Esophagitis, RefluxNCT05418920
Clinical Trial of Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy
A study testing left-opening single-flap technique and double-flap group technique in people with Esophagitis, Reflux, run by Oncogastroenterology Committee of Chinese.
Trial summary
1) To explore a simple, safe, post-proximal gastrectomy reconstruction method with good absorption and digestive function in order to improve patients' postoperative quality of life; 2) To fill the gap in the comparison of clinical efficacy between left-open single-flap technique and double-flap technique in this… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophagitis, Reflux
- What is being tested?
- left-opening single-flap technique and double-flap group technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2022to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 18-80 years, regardless of gender;
- Siewert III of the esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0) or adenocarcinoma of the upper part of the stomach: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0), Stage II( cT1-2N1-3M0 / cT3-4N0M0), Stage III(cT3-4aN1-3M0); patients who are suitable for surgery according to the 8th AJCC clinical staging of gastric cancer;
- Primary lesion diagnosed by preoperative endoscopic end pathology: tumor diameter <4 cm and located in the upper part of the stomach (including the esophagogastric junction), histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma;
- Preoperative ASA score: I, II, or III;
- Preoperative Karnofsky physical status score: ≥ 70%; or preoperative ECOG physical status score: ≤ 2;
- No distant metastases (confirmed by preoperative chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and upper abdominal CT); no peritoneal implant metastases (confirmed by laparoscopic exploration surgery);
- R0 surgical outcome is expected to be obtained with radical gastrectomy of D2 proximal gastric cancer;
- Patients and their families voluntarily participate in this study and sign the informed consent form after understanding the study content.
Who cannot join
- Patients received any preoperative treatment, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy; preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy recipients;
- Patients with clinical stage exceeding Siewert III of the esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0) or more than adenocarcinoma of the upper part of the stomach: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0), Stage II(cT1-2N1-3M0/cT3-4N0M0), Stage III(cT3-4aN1-3M0);
- Patients with acute infections, especially biliary tract infections;
- Patients with complications of gastric cancer (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) requiring emergency surgery;
- Patients with uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction;
- Patients with vital organ failure, such as heart, lung, liver, brain, kidney, etc.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Severe central nervous system disease, mental disorders, or impaired consciousness;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with distant metastases;
- Patients with a primary tumor at another site diagnosed within the past 5 years;
- Preoperative ASA score: ≥ IV;
- Preoperative ECOG physical status score: ≥ 2;
- History of continuous systemic corticosteroid therapy within the past 1 month;
- History of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or cerebral hemorrhage within the past 6 months;
- Patients with concurrent surgical treatment of other diseases;
- Patients with immunodeficiency, immunosuppression, or autoimmune diseases (organ transplant requiring immunosuppressive therapy within the past 5 years, allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients, taking immunosuppressive drugs, etc.);
- Patients with concurrent participation in other clinical studies;
- Patients refusing to sign an informed consent form to participate in this study;
- Preoperative imaging: regional fusion of enlarged lymph nodes (maximal diameter > 3 cm).
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Efficacy of Double-flap Technique Versus Single-flap Technique After Proximal Gastrectomy: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
- To explore a simple, safe, post-proximal gastrectomy reconstruction method with good absorption and digestive function in order to improve patients' postoperative quality of life; 2) To fill the gap in the comparison of clinical efficacy between left-open single-flap technique and double-flap technique in this specialized field in China; 3) To utilize the experience and foundation of gastrointestinal surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer and integrate the advantageous resources in China; 4) To establish a large-sample, multicenter randomized clinical study in order to promote the establishment and improvement of relevant norms of gastrointestinal reconstruction
Read the detailed description
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths each year. Although the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased worldwide compared to the past, the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer and upper 1/3 gastric cancer is gradually increasing. Currently, the main treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer and upper gastric cancer is surgery. However, there is no clinical consensus on the choice of surgical approach for these patients. Compared with total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy can preserve the physiological function of the stomach and has great advantages in nutrient absorption, thus it has been widely accepted in Asian countries.
