Patients with CCS receive 1 month of DAPT with aspirin plus clopidogrel, followed by 11 months of clopidogrel monotherapy. Patients with ACS receive 3 months of DAPT with aspirin plus a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel), followed by 9 months of potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. Receives: Drug: aspirin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite ischemic endpoint
Ischemic composite adverse event of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST)
Measured: 12 month
Net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Net clinical outcome defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and clinically relevant bleeding [BARC 2, 3, or 5]
Measured: 12 month
Clinically relevant bleeding
Clinically relevant bleeding [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5]
Measured: 12 month
Secondary outcomes (5)
Individual components of the composite ischemic endpoint
Individual components of the composite ischemic endpoints including 1) all-cause death; 2) myocardial infarction (MI); 3) ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR); and 4) definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST)
Measured: 12 month
Cardiovascular death
Sudden cardiac death; death due to acute myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, cardiogenic shock, stroke, other cardiovascular causes, or fatal bleeding
Measured: 12 month
Stroke
An acute focal neurologic deficit of presumed vascular origin lasting ≥ 24 h or resulting in death and classified as ischemic or hemorrhagic
Measured: 12 month
Individual BARC bleeding categories
Type 0 (No bleeding); Type 1 (Minor, Non-Actionable Bleeding); Type 2 (Actionable Bleeding); Type 3 (Major Bleeding); Type 4 (CABG-Related Bleeding); Type 5 (Fatal Bleeding)
Measured: 12 month
Stent strut coverage in the OCT substudy
% difference of strut coverage on FU OCT between optimal vs. suboptimal DES implantation group
Measured: 1 or 3 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2022
- Study start21 Oct 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Asan Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a) conventional DAPT strategy or b) tailored anti-platelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) after optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging. * All subjects will be clinically followed at 1(or 3), 6, and 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 50 months
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,944 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05418556
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-0568
- Acronym
- OPTIMIZE-APT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- OPTIMIZE-APT: Tailored Versus Conventional Antiplatelet Therapy After Intravascular Imaging-guided Drug-eluting Stent Implantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05418556
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIMIZE-APT / 2022-0568
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,944 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives: To assess the safety of tailored antiplatelet therapy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone strategy) in patients who received optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT)
Hypothesis: Tailored antiplatelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) is superior to conventional antiplatelet strategy in terms of clinically relevant bleeding and noninferior for ischemic composite adverse events in patients who received intravascular imaging-guided optimized DES implantation. (Optimized stent evaluated by on-site IVUS/OCT could act as an essential criterion for decision making for tailored antithrombotic strategy)
Detailed description
Objective: To assess the safety of tailored antiplatelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) in patients who received optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging (IVUS or OCT)
Design: Prospective, open label, multi-center, dual arm, randomized trial Number of Subjects 3,944 subjects (1972:1972) Study Population: Patients with coronary artery disease undergoing imaging-guided PCI
Study Design:
- Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a) conventional DAPT strategy or b) tailored anti-platelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) after optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging.
- All subjects will be clinically followed at 1(or 3), 6, and 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 50 months
Co-primary Endpoints:
- Ischemic composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 12 months post-PCI
- Net adverse clinical events, defined as the ischemic composite plus clinically relevant bleeding at 12 months post-PCI
- Clinically relevant bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 12 months post-PCI
Statistics and Analysis: The study was designed to test the hypothesis that tailored antithrombotic strategy, as compared to the conventional DAPT, would be superior for clinically relevant bleeding, noninferior to the ischemic composite adverse events and NACE. The primary analysis would be evaluated by intention-to-treat analysis. With 3756 (each 1,878) patients, this study has >80% power to detect noninferiority of tailored antiplatelet strategy for ischemic composite adverse event, >85% power to detect noninferiority of tailored antiplatelet strategy for NACE, and >85% power to detect superiority of the tailored antiplatelet arm on clinically relevant bleeding. To compensate for 5% attrition rate, 3,944 (each 1,972) patients will be randomized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- * Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to a) conventional DAPT strategy or b) tailored anti-platelet strategy (short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor alone) after optimized DES implantation guided by intravascular imaging. * All subjects will be clinically followed at 1(or 3), 6, and 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 50 months
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Arm | Active comparator | Drug: aspirinThe intended regimen is 12 months of DAPT with aspirin plus clopidogrel for CCS or aspirin plus a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) for ACS. For patients with CCS, a minimum DAPT duration of 6 months is permitted at the treating physician's discretion. |
| Tailored Arm | Experimental | Drug: aspirinPatients with CCS receive 1 month of DAPT with aspirin plus clopidogrel, followed by 11 months of clopidogrel monotherapy. Patients with ACS receive 3 months of DAPT with aspirin plus a potent P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel), followed by 9 months of potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Men or women ≥19 years
- Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI
- Significant de novo coronary artery lesions suitable for DES implantation
- Patients who underwent optimized stent implantation either by IVUS or OCT
- (Significant malapposition is defined as strut separation ≥ 0.3 mm from the vessel wall extending over a length > 3 mm.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Angiographic exclusion criteria: any of the followings 1. Bypass graft lesions 2. Lesions in which impaired delivery of imaging catheters is expected:
- In-stent restenosis
- Hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degradants and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Persistent thrombocytopenia (platelet count <80,000/μl)
- Any history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage / TIA or ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| aspirinAlso: clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelorDAPT strategy | Drug | Conventional Arm, Tailored Arm |
Primary outcome
Composite ischemic endpoint
Time frame: 12 month
Ischemic composite adverse event of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST)
Net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Time frame: 12 month
Net clinical outcome defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and clinically relevant bleeding [BARC 2, 3, or 5]
Clinically relevant bleeding
Time frame: 12 month
Clinically relevant bleeding [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5]
5 secondary outcomes
Individual components of the composite ischemic endpoint
Time frame: 12 month
Cardiovascular death
Time frame: 12 month
Stroke
Time frame: 12 month
Individual BARC bleeding categories
Time frame: 12 month
Stent strut coverage in the OCT substudy
Time frame: 1 or 3 month
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Transnational Performance of the Universal Cardiac Surgical Risk Score Across International Sites
Heart Valve Diseases, Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Not yet recruiting
Sirolimus-Coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Recurrent Coronary In-Stent Restenosis After Prior Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment (SPRIT)
Coronary In-stent Restenosis, Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Norepinephrine in the Management of General Anesthesia-Induced Arterial Hypotension in Chronic Heart Failure Patients
Hypotension
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The CoPenHagen PREeClampsia and cardIOvascUlar diSease Study
Pre-Eclampsia, Atherosclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment For Kidney Transplantation - Utility of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Assessment of Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation
Cardiovascular Diseases, Kidney Transplant; Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
33 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing aspirin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Asan Medical Center at 33 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ji Sue Hong, RN (82 2-2045-3798, sue5165@naver.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite ischemic endpoint (time frame: 12 month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.