However, the risk of developing reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy is high, which seriously affects patients' postoperative quality of life. In order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, clinicians continue to improve the methods of GI reconstruction. Currently, the common methods of GI reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy include esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal intubation (JI), jejunal pouch intubation (JPI), and dual-tract reconstruction (DTR). However, the choice of the optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy remains controversial, and there is no standard approach to GI reconstruction. In 2016, Kuroda et al. reported a new surgical approach with a double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy and showed satisfactory short-term outcomes compared with conventional esophagogastric anastomosis. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, no reflux esophagitis was detected in all patients. At the same time, the rate of anastomotic stenosis was noteworthy.
This study will be the first attempt at a left-open single-flap technique, which was modified from the double-flap technique. The short-term outcome was satisfactory in all patients. This study will establish a large sample, multicenter randomized clinical study. By exploring a simple, safe, good absorption and digestive function method of post-proximal gastrectomy reconstruction to improve patients' postoperative quality of life and fill the gap in the comparison of clinical efficacy between left-open single-flap technique and double-flap technique in this specialized field. This will promote the establishment and improvement of the specifications related to gastrointestinal reconstruction.
- Conditions
- Esophagitis, Reflux
- Being tested
- left-opening single-flap technique, double-flap group technique
- Keywords
- left open single-flap technique, proximal gastrectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophagitis, Peptic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
left-opening single-flap techniqueProcedure or surgery
left-opening single-flap technique
double-flap group techniqueProcedure or surgery
double-flap group technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| the trial group (left-opening single-flap group) | Experimental | left-opening single-flap group Receives: Procedure: left-opening single-flap technique |
| the control group (double-flap group) | Active comparator | double-flap group Receives: Procedure: double-flap group technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Overall postoperative complication rate
Overall postoperative complication rate
Measured: 30 days
Incidence of anastomotic fistula
Incidence of anastomotic fistula
Measured: 30 days
Operation time
Operation time
Measured: intraoperative
Bleeding loss volume
Bleeding loss volume
Measured: intraoperative
incidence of anastomotic stricture
incidence of anastomotic stricture
Measured: 30 days
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Measured: 6 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophagitis, RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oncogastroenterology Committee of Chinese
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tang-Du Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nan Wang, MD, Study chair, Tang-Du HospitalChao Zhang, MD, Study chair, Henan Provincial People's HospitalLei Wang, MD, Study chair, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityRenwei Chang, MD, Study chair, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityJunjun She, MD, Study chair, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05418920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- single-flap technique
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Yang QC, Wang WD, Mo ZC, Yue C, Zhou HK, Gao RQ, Yu J, Dong DH, Liu JQ, Wei JP, Yang XS, Ji G, Li XH. Study protocol for comparing the efficacy of left-open single-flap technique versus double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 17;12:973810. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973810. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36465382
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Efficacy of Double-flap Technique Versus Single-flap Technique After Proximal Gastrectomy: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05418920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- single-flap technique
- Conditions
- Esophagitis, Reflux
- Keywords
- left open single-flap technique, proximal gastrectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oncogastroenterology Committee of ChineseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tang-Du Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- To explore a simple, safe, post-proximal gastrectomy reconstruction method with good absorption and digestive function in order to improve patients' postoperative quality of life; 2) To fill the gap in the comparison of clinical efficacy between left-open single-flap technique and double-flap technique in this specialized field in China; 3) To utilize the experience and foundation of gastrointestinal surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer and integrate the advantageous resources in China; 4) To establish a large-sample, multicenter randomized clinical study in order to promote the establishment and improvement of relevant norms of gastrointestinal reconstruction
Detailed description
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths each year. Although the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased worldwide compared to the past, the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer and upper 1/3 gastric cancer is gradually increasing. Currently, the main treatment for esophagogastric junction cancer and upper gastric cancer is surgery. However, there is no clinical consensus on the choice of surgical approach for these patients. Compared with total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy can preserve the physiological function of the stomach and has great advantages in nutrient absorption, thus it has been widely accepted in Asian countries.
However, the risk of developing reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy is high, which seriously affects patients' postoperative quality of life. In order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, clinicians continue to improve the methods of GI reconstruction. Currently, the common methods of GI reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy include esophagogastrostomy (EG), jejunal intubation (JI), jejunal pouch intubation (JPI), and dual-tract reconstruction (DTR). However, the choice of the optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy remains controversial, and there is no standard approach to GI reconstruction. In 2016, Kuroda et al. reported a new surgical approach with a double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy and showed satisfactory short-term outcomes compared with conventional esophagogastric anastomosis. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, no reflux esophagitis was detected in all patients. At the same time, the rate of anastomotic stenosis was noteworthy.
This study will be the first attempt at a left-open single-flap technique, which was modified from the double-flap technique. The short-term outcome was satisfactory in all patients. This study will establish a large sample, multicenter randomized clinical study. By exploring a simple, safe, good absorption and digestive function method of post-proximal gastrectomy reconstruction to improve patients' postoperative quality of life and fill the gap in the comparison of clinical efficacy between left-open single-flap technique and double-flap technique in this specialized field. This will promote the establishment and improvement of the specifications related to gastrointestinal reconstruction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| the trial group (left-opening single-flap group) | Experimental | Procedure: left-opening single-flap techniqueleft-opening single-flap group |
| the control group (double-flap group) | Active comparator | Procedure: double-flap group techniquedouble-flap group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients aged 18-80 years, regardless of gender;
- Siewert III of the esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0) or adenocarcinoma of the upper part of the stomach: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0), Stage II( cT1-2N1-3M0 / cT3-4N0M0), Stage III(cT3-4aN1-3M0); patients who are suitable for surgery according to the 8th AJCC clinical staging of gastric cancer;
- Primary lesion diagnosed by preoperative endoscopic end pathology: tumor diameter <4 cm and located in the upper part of the stomach (including the esophagogastric junction), histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma;
- Preoperative ASA score: I, II, or III;
- Preoperative Karnofsky physical status score: ≥ 70%; or preoperative ECOG physical status score: ≤ 2;
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Patients received any preoperative treatment, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy; preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy recipients;
- Patients with clinical stage exceeding Siewert III of the esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0) or more than adenocarcinoma of the upper part of the stomach: Stage Ⅰ(cT1-2N0M0), Stage II(cT1-2N1-3M0/cT3-4N0M0), Stage III(cT3-4aN1-3M0);
- Patients with acute infections, especially biliary tract infections;
- Patients with complications of gastric cancer (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) requiring emergency surgery;
- Patients with uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| left-opening single-flap techniqueleft-opening single-flap technique | Procedure or surgery | the trial group (left-opening single-flap group) |
| double-flap group techniquedouble-flap group technique | Procedure or surgery | the control group (double-flap group) |
Primary outcome
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
6 secondary outcomes
Overall postoperative complication rate
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of anastomotic fistula
Time frame: 30 days
Operation time
Time frame: intraoperative
Bleeding loss volume
Time frame: intraoperative
incidence of anastomotic stricture
Time frame: 30 days
Incidence of reflux esophagitis
Time frame: 6 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36465382Yang QC, Wang WD, Mo ZC, Yue C, Zhou HK, Gao RQ, Yu J, Dong DH, Liu JQ, Wei JP, Yang XS, Ji G, Li XH. Study protocol for comparing the efficacy of left-open single-flap technique versus double-flap technique after proximal gastrectomy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 17;12:973810. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973810. eCollection 2022.
Related trials for Esophagitis, Reflux
Recruiting
SPADE Clinical Trial.
Early Gastric Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
PPI Dosing Per CYP2C19 Genotype
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Esophagitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Domperidone in Treating Patients With Gastrointestinal Disorders
Digestive System Disorder, Dyspepsia
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Predictors of Symptom Improvement After Laparoscopic Fundoplication
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Hiatal Hernia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of the Safety of Vonoprazan Exposure in Pregnant Women and Their Offspring
Erosive Esophagitis, Heartburn
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nan Wang, MD study chair
Tang-Du Hospital
Chao Zhang, MD study chair
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Lei Wang, MD study chair
General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing left-opening single-flap technique and double-flap group technique in people with Esophagitis, Reflux, run by Oncogastroenterology Committee of Chinese.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xiaohua Li, MD (+8613474299901, xjyylixiaohua@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of reflux esophagitis (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05418920, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2022.